Challenges and Opportunities of Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound With Neuronavigation in Relation to Intraoperative MRI

An attempt to identify brain tumour tissue in neurosurgery by mechanical indentation measurements

BACKGROUND

The intraoperative differentiation between tumour tissue, healthy brain tissue, and any sensitive structure of the central nervous system is carried out in modern neurosurgery using various multimodal technologies such as neuronavigation, fluorescent dyes, intraoperative ultrasound or the use of intraoperative MRI, but also the haptic experience of the neurosurgeon. Supporting the surgeon by developing instruments with integrated haptics could provide a further objective dimension in the intraoperative recognition of healthy and diseased tissue.

METHODS

In this study, we describe intraoperative mechanical indentation measurements of human brain tissue samples of different tumours taken during neurosurgical operation and measured directly in the operating theatre, in a time frame of maximum five minutes. We present an overview of the Young's modulus for the different brain tumour entities and potentially differentiation between them.

RESULTS

We examined 238 samples of 75 tumour removals. Neither a clear distinction of tumour tissue against healthy brain tissue, nor differentiation of different tumour entities was possible on solely the Young's modulus. Correlation between the stiffness grading of the surgeon and our measurements could be found.

CONCLUSION

The mechanical behaviour of brain tumours given by the measured Young's modulus corresponds well to the stiffness assessment of the neurosurgeon and can be a great tool for further information on mechanical characteristics of brain tumour tissue. Nevertheless, our findings imply that the information gained through indentation is limited.

Challenges with segmenting intraoperative ultrasound for brain tumours

Objective - Addressing the challenges that come with identifying and delineating brain tumours in intraoperative ultrasound. Our goal is to both qualitatively and quantitatively assess the interobserver variation, amongst experienced neuro-oncological intraoperative ultrasound users (neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists), in detecting and segmenting brain tumours on ultrasound. We then propose that, due to the inherent challenges of this task, annotation by localisation of the entire tumour mass with a bounding box could serve as an ancillary solution to segmentation for clinical training, encompassing margin uncertainty and the curation of large datasets. Methods - 30 ultrasound images of brain lesions in 30 patients were annotated by 4 annotators - 1 neuroradiologist and 3 neurosurgeons. The annotation variation of the 3 neurosurgeons was first measured, and then the annotations of each neurosurgeon were individually compared to the neuroradiologist's, which served as a reference standard as their segmentations were further refined by cross-reference to the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The following statistical metrics were used: Intersection Over Union (IoU), Sørensen-Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). These annotations were then converted into bounding boxes for the same evaluation. Results - There was a moderate level of interobserver variance between the neurosurgeons [ I o U : 0.789 , D S C : 0.876 , H D : 103.227 ] and a larger level of variance when compared against the MRI-informed reference standard annotations by the neuroradiologist, mean across annotators [ I o U : 0.723 , D S C : 0.813 , H D : 115.675 ] . After converting the segments to bounding boxes, all metrics improve, most significantly, the interquartile range drops by [ I o U : 37 % , D S C : 41 % , H D : 54 % ] . Conclusion - This study highlights the current challenges with detecting and defining tumour boundaries in neuro-oncological intraoperative brain ultrasound. We then show that bounding box annotation could serve as a useful complementary approach for both clinical and technical reasons.

Open access segmentations of intraoperative brain tumor ultrasound images

PURPOSE

Registration and segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) images could play an essential role in surgical planning and resectioning brain tumors. However, validating these techniques is challenging due to the scarcity of publicly accessible sources with high-quality ground truth information. To this end, we propose a unique set of segmentations (RESECT-SEG) of cerebral structures from the previously published RESECT dataset to encourage a more rigorous development and assessment of image-processing techniques for neurosurgery.

ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS

The RESECT database consists of MR and intraoperative US (iUS) images of 23 patients who underwent brain tumor resection surgeries. The proposed RESECT-SEG dataset contains segmentations of tumor tissues, sulci, falx cerebri, and resection cavity of the RESECT iUS images. Two highly experienced neurosurgeons validated the quality of the segmentations.

DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES

Segmentations are provided in 3D NIFTI format in the OSF open-science platform: https://osf.io/jv8bk.

POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS

The proposed RESECT-SEG dataset includes segmentations of real-world clinical US brain images that could be used to develop and evaluate segmentation and registration methods. Eventually, this dataset could further improve the quality of image guidance in neurosurgery.

