Efficacy and Resistance of Afatinib in Chinese Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With HER2 Alterations: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Pyrotinib as a salvage treatment for patients with HER-2 positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma after the progression of afatinib treatment

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of afatinib or pyrotinib has been demonstrated in HER2-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, the efficacy of pyrotinib after afatinib progression has yet to be determined.

METHOD

Patients with HER2 mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma administered afatinib or pyrotinib monotherapy were enrolled. Those who received pyrotinib after afatinib were further analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. A swimming plot was used to describe the specific treatments. Additionally, patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) were established from HER2-amplified NSCLC patient samples to investigate the antitumor activity of pyrotinib in HER2-amplified tumor cells in vitro.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients were enrolled, 13 of whom were administered pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. No statistical difference in PFS of pyrotinib was observed between patients whether be treated after afatinib progression or not (6.7 months vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.817), thus indicating that progression on afatinib did not affect the efficacy of pyrotinib. Further analysis was conducted on the former patients, which comprising eight patients administered interval chemotherapy after progression on afatinib. Two patients achieved PR after pyrotinib treatment. No independent factors were found to influence the PFS of pyrotinib. PDTOs confirmed the anti-tumor activity of pyrotinib in NSCLC tumor cells with HER2 amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

Progression after prior afatinib treatment does not influence the efficacy of pyrotinib treatment. Pyrotinib may be a salvage option for patients with HER2 mutation who have experienced progression on afatinib.

Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: promising strategies to overcoming challenges

Resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant challenge in the treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of resistance are multifactorial and include molecular target alterations and activation of alternative pathways, tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment change, immune evasion, and immunosuppression. Promising strategies for overcoming resistance include the development of combination therapies, understanding the resistance mechanisms to better use novel drug targets, the identification of biomarkers, the modulation of the tumor microenvironment and so on. Ongoing research into the mechanisms of resistance and the development of new therapeutic approaches hold great promise for improving outcomes for patients with NSCLC. Here, we summarize diverse mechanisms driving resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC and the latest potential and promising strategies to overcome the resistance to help patients who suffer from NSCLC.

Alternating Therapy With Osimertinib and Afatinib Blockades EGFR Secondary Mutation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer: A Single-Arm Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has limited treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although osimertinib or afatinib alone induced drug-resistant clones with EGFR secondary mutation in a preclinical model, its combination prevented the appearance of these mutations. We investigated alternating-dose therapy of osimertinib and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC in a single-arm Phase II trial.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with stage IV NSCLC harboring an activating EGFR mutation were enrolled. Alternating cycles of osimertinib (80 mg/day) followed by afatinib (20 mg/day) were administered every 8 weeks. Genomic analysis was performed using circulating tumor DNA obtained before and after the treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 46 enrolled patients, the median progression-free survival was 20.2 months. The overall response rate was 69.6%. The median overall survival was not reached. Among the 26 plasma samples obtained after the acquisition of resistance, 3 showed an increased MET gene copy number, and 1 showed BRAF mutation. Meanwhile, no EGFR secondary mutation was detected.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of our treatment was not significantly different from osimertinib alone, as reported previously in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Although the sample size was limited, this treatment may prevent the emergence of EGFR secondary mutations that trigger drug resistance. Further studies are warranted to establish the significance of this treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs051180009.

Exploration on the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although the treatment of ERBB2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been studied for many years, there are no comprehensive studies to evaluate the benefits of various therapies as first-line treatment. Through the development of immunotherapy, more and more different combination treatments were applicated in clinical practice, therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with ERBB2-altered NSCLC who had undergone at least one-line systemic anticancer treatment to evaluate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy alone (Chemo), anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (Chemo + Immuno), chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Antiangio) and chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy (Chemo + Immuno + Antiangio). The clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), one-year and three-year survival rate.

