1
|
Fiandra C, Zara S, Richetto V, Rossi L, Leonardi MC, Ferrari P, Marrocco M, Gino E, Cora S, Loi G, Rosica F, Ren Kaiser S, Verdolino E, Strigari L, Romeo N, Placidi L, Comi S, De Otto G, Roggio A, Di Dio A, Reversi L, Pierpaoli E, Infusino E, Coeli E, Licciardello T, Ciarmatori A, Caivano R, Poggiu A, Ciscognetti N, Ricardi U, Heijmen B. Multi-centre real-world validation of automated treatment planning for breast radiotherapy. Phys Med 2024; 123:103394. [PMID: 38852364 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the results of the first multi-centre real-world validation of autoplanning for whole breast irradiation after breast-sparing surgery, encompassing high complexity cases (e.g. with a boost or regional lymph nodes) and a wide range of clinical practices. METHODS The 24 participating centers each included 10 IMRT/VMAT/Tomotherapy patients, previously treated with a manually generated plan ('manplan'). There were no restrictions regarding case complexity, planning aims, plan evaluation parameters and criteria, fractionation, treatment planning system or treatment machine/technique. In addition to dosimetric comparisons of autoplans with manplans, blinded plan scoring/ranking was conducted by a clinician from the treating center. Autoplanning was performed using a single configuration for all patients in all centres. Deliverability was verified through measurements at delivery units. RESULTS Target dosimetry showed comparability, while reductions in OAR dose parameters were 21.4 % for heart Dmean, 16.7 % for ipsilateral lung Dmean, and 101.9 %, 45.5 %, and 35.7 % for contralateral breast D0.03cc, D5% and Dmean, respectively (all p < 0.001). Among the 240 patients included, the clinicians preferred the autoplan for 119 patients, with manplans preferred for 96 cases (p = 0.01). Per centre there were on average 5.0 ± 2.9 (1SD) patients with a preferred autoplan (range [0-10]), compared to 4.0 ± 2.7 with a preferred manplan ([0,9]). No differences were observed regarding deliverability. CONCLUSION The automation significantly reduced the hands-on planning workload compared to manual planning, while also achieving an overall superiority. However, fine-tuning of the autoplanning configuration prior to clinical implementation may be necessary in some centres to enhance clinicians' satisfaction with the generated autoplans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fiandra
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy.
| | - S Zara
- Tecnologie Avanzate, Turin, Italy
| | - V Richetto
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - L Rossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Ferrari
- Department of Health Physics, Provincial Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Lehrkrankenhaus der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität, Bolzano-Bozen, Italy
| | - M Marrocco
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy
| | - E Gino
- SC Fisica Sanitaria AO Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - S Cora
- U.O.C. Fisica Sanitaria, Ospedale "San Bortolo", AULSS8, Vicenza, Italy
| | - G Loi
- Department of Medical Physics, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - F Rosica
- U.O.C. Fisica Sanitaria, ASL Teramo, Italy
| | - S Ren Kaiser
- S.C. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy
| | | | - L Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - N Romeo
- UOC Radioterapia. Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Messina. Ospedale "San Vincenzo", Taormina, Italy
| | - L Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - S Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G De Otto
- S.C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy
| | - A Roggio
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - A Di Dio
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - L Reversi
- Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona - Medical Physics Department, Ancona, Italy
| | - E Pierpaoli
- UOC Fisica Sanitaria, Area Vasta 5 Asur P.O. Mazzoni, Ascoli, Italy
| | - E Infusino
- Medical Physics Dept IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome
| | - E Coeli
- U.O.C. di RADIOTERAPIA Azienda ULSS 9 Scaligera del Veneto, Legnago (VR), Italy
| | - T Licciardello
- SC Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - A Ciarmatori
- UOC Fisica Medica e Alte Tecnologie, AST Pesaro Urbino, Pesaro, Italy
| | - R Caivano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica e Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS CROB Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy
| | - A Poggiu
- SSD Fisica Sanitaria AOU Sassari, Italy
| | - N Ciscognetti
- ASL2 liguria - Dipartimento di diagnostic, SSD fisica sanitaria, Savona, Italy
| | - U Ricardi
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy
