Real-World Data on Apatinib Efficacy - Results of a Retrospective Study in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Pretreated With Multiline Treatment

Apatinib beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with advanced breast cancer: Results from an observational study

In the present study, the efficacy and safety of a low dose of apatinib in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a real-world setting were assessed, the impact of continuous anti-angiogenic therapy beyond progression was determined and the factors associated with efficacy were evaluated. A total of 63 patients with ABC who were treated with apatinib and for whom several lines of treatment had failed were retrospectively analyzed in Tangshan People's Hospital (Tangshan, China) between January 2016 and October 2022. Apatinib was administered orally combined with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy or monotherapy at a dose of 250 mg per day. Apatinib administration was continued in certain patients beyond first progressive disease (PD), and these patients were defined as the continued anti-angiogenic treatment beyond first progression (CABF) group, while those who discontinued apatinib were defined as the non-CABF group. In the evaluation of the first efficacy, the objective response rate was 33.3%. A total of 26 patients continued to receive apatinib post-first PD and were allocated to the CABF group. The median overall survival (OS) time of the 63 patients was 16 months. Log-rank univariate analysis revealed that the OS time was significantly associated with molecular subtype (P=0.014), CABF (P=0.004), and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P=0.011). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that being in the non-CABF group and a high NLR were independent risk factors for lower OS time (P=0.017 and P=0.041, respectively). These results support the continued administration of low-dose apatinib beyond progression and the use of NLR as an easily accessible prognostic marker in patients with ABC treated with apatinib.

The residual cancer burden index as a valid prognostic indicator in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The residual cancer burden index (RCB) was proposed as a response evaluation criterion in breast cancer patients treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC). This study evaluated the relevance of RCB with replase-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 254 breast cancer patients who received NAC between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively collected. The relationship between clinicopathologic factors and RFS was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RFS estimates were determined by Kaplan-Meier(K-M) analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with RCB. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed the potential of the RCB and MP grading systems as biomarkers for RFS.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 52 months, 59 patients(23.23%) developed relapse. Multivariate Cox regression showed that older age (P = 0.022), high Pathologic T stage after NAC (P = 0.023) and a high RCB score(P = 0.003) were risk factors for relapse. The outcomes of the multivariate logistic analysis indicated that RCB 0 (pathologic complete response [pCR]) was associated with HER2-positive patients (P = 0.002) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (P = 0.013). In addition, the RCB and MP scoring systems served as prognostic markers for patients who received NAC, and their area under curves (AUCs) were 0.691 and 0.342, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that RCB can be equally applied to predict RFS in Chinese patients with NAC. The application of RCB may help guide the selection of treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective cohort study with propensity-matched analysis

Optimizing neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is still an urgent problem to be solved in the clinic. In this prospective cohort study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin (Apa+ddTCb) vs dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens alone (ddTCb) in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced TNBC. TNBC patients with clinical stage I-IIIC were enrolled to receive neoadjuvant Apa+ddTCb therapy. Enrolled patients who underwent surgery were matched with TNBC patients who received neoadjuvant ddTCb therapy by propensity score matching. 25 locally advanced TNBC patients were enrolled for neoadjuvant Apa+ddTCb therapy. The overall clinical ORR achieved 88.00% and DCR achieved 100.0% after 6 cycles. For 23 patients who received surgery, 69 TNBC patients who received neoadjuvant ddTCb therapy were matched. The pCR rate (60.9% vs 30.4%, P = .009) and the BCS rate (47.8% vs 21.7%, P = .016) were significantly improved in the Apa+ddTCb group. The incidence of adverse events, especially those related to antiangiogenic therapy, was higher in the Apa+ddTCb group. Further immunohistochemical analysis suggested that the expression levels of VEGF, EGFR, p-VEGFR2 and CK17 were significantly decreased after receiving neoadjuvant therapy in the Apa+ddTCb group, and the baseline CK17 expression level in non-pCR patients was significantly higher than those in the pCR patients. Progression-free survival was not reached yet. Apa+ddTCb regimen achieved an improved efficacy and acceptable adverse events compared with ddTCb regimen, which might be a promising strategy in the neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced TNBC.