RESULTS

We enroll 36 patients harboring ERBB2 mutation and 29 with ERBB2 amplification. The overall ORR was 30.8%, DCR was 69.2% and mPFS was 5.7 months. Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (7.8 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.09-0.64, P = 0.002; 5.9 vs 3.6 months, HR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.15-0.88, P = 0.019; respectively), while there was no significant difference in mPFS between Chemo + Immuno or Chemo + Antiangio and Chemo (both P > 0.05), the mPFS of the first two was longer. For ERBB2-mutant patients, the mPFS was 5.9 months, and Chemo + Immuno and Chemo + Antiangio both achieved longer mPFS than TKI (12.9 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.15, 95 %CI: 0.03-0.68, P = 0.005; 7.1 vs 2.9 months, HR: 0.50, 95 %CI: 0.29-0.88, P = 0.009, respectively). In the same therapies, patients with ERBB2 mutation or ERBB2 amplification showed no statistical significance in PFS (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first-line treatment of ERBB2-altered NSCLC, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy may have greater survival benefits than ERBB2-target therapy, but the efficacy may not be better than that of chemotherapy.

Genomic landscape and efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

Background

HER2-targeted therapy provides survival benefits to HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A better understanding of the clinical and genomic characterization of treatment-naïve HER2-positive NSCLC, as well as the efficacy of and resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-altered NSCLC, could promote further improvement of HER2 targeted therapy.

Methods

HER2-altered NSCLC patients was retrospectively included and their genomic profiles were performed by next-generation sequencing. The clinical outcomes included overall response rate, disease control rate and progression-free survival.

Results

Among 176 treatment-naïve patients with HER2 alterations, 64.8% harbored HER2 mutations with/without HER2 amplification, and 35.2% carried HER2 amplification only. Molecular characterization was correlated with tumor stage that late-stage NSCLC with HER2 oncogenic mutations showed a higher prevalence of TP53 mutations and a higher tumor mutation burden. However, this correlation was not found in patients with HER2 amplification only. Twenty-one patients with HER2 alterations treated with pyrotinib or afatinib were retrospectively enrolled. Pyrotinib yielded a longer median progression-free survival than afatinib (5.9 [95% CI, 3.8-13.0] vs. 4.0 months [95% CI, 1.9-6.3], P = 0.06) in these patients. Analysis of the genomic profiles before and after anti-HER2 targeted therapies identified de novo HER2 copy number gain and G518W mutation, as well as mutations involving DNA damage repair signaling, SWI–SNF complex, and epigenetic regulations as potential resistance mechanisms.

Conclusion

HER2-mutant NSCLC had different molecular features from HER2-amplified NSCLC, and its genomic profile was dependent of tumor stage. Pyrotinib had superior therapeutic effects than afatinib in HER2-altered NSCLC, although larger cohorts are warranted to validate it. HER2-dependent and -independent resistance mechanisms to afatinib and pyrotinib were unveiled.

Updated Overall Survival and Exploratory Analysis From Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIIA Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor+ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The randomized, open-label, phase II EVAN study investigated the efficacy (disease-free survival [DFS] and 5-year overall survival [OS]) and safety of erlotinib versus vinorelbine/cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection (R0) for stage III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation+ non-small-cell lung cancer. We describe the updated results at the 43-month follow-up. In EVAN, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to erlotinib (n = 51) or vinorelbine/cisplatin (n = 51). The median follow-up was 54.8 and 63.9 months in the erlotinib and chemotherapy arms, respectively. With erlotinib, the respective 5-year DFS by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 48.2% (95% CI, 29.4 to 64.7) and 46.2% (95% CI, 27.6 to 62.9) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The median OS was 84.2 months with erlotinib versus 61.1 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.151 to 0.670). The 5-year survival rates were 84.8% and 51.1% with erlotinib and chemotherapy, respectively. In whole-exome sequencing analysis, frequent genes with variants co-occurring at baseline were TP53, MUC16, FAM104B, KMT5A, and DNAH9. With erlotinib, a single-nucleotide polymorphism mutation in UBXN11 was associated with significantly worse DFS (P = .01). To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS improvement with adjuvant erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in R0 stage III EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) possesses tyrosine kinase activity and participates in cell growth, differentiation and migration, and survival. Its alterations, mainly including mutations, amplifications, and overexpression are associated with poor prognosis and are one of the major drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several clinical trials had been investigating on the treatments of HER2-altered NSCLC, including conventional chemotherapy, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), however, the results were either disappointing or encouraging, but inconsistent. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted agent for treating HER2-mutant NSCLC. Effective screening of patients is the key to the clinical application of HER2-targeted agents such as TKIs and ADCs. Various testing methods are nowadays available, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), etc. Each method has its pros and cons and should be reasonably assigned to appropriate patients for diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions. To help standardize the clinical workflow, our expert group reached a consensus on the clinical management of HER2-altered NSCLC, focusing on the diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Pyrotinib for HER2-amplified non-small cell lung cancer patient after progression to Afatinib: a case report

