Case Report: Sirolimus Alleviates Persistent Cytopenia After CD19 CAR-T-Cell Therapy

Association of thrombocytopenia with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis based on the data from FDA adverse event reporting system database

Introduction: An increasing number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been reported during clinical treatment. We aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with ICIs-induced ITP under different therapeutic strategies based on the FAERS database and explore the potential biological mechanisms in combination with TCGA pan-cancer data. Methods: Data from FAERS were collected for ICIs adverse reactions between January 2012 and December 2022. Disproportionality analysis identified ICIs-induced ITP in the FAERS database using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRP), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker algorithms (MGPS). The potential biological mechanisms underlying ITP induced by ICIs were examined using TCGA transcriptome data on cancers. Results: In the FAERS, 345 ICIs-induced ITP reports were retrieved, wherein 290 (84.06%) and 55 (15.94%) were reported as monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. The median age of the reported patients with ICIs-induced ITP was 69 years (IQR 60-76), of which 62 (18%) died and 47 (13.6%) had a life-threatening outcome. The majority of reported indications were lung, skin, and bladder cancers, and the median time to ITP after dosing was 42 days (IQR 17-135), with 64 patients (43.5%) experiencing ITP within 30 days of dosing and 88 patients experiencing ITP in less than 2 months (59.9%). The occurrence of ICIs-induced ITP may be associated with ICIs-induced dysregulation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway and megakaryocyte dysfunction. Conclusion: There were significant reporting signals for ITP with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab/ipilimumab. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 in combination with anti-CTLA-4 are more likely to have an increased risk of ICIs-induced ITP. Patients with melanoma are at a higher risk of developing ITP when treated with ICI and should be closely monitored for this risk within 60 days of treatment. The potential biological mechanism of ICIs-induced ITP may be related to the dysfunction of megakaryocyte autophagy through the overactivation of the mTOR-related signaling pathway. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of ICIs-induced ITP. Clinicians should pay attention to this potentially fatal adverse reaction.

Prolonged haematologic toxicity in CAR-T-cell therapy: A review

Chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy is a novel immunotherapy with encouraging results for treatment of relapsed/refractory haematologic malignancies. With increasing use, our understanding of immune-mediated side effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity has improved; nevertheless, prolonged haematologic toxicity (PHT), with a high incidence rate, remains underrecognized. Owing to heterogeneity in populations, the CAR-T cells used and diseases treated as well as differences in the definition of PHT, its rate, risk factors and management vary across studies. In this review, we provide a narrative of PHT occurring in patients following CAR-T-cell therapy; evidence of PHT treatment strategies is also presented, with the aim of contributing to systematic understanding of PHT.

Inflammatory abrasion of hematopoietic stem cells: a candidate clue for the post-CAR-T hematotoxicity?

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown remarkable effects in treating various hematological malignancies. However, hematotoxicity, specifically neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, poses a serious threat to patient prognosis and remains a less focused adverse effect of CAR-T therapy. The mechanism underlying lasting or recurring late-phase hematotoxicity, long after the influence of lymphodepletion therapy and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the current clinical studies on CAR-T late hematotoxicity to clarify its definition, incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and interventions. Owing to the effectiveness of transfusing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in rescuing severe CAR-T late hematotoxicity and the unignorable role of inflammation in CAR-T therapy, this review also discusses possible mechanisms of the harmful influence of inflammation on HSCs, including inflammatory abrasion of the number and the function of HSCs. We also discuss chronic and acute inflammation. Cytokines, cellular immunity, and niche factors likely to be disturbed in CAR-T therapy are highlighted factors with possible contributions to post-CAR-T hematotoxicity.

Low-dose administration of prednisone has a good effect on the treatment of prolonged hematologic toxicity post-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy

Introduction

Hematologic toxicity (HT) is a joint adverse event after CAR-T cells infusion. Some patients experience prolonged hematologic toxicity (PHT), which is challenging to treat.

