Local control and patient reported outcomes after online MR guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases

Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases: a pooled analysis following the estro/eortc consensus recommendations

A large pooled analysis of liver oligometastases, classified accordingly to the ESTRO/EORTC recommendations, treated by stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and Radiosurgery (SRS) was carried out. The clinical and dosimetric data of patients who underwent SBRT/SRS for liver metastases were analysed in terms of efficacy and toxicity profile. In particular, the Local Control (LC), the Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS), the Disease-Free Survival (DFS), the Overall Survival (OS), and the Next Systemic Therapy Free Survival (NEST-FS) rates were analysed. 113 patients (M/F: 49/64), accounting for a total of 150 hepatic lesions (March 2006-February 2023) in two Italian radiotherapy Institutions were evaluated. Median age was 67 years old (36-92) and 48 (42.5%) patients had at least one comorbidity. The majority of the lesions were induced (30.7%) or repeated oligoprogressive (12.7%) metastases. 98 lesions were treated with more than one daily fraction (mainly 50 Gy in 5 fractions), while 52 were radiosurgery treatments (mainly 32 Gy). The treatment response at 3-4 months was evaluable in 147 lesions: complete response was 32.0%, partial response 17.0%, and stable disease 32.0%. Actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 1 year were 75.8%, 37.7%, 34.9%, 78.7%, and 59.4% respectively; while actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 2 years were 52.1%, 24.9%, 21.9%, 51.3%, and 36.8%, respectively. The achievement of complete response, synchronous oligometastases, and no treatment interruptions correlated with a more favorable outcomes. As per the toxicity profile, we registered only two acute and one late toxicity cases higher than grade 2. Stereotactic treatment for liver metastases seems to be a safe and promising option in terms of local control. The best results in term of outcomes have been obtained in patients with complete response, synchronous oligometastases, favorable histology, and no treatment interruptions.

Interobserver variation in tumor delineation of liver metastases using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background and purpose

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of liver metastases is an upcoming high-precision non-invasive treatment. Interobserver variation (IOV) in tumor delineation, however, remains a relevant uncertainty for planning target volume (PTV) margins. The aims of this study were to quantify IOV in MRI-based delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) of liver metastases and to detect patient-specific factors influencing IOV.

Materials and methods

A total of 22 patients with liver metastases from three primary tumor origins were selected (colorectal(8), breast(6), lung(8)). Delineation guidelines and planning MRI-scans were provided to eight radiation oncologists who delineated all GTVs. All delineations were centrally peer reviewed to identify outliers not meeting the guidelines. Analyses were performed both in- and excluding outliers. IOV was quantified as the standard deviation (SD) of the perpendicular distance of each observer's delineation towards the median delineation. The correlation of IOV with shape regularity, tumor origin and volume was determined.

Results

Including all delineations, average IOV was 1.6 mm (range 0.6-3.3 mm). From 160 delineations, in total fourteen single delineations were marked as outliers after peer review. After excluding outliers, the average IOV was 1.3 mm (range 0.6-2.3 mm). There was no significant correlation between IOV and tumor origin or volume. However, there was a significant correlation between IOV and regularity (Spearman's ρs = -0.66; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

MRI-based IOV in tumor delineation of liver metastases was 1.3-1.6 mm, from which PTV margins for IOV can be calculated. Tumor regularity and IOV were significantly correlated, potentially allowing for patient-specific margin calculation.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Liver Cancer

The role of radiotherapy in the management of primary and metastatic liver malignancies has expanded in recent years due to advances such as IGRT and SBRT. MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has arisen as an excellent option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver metastases due to the ability to combine improved hepatic imaging with conformal treatment planning paradigms like adaptive radiotherapy and advanced motion management techniques. Herein we review the data for MRgRT for liver malignancies, as well as describe workflow and technical considerations for the 2 commercially available MRgRT delivery platforms.