Navigated Intraoperative Ultrasound Offers Effective and Efficient Real-Time Analysis of Intracranial Tumor Resection and Brain Shift

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neuronavigation is a fundamental tool in the resection of intracranial tumors. However, it is limited by its calibration to preoperative neuroimaging, which loses accuracy intraoperatively after brain shift. Therefore, surgeons rely on anatomic landmarks or tools like intraoperative MRI to assess the extent of tumor resection (EOR) and update neuronavigation. Recent studies demonstrate that intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) provides point-of-care imaging without the cost or resource utilization of an intraoperative MRI, and advances in neuronavigation-guided iUS provide an opportunity for real-time imaging overlaid with neuronavigation to account for brain shift. We assessed the feasibility, efficacy, and benefits of navigated iUS to assess the EOR and restore stereotactic accuracy in neuronavigation after brain shift.

METHODS

This prospective single-center study included patients presenting with intracranial tumors (gliomas, metastasis) to an academic medical center. Navigated iUS images were acquired preresection, midresection, and postresection. The EOR was determined by the surgeon intraoperatively and compared with the postoperative MRI report by an independent neuroradiologist. Outcome measures included time to perform the iUS sweep, time to process ultrasound images, and EOR predicted by the surgeon intraoperatively compared with the postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

This study included 40 patients consisting of gliomas (n = 18 high-grade gliomas, n = 4 low-grade gliomas, n = 4 recurrent) and metastasis (n = 18). Navigated ultrasound sweeps were performed in all patients (n = 83) with a median time to perform of 5.5 seconds and a median image processing time of 29.9 seconds. There was 95% concordance between the surgeon's and neuroradiologist's determination of EOR using navigated iUS and postoperative MRI, respectively. The sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 94%.

CONCLUSION

Navigated iUS was successfully used for EOR determination in glioma and metastasis resection. Incorporating navigated iUS into the surgical workflow is safe and efficient and provides a real-time assessment of EOR while accounting for brain shift in intracranial tumor surgeries.

Awake craniotomy in pediatric low-grade glioma: barriers and future directions

INTRODUCTION

The goal of surgical management in pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) is gross total resection (GTR), as it is considered curative with favorable long-term outcomes. Achieving GTR can be challenging in the setting of eloquent-region gliomas, in which resection may increase risk of neurological deficits. Awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative neurofunctional mapping (IONM) offers a promising approach to achieve maximal resection while preserving neurological function. However, its adoption in pediatric cases has been hindered, and barriers to its adoption have not previously been elucidated.

FINDINGS

This review includes two complementary investigations. First, a survey study was conducted querying pediatric neurosurgeons on their perceived barriers to the procedure in children with pLGG. Next, these critical barriers were analyzed in the context of existing literature. These barriers included the lack of standardized IONM techniques for children, inadequate surgical and anesthesia experience, concerns regarding increased complication risks, doubts about children's ability to tolerate the procedure, and perceived non-indications due to alternative monitoring tools.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to overcome these barriers include standardizing IONM protocols, refining anesthesia management, enhancing patient preparation strategies, and challenging entrenched beliefs about pediatric AC. Collaborative interdisciplinary efforts and further studies are needed to establish safety guidelines and broaden the application of AC, ultimately improving outcomes for children with pLGG.

Progress in the application of ultrasound in glioma surgery

Brain glioma, which is highly invasive and has a poor prognosis, is the most common primary intracranial tumor. Several studies have verified that the extent of resection is a considerable prognostic factor for achieving the best results in neurosurgical oncology. To obtain gross total resection (GTR), neurosurgery relies heavily on generating continuous, real-time, intraoperative glioma descriptions based on image guidance. Given the limitations of existing devices, it is imperative to develop a real-time image-guided resection technique to offer reliable functional and anatomical information during surgery. At present, the application of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) has been indicated to enhance resection rates and maximize brain function preservation. IOUS, which is promising due to its lower cost, minimal operational flow interruptions, and lack of radiation exposure, can enable real-time localization and precise tumor size and form descriptions while assisting in discriminating residual tumors and solving brain tissue shifts. Moreover, the application of new advancements in ultrasound technology, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS), noninvasive ultrasound (NUS), and ultrasound elastography (UE), could assist in achieving GTR in glioma surgery. This article reviews the advantages and disadvantages of IOUS in glioma surgery.

