1
|
Fan P, Lyu P, Gao F, Li J, Wei C, Du G. A Novel Endoscopic Approach for Treating Breast Cancer: Haigui-1 Hole. Surg Innov 2024; 31:349-354. [PMID: 38867678 DOI: 10.1177/15533506241262563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic surgery is an effective technique for preserving the nipple and areola, as well as for sentinel lymph node biopsy and breast implant reconstruction. However, the technical challenges associated with endoscopic surgery have limited its widespread adoption. METHODS In the normal single-port endoscopic surgery, the ultrasonic knife was accessed through the retractor. In our modified procedure, a tiny 5 mm incision was made at the lateral margin underneath the breast, serving as the second entry port for the ultrasonic scalpel, which was referred to as the "Haigui-1 hole". Preoperative and postoperative indicators such as blood loss, operative time, and postoperative drainage volume were collected. Differences between parameters were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS Endoscopic surgery with the assistance of the "Haigui-1 hole" led to preserved breast aesthetics with minimal scarring. Moreover, "Haigui-1 hole" surgery significantly reduced the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative drainage volume compared to normal single-port endoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION The "Haigui-1 hole" procedure, which involves the addition of a second entrance to improve the maneuverability of the ultrasonic knife, is worthy of further promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pingming Fan
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Pengfei Lyu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Fangfang Gao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Jingtai Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Changyuan Wei
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Guankui Du
- Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education, School of Basic Medicine and Life Sciences, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dvorak T, Meeks S, Dvorak L, Rineer J, Kelly P, Ramakrishna N, Henig T, Kucukvar M, Onat NC, Tatari O, Shah A, Salazar J, Zeidan O. Evaluating Carbon Footprint of Proton Therapy Based on Power Consumption and Possible Mitigation Strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:22-30. [PMID: 37244624 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing concern about rising carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their hazardous effect on human health. This study quantifies the energy utilization of proton therapy, assesses the corresponding carbon footprint, and discusses possible offsetting strategies toward carbon-neutral health care operations. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients treated between July 2020 and June 2021 using the Mevion proton system were evaluated. Current measurements were converted to kilowatts of power consumption. Patients were reviewed for disease, dose, number of fractions, and duration of beam. The Environmental Protection Agency calculator was used to convert power consumption to tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) for scope-based carbon footprint accounting. RESULTS There were 185 patients treated and a total of 5176 fractions delivered (average, 28). Power consumption was 55.8 kW in standby/night mode and 64.4 kW during BeamOn, for an annual total of 490 MWh. BeamOn time was 149.6 hours, and BeamOn consumption accounted for 2% of the machine total. Power consumption was 52 kWh per patient (breast, highest at 140 kWh; prostate, lowest at 28 kWh). Annual power consumption of the administrative areas was approximately 96 MWh, for a program total of 586 MWh. The carbon footprint for BeamOn time was 4.17 metric tons of CO2e, or 23 kg per patient course (breast cancer, 60 kg; prostate, 12 kg). The annual carbon footprint for the machine was 212.2 tons CO2e, and for the proton program, 253.7 tons CO2e, with an attributed footprint of 1372 kg CO2e per patient. The corresponding CO2e offset for the program could be 4192 new trees planted and grown for 10 years (23 trees per patient). CONCLUSIONS The carbon footprint varied by disease treated. On average, the carbon footprint was 23 kg of CO2e per patient and 253.7 tons of CO2e for the proton program. There are a number of reduction, mitigation, and offset strategies possible for radiation oncologists that should be explored, such as waste minimization, less treatment commuting, efficient energy use, and renewable electricity power use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Dvorak
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida.
