DPP6 and MFAP5 are associated with immune infiltration as diagnostic biomarkers in distinguishing uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma

Potential Markers to Differentiate Uterine Leiomyosarcomas from Leiomyomas

Uterine leiomyomas (ULM) are the most common benign tumors of the female genitalia, while uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) are rare. The sarcoma is diffuse growth, prone to hematogenous metastasis, and has a poor prognosis. Due to their similar clinical symptoms and morphological features, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish them, and the final diagnosis depends on histological diagnosis. Misdiagnosis of ULM as ULMS will lead to more invasive and extensive surgery when it is not needed, while misdiagnosis of ULMS as ULM may lead to delayed treatment and poor prognosis. This review searched and studied the published articles on ULM and ULMS, and summarized the potential markers for the differential diagnosis of ULMS. These markers will facilitate differential diagnosis and personalized treatment, providing timely diagnosis and potentially better prognosis for patients.

Identification and validation of feature genes associated with M1 macrophages in preeclampsia

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific cardiovascular complication that is the leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have indicated the importance of immune cells, such as M1 and M2 macrophages, in the pathogenesis of PE. However, the mechanisms leading to immune dysregulation are unclear. Data-independent acquisition proteomic analysis was performed on placental tissues collected from patients with PE and healthy controls. Transcriptome data for placenta samples from patients with PE and their corresponding controls were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differential analysis of transcriptome and proteome data between PE and control groups was performed using R software. Immunocytic infiltration scoring was performed using the quantiseq algorithm. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) screened for feature genes associated with M1 cell infiltration. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis identified hub genes. We confirm that the infiltration score of M1 macrophages was significantly increased in the placental tissues of patients with PE. Differential analysis, WGCNA, and PPI analysis identified four hub molecules associated with M1 cell infiltration (HTRA4, POGK, MFAP5, and INHBA). The hub molecules displayed dysregulated expression in PE tissues. The qPCR, Western blots, and immunohistochemistry analyses confirmed that Inhibin, beta A (INHBA) was highly expressed in placental tissues of patients with PE. Immunofluorescence revealed the extensive infiltration of M1 macrophages in the placental tissues of patients with PE and their co-localization with INHBA. The collective results identified hub genes associated with M1 macrophage infiltration, providing potential targets for the pathogenesis and treatment of PE.

Interactions between MFAP5 + fibroblasts and tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells shape the malignant microenvironment of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not yet been fully developed and utilized because of the complexity of the cell-cell interactions within the TME. The further exploration of these interactions among tumor-specific clusters would provide more detailed information about these communication networks with potential curative value.

METHODS

Single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and bulk RNA sequencing datasets were integrated in this study to explore the biological properties of MFAP5 + fibroblasts and their interactions with tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells in colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunohistochemistry were performed to confirm the results of these analyses.

RESULTS

We profiled heterogeneous single-cell landscapes across 27,414 cells obtained from tumors and adjacent tissues. We mainly focused on the pro-tumorigenic functions of the identified MFAP5 + fibroblasts. We demonstrated that tumor-resident MFAP5 + fibroblasts and myeloid cells (particularly C1QC + macrophages) were positively correlated in both spatial transcriptomics and bulk RNA-seq public cohorts. These cells and their interactions might shape the malignant behavior of CRC. Intercellular interaction analysis suggested that MFAP5 + fibroblasts could reciprocally communicate with C1QC + macrophages and other myeloid cells to remodel unfavorable conditions via MIF/CD74, IL34/CSF1R, and other tumor-promoting signaling pathways.

CONCLUSION

Our study has elucidated the underlying pro-tumor mechanisms of tumor-resident MFAP5 + fibroblasts and provided valuable targets for the disruption of their properties.

Microfibril-associated protein 5 and the regulation of skin scar formation

Many factors regulate scar formation, which yields a modified extracellular matrix (ECM). Among ECM components, microfibril-associated proteins have been minimally explored in the context of skin wound repair. Microfibril-associated protein 5 (MFAP5), a small 25 kD serine and threonine rich microfibril-associated protein, influences microfibril function and modulates major extracellular signaling pathways. Though known to be associated with fibrosis and angiogenesis in certain pathologies, MFAP5's role in wound healing is unknown. Using a murine model of skin wound repair, we found that MFAP5 is significantly expressed during the proliferative and remodeling phases of healing. Analysis of existing single-cell RNA-sequencing data from mouse skin wounds identified two fibroblast subpopulations as the main expressors of MFAP5 during wound healing. Furthermore, neutralization of MFAP5 in healing mouse wounds decreased collagen deposition and refined angiogenesis without altering wound closure. In vitro, recombinant MFAP5 significantly enhanced dermal fibroblast migration, collagen contractility, and expression of pro-fibrotic genes. Additionally, TGF-ß1 increased MFAP5 expression and production in dermal fibroblasts. Our findings suggest that MFAP5 regulates fibroblast function and influences scar formation in healing wounds. Our work demonstrates a previously undescribed role for MFAP5 and suggests that microfibril-associated proteins may be significant modulators of wound healing outcomes and scarring.