Enabling Navigation and Augmented Reality in the Sitting Position in Posterior Fossa Surgery Using Intraoperative Ultrasound

Despite its broad use in cranial and spinal surgery, navigation support and microscope-based augmented reality (AR) have not yet found their way into posterior fossa surgery in the sitting position. While this position offers surgical benefits, navigation accuracy and thereof the use of navigation itself seems limited. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can be applied at any time during surgery, delivering real-time images that can be used for accuracy verification and navigation updates. Within this study, its applicability in the sitting position was assessed. Data from 15 patients with lesions within the posterior fossa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based navigation-supported surgery in the sitting position were retrospectively analyzed using the standard reference array and new rigid image-based MRI-iUS co-registration. The navigation accuracy was evaluated based on the spatial overlap of the outlined lesions and the distance between the corresponding landmarks in both data sets, respectively. Image-based co-registration significantly improved (p < 0.001) the spatial overlap of the outlined lesion (0.42 ± 0.30 vs. 0.65 ± 0.23) and significantly reduced (p < 0.001) the distance between the corresponding landmarks (8.69 ± 6.23 mm vs. 3.19 ± 2.73 mm), allowing for the sufficient use of navigation and AR support. Navigated iUS can therefore serve as an easy-to-use tool to enable navigation support for posterior fossa surgery in the sitting position.

ReMIND: The Brain Resection Multimodal Imaging Database

The standard of care for brain tumors is maximal safe surgical resection. Neuronavigation augments the surgeon's ability to achieve this but loses validity as surgery progresses due to brain shift. Moreover, gliomas are often indistinguishable from surrounding healthy brain tissue. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and ultrasound (iUS) help visualize the tumor and brain shift. iUS is faster and easier to incorporate into surgical workflows but offers a lower contrast between tumorous and healthy tissues than iMRI. With the success of data-hungry Artificial Intelligence algorithms in medical image analysis, the benefits of sharing well-curated data cannot be overstated. To this end, we provide the largest publicly available MRI and iUS database of surgically treated brain tumors, including gliomas (n = 92), metastases (n = 11), and others (n = 11). This collection contains 369 preoperative MRI series, 320 3D iUS series, 301 iMRI series, and 356 segmentations collected from 114 consecutive patients at a single institution. This database is expected to help brain shift and image analysis research and neurosurgical training in interpreting iUS and iMRI.

Fluorescein-stained confocal laser endomicroscopy versus conventional frozen section for intraoperative histopathological assessment of intracranial tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this clinical trial was to compare Fluorescein-stained intraoperative confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) of intracranial lesions and evaluation by a neuropathologist with routine intraoperative frozen section (FS) assessment by neuropathology.

METHODS

In this phase II noninferiority, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, off-label clinical trial (EudraCT: 2019-004512-58), patients above the age of 18 years with any intracranial lesion scheduled for elective resection were included. The diagnostic accuracies of both CLE and FS referenced with the final histopathological diagnosis were statistically compared in a noninferiority analysis, representing the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the safety of the technique and time expedited for CLE and FS.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included by 3 participating sites between November 2020 and June 2022. Most common entities were high-grade gliomas (37.9%), metastases (24.1%), and meningiomas (22.7%). A total of 6 serious adverse events in 4 (2%) patients were recorded. For the primary endpoint, the diagnostic accuracy for CLE was inferior with 0.87 versus 0.91 for FS, resulting in a difference of 0.04 (95% confidence interval -0.10; 0.02; P = .367). The median time expedited until intraoperative diagnosis was 3 minutes for CLE and 27 minutes for FS, with a mean difference of 27.5 minutes (standard deviation 14.5; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

CLE allowed for a safe and time-effective intraoperative histological diagnosis with a diagnostic accuracy of 87% across all intracranial entities included. The technique achieved histological assessments in real time with a 10-fold reduction of processing time compared to FS, which may invariably impact surgical strategy on the fly.

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial ectopic pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus: A case report

A rare case of unicornuate uterus with interstitial ectopic pregnancy was diagnosed using three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS). The ultrasound revealed a "lancet-shaped" endometrial corona, a gestational sac near the uterus base extending toward the uterine serosa, and visible interstitial lines. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery for a lesion in the right fallopian tube. 3D-TVUS was crucial in precisely locating the gestational sac, aiding in effective treatment. Interstitial ectopic pregnancies risk severe hemorrhaging upon rupture. Rapid, accurate diagnosis is vital for lifesaving treatment and preventing critical complications.

