1
|
Chen H, Wu M, Chen M. Evaluation of the Management of Urachal Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience over 13 Years. Urol Int 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38964295 DOI: 10.1159/000539760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urachal carcinoma is characterized by high malignancy, poor prognosis, and late stage of diagnosis. There is a lack of unanimous clinical treatment guidelines. We summarize the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of urachal carcinoma from our center, hoping to provide a reference for diagnosis and treatment. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 21 patients with urachal carcinoma who were treated at our center from January 2010 to August 2022, and all patients were followed up. RESULTS The average survival time was 67.1 ± 9.1 (ranging from 49.3 to 84.9) months. The average relapse-free survival was 48.8 ± 9.9 (ranging from 29.5 to 68.2) months. Six patients received adjuvant therapy, mainly chemotherapy. Five patients died during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Early physical examination may be helpful for early detection of urachal carcinoma. Surgical treatment is still preferred for localized urachal carcinoma. Lymph node dissection may facilitate accurate staging, and positive margin usually results in a worse prognosis. Adjuvant therapy, mainly chemotherapy, may help improve the prognosis. The application of radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy still needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hengxin Chen
- Department of Urology, Liuzhou Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Liuzhou, China,
| | - Menghai Wu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hatano A, Wakaki K, Miyajima N, Komatsu S. Relapsed urachal carcinoma responding to first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine-oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab. IJU Case Rep 2023; 6:345-348. [PMID: 37928300 PMCID: PMC10622206 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advanced urachal carcinoma has a poor prognosis; however, a standard systemic treatment has not been established. We treated a patient with relapsed urachal carcinoma with capecitabine-oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab, a standard regimen for colon cancer, and obtained favorable responses. Case presentation A 47-year-old woman presented with hematuria. Under the diagnosis of non-metastatic urachal carcinoma, an extended partial cystectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed adenocarcinoma with negative surgical margins and lymph nodes. Thirty-two months postoperatively, lung metastases and local recurrence were confirmed, along with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and nine chemotherapy cycles were administered. Subsequently, the recurrent lesion regressed, and tumor marker levels normalized. Fourteen months after treatment discontinuation, the disease remained stable without progression. Conclusion This is the first report of advanced urachal carcinoma treated with capecitabine-oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab, demonstrating the potential of this treatment as first-line chemotherapy for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiko Hatano
- Department of Urology Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital Shibata Niigata Japan
| | - Kunihiko Wakaki
- Department of Pathology Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital Shibata Niigata Japan
| | - Norio Miyajima
- Department of Urology Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital Shibata Niigata Japan
| | - Shuichi Komatsu
- Department of Urology Niigata Prefectural Shibata Hospital Shibata Niigata Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerin M, Miran C, Colomba E, Cabart M, Herrmann T, Pericart S, Maillet D, Neuzillet Y, Deleuze A, Coquan E, Laramas M, Thibault C, Abbar B, Mesnard B, Borchiellini D, Dumont C, Boughalem E, Deville JL, Cancel M, Saldana C, Khalil A, Baciarello G, Flechon A, Walz J, Gravis G. Urachal carcinoma: a large retrospective multicentric study from the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1110003. [PMID: 36741023 PMCID: PMC9892758 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1110003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare, non-urothelial malignancy. Its natural history and management are poorly understood. Although localized to the bladder dome, the most common histological subtype of UrC is adenocarcinoma. UrC develops from an embryonic remnant, and is frequently diagnosed in advanced stage with poor prognosis. The treatment is not standardized, and based only on case reports and small series. This large retrospective multicentric study was conducted by the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group to gain a better understanding of UrC. Material and Methods data has been collected retrospectively on 97 patients treated at 22 French Cancer Centers between 1996 and 2020. Results The median follow-up was 59 months (range 44-96). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 20-86), 45% were females and 23% had tobacco exposure. For patients with localized disease (Mayo I-II, n=46) and with lymph-node invasion (Mayo III, n=13) median progression-free-survival (mPFS) was 31 months (95% CI: 20-67) and 7 months (95% CI: 6-not reached (NR)), and median overall survival (mOS) was 73 months (95% CI: 57-NR) and 22 months (95% CI: 21-NR) respectively. For 45 patients with Mayo I-III had secondary metastatic progression, and 20 patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Metastatic localization was peritoneal for 54% of patients. Most patients with localized tumor were treated with partial cystectomy, with mPFS of 20 months (95% CI: 14-49), and only 12 patients received adjuvant therapy. Metastatic patients (Mayo IV) had a mOS of 23 months (95% CI: 19-33) and 69% received a platin-fluorouracil combination treatment. Conclusion UrC is a rare tumor of the bladder where patients are younger with a higher number of females, and a lower tobacco exposure than in standard urothelial carcinoma. For localized tumor, partial cystectomy is recommended. The mOS and mPFS were low, notably for patients with lymph node invasion. For metastatic patients the prognosis is poor and standard therapy is not well-defined. Further clinical and biological knowledge are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Guerin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France,*Correspondence: M. Guerin,
| | - C. Miran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon-Berard, Lyon, France
| | - E. Colomba
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave-Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - M. Cabart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - T. Herrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - S. Pericart
- Department of Anatomo-pathology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Centre Hospital-Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - D. Maillet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre hospitalo-Universitaire Hospices civils, Lyon, France
| | - Y. Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hopital Foch, Paris, France
| | - A. Deleuze
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - E. Coquan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - M. Laramas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Grenoble, France
| | - C. Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - B. Abbar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Pitié-Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | - B. Mesnard
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Nantes, France
| | - D. Borchiellini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - C. Dumont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - E. Boughalem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | - JL. Deville
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France
| | - M. Cancel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - C. Saldana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Henri Mondor, Paris, France
| | - A. Khalil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital tenon, Paris, France
| | - G. Baciarello
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave-Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - A. Flechon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon-Berard, Lyon, France
| | - J. Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - G. Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Szarvas T, Reis H. Commentary: Treatment Outcome of Different Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Metastatic Malignant Urachal Tumor. Front Oncol 2022; 12:864708. [PMID: 35707349 PMCID: PMC9189274 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.864708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tibor Szarvas
- Department of Urology, University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Henning Reis
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- *Correspondence: Henning Reis,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loizzo D, Pandolfo SD, Crocerossa F, Guruli G, Ferro M, Paul AK, Imbimbo C, Lucarelli G, Ditonno P, Autorino R. Current Management of Urachal Carcinoma: An Evidence-based Guide for Clinical Practice. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 39:1-6. [PMID: 35309098 PMCID: PMC8927909 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Urachal carcinoma is a rare urological disease. The shortage of data about diagnosis and surgical treatment in literature makes it hard for clinicians to make a decision. Indeed, urachal carcinoma is an aggressive disease that requires prompt staging and treatment to ensure the best outcome for patients. We reviewed the last evidence about the management of urachal carcinoma to provide an easy-to-use guide for clinical practice. Patient summary Urachal carcinoma is a rare malignancy. The literature on this challenging disease remains limited. Herein, we provide a practical guide for its management from diagnosis to treatment, which in most cases requires surgical intervention or chemotherapy.
Collapse
|