Construction of a risk stratification model integrating ctDNA to predict response and survival in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer is closely related to a better prognosis. However, there are no reliable indicators to accurately identify which patients will achieve pCR before surgery, and a model for predicting pCR to NAC is required.

METHODS

A total of 269 breast cancer patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Liaocheng People's Hospital receiving anthracycline and taxane-based NAC were prospectively enrolled. Expression profiling using a 457 cancer-related gene sequencing panel (DNA sequencing) covering genes recurrently mutated in breast cancer was carried out on 243 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies samples before NAC from 243 patients. The unique personalized panel of nine individual somatic mutation genes from the constructed model was used to detect and analyze ctDNA on 216 blood samples. Blood samples were collected at indicated time points including before chemotherapy initiation, after the 1st NAC and before the 2nd NAC cycle, during intermediate evaluation, and prior to surgery. In this study, we characterized the value of gene profile mutation and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in combination with clinical characteristics in the prediction of pCR before surgery and investigated the prognostic prediction. The median follow-up time for survival analysis was 898 days.

RESULTS

Firstly, we constructed a predictive NAC response model including five single nucleotide variant (SNV) mutations (TP53, SETBP1, PIK3CA, NOTCH4 and MSH2) and four copy number variation (CNV) mutations (FOXP1-gain, EGFR-gain, IL7R-gain, and NFKB1A-gain) in the breast tumor, combined with three clinical factors (luminal A, Her2 and Ki67 status). The tumor prediction model showed good discrimination of chemotherapy sensitivity for pCR and non-pCR with an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.797-0.927) in the training set, 0.771 (95% CI, 0.649-0.883) in the test set, and 0.726 (95% CI, 0.556-0.865) in an extra test set. This tumor prediction model can also effectively predict the prognosis of disease-free survival (DFS) with an AUC of 0.749 at 1 year and 0.830 at 3 years. We further screened the genes from the tumor prediction model to establish a unique personalized panel consisting of 9 individual somatic mutation genes to detect and analyze ctDNA. It was found that ctDNA positivity decreased with the passage of time during NAC, and ctDNA status can predict NAC response and metastasis recurrence. Finally, we constructed the chemotherapy prediction model combined with the tumor prediction model and pretreatment ctDNA levels, which has a better prediction effect of pCR with the AUC value of 0.961.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we established a chemotherapy predictive model with a non-invasive tool that is built based on genomic features, ctDNA status, as well as clinical characteristics for predicting pCR to recognize the responders and non-responders to NAC, and also predicting prognosis for DFS in breast cancer. Adding pretreatment ctDNA levels to a model containing gene profile mutation and clinical characteristics significantly improves stratification over the clinical variables alone.

Efficacy of apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer in a real-world setting

Objectives

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib (an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR-2) 250 mg combined with chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting.

Patients and methods

A database of patients with advanced breast cancer who received apatinib between December 2016 and December 2019 in our institution was reviewed, and patients who received apatinib combined with chemotherapy were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related toxicity were analyzed.

Results

In total, 52 evaluated patients with metastatic breast cancer previously exposed to anthracyclines or taxanes who received apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Median PFS and OS were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.2-6.4) and 15.4 months (95% CI = 9.2-21.6), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 25% and 86.5%, respectively. Median PFS for the previous line of treatment was 2.1 months (95% CI = 0.65-3.6), which was significantly shorter than that for the apatinib-chemotherapy combination (p < 0.001). No significant difference was identified in the ORR and PFS among the subgroups(subtypes, target lesion, combined regimens and treatment lines). The common toxicities related to apatinib were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and fatigue events.

Conclusion

Apatinib 250 mg combined with chemotherapy provided favorable efficacy in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer regardless of molecular types and treatment lines. The toxicities of the regimen were well tolerated and manageable. This regimen could be a potential treatment option in patients with refractory pretreated metastatic breast cancers.

