Perspectives and Expertise in Establishing a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Programme for Challenging Childhood Cancer Patient Populations

Pediatric oncology services in Nepal: A special focus on pharmacy practice

The role of clinical pharmacists or oncology pharmacists in pediatric oncology has been established as important in anticancer regimen review, dose calculation, recommendation, chemocounseling, identification of drug-related problems, its resolution, and, prevention and monitoring of adverse drug reactions within high-income countries. With several hospitals providing pediatric oncology services in Nepal, clinical pharmacist involvement in these hospitals is very poor. Upon reviewing the reputed organization and association focused on pediatric oncology pharmacy practice, it looks imperative for Nepal to initiate clinical pharmacy services which will further help in improving patient health outcomes. As such in this commentary, we try to accentuate the pediatric oncology services and pediatric pharmacy practice within Nepal and try to pinpoint the potential areas for clinical pharmacists to focus if they intend to provide services in pediatric oncology pharmacy practice.

Generation of evidence-based carboplatin dosing guidelines for neonates and infants

BACKGROUND

To optimally dose childhood cancer patients it is essential that we apply evidence-based dosing approaches. Carboplatin is commonly dosed to achieve a cumulative target exposure (AUC) in children, with target AUC values of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min defined. To achieve these exposures patients are dosed at 6.6 mg/kg/day or 4.4 mg/kg for patients <5 kg. The current study uses real world clinical pharmacology data to optimise body weight-based doses to effectively target AUCs of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min in infants.

METHODS

Carboplatin exposures were determined across 165 treatment cycles in 82 patients ≤10 kg. AUC and clearance values were determined by Bayesian modelling from samples collected on day 1. These parameters were utilised to assess current dosing variability, determine doses required to achieve target AUC values and predict change in AUC using the modified dose.

RESULTS

No significant differences in clearance were identified between patients <5 kg and 5-10 kg. Consequently, for patients <5 kg, 4.4 mg/kg dosing was not sufficient to achieve a target AUC of 5.2 mg/ml.min, with <55% of patients within 25% of this target. Optimised daily doses for patients ≤10 kg were 6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg for cumulative carboplatin target exposures of 5.2 and 7.8 mg/ml.min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of these evidence-based carboplatin doses in neonates and infants will reduce drug exposure variability and positively impact treatment.

Should personalised dosing have a role in cancer treatment?

Almost all pharmaceutical products are approved on the basis of their effect in patients representing the "average" of the population studied in registrational trials, with most drug labels allowing, at most, for empirical dose reduction in the case of toxicity. In this perspective article we explore some of the evidence that supports the use of personalised dosing in cancer treatment and show how we have been able to build on existing models linking dose, exposure and toxicity to demonstrate how dose optimisation, including increasing the dose, has the potential to significantly improve efficacy outcomes. We also explore, through the lens of our own experience of developing a personalised dosing platform, some of the hurdles that stand in the way of implementing a personalised approach to dosing in real world settings. In particular, our experience is illustrated by the application of a dosing platform for docetaxel treatment in prostate cancer.