1
|
Qureshi Z, Jamil A, Altaf F, Siddique R, Fatima E, Dost S, Zelkowitz RS, Shah S. Revolutionizing triple-negative metastatic breast cancer treatment: sacituzumab Govitecan's role in advancing chemotherapy. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:5314-5319. [PMID: 39238964 PMCID: PMC11374285 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This review aims to discuss the role and efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan in the management of breast cancer. Summary Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer among women worldwide. This comprehensive review delves into the advancements brought about by Sacituzumab Govitecan in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). With a focus on its mode of action, efficacious role, clinical trials, and comparative advantages over conventional chemotherapy, the review highlights the therapy's precision in targeting cancer cells through monoclonal antibodies. Sacituzumab Govitecan's ability to deliver a chemotherapeutic payload specifically to cancer cells with the Trop-2 receptor sets it apart from traditional chemotherapy, minimizing collateral damage and reducing severe side effects. The impact of Sacituzumab Govitecan on improving progression-free survival, tumor response rates, and, significantly, the quality of life for patients is discussed. This article also sheds light on ongoing trials, FDA recognition, and the therapy's potential to transform breast cancer treatment. Conclusion In conclusion, Sacituzumab Govitecan shows potential as an innovative therapeutic option for breast cancer, particularly in metastatic breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, but it warrants additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Qureshi
- The Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University
| | - Abdur Jamil
- Department of Medicine, Samaritan Medical Centre
| | - Faryal Altaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/BronxCare Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Eeshal Fatima
- Department of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sara Dost
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, St. Vincent Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT
| | | | - Shivendra Shah
- Department of Medicine, Nepalgunj Medical College, Chisapani, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Y, Hu S, Liu X, Chen Y, Luan J, Wang S. Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a trial-based analysis. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2024; 22:32. [PMID: 38659013 PMCID: PMC11044338 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00539-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has recently been approved in China for the post-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SG substantially improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy for pretreated mTNBC. However, in view of the high price of SG, it is necessary to consider its value in terms of costs and outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of SG versus single-agent treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in the post-line setting for patients with mTNBC from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS The cohort characteristics were sourced from the ASCENT randomized clinical trial, which enrolled 468 heavily pretreated patients with mTNBC between November 2017 and September 2019. A partitioned survival model was constructed to assess the long-term costs and effectiveness of SG versus TPC in the post-line treatment of mTNBC. Quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) and total costs in 2022 US dollars were used to derive incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). QALMs and costs were discounted at 5% annually. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was defined as $3188 per QALM, three times China's average monthly per capita gross domestic product in 2022. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses were performed to estimate the robustness of the results. RESULTS Treatment with SG yielded an incremental 5.17 QALMs at a cost of $44,792 per QALM, much above the WTP threshold of $3188/QALM in China. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that SG price was a crucial factor in the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost-effective acceptability of SG was 0% in the current setting. Scenario analyses indicated that the result was robust in all subgroups in ASCENT or under different time horizons. Furthermore, SG must reduce the price to enter the Chinese mainland market. When the monthly cost of SG reduce to $2298, SG has about 50% probability to be a preferred choice than TPC. CONCLUSIONS SG was estimated to be not cost-effective compared with TPC for post-line treatment for mTNBC in China by the current price in HK under a WTP threshold of $3188 per QALM. A drastic price reduction is necessary to improve its cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilai Wu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, 241001, Wuhu, Anhui, China
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200080, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Hu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200080, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolin Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200080, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Chen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200080, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiajie Luan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, 241001, Wuhu, Anhui, China.