High DCR and Better Survival in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Receiving Anti-Angiogenic TKI plus Chemotherapy: A Real-World Study

Objectives: This study was carried out to assess the efficacy and drug toxicity of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy as second-line or above therapeutic regime in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients. Methods: From November 2017 to April 2020, advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients who have failed from prior treatment and received apatinib combined with irinotecan or irinotecan treatment were analyzed. The primary observed indicator was progression-free survival (PFS). Objective: response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and drug toxicity were also evaluated. Results: 26 patients received apatinib combined with irinotecan and 29 patients received irinotecan. The ORR in the combination therapy and monotherapy population was 26.9% and 17.2%, respectively. The DCR in the apatinib combined with irinotecan group was higher than in irinotecan monotherapy population (80.8% vs 55.2%, P = .043). Median PFS was 4.2 months in the combination group and 3.3 months in the monotherapy group (P = .020). Median OS was 8.0 months in the combination group and 5.9 months in the monotherapy group (P = .048). Except for ECOG PS 2, PFS and OS were generally consistent across subgroups by sex, age, number of metastatic sites and primary tumor site. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events in combination and monotherapy group was 23.1% and 20.7%, respectively. In apatinib combined with irinotecan group, adverse events that were attributed to apatinib were secondary hypertension (in seven patients, 26.9%), hand-foot syndrome (5,19.2%), and proteinuria (5, 19.2%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that secondary hypertension was considered to be a favorable factor (P = .040) for longer OS in combination therapy group. Conclusions: Compared with chemotherapy alone, anti-angiogenic TKI plus chemotherapy showed better PFS, OS and DCR in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer as second-line or above therapy, with a tolerable and manageable safety profile.

Cardiotoxicity from neoadjuvant targeted treatment for breast cancer prior to surgery

Cancer treatment has been gradually shifting from non-specific cytotoxic agents to molecularly targeted drugs. Breast cancer (BC), a malignant tumor with one of the highest incidence worldwide, has seen a rapid development in terms of targeted therapies, leading to a radical change in the treatment paradigm. However, the use of targeted drugs is accompanied by an increasing rate of deaths due to non-tumor-related causes in BC patients, with cardiovascular complications as the most common cause. Cardiovascular toxicity during antitumor therapy has become a high-risk factor for survival in BC patients. Targeted drug-induced cardiotoxicity exerts a wide range of effects on cardiac structure and function, including conduction disturbances, QT interval prolongation, impaired myocardial contractility, myocardial fibrosis, and hypertrophy, resulting in various clinical manifestations, e.g., arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and even sudden death. In adult patients, the incidence of antitumor targeted drug-induced cardiotoxicity can reach 50%, and current preclinical evaluation tools are often insufficiently effective in predicting clinical cardiotoxicity. Herein, we reviewed the current status of the occurrence, causative mechanisms, monitoring methods, and progress in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity associated with preoperative neoadjuvant targeted therapy for BC. It supplements the absence of relevant review on the latest research progress of preoperative neoadjuvant targeted therapy for cardiotoxicity, with a view to providing more reference for clinical treatment of BC patients.

A Real-World Multicentre Retrospective Study of Low-Dose Apatinib for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Treatment options for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative breast cancer patients are limited in comparison to the HER2-positive patients, particularly for metastatic breast cancer patients. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). Here, we reported the apatinib-based therapy data in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Apatinib was taken at a dose of 250 mg orally once per day and combined with standard chemotherapy regimens. The PFS and OS of 128 patients were 4.7 months and 15.3 months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 22.7% and 80.5%, respectively. Patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations were found to have a longer PFS and OS. Moreover, combination immunotherapy or paclitaxel-platinum regimens shared an improved response to other regimens. Most of the adverse effects (hypertension, anaemia, and hand-foot syndrome) were grade 1 to 2. Metastatic breast cancer patients could benefit from apatinib therapy at a low dosage, and the adverse effects are mild in real-world clinical practice. Furthermore, BRCA may be a putative biomarker for apatinib in HER2-negative breast cancer. Immunotherapy or paclitaxel-platinum regimens may be recommended to combine with apatinib therapy.

