1
|
Pei YX, Su CG, Liao Z, Li WW, Wang ZX, Liu JL. Comparative effectiveness of several adjuvant therapies after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:554-570. [PMID: 38463369 PMCID: PMC10921205 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), radical hepatectomy is commonly used as a curative treatment. However, postoperative recurrence significantly diminishes the overall survival (OS) of HCC patients, especially with microvascular invasion (MVI) as an independent high-risk factor for recurrence. While some studies suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy may decrease the risk of recurrence following liver resection in HCC patients, the specific role of adjuvant therapies in those with MVI remains unclear. AIM To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of various adjuvant therapies and determine the optimal adjuvant regimen. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until April 6, 2023. Studies comparing different adjuvant therapies or comparing adjuvant therapy with hepatectomy alone were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were used to combine data on recurrence free survival and OS in both pairwise meta-analyses and NMA. RESULTS Fourteen eligible trials (2268 patients) reporting five different therapies were included. In terms of reducing the risk of recurrence, radiotherapy (RT) [HR = 0.34 (0.23, 0.5); surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 97.7%] was found to be the most effective adjuvant therapy, followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy [HR = 0.52 (0.35, 0.76); SUCRA = 65.1%]. Regarding OS improvement, RT [HR: 0.35 (0.2, 0.61); SUCRA = 93.1%] demonstrated the highest effectiveness, followed by sorafenib [HR = 0.48 (0.32, 0.69); SUCRA = 70.9%]. CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy following hepatectomy may reduce the risk of recurrence and provide a survival benefit for HCC patients with MVI. RT appears to be the most effective adjuvant regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Xuan Pei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Chen-Guang Su
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zheng Liao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Wei-Wei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zi-Xiang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jin-Long Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ye Y, Wang Y, Xu H, Yi F. Network meta-analysis of adjuvant treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:320. [PMID: 37730533 PMCID: PMC10510134 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02955-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prevention of recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection is still a great challenge in clinical practice. There are numerous studies that trying to search for favorable strategies to decrease the recurrence and prolong life span for these patients, whereas no consensus is reached till now. Herein, we aim to compare the efficacy between different reported treatments by network meta-analysis(NMA). METHODS We searched Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through February 2023. All of the random controlled trials(RCTs) were evaluated and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was the prevention of recurrence between different procedures. The second outcomes were one-year survival, three-year survival and five-year survival. RESULTS Thirty-two RCTs including 5783 patients were selected, and 12 treatments were classified. Most of the studies were high quality with low bias. Thirty-one studies including 5629 patients were recruited for recurrence analysis. The network meta-analysis showed benefits from transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) + portal vein chemotherapy(PVC)[OR, 2.84 (1.15,6.99)] and internal radiotherapy(IRT) [OR, 2.63 (1.41,4.91)] compared to non-adjuvant(NA) treatment when considering prevention of recurrence. Seventeen studies including 2047 patients were collected for one-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis showed benefit from TACE[OR, 0.33 (0.14,0.75)] when considering one-year survival. Twenty-one studies including 2463 patients were collected for three-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis showed TACE [OR, 0.51 (0.30,0.86)], IRT[OR, 0.41 (0.20,0.83)] and dendritic cell(DC) [OR, 0.09 (0.01,0.98)] were better than NA when considering three-year survival. Sixteen studies including 1915 patients were collected for five-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis didn't show any benefit from different treatments when considering five-year survival. Other strategies including external radiotherapy(ERT), branched-chain amino acids(BCAA), hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC), cytokine-induced killer(CIK), adoptive immunotherapy(AIT), Huaier, interferon(IFN), oral chemotherapy(OCT) and sorafenib(SOR) didn't show significant benefit regardless of prevention of recurrence or short-, long- time survival. CONCLUSION This NMA found that TACE + PVC and IRT were considered as the procedures to decrease HCC recurrence rate. TACE, IRT and DC were preferred when considering the extending of life span for post-operative patients with HCC. Large scale of RCTs are needed to verify it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China
- JiangXi Key Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China
| | - Haoqian Xu
- Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China
- JiangXi Key Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China
| | - Fengming Yi
- Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China.