| | - B Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang C, Liu B, Yuan J, He J, Xie R, Huang M, Niu S, Liu H. Dosimetric evaluation of different planning strategies for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation technique. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115025. [PMID: 38670137 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Purpose.The dose hotspot areas in hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) greatly increase the risk of acute skin toxicity because of the anatomical peculiarities of the breast. In this study, we presented several novel planning strategies that integrate multiple sub-planning target volumes (sub-PTVs), field secondary placement, and RapidPlan models for right-sided hypofractionated WBI.Methods.A total of 35 cases of WBI with a dose of 42.5 Gy for PTVs using tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were selected. Both PTVs were planned for simultaneous treatment using the original manual multiple sub-PTV plan (OMMP) and the original manual single-PTV plan (OMSP). The manual field secondary placement multiple sub-PTV plan (m-FSMP) with multiple objects on the original PTV and the manual field secondary placement single-objective plan (m-FSSP) were initially planned, which were distribution-based of V105 (volume receiving 105% of the prescription dose). In addition, two RapidPlan-based plans were developed, including the RapidPlan-based multiple sub-PTVs plan (r-FSMP) and the RapidPlan-based single-PTV plan (r-FSSP). Dosimetric parameters of the plans were compared, and V105 was evaluated using multivariate analysis to determine how it was related to the volume of PTV and the interval of lateral beam angles (ILBA).Results.The lowest mean V105 (5.64 ± 6.5%) of PTV was observed in m-FSMP compared to other manual plans. Upon validation, r-FSSP demonstrated superior dosimetric quality for OAR compared to the two other manual planning methods, except for V5(the volume of ipsilateral lung receiving 5 Gy) of the ipsilateral lung. While r-FSMP showed no significant difference (p = 0.06) compared to r-FSSP, it achieved the lowest V105 value (4.3 ± 4.5%), albeit with a slight increase in the dose to some OARs. Multivariate GEE linear regression showed that V105 is significantly correlated with target volume and ILBA.Conclusions.m-FSMP and r-FSMP can substantially enhance the homogeneity index (HI) and reduce V105, thereby minimizing the risk of acute skin toxicities, even though there may be a slight dose compromise for certain OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
- Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
| | - Biaoshui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
- Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji He
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511495, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruilian Xie
- Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
| | - Minfeng Huang
- First Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
| | - Shanzhou Niu
- School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
- Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Computational Imaging , Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongdong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Castriconi R, Tudda A, Placidi L, Benecchi G, Cagni E, Dusi F, Ianiro A, Landoni V, Malatesta T, Mazzilli A, Meffe G, Oliviero C, Rambaldi Guidasci G, Scaggion A, Trojani V, Del Vecchio A, Fiorino C. Inter-institutional variability of knowledge-based plan prediction of left whole breast irradiation. Phys Med 2024; 120:103331. [PMID: 38484461 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Within a multi-institutional project, we aimed to assess the transferability of knowledge-based (KB) plan prediction models in the case of whole breast irradiation (WBI) for left-side breast irradiation with tangential fields (TF). METHODS Eight institutions set KB models, following previously shared common criteria. Plan prediction performance was tested on 16 new patients (2 pts per centre) extracting dose-volume-histogram (DVH) prediction bands of heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and breast. The inter-institutional variability was quantified by the standard deviations (SDint) of predicted DVHs and mean-dose (Dmean). The transferability of models, for the heart and the ipsilateral lung, was evaluated by the range of geometric Principal Component (PC1) applicability of a model to test patients of the other 7 institutions. RESULTS SDint of the DVH was 1.8 % and 1.6 % for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (20 %-80 % dose range); concerning Dmean, SDint was 0.9 Gy and 0.6 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (<0.2 Gy for contralateral organs). Mean predicted doses ranged between 4.3 and 5.9 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and 1.1-2.3 Gy for the heart. PC1 analysis suggested no relevant differences among models, except for one centre showing a systematic larger sparing of the heart, concomitant to a worse PTV coverage, due to high priority in sparing the left anterior descending coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS Results showed high transferability among models and low inter-institutional variability of 2% for plan prediction. These findings encourage the building of benchmark models in the case of TF-WBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Castriconi