Contrary to the success of antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy in HER2-amplified breast cancer, the optimal targeted drug therapy for HER2-amplified lung cancer remains to be determined clinically. In this report, a nonsmoker, Chinese, old, male patient was diagnosed with cT2bN3M0 nonsmall cell lung cancer with genetic testing revealing HER2 amplification. Though the patient received successful microwave ablation, the results of reexamination after two cycles of afatinib monotherapy showed disease progression. Then the treatment regimen was switched to pan-HER inhibitor pyrotinib 400 mg daily, with which the patient remained with stable disease for 9 months. After computed tomography showed tumor enlargement in October 2021, anlotinib was added to the present treatment. This case suggests that pyrotinib may provide a novel effective treatment option for HER2-amplified lung cancer.

HER2-Altered Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biology, Clinicopathologic Features, and Emerging Therapies

Multiple oncogenic molecular alterations have been discovered that serve as potential drug targets in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the pathogenic and pharmacological features of common targets in NSCLC have been widely investigated, those of uncommon targets are still needed to be clarified. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2)-altered tumors represent a highly heterogeneous group of diseases, which consists of three distinct situations including mutation, amplification and overexpression. Compared with breast and gastric cancer, previous studies have shown modest and variable results of anti-HER2 treatments in lung cancers with HER2 aberrations, thus effective therapies in these patients represent an unmet medical need. By far, encouraging efforts towards novel treatment strategies have been made to improve the clinical outcomes of these patients. In this review, we describe the biological and clinicopathological characteristics of HER2 alterations and systematically sum up recent studies on emerging therapies for this subset of patients.

Consensus for HER2 alterations testing in non-small-cell lung cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor with intracellular tyrosine kinase activity. Its alterations, including mutation, amplification and overexpression, could result in oncogenic potential and have been detected in many cancers such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Such alterations are, in general, considered markers of poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, e.g. trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) and disitamab vedotin (RC48), were recently approved for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Meanwhile, several HER2-targeted drugs, such as T-DXd, neratinib, afatinib, poziotinib and pyrotinib, have been evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC, with several of them demonstrating clinical benefit. Therefore, identifying HER2 alterations is pivotal for NSCLC patients to benefit from these targeted therapies. Recent guidelines on HER2 testing were developed for breast and gastric cancer, however, and have not been fully established for NSCLC. The expert group here reached a consensus on HER2 alteration testing in NSCLC with the focus on clinicopathologic characteristics, therapies, detection methods and diagnostic criteria for HER2-altered NSCLC patients. We hope this consensus could improve the clinical management of NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations.

•

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations lead to poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

•

Identifying HER2 alterations is pivotal to guide the anti-HER2-targeted therapies in NSCLC.

•

The requirements for HER2 mutation, amplification or expression testing are distinct in NSCLC.

•

This consensus fills the gap in the criteria for HER2 alteration testing in NSCLC.

Pyrotinib in Patients with HER2-Amplified Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, in HER2-amplified NSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial (ChiCTR1800020262), advanced NSCLC patients with HER2 amplification, as determined by next-generation sequencing, were enrolled and administered pyrotinib orally at 400 mg per day. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Other endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

The enrolled cohort included twenty-seven patients with HER2 amplification. The 6-month PFS rate was 51.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.0%-69.3%). The median PFS was 6.3 months (95%CI 3.0-9.6 months), and median OS was 12.5 months (95%CI 8.2-16.8 months). Pyrotinib elicited a confirmed ORR of 22.2% (95%CI 10.6%-40.8%). Patients administered pyrotinib as first-line treatment achieved an mPFS of 12.4 months. Moreover, 30.8% of the patients who had progressed on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) responded to pyrotinib. Patients with brain metastases had an ORR of 40%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all patients (grade 3, 22.2%), but no grade 4 or higher TRAEs were documented. Diarrhea was the most frequent TRAE (all, 92.6%; grade 3, 7.4%). Loss of HER2 amplification was detected upon disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrotinib provided antitumor efficacy with a manageable safety profile in HER2-amplified NSCLC patients.