Patient-Reported Outcomes-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Pitfalls and possibilities from the radiation oncologist's point of view

BACKGROUND

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may experience substantial anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy treatment. The implementation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) proves effective in managing the consequent impact on the planned dose distribution.

METHODS

This narrative literature review comprehensively discusses the diverse strategies of ART in HNC and the documented dosimetric and clinical advantages associated with these approaches, while also addressing the current challenges for integration of ART into clinical practice.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Although based on mainly non-randomized and retrospective trials, there is accumulating evidence that ART has the potential to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life and tumor control in HNC patients treated with RT. However, several questions remain regarding accurate patient selection, the ideal frequency and timing of replanning, and the appropriate way for image registration and dose calculation. Well-designed randomized prospective trials, with a predetermined protocol for both image registration and dose summation, are urgently needed to further investigate the dosimetric and clinical benefits of ART.

Emerging pharmacotherapy trends in preventing and managing oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy and targeted agents

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has tremendously changed the clinical outcomes and prognosis of cancer patients. Despite innovative pharmacological therapies and improved radiotherapy (RT) techniques, patients continue to suffer from side effects, of which oral mucositis (OM) is still the most impactful, especially for quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of current advances in cancer pharmacotherapy and RT, in relation to their potential to cause OM, and of the less explored and more recent literature reports related to the best management of OM. We have analyzed natural/antioxidant agents, probiotics, mucosal protectants and healing coadjuvants, pharmacotherapies, immunomodulatory and anticancer agents, photobiomodulation and the impact of technology.

EXPERT OPINION

The discovery of more precise pathophysiologic mechanisms of CT and RT-induced OM has outlined that OM has a multifactorial origin, including direct effects, oxidative damage, upregulation of immunologic factors, and effects on oral flora. A persistent upregulated immune response, associated with factors related to patients' characteristics, may contribute to more severe and long-lasting OM. The goal is strategies to conjugate individual patient, disease, and therapy-related factors to guide OM prevention or treatment. Despite further high-quality research is warranted, the issue of prevention is paramount in future strategies.

Weekly Adaptive Radiotherapy vs Standard Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Improving Salivary Function in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Xerostomia is a major toxic effect associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancers.

Objective

To assess whether adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improves salivary function compared with IMRT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted in 11 French centers. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with stage III-IVB squamous cell oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy were enrolled between July 5, 2013, and October 1, 2018. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to May 2022.

Interventions

The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard IMRT (without replanning) or ART (systematic weekly replanning).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the frequency of xerostomia, measured by stimulating salivary flow with paraffin. Secondary end points included salivary gland excretory function measured using technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy, patient-reported outcomes (Eisbruch xerostomia-specific questionnaire and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer questionnaire), early and late toxic effects, disease control, and overall and cancer-specific survival.

Results

A total of 132 patients were randomized, and after 1 exclusion in the ART arm, 131 were analyzed: 66 in the ART arm (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 60 [8] years; 57 [86.4%] male) and 65 in the standard IMRT arm (mean [SD] age at inclusion, 60 [8] years; 57 [87.7%] male). The median follow-up was 26.4 months (IQR, 1.2-31.3 months). The mean (SD) salivary flow (paraffin) at 12 months was 630 (450) mg/min in the ART arm and 584 (464) mg/min in the standard arm (P = .64). The mean (SD) excretory function of the parotid gland at 12 months, measured by scintigraphy, improved in the ART arm (48% [17%]) compared with the standard arm (41% [17%]) (P = .02). The 2-year-overall survival was 76.9% (95% CI, 64.7%-85.4%) in both arms.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial did not demonstrate a benefit of ART in decreasing xerostomia compared with standard IMRT. No significant differences were found in secondary end points except for parotid gland excretory function, as assessed by scintigraphy, or in survival rates.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01874587.

The impact of radiation induced lymphopenia in the prognosis of head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiotherapy is a key part of head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Radiation induced lymphopenia (RIL) is a severe complication of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of RIL in HNC patients.

METHOD

We conducted a PRISMA guideline based systemic review and meta-analysis. The studies were identified on the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from 2007 to October 2021. The quality of each study was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies (NOS).

RESULTS

There were 8 studies with 2,733 samples finally included in current study. The meta-analysis showed that the odds ratio of developing grade 3-4 RIL was 13.49 (95%CI = 7.03-25.89, I² = 94%). The incidence rate of grade 3-4 RIL ranged from 73%-88%. Multivariate meta-analysis found that the RIL significantly decreased the overall survival (HR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.83-4.74, I² = 0%) and distant metastasis free survival of HNC (HR = 3.79, 95%CI = 2.06-6.97, I² = 0%). After sensitivity analysis and excluding a potential study that caused heterogeneity, the new pooled multivariate meta-analysis showed RIL was a risk factor to the progression free survival of HNC patients (HR = 3.16, 95%CI = 1.77-5.63, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first meta-analysis which showed severe RIL decreased the overall survival and promoted the progression of HNC patients. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to evaluate the association between severe RIL and the prognosis of HNC.