| | - Shuowen Wang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200080, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wickmann A, Kurte MS, Jeck J, Camacho L, Klinkhammer D, Kron F, Dengler R. Cost-benefit evaluation of advanced therapy lines in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in Germany. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2024; 22:21. [PMID: 38459569 PMCID: PMC10924420 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00528-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is responsible for 10-20% cases of breast cancer and is resulting in rising healthcare costs. Thus, health-economic evaluations are needed to relate clinical outcomes and costs of treatment options and to provide recommendations of action from a health-economic perspective. METHODS We investigated the cost-benefit-ratio of approved treatment options in metastatic TNBC in Germany by applying the efficiency frontier approach. These included sacituzumab-govitecan (SG), eribulin, vinorelbine, and capecitabine. Clinical benefit was measured as (i) median overall survival (mOS) and (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of time to symptom worsening (TSW). To assess medical benefits, literature was systematically reviewed in PubMed for (i) and (ii), respectively. Treatment costs were calculated considering annual direct outpatient treatment costs from a statutory healthcare payer perspective. It was intended that both, (i) and (ii), yield an efficiency frontier. RESULTS Annual direct outpatient treatment costs amounted to EUR 176,415.21 (SG), EUR 47,414.14 (eribulin), EUR 13,711.35 (vinorelbine), and EUR 3,718.84 (capecitabine). Systematic literature review of (i) and statistical analysis resulted in OS values of 14.3, 9.56, 9.44, and 7.46 months, respectively. Capecitabine, vinorelbine, and SG are part of the efficiency frontier including OS. The highest additional benefit per additional cost was determined for vinorelbine, followed by SG. Systematic review of (ii) revealed that no TSW data of TNBC patients receiving vinorelbine were available, preventing the presentation of an efficiency frontier including HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Vinorelbine is most cost-effective, followed by SG. Health-economic evaluations support decision-makers to assess treatment options within one indication area. In Germany, the efficiency frontier can provide decision support for the pricing of innovative interventions. Results of our analysis may thus guide reimbursement determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melina Sophie Kurte
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Jeck
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Florian Kron
- VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cher BP, Goh S, Aziz MIA, Wong G, Ng Chee Hui R, Ong BSK, Ng KH. Cost-utility analysis of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in Singapore. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:217-225. [PMID: 38149409 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2291155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan for treating relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in Singapore. METHODS A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan from a healthcare system perspective over 5 years. Clinical inputs were obtained from the ASCENT trial. Health state utilities were retrieved from the literature and direct costs were sourced from public healthcare institutions in Singapore. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties and assumptions on cost-effectiveness results. RESULTS Compared with single-agent chemotherapy, sacituzumab govitecan was associated with a base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of S$328,000 (US$237,816) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was most sensitive to the cost of sacituzumab govitecan and progression-free utility values. Regardless of variation in these parameters, the ICER remained high, and a substantial price reduction was required to reduce the ICER. CONCLUSION At its current price, sacituzumab govitecan does not represent a cost-effective treatment for relapsed or refractory metastatic TNBC in Singapore. Our findings will be useful to inform funding decisions alongside other factors including clinical effectiveness, safety, and budget impact considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boon Piang Cher
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sharon Goh
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Grace Wong
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Kwong-Hoe Ng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liang Y, Zhang P, Li F, Lai H, Qi T, Wang Y. Advances in the study of marketed antibody-drug Conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of breast cancer. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1332539. [PMID: 38352694 PMCID: PMC10862125 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1332539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer continues to have a high incidence rate among female malignancies. Despite significant advancements in treatment modalities, the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer and its resistance to various therapeutic approaches pose considerable challenges. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) effectively merge the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, offering a novel strategy for precision treatment of breast cancer. Notably, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has provided a new therapeutic option for HER2-positive breast cancer patients globally, especially those resistant to conventional treatments. The development of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has further broadened the applicability of ADCs in breast cancer therapy, presenting new hopes for patients with low HER2 expression and triple-negative breast cancer. However, the application of ADCs presents certain challenges. For instance, their treatment may lead to adverse reactions such as interstitial lung disease, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. Moreover, prolonged treatment could result in ADCs resistance, complicating the therapeutic process. Economically, the high costs of ADCs might hinder their accessibility in low-income regions. This article reviews the structure, mechanism of action, and clinical trials of commercially available ADCs for breast cancer treatment, with a focus on the clinical trials of the three drugs, aiming to provide insights for clinical applications and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
- School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Purong Zhang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Feng Li
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
- School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Houyun Lai
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
- School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Tingting Qi
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Yixin Wang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliate University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang J, Han J, Zeng N, Yan X. Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231169983. [PMID: 37228255 PMCID: PMC10204055 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231169983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Results from DESTINY-Breast04 trial revealed that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved both progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the economic impact of this practice remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd on HER2-low mBC from the viewpoint of U.S. payers. Methods Using the clinical data from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, a three-state Markov model was created to assess the economic and health effects of T-DXd versus chemotherapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and willingness-to-pay threshold were determined and compared. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to measure parameter uncertainty. Results In the overall HER2-low population, T-DXd provided additional 0.47 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an increased cost of $149,222 compared with chemotherapy, yielding an ICER of $317,494/QALY. The ICER was $353,903/QALY in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup, which decreased to $259,825/QALY in the HR-negative subgroup. The sensitivity analysis found that T-DXd would not be cost-effective in the base-case. The expected cost of T-DXd will be less than $4,281/cycle ($11.33/mg) or $1,903/cycle ($5.03/mg) to achieve a 50 or 90% cost-benefit probability, respectively. Conclusions T-DXd provides significant health benefit for patients with HER2-low mBC compared with chemotherapy but is unlikely to be cost-effective in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ni Zeng
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of
Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R.