ReMIND: The Brain Resection Multimodal Imaging Database

The standard of care for brain tumors is maximal safe surgical resection. Neuronavigation augments the surgeon's ability to achieve this but loses validity as surgery progresses due to brain shift. Moreover, gliomas are often indistinguishable from surrounding healthy brain tissue. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) and ultrasound (iUS) help visualize the tumor and brain shift. iUS is faster and easier to incorporate into surgical workflows but offers a lower contrast between tumorous and healthy tissues than iMRI. With the success of data-hungry Artificial Intelligence algorithms in medical image analysis, the benefits of sharing well-curated data cannot be overstated. To this end, we provide the largest publicly available MRI and iUS database of surgically treated brain tumors, including gliomas (n=92), metastases (n=11), and others (n=11). This collection contains 369 preoperative MRI series, 320 3D iUS series, 301 iMRI series, and 356 segmentations collected from 114 consecutive patients at a single institution. This database is expected to help brain shift and image analysis research and neurosurgical training in interpreting iUS and iMRI.

High-Volume-Rate 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Fast-Tilting and Redirecting Reflectors

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging has many advantages over 2-D imaging such as more comprehensive tissue evaluation and less operator dependence. However, developing a low-cost and accessible 3-D ultrasound solution with high volume rate and imaging quality remains a challenging task. Recently, we proposed a 3-D ultrasound imaging technique: fast acoustic steering via tilting electromechanical reflectors (FASTER), which uses a fast-tilting acoustic reflector to steer ultrafast plane waves elevationally to achieve high-volume-rate 3-D imaging with conventional 1-D transducers. However, the initial FASTER implementation requires a water tank for acoustic wave conduction and cannot be conveniently used for regular handheld scanning. To address these limitations, here, we developed a novel ultrasound probe clip-on device that encloses a fast-tilting reflector, a redirecting reflector, and an acoustic wave conduction medium. The new FASTER 3-D imaging device can be easily attached to or removed from clinical ultrasound transducers, allowing rapid transformation from 2-D to 3-D imaging. In vitro B-mode studies demonstrated that the proposed method provided comparable imaging quality to conventional, mechanical-translation-based 3-D imaging while offering a much faster volume rate (e.g., 300 versus  ∼  10 Hz). We also demonstrated 3-D power Doppler (PD) and 3-D super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) with the FASTER device. An in vivo imaging study showed that the FASTER device could clearly visualize the 3-D anatomy of the basilic vein. These results suggest that the newly developed redirecting reflector and the clip-on device could overcome key hurdles for future clinical translation of the FASTER 3-D imaging technology.

High Volume Rate 3-D Ultrasound Imaging Using Fast-Tilting and Redirecting Reflectors

3-D ultrasound imaging has many advantages over 2-D imaging such as more comprehensive tissue evaluation and less operator dependence. Although many 3-D ultrasound imaging techniques have been developed in the last several decades, a low-cost and accessible solution with high imaging volume rate and imaging quality remains elusive. Recently we proposed a new, high volume rate 3-D ultrasound imaging technique: Fast Acoustic Steering via Tilting Electromechanical Reflectors (FASTER), which uses a water-immersible and fast-tilting acoustic reflector to steer ultrafast plane waves in the elevational direction to achieve high volume rate 3-D ultrasound imaging with conventional 1-D array transducers. However, the initial implementation of FASTER imaging only involves a single fast-tilting acoustic reflector, which is inconvenient to use because the probe cannot be held in the regular upright position. Also, conventional FASTER imaging can only be performed inside a water tank because of the necessity of using water for acoustic conduction. To address these limitations of conventional FASTER, here we developed a novel ultrasound probe clip-on device that encloses a fast-tilting reflector, a redirecting reflector, and an acoustic wave conduction medium. The new FASTER 3-D imaging device can be easily attached to or removed from clinical ultrasound transducers, allowing rapid transformation from 2-D to 3-D ultrasound imaging. In vitro B-mode imaging studies demonstrated that the proposed method provided comparable imaging quality (e.g., spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio) to conventional, mechanical-translation-based 3-D imaging while providing a much faster 3-D volume rate (e.g., 300 Hz vs ∼10 Hz). In addition to B-mode imaging, we also demonstrated 3-D power Doppler imaging and 3-D super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy with the newly developed FASTER device. An in vivo imaging study showed that the FASTER device could clearly visualize the 3-D anatomy of the basilic vein of a healthy volunteer, and customized beamforming was implemented to accommodate the speed of sound difference between the acoustic medium and the imaging object (e.g., soft tissue). These results suggest that the newly developed redirecting reflector and the clip-on device could overcome key hurdles for future clinical translation of the FASTER 3-D imaging technology.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Resection of Spinal Cord Gliomas