- JiangXi Key Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, Nanchang, 330006, P.R. of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Omar A, Kaseb A, Elbaz T, El-Kassas M, El Fouly A, Hanno AF, El Dorry A, Hosni A, Helmy A, Saad AS, Alolayan A, Eysa BE, Hamada E, Azim H, Khattab H, Elghazaly H, Tawfik H, Ayoub H, Khaled H, Saadeldin I, Waked I, Barakat EMF, El Meteini M, Hamed Shaaban M, EzzElarab M, Fathy M, Shaker M, Sobhi M, Shaker MK, ElGharib M, Abdullah M, Mokhtar M, Elshazli M, Heikal OMK, Hetta O, ElWakil RM, Abdel Wahab S, Eid SS, Rostom Y. Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer Recommendation Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023; 10:1547-1571. [PMID: 37744303 PMCID: PMC10516190 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s404424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer. The prevalence of this pathology, which has been on the rise in the last 30 years, has been predicted to continue increasing. HCC is the most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Egypt and is also the most common cancer in males. Chronic liver diseases, including chronic hepatitis C, which is a primary health concern in Egypt, are considered major risk factors for HCC. However, HCC surveillance is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and liver cirrhosis; those above 40 with HBV but without cirrhosis; individuals with hepatitis D co-infection or a family history of HCC; and Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients exhibiting significant fibrosis or cirrhosis. Several international guidelines aid physicians in the management of HCC. However, the availability and cost of diagnostic modalities and treatment options vary from one country to another. Therefore, the current guidelines aim to standardize the management of HCC in Egypt. The recommendations presented in this report represent the current management strategy at HCC treatment centers in Egypt. Recommendations were developed by an expert panel consisting of hepatologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, pathologists, and radiologists working under the umbrella of the Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer. The recommendations, which are based on the currently available local diagnostic aids and treatments in the country, include recommendations for future prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf Omar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tamer Elbaz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed El-Kassas
- Department of Endemic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr El Fouly
- Department of Endemic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Abdel Fatah Hanno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ahmed El Dorry
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Hosni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr Helmy
- Department of Surgery, National Liver Institute Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Amr S Saad
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ashwaq Alolayan
- Department of Oncology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Basem Elsayed Eysa
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Emad Hamada
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hamdy Azim
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hany Khattab
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hesham Elghazaly
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hesham Tawfik
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, TantaEgypt
| | - Hisham Ayoub
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hussein Khaled
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ibtessam Saadeldin
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Imam Waked
- Department of Gastroenterology, Menoufia Liver Institute, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Eman M F Barakat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud El Meteini
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Hamed Shaaban
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed EzzElarab
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Fathy
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Shaker
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Sobhi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Kamal Shaker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed ElGharib
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Abdullah
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohesn Mokhtar
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mostafa Elshazli
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Osama Hetta
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Reda Mahmoud ElWakil
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh Abdel Wahab
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Samir Shehata Eid
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Yousri Rostom
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - On behalf of the Egyptian Liver Cancer Committee Study Group
