Therapeutic Targeting of Minimal Residual Disease to Prevent Late Recurrence in Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: Challenges and New Approaches

Enhancing Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivorship: Evidence-Based Strategies, Surveillance Testing, and Imaging Guidelines

Addressing the challenges of survivorship necessitates a comprehensive, patient-centered approach, focusing on mitigating risk through lifestyle modification, identifying distant recurrence, and optimization of breast imaging. This article will discuss the current and emerging clinical strategies for the survivorship period, advocating a multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach. In this manner, early-stage breast cancer survivors are empowered to navigate their journey with enhanced knowledge, facilitating a transition to life beyond cancer.

Serum protein profiling reveals an inflammation signature as a predictor of early breast cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Breast cancers exhibit considerable heterogeneity in their biology, immunology, and prognosis. Currently, no validated, serum protein-based tools are available to evaluate the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 521 early-stage breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Additionally, 61 patients with breast fibroadenoma or atypical ductal hyperplasia were included as controls. We used a proximity extension assay to measure the preoperative serum levels of 92 proteins associated with inflammatory and immune response processes. The invasive cancers were randomly split into discovery (n = 413) and validation (n = 108) cohorts for the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Using LASSO regression, we identified a nine-protein signature (CCL8, CCL23, CCL28, CSCL10, S100A12, IL10, IL10RB, STAMPB2, and TNFβ) that predicted various survival endpoints more accurately than traditional prognostic factors. In the time-dependent analyses, the prognostic power of the model remained rather stable over time. We also developed and validated a 17-protein model with the potential to differentiate benign breast lesions from malignant lesions (Wilcoxon p < 2.2*10- 16; AUC 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation and immunity-related serum proteins have the potential to rise above the classical prognostic factors of early-stage breast cancer. They may also help to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions.

Intricacies in the Preparation of Patient Doses of [177Lu]Lu-Rituximab and [177Lu]Lu-Trastuzumab Using Low Specific Activity [177Lu]LuCl3: Methodological Aspects

The development of humanized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) with Lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu3+) has brought a paradigm shift in the arena of targeted therapy of various cancers. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Rituximab and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Trastuzumab have gained prominence due to their improved therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of lymphoma and breast cancer. The clinical dose formulation of these radiolabeled MAbs, using low specific activity [177Lu]LuCl3, requires extensive optimization of the radiolabeling protocol. The present study merits the development of a single protocol which has been optimized for conjugation of Rituximab and Trastuzumab with p-NCS-benzyl-DOTA and further radiolabeling these immunoconjugates (ICs) with low specific activity [177Lu]LuCl3. Herein, we report a consistent and reproducible protocol for clinical dose formulations of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Rituximab and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Trastuzumab (~9.25 GBq each, equivalent to ~2 patient doses) with radiochemical yield (RCY) between 84 and 86% and radiochemical purities (RCP) >99%. The in vitro stabilities of both these radioimmunoconjugates (RICs) were retained up to 120 h post-radiolabeling, upon storage with L-ascorbic acid as stabilizer (concentration: ~ 220-240 μg/37MBq) at -20 °C. The ready-to-use formulation of clinical doses[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Rituximab and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Trastuzumab has been successfully achieved by employing a single optimized protocol. While [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Rituximab has exhibited a high degree of localization in retroperitoneal nodal mass of refractory lymphoma patient, high uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-Trastuzumab has been observed in metastatic breast carcinoma patient with multiple skeletal metastases.

Molecular Residual Disease in Breast Cancer: Detection and Therapeutic Interception

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women despite screening and therapeutic advances. Early detection allows for resection of local disease; however, patients can develop metastatic recurrences years after curative treatment. There is no reliable blood-based monitoring after curative therapy, and radiographic evaluation for metastatic disease is performed only in response to symptoms. Advances in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays have allowed for a potential option for blood-based monitoring. The detection of ctDNA in the absence of overt metastasis or recurrent disease indicates molecular evidence of cancer, defined as molecular residual disease (MRD). Multiple studies have shown that MRD detection is strongly associated with disease recurrence, with a lead time prior to clinical evidence of recurrence of many months. Importantly, it is still unclear whether treatment changes in response to ctDNA detection will improve outcomes. There are currently ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy of therapy escalation in the setting of MRD, and these studies are being conducted in all major breast cancer subtypes. Additional therapies under study include CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, HER2-targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. This review will summarize the underlying scientific principles of various MRD assays, their known prognostic roles in early breast cancer, and the ongoing clinical trials assessing the efficacy of therapy escalation in the setting of MRD.