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (iCEUS) is a relatively new technique for visualizing brain gliomas and can help achieve maximum resection, but its potential in evaluation of spinal cord gliomas has not been well defined. The aim of this study was to describe the iCEUS characterization of and evaluate its role in visualizing intramedullary gliomas.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent intramedullary glioma resection with iCEUS guidance from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. An offline analysis was performed to compare and characterize the perfusion features of each glioma.

RESULTS

This study included 36 patients who underwent iCEUS for spinal cord gliomas. iCEUS was performed successfully, and all gliomas were clearly identified. The distribution of contrast agent showed different dynamic phases (arterial, peak, and washout) from those observed in brain gliomas, generally appearing slower and less intense in spinal cord gliomas. iCEUS helped highlight intramedullary gliomas, each of which demonstrated specific iCEUS features depending on the grade. Gross total resection was achieved in 20 patients (55.6%), subtotal resection was achieved in 11 patients (30.6%), and partial resection was achieved in 5 patients (13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

ICEUS adds valuable information in highlighting spinal cord gliomas in real time. It allows the neurosurgeon to assess the anatomical location of the glioma and delineate the tumor margins. iCEUS could play a potentially important role in guiding spinal cord glioma resection. Further study with more cases is needed to better understand the microbubble distribution dynamics in intramedullary gliomas.

Mapping Resection Progress by Tool-Tip Tracking during Brain Tumor Surgery for Real-Time Estimation of Residual Tumor

Surgical resection continues to be the primary initial therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with brain tumors. Computerized cranial neuronavigation based on preoperative imaging offers precision guidance during craniotomy and early tumor resection but progressively loses validity with brain shift. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) and intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can update the imaging used for guidance and navigation but are limited in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, respectively. We present a system that uses time-stamped tool-tip positions of surgical instruments to generate a map of resection progress with high spatial and temporal accuracy. We evaluate this system and present results from 80 cranial tumor resections. Regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation that are covered by the resection map (True Positive Tracking) and regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation not covered by the resection map (True Negative Tracking) are determined for each case. We compare True Negative Tracking, which estimates the residual tumor, with the actual residual tumor identified using iMRI. We discuss factors that can cause False Positive Tracking and False Negative Tracking, which underestimate and overestimate the residual tumor, respectively. Our method provides good estimates of the residual tumor when there is minimal brain shift, and line-of-sight is maintained. When these conditions are not met, surgeons report that it is still useful for identifying regions of potential residual.

[Robotics and computer-assisted procedures in cranial neurosurgery]

BACKGROUND

The medical technical innovations over the last decade have made operations in the highly sensitive regions of the brain much safer.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of how far computer assistance and robotics have become incorporated into clinical neurosurgery.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Evaluation of the scientific literature and analysis of the certification status of the corresponding medical devices.

RESULTS

The rapid development of computer technology and the switch to digital imaging has led to the widespread introduction of neurosurgical planning software and intraoperative neuronavigation. In the field of robotics, the penetration into clinical neurosurgery is currently still largely limited to the automatic setting of trajectories.

CONCLUSION

The digitalization of imaging has fundamentally transformed neurosurgery. In the field of cranial neurosurgery, computer-assisted procedures can now be distinguished from noncomputer-assisted procedures only in a handful of cases. In the coming years important innovations for the clinical implementation can be expected in the field of robotics.