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Endemic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Surgery, National Liver Institute Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, TantaEgypt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Menoufia Liver Institute, Menoufia, Egypt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li J, Wang WQ, Zhu RH, Lv X, Wang JL, Liang BY, Zhang EL, Huang ZY. Postoperative adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies improves surgical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk recurrent factors. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1202039. [PMID: 37359534 PMCID: PMC10285103 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical value of postoperative adjuvant therapy (PAT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of PAT with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies on the surgical outcomes of HCC patients with high-risk recurrent factors (HRRFs). Methods HCC patients who underwent radical hepatectomy at Tongji Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and those with HRRFs were divided into PAT group and non-PAT group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors associated with RFS and OS were determined by Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis was also conducted. Results A total of 250 HCC patients were enrolled, and 47 pairs of patients with HRRFs in the PAT and non-PAT groups were matched through PSM. After PSM, the 1- and 2-year RFS rates in the two groups were 82.1% vs. 40.0% (P < 0.001) and 54.2% vs. 25.1% (P = 0.012), respectively. The corresponding 1- and 2-year OS rates were 95.4% vs. 69.8% (P = 0.001) and 84.3% vs. 55.5% (P = 0.014), respectively. Multivariable analyses indicated that PAT was an independent factor related to improving RFS and OS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that HCC patients with tumor diameter > 5 cm, satellite nodules, or vascular invasion could significantly benefit from PAT in RFS and OS. Common grade 1-3 toxicities, such as pruritus (44.7%), hypertension (42.6%), dermatitis (34.0%), and proteinuria (31.9%) were observed, and no grade 4/5 toxicities or serious adverse events occurred in patients receiving PAT. Conclusions PAT with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies could improve surgical outcomes for HCC patients with HRRFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Er-lei Zhang
- *Correspondence: Zhi-yong Huang, ; Er-lei Zhang,
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu L, Zheng Y, Lin J, Shi X, Wang A. Does adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy improve patient outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma following liver resection? A meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:121. [PMID: 37013589 PMCID: PMC10069128 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03000-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been shown to be beneficial to the patient outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were identified from six databases up to January 26, 2023. Patient outcomes were assessed using overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Data were presented as hazard ratios (HR, 95% confidence intervals, or CIs). RESULTS The present systematic review included 2 RCTs and 9 non-RCTs with a total of 1290 cases. Adjuvant HAIC improved OS (HR of 0.69; 95% CI of 0.56-0.84; p < 0.01) and DFS (HR of 0.64; 95% CI of 0.49-0.83; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that HCC patients with portal vein invasion (PVI) or microvascular invasion (MVI) benefit from adjuvant HAIC in terms of OS ((HR of 0.43; 95% CI of 0.19-0.95; p < 0.01) and (HR of 0.43; 95% CI of 0.19-0.95; p = 0.0373), respectively) and DFS ((HR of 0.38; 95% CI of 0.21-0.69; p < 0.01) and (HR of 0.73; 95% CI of 0.60-0.88; p = 0.0125), respectively). Adjuvant HAIC with the oxaliplatin-based approach significantly improved OS (HR of 0.60; 95% CI of 0.36-0.84; p = 0.02) and (HR of 0.59; 95% CI of 0.43-0.75; p < 0.01), respectively). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant HAIC was beneficial in HCC patients with PVI and MVI. It remains unclear whether HAIC can improve the survival outcome in all HCC patients after hepatic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingbo Hu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Enze Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yu Zheng
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiangyin Lin
- Department of Blood Purification, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xingpeng Shi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Enze Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Aidong Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Enze Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koza A, Bhogal RH, Fotiadis N, Mavroeidis VK. The Role of Ablative Techniques in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Indications and Outcomes. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11041062. [PMID: 37189680 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11041062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains complex and will continue to rely on the multidisciplinary input of hepatologists, surgeons, radiologists, oncologists and radiotherapists. With the appropriate staging of patients and selection of suitable treatments, the outcomes for HCC are improving. Surgical treatments encompassing both liver resection and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are the definitive curative-intent options. However, patient suitability, as well as organ availability, pose essential limitations. Consequently, non-surgical options, such as ablative techniques, play an increasingly important role, especially in small HCCs, where overall and disease-free survival can be comparable to surgical resection. Ablative techniques are globally recommended in recognised classification systems, showing increasingly promising results. Recent technical refinements, as well as the emerging use of robotic assistance, may expand the treatment paradigm to achieve improved oncological results. At present, in very early stage and early stage unresectable disease, percutaneous thermal ablation is considered the treatment of choice. Owing to their different features, various ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryotherapy ablation and irreversible electroporation, have been shown to confer different comparative advantages and applicability. We herein review the role of available ablative techniques in the current complex multidisciplinary management of HCC, with a main focus on the indications and outcomes, and discuss future perspectives.