Low-dose apatinib combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (LANCET): a single-center, single-arm, phase II trial

Background:

Antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy could improve pathological complete response (pCR) for breast cancer. Apatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. We assessed the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Materials and methods:

This single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients aged 18–70 years with previously untreated stage IIA-IIIB TNBC. Patients received oral apatinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily and intravenously docetaxel every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate in the breast and lymph nodes. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results:

In all, 31 patients were enrolled, and the median follow-up time was 22.9 months (range: 10.1–41.6 months). The pCRs in both breast and lymph nodes were achieved in 17 [54.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 36.0–72.7] of 31 patients. Objective responses were achieved in 29 patients (93.5%; 95% CI: 78.6–99.2), and disease control was achieved in 31 patients (100%; 95% CI: 88.8–100.0). The 2-year EFS and 2-year OS were 90.9% and 94.4%, respectively. The five most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (51%), hypertension (41%), anorexia (39%), hand–foot syndrome (35%), and diarrhea (32%). Few grade 3 or more adverse events were observed.

Conclusion:

The combination of apatinib with docetaxel followed by epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide showed excellent efficacy and manageable toxicities; and further randomized controlled phase III trials are warranted.

Trial registration:

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03243838) on 5 August 2017.

Effects of Apatinib Mesylate Monotherapy on the Incidence of Adverse Reactions and Immune Function in Patients with Breast Cancer after Radical Mastectomy

Objective

To assess the effects of monotherapy with apatinib mesylate on the incidence of adverse events and immune function in breast cancer patients after a radical mastectomy.

Methods

Between December 2018 and August 2020, 90 patients with breast cancer scheduled for a radical mastectomy in People's Liberation Army Navy 971 Hospital were randomly recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either conventional treatment (conventional group) or apatinib mesylate after radical mastectomy (study group). The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), and the secondary endpoints were adverse events and the immune function of the patients.

Results

Monotherapy with apatinib mesylate was associated with a higher DCR (86.67%) versus conventional postoperative treatment (42.23%). All patients in the study group had documented adverse events, including 2 (4.45%) cases of headache, 3 (6.67%) cases of dizziness, 9 (20.00%) cases of hypertension, 6 (13.34%) cases of hand-foot syndrome, 3 (6.67%) cases of thrombocytopenia, 1 (2.23%) case of tinnitus, 7 (15.56%) cases of fatigue, 2 (4.45%) cases of anemia, 2 (4.45%) cases of oral pain, and 10 (22.23%) cases of leukopenia. There were 23 cases of intermittent discontinuation due to adverse events during treatment, 15 cases of dose reduction, and 3 cases of discontinuation due to adverse events. The difference in preoperative and postoperative T-cell subsets and natural killer (NK) cells between the two groups did not come up to the statistical standard (P > 0.05). Monotherapy with apatinib mesylate resulted in significantly lower levels of CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and NK cells and higher CD8+ levels versus conventional treatment at 1 week and 4 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Apatinib mesylate monotherapy after radical mastectomy yields a high DCR, a lower incidence of adverse events, and improved immune recovery. Clinical trials are, however, required prior to clinical promotion.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with advanced breast cancer usually have poor prognosis. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the reports regarding the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer in the current literature are controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to collect and pool efficacy and safety data of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer with the aim of providing up-to-date evidence to aid clinical practice.

Methods

This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020190049). Three literature databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were searched. For evaluating efficacy, the objective response rate and disease control rate were extracted or calculated. Safety was evaluated in terms of the proportions of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. The pooled proportions of the outcomes and their 95% confidence interval were shown. The Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival and progression-free survival were pooled from the extracted data of the included studies. Furthermore, pooled medians for overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Six studies were included and deemed eligible for further quality evaluation and analysis. The pooled objective response rate and disease control rate were 20.4% and 71.6%, respectively. The pooled proportions of four hematologic adverse events ranged from 2.6% to 6.9%. The pooled proportions of hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, transaminase increased, and proteinuria ranged from 4.1% to 24.3%, and other non-hematologic adverse events were &lt;1%. The pooled median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.00 and 10.43 months, respectively, in cases of advanced breast cancer treated with apatinib.