Intraoperative ultrasound in recurrent gliomas surgery: Impact on residual tumor volume and patient outcomes

Background

Reoperation may be beneficial for patients with recurrent gliomas. Minimizing the residual tumor volume (RTV) while ensuring the functionality of relevant structures is the goal of the reoperation of recurrent gliomas. Intraoperative ultrasound (IoUS) may be helpful for intraoperative tumor localization, intraoperative real-time imaging to guide surgical resection, and postoperative evaluation of the RTV in the reoperation for recurrent gliomas.

Objective

To assess the effect of real-time ioUS on minimizing RTV in recurrent glioma surgery compared to Non-ioUS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 92 patients who had recurrent glioma surgical resection: 45 were resected with ioUS guidance and 47 were resected without ioUS guidance. RTV, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at 6 months after the operation, the number of recurrent patients, and the time to recurrence were evaluated.

Results

The average RTV in the ioUS group was significantly less than the Non-ioUS group (0.27 cm³ vs. 1.33 cm³, p = 0.0004). Patients in the ioUS group tended to have higher KPS scores at 6 months of follow-up after the operation than those in the Non-ioUS group (70.00 vs. 60.00, p = 0.0185). More patients in the Non-ioUS group experienced a recurrence than in the ioUS group (43 (91.49%) vs. 32 (71.11%), p = 0.0118). The ioUS group had a longer mean time to recurrence than the Non-ioUS group (7.9 vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.0013).

Conclusion

The use of ioUS-based real-time for resection of recurrent gliomas has been beneficial in terms of both RTV and postoperative outcomes, compared to the Non-ioUS group.

Is intraoperative ultrasound more efficient than magnetic resonance in neurosurgical oncology? An exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective

Intraoperative imaging is a chief asset in neurosurgical oncology, it improves the extent of resection and postoperative outcomes. Imaging devices have evolved considerably, in particular ultrasound (iUS) and magnetic resonance (iMR). Although iUS is regarded as a more economically convenient and yet effective asset, no formal comparison between the efficiency of iUS and iMR in neurosurgical oncology has been performed.

Methods

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two single-center prospectively collected surgical cohorts, classified according to the intraoperative imaging used. iMR (2013-2016) and iUS (2021-2022) groups comprised low- and high-grade gliomas, with a maximal safe resection intention. Units of health gain were gross total resection and equal or increased Karnofsky performance status. Surgical and health costs were considered for analysis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for the two intervention alternatives. The cost-utility graphic and the evolution of surgical duration with the gained experience were also analyzed.

Results

50 patients followed an iMR-assisted operation, while 17 underwent an iUS-guided surgery. Gross total resection was achieved in 70% with iMR and in 60% with iUS. Median postoperative Karnofsky was similar in both group (KPS 90). Health costs were € 3,220 higher with iMR, and so were surgical-related costs (€ 1,976 higher). The ICER was € 322 per complete resection obtained with iMR, and € 644 per KPS gained or maintained with iMR. When only surgical-related costs were analyzed, ICER was € 198 per complete resection with iMR and € 395 per KPS gained or maintained.

Conclusion

This is an unprecedented but preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of the two most common intraoperative imaging devices in neurosurgical oncology. iMR, although being costlier and time-consuming, seems cost-effective in terms of complete resection rates and postoperative performance status. However, the differences between both techniques are small. Possibly, iMR and iUS are complementary aids during the resection: iUS real-time images assist while advancing towards the tumor limits, informing about the distance to relevant landmarks and correcting neuronavigation inaccuracy due to brain shift. Yet, at the end of resection, it is the iMR that reliably corroborates whether residual tumor remains.

Evaluation of a Navigated 3D Ultrasound Integration for Brain Tumor Surgery: First Results of an Ongoing Prospective Study

The aim of the study was to assess the quality, accuracy and benefit of navigated 2D and 3D ultrasound for intra-axial tumor surgery in a prospective study. Patients intended for gross total resection were consecutively enrolled. Intraoperatively, a 2D and 3D iUS-based resection was performed. During surgery, the image quality, clinical benefit and navigation accuracy were recorded based on a standardized protocol using Likert’s scales. A total of 16 consecutive patients were included. Mean ratings of image quality in 2D iUS were significantly higher than in 3D iUS (p < 0.001). There was no relevant decrease in rating during the surgery in 2D and 3D iUS (p > 0.46). The benefit was rated 2.2 in 2D iUS and 2.6 in 3D iUS (p = 0.08). The benefit remained stable in 2D, while there was a slight decrease in the benefit in 3D after complete tumor resection (p = 0.09). The accuracy was similar in both (mean 2.2 p = 0.88). Seven patients had a small tumor remnant in intraoperative MRT (mean 0.98 cm3) that was not appreciated with iUS. Crucially, 3D iUS allows for an accurate intraoperative update of imaging with slightly lower image quality than 2D iUS. Our preliminary data suggest that the benefit and accuracy of 2D and 3D iUS navigation do not undergo significant variations during tumor resection.

Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI

Background

Intraoperative ultrasound(iUS) and intraoperative MRI (iMRI) are effective ways to perform resection control during glioma surgery. However, most published studies employed only one modality. Few studies have used both during surgery. How to combine these two techniques reasonably, and what advantages they could have for glioma surgery are still open questions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients who underwent initial surgical treatment of supratentorial gliomas in our center. We utilized a full-course resection control strategy to combine iUS and iMRI: IUS for pre-resection assessment and intermediate resection control; iMRI for final resection control. The basic patient characteristics, surgical results, iMRI/iUS findings, and their impacts on surgical procedures were evaluated and reported.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included. The extent of resection was 95.43 ± 10.37%, and the gross total resection rate was 72.5%. The median residual tumor size was 6.39 cm3 (range 1.06–16.23 cm3). 5% (2/40) of patients had permanent neurological deficits after surgery. 17.5% (7/40) of patients received further resection after the first iMRI scan, resulting in four (10%) more patients achieving gross total resection. The number of iMRI scans per patient was 1.18 ± 0.38. The surgical time was 4.5 ± 3.6 hours. The pre-resection iUS scan revealed that an average of 3.8 borders of the tumor were beside sulci in 75% (30/40) patients. Intermediate resection control was utilized in 67.5% (27/40) of patients. In 37.5% (15/40) of patients, the surgical procedures were changed intraoperatively based on the iUS findings. Compared with iMRI, the sensitivity and specificity of iUS for residual tumors were 46% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusion

The full-course resection control strategy by combining iUS and iMRI could be successfully implemented with good surgical results in initial glioma surgeries. This strategy might stabilize resection control quality and provide the surgeon with more intraoperative information to tailor the surgical strategy. Compared with iMRI-assisted glioma surgery, this strategy might improve efficiency by reducing the number of iMRI scans and shortening surgery time.

Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery: is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature

PURPOSE

The extent of brain tumor resection (EOR) is a fundamental prognostic factor in pediatric neuro-oncology in association with the histology. In general, resection aims at gross total resection (GTR). Intraoperative imaging like intraoperative US (iOUS) and MRI have been developed in order to find any tumoral remnant but with different costs. Aim of our work is to review the current literature in order to better understand the differences between costs and efficacy of MRI and iOUS to evaluate tumor remnants intraoperatively.

METHODS

We reviewed the existing literature on PubMed until 31st December 2021 including the sequential keywords "intraoperative ultrasound and pediatric brain tumors", "iUS and pediatric brain tumors", "intraoperative magnetic resonance AND pediatric brain tumors", and "intraoperative MRI AND pediatric brain tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 300 papers were screened through analysis of title and abstract; 254 were excluded. After selection, a total of 23 articles were used for this systematic review. Among the 929 patients described, a total of 349(38%) of the cases required an additional resection after an iMRI scan. GTR was measured on 794 patients (data of 69 patients lost), and it was achieved in 552(70%) patients. In case of iOUS, GTR was estimated in 291 out of 379 (77%) cases. This finding was confirmed at the post-operative MRI in 256(68%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the available literature demonstrates that expensive equipment does not always mean better. In fact, for the majority of pediatric brain tumors, iOUS is comparable to iMRI in estimating the EOR.

Intraoperative integration of multimodal imaging to improve neuronavigation: a technical note

BACKGROUND

Brain shift may cause significant error in neuronavigation leading the surgeon to possible mistakes. Intraoperative MRI is the most reliable technique in brain tumor surgery. Unfortunately, it is highly expensive and time consuming and, at the moment, it is available only in few neurosurgical centers.

METHODS

In this case series the surgical workflow for brain tumor surgery is described where neuronavigation of pre-operative MRI, intraoperative CT scan and US as well as rigid and elastic image fusion between preoperative MRI and intraoperative US and CT, respectively, was applied to four brain tumor patients in order to compensate for surgical induced brain shift by using a commercially available software (Elements Image Fusion 4.0 with Virtual iMRI Cranial; Brainlab AG).