- Medical Physics Dept, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
| | - Alessia Tudda
- Medical Physics Dept, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy; Università Statale di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Benecchi
- Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital of Parma AOUP, Parma, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Advanced Technology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesca Dusi
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Landoni
- IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Malatesta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Roma, Italy
| | - Aldo Mazzilli
- Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital of Parma AOUP, Parma, Italy
| | - Guenda Meffe
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandro Scaggion
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Advanced Technology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics Dept, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Portik D, Clementel E, Krayenbühl J, Bakx N, Andratschke N, Hurkmans C. Knowledge-based versus deep learning based treatment planning for breast radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100539. [PMID: 38303923 PMCID: PMC10832493 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose To improve radiotherapy (RT) planning efficiency and plan quality, knowledge-based planning (KBP) and deep learning (DL) solutions have been developed. We aimed to make a direct comparison of these models for breast cancer planning using the same training, validation, and testing sets. Materials and Methods Two KBP models were trained and validated with 90 RT plans for left-sided breast cancer with 15 fractions of 2.6 Gy. The versions either used the full dataset (non-clean model) or a cleaned dataset (clean model), thus eliminating geometric and dosimetric outliers. Results were compared with a DL U-net model (previously trained and validated with the same 90 RT plans) and manually produced RT plans, for the same independent dataset of 15 patients. Clinically relevant dose volume histogram parameters were evaluated according to established consensus criteria. Results Both KBP models underestimated the mean heart and lung dose equally 0.4 Gy (0.3-1.1 Gy) and 1.4 Gy (1.1-2.8 Gy) compared to the clinical plans 0.8 Gy (0.5-1.8 Gy) and 1.7 Gy (1.3-3.2 Gy) while in the final calculations the mean lung dose was higher 1.9-2.0 Gy (1.5-3.5 Gy) for both KPB models. The U-Net model resulted in a mean planning target volume dose of 40.7 Gy (40.4-41.3 Gy), slightly higher than the clinical plans 40.5 Gy (40.1-41.0 Gy). Conclusions Only small differences were observed between the estimated and final dose calculation and the clinical results for both KPB models and the DL model. With a good set of breast plans, the data cleaning module is not needed and both KPB and DL models lead to clinically acceptable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Portik
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jérôme Krayenbühl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Nienke Bakx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Applied Physics and Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Phys Med 2022; 101:44-49. [PMID: 35944444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed tumor in pregnant women and radiation therapy should carefully be weighted up because of the dose to the fetus. The aim of this study was to investigate fetal dose in a patient treated with Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy (ViTAT), an innovative technique for whole breast irradiation. Optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) were calibrated on a Varian TrueBeam linac, with both a 6X and 6XFFF beam quality, and used for out-of-field measurements. Fetal dose related with ViTAT technique was compared to the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy technique (3DCRT). The fetal dose delivered with a ViTAT technique planned with 6XFFF beam was also investigated. Measurements were taken on a phantom composed of Rando Alderson Phantom slices and solid water slabs. OSLDs were placed in a region identified by the height of the fundus from conception to the twentieth week using a custom made PMMA grid. Due to the higher number of monitor units, the peripheral dose of ViTAT delivered with 6X beams is higher than that of 3DCRT. However, nanoDots measurements prove that ViTAT can be used in place of 3DCRT while maintaining similar fetal dose levels if 6XFFF beams are used.