China
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shi D, Li Y, Liang X, Chen L. Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1162360. [PMID: 37251935 PMCID: PMC10213649 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1162360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The efficiency and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the therapy of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (BC) has been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to evaluate its cost-effectiveness on HR+/HER2- metastatic BC from the third-party payer perspective in the United States. Methods We performed the cost-effectiveness of SG and chemotherapy using a partitioned survival model. TROPiCS-02 provided clinical patients for this study. We evaluated the robustness of this study by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses were also conducted. The outcomes were costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefit (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Results SG treatment was related to an increase of 0.284 life years and 0.217 QALYs over chemotherapy, as well as a cost increase of $132,689, reaching an ICER of $612,772/QALY. The INHB was -0.668 QALYs, and the INMB was -$100,208. SG was not cost-effective at the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY. The outcomes were sensitive to patient body weight and cost of SG. SG may be cost-effective at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY if the price is less than $3.997/mg or the weight of patients is under 19.88 kg. Based on the subgroup analysis, SG did not prove cost-effective in all subgroups at the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. Conclusion From a third-party payer standpoint in the United States, SG was not cost-effective, even though it had a clinically significant advantage over chemotherapy for the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic BC. The cost-effectiveness of SG can be improved if the price is substantially reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demin Shi
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The People’s Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xueyan Liang
- Department of Pharmacy, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Lingyuan Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Hechi, Hechi, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang J, Han J, Zhang Y, Muhetaer M, Chen N, Yan X. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive breast cancer. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:924126. [PMID: 36160459 PMCID: PMC9500475 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.924126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The DESTINY-Breast03 clinical trial demonstrated that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) outperformed trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Considering the excessive cost of antibody-drug conjugates, the clinical value of T-DXd must be assessed by both its efficacy and cost. We compared the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for patients with HER2-positive mBC pretreated with anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane from the perspectives of the United States (US) and China. Methods: A comprehensive Markov model based on the DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial was used to compared the cost and effectiveness of T-DXd and T-DM1 for HER2-positive mBC. Data on direct medical cost and utilities were collected from published literatures. The recorded data included the costs, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to measure the potential uncertainty due to parameter variability. Additional subgroup cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. Results: Treatment of HER2-positive mBC with T-DXd gained 0.73 QALYs compared with T-DM1 strategy. The incremental cost was $59,942 in the US, with an ICER of $ 82,112/QALY and an INHB of 0.33 QALYs, respectively. In China, the incremental cost of T-DXd versus T-DM1 was $222,680, with an ICER of $305,041/QALY and a negative INHB of -5.18 QALYs. At willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY in the US and $37,653/QALY in China, the probability of T-DXd as the dominant option was 77.5 and 0.1%, respectively. The unit price of T-DXd greatly influenced the results according to one-way sensitivity analysis. To meet the 50% or 90% chance of being cost-effective, the estimated cost of T-DXd would need to be less than $17.24/mg and $12.06/mg in China, respectively. Conclusion: T-DXd is more cost-effective than T-DM1 for patients with HER2-positive mBC in the US, but not in China at current drug prices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangping Yang
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaqi Han
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yalan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Muhelisa Muhetaer
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nianyong Chen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Yan
- Department of Head, Neck and Mammary Gland Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Xi Yan,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tang Z, Xu X, Gao J, Chen L, Zhu Q, Wang J, Yan X, Chen B, Zhu Y. Economic evaluation of margetuximab vs. trastuzumab for pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer in the US and China. Front Public Health 2022; 10:942767. [PMID: 36159262 PMCID: PMC9500445 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the economic evaluation of margetuximab plus chemotherapy over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer in the United States (US) and China. Methods Based on the SOPHIA trial, a three-state Markov model was developed to compare the cost and efficacy of margetuximab to trastuzumab for previously treated women with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer. The model inputs were derived from existing literature and the US life table. Primary outcomes included lifetime costs in US dollars, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of uncertainty. Results The base case analyses demonstrated that margetuximab plus chemotherapy had an increasing cost of $68,132 and $20,540 over trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in the US and China, respectively, with a gain of 0.11 and 0.09 QALYs both favored margetuximab. The ICERs for two treatment strategies were $260,176 in the US and $630,777 in China, resulting in a poor cost-effectiveness at their respective threshold of willingness to play. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results to be most sensitive to the price of margetuximab and that of trastuzumab. And an 11 and 82% price reduction of margetuximab would make this regimen cost-effective in the US and China, respectively. Conclusion In the US and China, margetuximab plus chemotherapy is not likely to be cost-effective for women with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, whereas price reduction effectively improves insufficient cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Tang
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Qiuyan Zhu
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jinli Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yan
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bohua Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yumei Zhu