RESULTS

Three exemplificative cases demonstrated successful integration of different components of the described intraoperative surgical workflow. The data indicates that intraoperative navigation update is feasible by applying intraoperative 3D US and CT scanning as well as rigid and elastic image fusion applied depending on the degree of observed brain shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of multiple intraoperative imaging techniques combined with rigid and elastic image fusion of preoperative MRI may reduce the risk of incorrect neuronavigation during brain tumor resection. Further studies are needed to confirm the present findings in a larger population.

Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary adult intracranial malignancy and carries a dismal prognosis despite an aggressive multimodal treatment regimen that consists of surgical resection, radiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiographic evaluation, largely informed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a critical component of initial diagnosis, surgical planning, and post-treatment monitoring. However, conventional MRI does not provide information regarding tumor microvasculature, necrosis, or neoangiogenesis. In addition, traditional MRI imaging can be further confounded by treatment-related effects such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and/or pseudoresponse(s) that preclude clinicians from making fully informed decisions when structuring a therapeutic approach. A myriad of novel imaging modalities have been developed to address these deficits. Herein, we provide a clinically oriented review of standard techniques for imaging GBM and highlight emerging technologies utilized in disease characterization and therapeutic development.

Navigated Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound in Glioblastoma Surgery: Analysis of Imaging Features and Impact on Extent of Resection

Background

Neuronavigation is routinely used in glioblastoma surgery, but its accuracy decreases during the operative procedure due to brain shift, which can be addressed utilizing intraoperative imaging. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is widely available, offers excellent live imaging, and can be fully integrated into modern navigational systems. Here, we analyze the imaging features of navigated i3D US and its impact on the extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma surgery.

Methods

Datasets of 31 glioblastoma resection procedures were evaluated. Patient registration was established using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT). Pre-operative MRI (pre-MRI) and pre-resectional ultrasound (pre-US) datasets were compared regarding segmented tumor volume, spatial overlap (Dice coefficient), the Euclidean distance of the geometric center of gravity (CoG), and the Hausdorff distance. Post-resectional ultrasound (post-US) and post-operative MRI (post-MRI) tumor volumes were analyzed and categorized into subtotal resection (STR) or gross total resection (GTR) cases.

Results

The mean patient age was 59.3 ± 11.9 years. There was no significant difference in pre-resectional segmented tumor volumes (pre-MRI: 24.2 ± 22.3 cm³; pre-US: 24.0 ± 21.8 cm³). The Dice coefficient was 0.71 ± 0.21, the Euclidean distance of the CoG was 3.9 ± 3.0 mm, and the Hausdorff distance was 12.2 ± 6.9 mm. A total of 18 cases were categorized as GTR, 10 cases were concordantly classified as STR on MRI and ultrasound, and 3 cases had to be excluded from post-resectional analysis. In four cases, i3D US triggered further resection.

Conclusion

Navigated i3D US is reliably adjunct in a multimodal navigational setup for glioblastoma resection. Tumor segmentations revealed similar results in i3D US and MRI, demonstrating the capability of i3D US to delineate tumor boundaries. Additionally, i3D US has a positive influence on the EOR, allows live imaging, and depicts brain shift.

Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection

One of the major issues in the surgical treatment of gliomas is the concern about maximizing the extent of resection while minimizing neurological impairment. Thus, surgical planning by carefully observing the relationship between the glioma infiltration area and eloquent area of the connecting fibers is crucial. Neurosurgeons usually detect an eloquent area by functional MRI and identify a connecting fiber by diffusion tensor imaging. However, during surgery, the accuracy of neuronavigation can be decreased due to brain shift, but the positional information may be updated by intraoperative MRI and the next steps can be planned accordingly. In addition, various intraoperative modalities may be used to guide surgery, including neurophysiological monitoring that provides real-time information (e.g., awake surgery, motor-evoked potentials, and sensory evoked potential); photodynamic diagnosis, which can identify high-grade glioma cells; and other imaging techniques that provide anatomical information during the surgery. In this review, we present the historical and current context of the intraoperative MRI and some related approaches for an audience active in the technical, clinical, and research areas of radiology, as well as mention important aspects regarding safety and types of devices.