Collapse
|
6
|
Tudda A, Castriconi R, Benecchi G, Cagni E, Cicchetti A, Dusi F, Esposito PG, Guernieri M, Ianiro A, Landoni V, Mazzilli A, Moretti E, Oliviero C, Placidi L, Rambaldi Guidasci G, Rancati T, Scaggion A, Trojani V, Fiorino C. Knowledge-based multi-institution plan prediction of whole breast irradiation with tangential fields. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:10-16. [PMID: 35868603 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify inter-institute variability of Knowledge-Based (KB) models for right breast cancer patients treated with tangential fields whole breast irradiation (WBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten institutions set KB models by using RapidPlan (Varian Inc.), following previously shared methodologies. Models were tested on 20 new patients from the same institutes, exporting DVH predictions of heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast. Inter-institute variability was quantified by the inter-institute SDint of predicted DVHs/Dmean. Association between lung sparing vs PTV coverage strategy was also investigated. The transferability of models was evaluated by the overlap of each model's geometric Principal Component (PC1) when applied to the test patients of the other 9 institutes. RESULTS The overall inter-institute variability of DVH/Dmean ipsilateral lung dose prediction, was less than 2% (20%-80% dose range) and 0.55 Gy respectively (1SD) for a 40 Gy in 15 fraction schedule; it was < 0.2 Gy for other OARs. Institute 6 showed the lowest mean dose prediction value and no overlap between PTV and ipsilateral lung. Once excluded, the predicted ipsilateral lung Dmean was correlated with median PTV D99% (R2 = 0.78). PC1 values were always within the range of applicability (90th percentile) for 7 models: for 2 models they were outside in 1/18 cases. For the model of institute 6, it failed in 7/18 cases. The impact of inter-institute variability of dose calculation was tested and found to be almost negligible. CONCLUSIONS Results show limited inter-institute variability of plan prediction models translating in high inter-institute interchangeability, except for one of ten institutes. These results encourage future investigations in generating benchmarks for plan prediction incorporating inter-institute variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Tudda
- Medical Physics Dept, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy; Università Statale di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Advanced Technology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Dusi
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marika Guernieri
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aldo Mazzilli
- Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital of Parma AOUP, Italy
| | - Eugenia Moretti
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Rambaldi Guidasci
- Amethyst Radioterapia Italia, Medical Physics Department, San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scaggion
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Valeria Trojani
- Medical Physics Unit, Department of Advanced Technology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics Dept, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Esposito PG, Castriconi R, Mangili P, Broggi S, Fodor A, Pasetti M, Tudda A, Di Muzio NG, del Vecchio A, Fiorino C. Knowledge-based automatic plan optimization for left-sided whole breast tomotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:54-59. [PMID: 35814259 PMCID: PMC9256826 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Purpose Tomotherapy may deliver high-quality whole breast irradiation at static angles. The aim of this study was to implement Knowledge-Based (KB) automatic planning for left-sided whole breast using this modality. Materials/Methods Virtual volumetric plans were associated to the dose distributions of 69 Tomotherapy (TT) clinical plans of previously treated patients, aiming to train a KB-model using a commercial tool completely implemented in our treatment planning system. An individually optimized template based on the resulting KB-model was generated for automatic plan optimization. Thirty patients of the training set and ten new patients were considered for internal/external validation. Fully-automatic plans (KB-TT) were generated and compared using the same geometry/number of fields of the corresponding clinical plans. Results KB-TT plans were successfully generated in 26/30 and 10/10 patients of the internal/external validation sets; for 4 patients whose original plans used only two fields, the manual insertion of one/two fields before running the automatic template was sufficient to obtain acceptable plans. Concerning internal validation, planning target volume V95%/D1%/dose distribution standard deviation improved by 0.9%/0.4Gy/0.2Gy (p < 0.05) against clinical plans; Organs at risk mean doses were also slightly improved (p < 0.05) by 0.07/0.4/0.2/0.01 Gy for left lung/heart/right breast/right lung respectively. Similarly satisfactory results were replicated in the external validation set. The resulting treatment duration was 8 ± 1 min, consistent with our clinical experience. The active planner time per patient was 5–10 minutes. Conclusion Automatic TT left-sided breast KB-plans are comparable to or slightly better than clinical plans and can be obtained with limited planner time. The approach is currently under clinical implementation.
Collapse
|
8
|
A semi-automatic planning technique for whole breast irradiation with tangential IMRT fields. Phys Med 2022; 98:122-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|