Dormancy in Breast Cancer

The pattern of delayed recurrence in a subset of breast cancer patients has long been explained by a model that incorporates a variable period of cellular or tumor mass dormancy prior to disease relapse. In this review, we critically evaluate existing data to develop a framework for inferring the existence of dormancy in clinical contexts of breast cancer. We integrate these clinical data with rapidly evolving mechanistic insights into breast cancer dormancy derived from a broad array of genetically engineered mouse models as well as experimental models of metastasis. Finally, we propose actionable interventions and discuss ongoing clinical trials that translate the wealth of knowledge gained in the laboratory to the long-term clinical management of patients at a high risk of developing recurrence.

Adjuvant Targeted Therapy in Solid Cancers: Pioneers and New Glories

Targeted therapy (TT) has revolutionized cancer treatment, successfully applied in various settings. Adjuvant TT in resected early-stage gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and breast cancer has led to practice-changing achievements. In particular, standard treatments include BRAF inhibitors for melanoma, osimertinib for NSCLC, hormone therapy or HER2 TT for breast cancer, and imatinib for GIST. Despite the undeniable benefit derived from adjuvant TT, the optimal duration of TT and the appropriate managing of the relapse remain open questions. Furthermore, neoadjuvant TT is emerging as valuable, particularly in breast cancer, and ongoing studies evaluate TT in the perioperative setting for early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we aim to collect and describe the large amount of data available in the literature about adjuvant TT across different histologies, focusing on epidemiology, major advances, and future directions.

Emerging Therapies for Breast Cancer

The steady, incremental improvements in outcomes for both early-stage and advanced breast cancer patients are, in large part, attributable to the success of novel systemic therapies. In this review, we discuss key conceptual paradigms that have underpinned this success including (1) targeting the driver: the identification and targeting of major oncoproteins in breast cancers; (2) targeting the lineage pathway: inhibition of those pathways that drive normal mammary epithelial cell proliferation that retain importance in cancer; (3) targeting precisely: the application of molecular classifiers to refine therapy selection for specific cancers, and of antibody-drug conjugates to pinpoint tumor and tumor promoting cells for eradication; and (4) exploiting synthetic lethality: leveraging unique vulnerabilities that cancer-specific molecular alterations induce. We describe promising examples of novel therapies that have been discovered within each of these paradigms and suggest how future drug development efforts might benefit from the continued application of these principles.

Long-term impact of smoking cessation on new glottic cancer events in patients with early glottic cancer

Objective

Patients with early glottic cancer sometimes exhibit new glottic cancer events after 5 years. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and risk factors of new glottic cancer events in patients with early glottic cancer 5 years after initial treatment.

Methods

In total, 209 patients were included in this study. Age, sex, T stage, anterior commissure involvement, smoking pattern and treatment modality were retrospectively analysed.

Results

The median follow-up was 91 (range, 60-266) months. The median time for the occurrence of new glottic cancer events was 97 (range, 61-199) months. New glottic cancer events occurred 5 years after initial treatment in 16 (7.6%) patients, among whom 12 (75.0%) had new glottic cancer event lesions overlapping with initial lesions. Smoking cessation after treatment was significantly correlated with fewer new glottic cancer events after 5 years.

Conclusions

New glottic cancer events occurring 5 years after initial treatment in patients with early glottic cancer are not negligible. In particular, if smoking is continued after treatment, these patients can experience new glottic cancer events even after 5 years.

Circulating Tumor DNA and Late Recurrence in High-Risk Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the prevalence and dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with metastatic recurrence in patients with high-risk early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) more than 5 years from diagnosis.

METHODS

We enrolled 103 patients with high-risk stage II-III HR+ BC diagnosed more than 5 years prior without clinical evidence of recurrence. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations tracked via a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA test to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). We collected plasma at the time of consent and at routine visits every 6-12 months. Patients were followed for clinical recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 85 of 103 patients had sufficient tumor tissue; of them, 83 of 85 (97.6%) patients had successful whole-exome sequencing. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed targeting a median of 36 variants to test 219 plasma samples. The median time from diagnosis to first sample was 8.4 years. The median follow-up was 10.4 years from diagnosis and 2.0 years from first sample. The median number of plasma samples per patient was two. Eight patients (10%) had positive MRD testing at any time point. Six patients (7.2%) developed distant metastatic recurrence, all of whom were MRD-positive before overt clinical recurrence, with median ctDNA lead time of 12.4 months. MRD was not identified in one patient (1.2%) with local recurrence. Two of eight MRD-positive patients had not had clinical recurrence at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, in patients with high-risk HR+ BC in the late adjuvant setting, ctDNA was identified a median of 1 year before all cases of distant metastasis. Future studies will determine if ctDNA-guided intervention in patients with HR+ BC can alter clinical outcomes.

Late Recurrence Following Early Breast Cancer

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.