Conclusions

This study confirms the reliable efficacy of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer. However, non-hematologic grade 3–4 adverse events, especially hypertension, are more frequently observed during apatinib treatment than during treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib or sorafenib.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020190049.

Studies of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Apatinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Apatinib’s Novel Anticancer Effect by Inhibiting Tumor-Derived Exosome Secretion

Simple Summary

We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The ORR and DCR were 4.0% (2/50) and 70% (35/50), and the median PFS and OS were 4.7 months and 10.1 months, which demonstrated comparable survival outcomes, significant improvements to the patient’s quality of life, and tolerable adverse reactions. We also disclosed a novel role of apatinib’s anticancer effect, i.e., inhibiting tumor-derived exosome release. Our results indicated that apatinib treatment inhibited exosome secretion through the regulation of MVB biogenesis, transport, and fusion by regulating LAMP2, RAB11, Snap23, and VAMP2. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib in CRC treatment.

Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy is an important treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a clinical study of low-dose apatinib (250 mg) monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with mCRC and assessed its efficacy and safety. It demonstrated that low-dose apatinib had comparable survival outcomes, significantly improved the patient quality of life, and caused tolerable adverse reactions. To further investigate the underlying mechanism of the effects of apatinib in CRC besides angiogenesis, we performed RNA-seq, and our results suggested that apatinib may have other potential antitumor mechanisms in CRC through multiple pathways, including exosomes secretion. In RKO and HCT116 cells, apatinib significantly reduced exosomes secretion by targeting multivesicular body (MVB) transport. Further studies have indicated that apatinib not only promoted the degradation of MVBs via the regulation of LAMP2 but also interfered with MVB transport by inhibiting Rab11 expression. Moreover, apatinib inhibited MVB membrane fusion by reducing SNAP23 and VAMP2 expression. In vivo, apatinib inhibited orthotopic murine colon cancer growth and metastasis and reduced the serum exosomes amount. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib beyond angiogenesis inhibition.

Apatinib and Ginsenoside-Rb1 Synergetically Control the Growth of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells

Background

Apatinib is an anticancer drug known to inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) through regulating tyrosine kinases. Drug resistance and reduced activity in various cancers is the matter of great concern; thus, researchers opt to use combination of the two or more drugs. So far, its gynergetic anticancer role with a traditional Chinese drug Ginsenoside-Rb1 (G-Rb1) has not been studied in cancers including hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Objective

The current study is aimed at investigating the anticancer synergetic effects of G-Rb1 and apatinib in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

Methods

The synergetic effects of both drugs on cell proliferation, wound healing and cell migration, and cell apoptosis were studied in hypopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Furthermore, the xenograft rat model was generated, and tumor inhibition was monitored after treating rats with both drugs as mono- and combination therapy. In addition, protein expression and localization were performed by western blotting and immunofluorescent staining, respectively.

Results

The analyses of the data showed that combination therapy of apatinib and G-Rb1 significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration, and wound healing capability of hypopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Moreover, the glycolysis rate of the cells in the combination therapy (apatinib and G-Rb1) group was significantly decreased as compared to that in the monotherapy group or no treatment group, suggesting that the glycolysis inhibition led to the inhibition of tumor growth. Moreover, the combination therapy on xenograft rats dramatically reduced the tumor size. Furthermore, combination therapy also exhibited an increased count of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, as well as the ratio between CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells.

Conclusion

Interestingly, a combination of apatinib and G-Rb1 induced more tumor cell apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation than the individual drug treatment and promote antitumor immunity by enhancing immunomodulatory molecules. Thus, we believe that this study could serve as a valuable platform to assess the synergetic anticancer effects of the herbal as well as synthetic medicines.