Camrelizumab Plus Sorafenib Versus Sorafenib Monotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

A real-world observation on thrombopoietic agents for patients with cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China: A multicenter, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Studies on various thrombopoietic agents for cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia (CTIT) in China are lacking. This study aimed to provide detailed clinical profiles to understand the outcomes and safety of different CTIT treatment regimens.

METHODS

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1664 questionnaires were collected from 33 hospitals between March 1 and July 1, 2021. Patients aged >18 years were enrolled who were diagnosed with CTIT and treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11), recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO), or a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The outcomes, compliance, and safety of different treatments were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 1437 analyzable cases, most patients were treated with either rhTPO alone (49.3%) or rhIL-11 alone (27.0%). The most common combination regimen used was rhTPO and rhIL-11 (10.9%). Platelet transfusions were received by 117 cases (8.1%). In multivariate analysis, rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery, platelet transfusion, and hospitalization due to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) than rhIL-11 alone. No significant difference was observed in the time taken to achieve a platelet count of >100 × 109/L and chemotherapy dose reduction due to CIT among the different thrombopoietic agents. The outcomes of thrombocytopenia in 170 patients who received targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy are also summarized. The results show that the proportion of platelet recovery was similar among the different thrombopoietic agents. No new safety signals related to thrombopoietic agents were observed in this study. A higher proportion of physicians preferred to continue treatment with TPO-RA alone than with rhTPO and rhIL-11.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides an overview of CTIT and the application of various thrombopoietic agents throughout China. Comparison of monotherapy with rhIL-11, rhTPO, and TPO-RA requires further randomized clinical trials. The appropriate application for thrombopoietic agents should depend on the pretreatment of platelets, treatment variables, and risk of bleeding.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

To provide an overview of the outcome of cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia in China, our cross-sectional study analyzed 1437 cases treated with different thrombopoietic agents. Most of the patients were treated with recombinant interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) and recombinant thrombopoietin (rhTPO). rhTPO was associated with a significantly lower proportion of platelet recovery and platelet transfusion compared with rhIL-11.

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of camrelizumab plus lenvatinib in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma surgery

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus different targeted drugs in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery.

Patients and methods

This retrospective cohort study included HCC patients who, after undergoing failed postoperative adjuvant lenvatinib therapy, received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (C group, n = 97), camrelizumab plus oral apatinib 250 mg daily (C+A group, n = 125), camrelizumab plus oral lenvatinib 12 mg daily (for bodyweight ≥60 kg)/lenvatinib 8 mg daily (for bodyweight <60 kg) (C+L group, n = 120), or camrelizumab plus oral sorafenib 400 mg bi-daily (C+S group, n = 114) between October 2020 and October 2021. The outcomes including the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. The median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), 6-month OS rate, 12-month OS rate, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

As of 31 May 2022 with last follow-up time, the ORR was 17.2% for the C group, 44.6% for the C+A group, 47.9% for the C+L group, and 36.3% for the C+S group. The DCR was 72.0% for the C group, 81.8% for the C+A group, 85.5% for the C+L group, and 77.9% for the C+S group. The mPFS was 11.0 months (10.1-12.8) for the C group, 14.0 months (12.7-16.5) for the C+A group, 18.0 months (16.9-20.1) for the C+L group, and 12.0 months (9.7-14.4) for the C+S group. The mOS was 13.0 months (11.6-15.3) for the C group, 17.0 months (15.8-19.4) for the C+A group, 19.0 months (17.7-20.2) for the C+L group, and 15.0 months (14.1-17.3) for the C+S group. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 patients (14.4%) for the C group, 10 patients (8.0%) for the C+A group, 5 patients (4.2%) for the C+L group, and 11 patients (9.6%) for the C+S group. The most common adverse events were fatigue and transaminitis.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib as adjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in HCC patients. It might be a potential adjuvant therapy or second-line treatment for these patients.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95% CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95% CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95% CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95% CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST [14/221 (6.33%)], increased ALT [13/221 (5.88%)], and decreased platelet count [13/221 (5.88%)], was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.