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shi B, Ma W, Pan H, Shi Y, Zhang H, Xing S. Cost-Effectiveness of Apatinib and Cabozantinib for the Treatment of Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:860615. [PMID: 35847009 PMCID: PMC9280160 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.860615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of apatinib and cabozantinib for the treatment of radioactive iodine–refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) has been demonstrated recently. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these treatments from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods: Two partitioned survival models over a 10-year horizon were built to compare the cost and effectiveness of apatinib vs. placebo and cabozantinib vs. placebo based on the clinical data from the phase 3 randomized REALITY and COSMIC-311 trials. Costs and utility data were obtained from the literature and institutional database. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the conclusion. Results: Apatinib yielded an additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.74 at an additional cost of Chinese Renminbi ¥44,077. The ICER was ¥93,460 (US dollar $13545)/QALY and it was below the current willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥217341/QALY. Cabozantinib was associated with an additional QALY of 0.79 at an extra cost of ¥3,55,614 when compared with placebo, and the ICER was ¥4,52,325 ($65,554)/QALY, which was above the WTP threshold. The conclusion were robust under one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The price of cabozantinib has to drop to ¥5.87/mg (39% of the current price) for it has a 50% likelihood of being cost-effective. Conclusion: Apatinib is cost-effective for RAIR-DTC when compared with placebo from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. However, based on the current evidence, cabozantinib might not be cost-effective and a reduction of price is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Shi, ; Shenghai Xing,
| | - Wenbiao Ma
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
| | - Hongshuai Pan
- Department of General Surgery, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
| | - Yang Shi
- Department of Gynecology, Second Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
| | - Shenghai Xing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Shi, ; Shenghai Xing,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Emerging Therapies for Chemotherapy Resistant TNBC. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031665. [PMID: 35163586 PMCID: PMC8836182 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with high recurrence rates, high incidence of distant metastases, and poor overall survival (OS). Taxane and anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (CT) is currently the main systemic treatment option for TNBC, while platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising results in the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. An early arising of intrinsic or acquired CT resistance is common and represents the main hurdle for successful TNBC treatment. Numerous mechanisms were uncovered that can lead to the development of chemoresistance. These include cancer stem cells (CSCs) induction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, hypoxia and avoidance of apoptosis, single factors such as tyrosine kinase receptors (EGFR, IGFR1), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10), and a few pathological molecular pathways. Some biomarkers capable of predicting resistance to specific chemotherapeutic agents were identified and are expected to be validated in future studies for a more accurate selection of drugs to be employed and for a more tailored approach, both in neoadjuvant and advanced settings. Recently, based on specific biomarkers, some therapies were tailored to TNBC subsets and became available in clinical practice: olaparib and talazoparib for BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers larotrectinib and entrectinib for neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion carriers, and anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2) antibody drug conjugate therapy for heavily pretreated metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Further therapies targeting some pathologic molecular pathways, apoptosis, miRNAS, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), and androgen receptor (AR) are under investigation. Among them, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and EGFR inhibitors as well as antiandrogens showed promising results and are under evaluation in Phase II/III clinical trials. Emerging therapies allow to select specific antiblastics that alone or by integrating the conventional therapeutic approach may overcome/hinder chemoresistance.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pavone G, Motta L, Martorana F, Motta G, Vigneri P. A New Kid on the Block: Sacituzumab Govitecan for the Treatment of Breast Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Molecules 2021; 26:molecules26237294. [PMID: 34885875 PMCID: PMC8659286 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Human trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is a membrane glycoprotein involved in cell proliferation and motility, frequently overexpressed in epithelial tumors. Thus, it represents an attractive target for anticancer therapies. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a third-generation antibody-drug conjugate, consisting of an anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody (hRS7), a hydrolyzable linker, and a cytotoxin (SN38), which inhibits topoisomerase 1. Specific pharmacological features, such as the high antibody to payload ratio, the ultra-toxic nature of SN38, and the capacity to kill surrounding tumor cells (the bystander effect), make SG a very promising drug for cancer treatment. Indeed, unprecedented results have been observed with SG in patients with heavily pretreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer and urothelial carcinomas, and the drug has already received approval for these indications. These results are coupled with a manageable toxicity profile, with neutropenia and diarrhea as the most frequent adverse events, mainly of grades 1-2. While several trials are exploring SG activity in different tumor types and settings, potential biomarkers of response are under investigation. Among these, Trop-2 overexpression and the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations seem to be the most promising. We review the available literature concerning SG, with a focus on its toxicity spectrum and possible biomarkers of its response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliana Pavone
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (P.V.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Lucia Motta
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (P.V.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-095-3781959
| | - Federica Martorana
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (P.V.)
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Motta
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (P.V.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Paolo Vigneri
- Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (G.P.); (F.M.); (G.M.); (P.V.)
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-S.Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|