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo B, Chen Q, Liu Z, Chen X, Zhu P. Adjuvant therapy following curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: current dilemmas and prospects. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1098958. [PMID: 37139151 PMCID: PMC10149944 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1098958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Curative surgical treatments, mainly liver resection, are still one of the optimal options for patients with early-, mid-, and even progression-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the recurrence rate within 5 years after surgery is as high as 70%, especially in patients with high risk factors for recurrence, most of whom experience early recurrence within 2 years. Effective adjuvant therapy may improve prognosis, previous studies found that adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization, antiviral, and traditional Chinese medicine et al. were helpful in preventing HCC recurrence. Nevertheless, due to controversial results or lack of high-level evidence, there is no standardized postoperative management protocol worldwide at present. Continued exploration of effective postoperative adjuvant treatments to improve surgical prognosis is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Guo
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Zhicheng Liu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Peng Zhu,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li SH, Mei J, Cheng Y, Li Q, Wang QX, Fang CK, Lei QC, Huang HK, Cao MR, Luo R, Deng JD, Jiang YC, Zhao RC, Lu LH, Zou JW, Deng M, Lin WP, Guan RG, Wen YH, Li JB, Zheng L, Guo ZX, Ling YH, Chen HW, Zhong C, Wei W, Guo RP. Postoperative Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy With FOLFOX in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion: A Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 41:1898-1908. [PMID: 36525610 PMCID: PMC10082249 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, open-label, multicenter trial, histologically confirmed HCC patients with MVI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive adjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC (treatment group) or routine follow-up (control group). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis while secondary end points were overall survival, recurrence rate, and safety. RESULTS Between June 2016 and August 2021, a total of 315 patients (ITT population) at five centers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 157) or the control group (n = 158). In the ITT population, the median DFS was 20.3 months (95% CI, 10.4 to 30.3) in the treatment group versus 10.0 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 13.2) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.81; P = .001). The overall survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 93.8% (95% CI, 89.8 to 98.1), 86.4% (95% CI, 80.0 to 93.2), and 80.4% (95% CI, 71.9 to 89.9) for the treatment group and 92.0% (95% CI, 87.6 to 96.7), 86.0% (95% CI, 79.9 to 92.6), and 74.9% (95% CI, 65.5 to 85.7) for the control group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.14; P = .130), respectively. The recurrence rates were 40.1% (63/157) in the treatment group and 55.7% (88/158) in the control group. Majority of the adverse events were grade 0-1 (83.8%), with no treatment-related death in both groups. CONCLUSION Postoperative adjuvant HAIC with FOLFOX significantly improved the DFS benefits with acceptable toxicities in HCC patients with MVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao-Hua Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jie Mei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yuan Cheng
- Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qiao-Xuan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Chong-Kai Fang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qiu-Cheng Lei
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Hua-Kun Huang
- Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ming-Rong Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Rui Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jing-Duo Deng
- Second Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yu-Chuan Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Rong-Ce Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Liang-He Lu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jing-Wen Zou
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Min Deng
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Ping Lin
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ren-Guo Guan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yu-Hua Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Department of Clinical Research Methodology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Lie Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Xing Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Hong Ling
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Huan-Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Chong Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Rong-Ping Guo
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cacicedo ML, Limeres MJ, Gehring S. mRNA-Based Approaches to Treating Liver Diseases. Cells 2022; 11:3328. [PMID: 36291194 PMCID: PMC9601253 DOI: 10.3390/cells11203328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Diseases that affect the liver account for approximately 2 million deaths worldwide each year. The increasing prevalence of these diseases and the limited efficacy of current treatments are expected to stimulate substantial growth in the global market for therapeutics that target the liver. Currently, liver transplantation is the only curative option available for many liver diseases. Gene therapy represents a valuable approach to treatment. The liver plays a central role in a myriad of essential metabolic functions, making it an attractive organ for gene therapy; hepatocytes comprise the most relevant target. To date, viral vectors constitute the preferred approach to targeting hepatocytes with genes of therapeutic interest. Alternatively, mRNA-based therapy offers a number of comparative advantages. Clinical and preclinical studies undertaken to treat inherited metabolic diseases affecting the liver, cirrhosis and fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatitis B, and cytomegalovirus using lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNAs that encode the therapeutic or antigenic protein of interest are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximiliano L. Cacicedo
- Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Mainz of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Franses JW, Zhu AX. Neoadjuvant approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma: There's no time like the present. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2738-2743. [PMID: 35266995 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a lethal malignancy and is an increasingly common cause of cancer death worldwide. Curative-intent surgical resection remains the standard of care for eligible patients, yet outcomes remain poor for many patients, with most patients experiencing recurrence in the five years after resection. There is currently significant interest in utilizing locoregional and systemic therapies - in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings - to increase the chance of cure. This review article appraises the existing literature and current clinical trial landscape of neoadjuvant therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
|