Case Report: Anlotinib Combined With Sintilimab as Third-Line Treatment in a Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma Patient With FGFR3 Mutation

Case report: Sintilimab combined with anlotinib as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic bone tumor resection in patients with PSC

Background

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy with a poor prognosis. PSC is highly malignant and is prone to recurrence even after surgery. The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor cell proportion score (TPS) 5%, TERT and TP53 gene mutations were detected in this patient accompanied by multiple metastatic sites. The anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that could be effective for advanced NSCLC and some sarcoma patients. Limited clinical trials and case reports have shown that PSC patients with gene mutations and PD-L1 expression have good responses to multitarget antiangiogenic drug and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this article, we reported a case with metastatic PSC diagnosed by Computed Tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy treated with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic drugs as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). PSC is controlled and the patient achieves successfully limb salvage treatment by surgical resection. Therefore, targeted therapy and immunotherapy can provide sufficient surgical opportunities for limb salvage in the treatment of metastatic PSC patients.

Case summary

A 69-year-old male diagnosed with malignant bone tumor in the proximal femur was admitted to our hospital in June 2022 with recurrent fever as well as swelling and pain in the left thigh for twenty days. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed a pulmonary cavity (20 mm × 30 mm) and scattered lung masses. Subsequently, he underwent a CT-guided needle biopsy to distinguish the essence of osteolytic bone destruction and soft tissue mass in the left proximal femur which showed metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma histology. Genetic testing revealed TERT c.-124C mutation (abundance 8.81%), TP53 p.R342 mutation (abundance 11.35%), tumor mutational burden (TMB) 7.09 muts/Mb, microsatellite stability (MSS), and PD-L1 (SP263) TPS 5% were also detected. The patient was tentatively treated with a combination of antiangiogenic drug and PD-1 inhibitor. After one course, the tumor volume significantly reduced in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological fracture occurred in the femur after combined treatment. The patient received proximal femoral tumor resection and prosthesis replacement after defervescence. Sequentially sintilimab with anlotinib were administered for over 1 year. Finally, the local tumor was well controlled, and no obvious drug-related adverse reactions were observed. The lesions in the lung remained in partial response (PR) for more than 16 months and complete response (CR) of metastatic tumor in the proximal femur was observed through imaging examinations.

Conclusion

This is the first reported case of a metastatic PSC in femur showing a favorable response to the treatment consisting of anlotinib combined with sintilimab. This case suggests that antiangiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy may benefit patients with metastatic PSC in the preoperative adjuvant therapy for limb salvage.

Case report: Complete response of a bladder cancer patient with multiple hepatic and pelvic metastases treated by nab-paclitaxel combined with sintilimab

This article described a patient with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) who was successfully treated with nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab. Localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) was discovered in a 56-year-old man who received radical cystectomy and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven months after cystectomy, this patient developed numerous hepatic and pelvic metastases and progressed to mBC. The patient was given an anti-PD-1 antibody (sintilimab 200mg, q3w) in combination with Nab-paclitaxel (100mg, qw) for mBC. Complete remission (CR) was achieved after nine cycles of therapy, and the patient had no severe side effects during the treatment. The disease remained in CR after 41 months of follow-up. This case suggests that nab-paclitaxel combined with sintilimab is a safe and effective option in treatment of mBC.

Case Report: Potential Predictive Value of MMR/MSI Status and PD-1 Expression in Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown encouraging outcomes against Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H). However, there is as yet no clarity on the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in LS-associated urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we report a patient with recurrent and metastatic LS-associated UC who achieved sustained response to programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined with chemotherapy over 31 months, during which the side effects of immunotherapy could be controlled and managed. Our findings indicate that the dMMR/MSI status and PD-1 expression in UC may have potential predictive value for the response to PD-1-targeted immunotherapy. Our case supports the inclusion of such combination and/or monotherapy for UC in clinical studies and using dMMR/MSI status and PD-1 expression as potential predictive biomarkers for assessment of the therapeutic response.

Efficacy and Adverse Events of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma From a Real-World Experience

Background: Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors—tislelizumab, toripalimab, camrelizumab, and sintilimab—are used for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in China. To date, the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these PD-1 inhibitors have been poorly reported for advanced UC.

Methods: We reviewed 118 patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors for advanced UC from July 2019 to October 2021 at Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital. Patient data were obtained from hospital records and telephone follow-ups. The safety and efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors were assessed by RESIST and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0), respectively.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 6 months, 112 patients (95%) experienced AEs; of these, 104 (88%) were grade 1–2 AEs, and 60 (51%) were grade 3–4 AEs. The most common AE was anemia, and no patients died as a result of treatment. A subanalysis according to treatment method (PD-1 inhibitor vs. PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy) was performed. The incidence of grade 1–2 AEs was not different between the groups (85% vs. 94%), but combination therapy significantly increased grade 3–4 AEs (32% vs. 89%). Monotherapy and combination therapy also did not differ with regard to immune-related AEs of grades 1–2 (13% vs. 22%) or grades 3–4 (1% vs. 6%). In efficacy, complete response was not observed, but 33 patients (28%) had partial response, 30 (25%) had stable disease, and 47 had progressive disease (40%). The overall response and disease control rates were 28% and 53%, respectively. The preliminary efficacy of disease control was better with combination therapy versus monotherapy (78 vs. 43%).

Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitors show promising tolerance and efficacy in advanced UC. PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy offered better disease control but had more grade 3–4 AEs. The clinical use of combination therapy warrants caution.