A multicenter prospective study of TACE combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) predicts a poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using lenvatinib and camrelizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to treat HCC with PVTT.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and prospective study. Eligible patients with advanced HCC accompanied by PVTT were enrolled to receive TACE combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between April 2020 and April 2022, 69 patients were successfully enrolled. With a median follow-up time of 17.3 months, the median age of the patient cohort was 57 years (range: 49-64 years). According to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the ORR was 26.1% (18 partial responses [PRs]) and the DCR was 78.3% (18 PRs, 36 stable diseases [SDs]). The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 9.3 and 18.2 months, respectively. And tumor number >3 was identified as an adverse risk factor for both PFS and OS. The most common adverse events across all grades included fatigue (50.7%), hypertension (46.4%), and diarrhea (43.5%). Twenty-four patients (34.8%) experienced Grade 3 toxicity that was relieved by dose adjustment and symptomatic treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab is a well-tolerated modality treatment with promising efficacy for advanced HCC with PVTT.

Adjuvant ICIs Plus Targeted Therapies Reduce HCC Recurrence after Hepatectomy in Patients with High Risk of Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The high recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy usually results in poor prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, no study has reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus targeted therapies on preventing HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the benefits and safety of applying adjuvant ICIs plus targeted therapies after hepatectomy for patients at high risk of HCC recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients with any risk factors for recurrence who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were reviewed in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group (n = 158), ICIs plus targeted therapies (n = 38) had a significantly higher recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate in univariate analysis (HR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.90; p = 0.020), multivariate analysis (adjusted HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.49-0.79; p < 0.001) and propensity score-matched analysis (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.16-0.75; p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses also showed that postoperative adjuvant ICIs plus targeted therapies might reduce HCC recurrence in patients with the most of risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant ICI plus targeted therapies may reduces early HCC recurrence in patients with a high risk of recurrence, and the treatments are well tolerated.

The Feasibility of TACE Combined with TKIs Plus PD-1 Antibody for Advanced HCC

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs: sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib) plus camrelizumab (TACE-TKIs-C) vs TACE combined with TKIs (TACE-TKIs) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In this two-center retrospective study, patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE-TKIs-C or TACE-TKIs were enrolled between January 1, 2018, to October 1, 2020. A total of 260 eligible patients received TACE-TKIs-C (N=70) or TACE-TKIs (N=190). The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response were compared between two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was applied to reduce patient selection bias. The risk factors affecting OS or PFS were analyzed.

Results

Fifty-three pairs of patients were matched after PSM analysis. Before PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS of TACE-TKIs-C were significantly longer than those of the TACE-TKIs (OS: not reached vs 12.0 months, P<0.0001; PFS: 10.0 months vs 6.0 months, P<0.0001). After PSM analysis, the median OS and PFS of TACE-TKIs-C were significantly longer than those of the TACE-TKIs (OS: Not reached vs 13.0 months, P<0.0001; PFS: 9.0 months vs 6.0 months, P<0.0001); the uni- and multivariate analysis revealed that TACE-TKIs-C treatment was a protective factor of OS and PFS. Grade 3 or 4 hypertension occurred in 14.3% of patients in the TACE-TKIs-C group and other high-grade toxic effects were infrequent.

Conclusion

In patients with advanced HCC, TACE-TKIs-C may improve overall and progression-free survival outcomes over TACE-TKIs with manageable safety profile.

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Monotherapy and Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Practice: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based therapy has recently been demonstrated to greatly ameliorate survival outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of ICIs-based monotherapy and combination therapy as first-line treatment of adults with advanced HCC in real-world practice by conducting a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 25 April 2022. Retrospective or prospective real-world studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of patients with advanced HCC receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy were included.

RESULTS

Of 7805 studies retrieved, 38 were deemed eligible for inclusion. For patients receiving first-line ICIs-based therapy in real-world practice, the pooled median PFS and OS were 7.03 (95% CI: 5.55-8.51) and 14.39 (95% CI: 10.91-17.86) months. The ORR and DCR were 0.432 (95% CI: 0.327-0.538) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.677-0.836), according to mRECIST 1.1, 0.317 (95% CI: 0.218-0.416) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.644-0.835), judged by RECIST 1.1. The best outcomes of survival and response rate were observed in ICIs-based combination therapy of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs. Furthermore, ORR, DCR judged by mRECIST 1.1, and PFS could be potential prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This research revealed diversified first-line ICIs-based therapies for advanced HCC in real-world practice. Future studies are needed to adopt prospective, multicentric and comparative designs to test the ICIs-based combination therapies, especially triple therapies of ICIs, TKIs, plus LRTs.