Methods

We collected clinical data from patients with relapsed refractory B-ALL treated with CD19 CAR-T cells. Patients with PHT who did not respond to erythropoietin, platelet receptor agonists, transfusion, or G-CSF and eventually received low-dose prednisone therapy were included in the analysis. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of low-dose prednisone on PHT.

Results

Among 109 patients treated with CD19 CAR-T cells, 78.9% (86/109) of patients were evaluated as PHT. Of these, 15 patients had persistent hematological toxicity after infusion (12 were grade 3/4 cytopenia, 12 were trilineage cytopenia and 3 were bilineage cytopenia), 2 developed cytopenia without apparent cause after D28. The initial prednisone dose was 0.5 mg/kg/day, and the median response time was 21 days (7-40 days). The recovery rate of blood count was 100%, and the complete recovery rate ranged from 60% to 66.67%. Especially exciting was that HT recurred in 6 patients after stopping prednisone. They were relieved again after the administration of prednisone. The median follow-up time was 14.97 months (4.1-31.2 months). Twelve-month duration of PFS and OS rates were 58.8% (±11.9%) and 64.7% (±11.6%). We did not observe any other side effects of prednisone apart from drug-controllable hyperglycemia and hypertension.

Discussion

We suggest that low-dose prednisone is a beneficial and tolerable therapy for PHT after CAR-T cells. The trials have been registered at www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR-ONN-16009862 (November 14, 2016) and ChiCTR1800015164 (March 11, 2018).

Preclinical proof of concept for VivoVec, a lentiviral-based platform for in vivo CAR T-cell engineering

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated transformational outcomes in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but their widespread use is hindered by technical and logistical challenges associated with ex vivo cell manufacturing. To overcome these challenges, we developed VivoVec, a lentiviral vector-based platform for in vivo engineering of T cells. UB-VV100, a VivoVec clinical candidate for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, displays an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) on the surface and delivers a genetic payload that encodes a second-generation CD19-targeted CAR along with a rapamycin-activated cytokine receptor (RACR) system designed to overcome the need for lymphodepleting chemotherapy in supporting successful CAR T-cell expansion and persistence. In the presence of exogenous rapamycin, non-transduced immune cells are suppressed, while the RACR system in transduced cells converts rapamycin binding to an interleukin (IL)-2/IL-15 signal to promote proliferation.

METHODS

UB-VV100 was administered to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors and from patients with B-cell malignancy without additional stimulation. Cultures were assessed for CAR T-cell transduction and function. Biodistribution was evaluated in CD34-humanized mice and in canines. In vivo efficacy was evaluated against normal B cells in CD34-humanized mice and against systemic tumor xenografts in PBMC-humanized mice.

RESULTS

In vitro, administration of UB-VV100 resulted in dose-dependent and anti-CD3 scFv-dependent T-cell activation and CAR T-cell transduction. The resulting CAR T cells exhibited selective expansion in rapamycin and antigen-dependent activity against malignant B-cell targets. In humanized mouse and canine studies, UB-VV100 demonstrated a favorable biodistribution profile, with transduction events limited to the immune compartment after intranodal or intraperitoneal administration. Administration of UB-VV100 to humanized mice engrafted with B-cell tumors resulted in CAR T-cell transduction, expansion, and elimination of systemic malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that UB-VV100 generates functional CAR T cells in vivo, which could expand patient access to CAR T technology in both hematological and solid tumors without the need for ex vivo cell manufacturing.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies: Current Opportunities and Challenges

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy represents a major breakthrough in cancer treatment, and it has achieved unprecedented success in hematological malignancies, especially in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. At present, CD19 and BCMA are the most common targets in CAR-T cell therapy, and numerous novel therapeutic targets are being explored. However, the adverse events related to CAR-T cell therapy might be serious or even life-threatening, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), CAR-T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), infections, cytopenia, and CRS-related coagulopathy. In addition, due to antigen escape, the limited CAR-T cell persistence, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, a considerable proportion of patients relapse after CAR-T cell therapy. Thus, in this review, we focus on the progress and challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies, such as attractive therapeutic targets, CAR-T related toxicities, and resistance to CAR-T cell therapy, and provide some practical recommendations.