| | | | - Lucas Dvorak
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Omer Tatari
- University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
| | - Amish Shah
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | | | - Omar Zeidan
- Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Omosule M, De Silva-Minor S, Coombs N. Case Report: Intraoperative radiotherapy as the new standard of care for breast cancer patients with disabling health conditions or impairments. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1156619. [PMID: 37274260 PMCID: PMC10233125 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1156619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In selected patients, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) offers an alternative to standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) while providing equivalent breast cancer control outcomes. After IORT, most patients do not require external beam radiotherapy and thus avoid the need to travel to and from a radiotherapy centre in the weeks after surgery. EBRT is associated with an increased risk of non-breast cancer mortality and poorer cosmetic outcomes while increasing patient travel time, emissions associated with travel and time spent in the hospital. Consequently, EBRT is associated with an overall reduction in quality of life compared to IORT. Patients with other on-going health conditions or clinical impairments are likely to be affected by the daily radiotherapy requirement. Should these patients be consulted during their pre-operative assessment as to options to undergo IORT? This paper describes a case of IORT and follow up in a functionally blind patient. Quality of life effects are elucidated and further support the use of IORT in selected breast cancer patients with health conditions or impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Omosule
- GKT School of Medical Education, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shiroma De Silva-Minor
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nathan Coombs
- Department of Breast Surgery, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041260. [PMID: 36831598 PMCID: PMC9954587 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is a well-established treatment standard for early invasive breast cancer. Screening, early diagnosis, refinement in surgical techniques, the knowledge of new and specific molecular prognostic factors, and now the standard use of more effective neo/adjuvant systemic therapies have proven instrumental in reducing the rates of locoregional relapses. This underscores the need for reliably identifying women with such low-risk disease burdens in whom elimination of radiation from the treatment plan would not compromise oncological safety. This review summarizes the current evidence for radiation de-intensification strategies and details ongoing prospective clinical trials investigating the omission of adjuvant whole breast irradiation in molecularly defined low-risk breast cancers and related evidence supporting the potential for radiation de-escalation in HER2+ and triple-negative clinical subtypes. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for the de-escalation of regional nodal irradiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we also detail the current knowledge of the clinical value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and liquid-based biomarkers as prognostic factors for locoregional relapse.
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang H, Qiu M, Feng Y, Wen N, Zhou J, Qin X, Li J, Liu X, Wang X, Du Z. The role of radiotherapy in HER2+ early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Front Oncol 2023; 12:903001. [PMID: 36686782 PMCID: PMC9845557 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Due to radioresistance, some HER2+ patients may gain limited benefit from radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aimed to develop an individualized nomogram to identify early-stage HER2+ patients who could omit RT after BCS. Methods The data of HER2+ patients with T0-2N0M0 breast cancer after BCS between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Based on the independent prognostic factors determined by the Cox analysis in patients without RT after propensity score matching (PSM), the nomogram and risk stratification model were constructed, and then the prognosis of patients with and without RT was compared in each stratified group. Results A total of 10799 early-stage HER2+ patients after BCS were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups after PSM. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that RT could improve overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.45, P<0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (HR: 0.53, P<0.001). Age, marital status, tumor location, tumor size, and chemotherapy were identified by multivariate Cox analysis in patients without RT and were incorporated into a well-validated nomogram. The risk stratification model based on the nomogram indicated that RT was associated with improved OS (HR 0.40, P< 0.001) and BCSS (HR 0.39, P< 0.001) in the high-risk group but not in the low-risk group [OS: HR 1.04, P = 0.94; BCSS: HR 1.06, P = 0.93]. Conclusion RT could significantly improve the OS and BCSS of HER2+ early-stage breast cancer patients after BCS on the whole. For high-risk patients, RT is an essential component of cancer therapy. However, the omission of radiotherapy may be considered for low-risk HER2+ early-stage patients. Further validation and improvement of the nomogram by prospective study or randomized controlled trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanzuo Yang
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mengxue Qiu
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu Feng
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Wen
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiao Zhou
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangquan Qin
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Li
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Province People’s Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xinran Liu
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,*Correspondence: Zhenggui Du, ; Xiaodong Wang,
| | - Zhenggui Du
- Breast Disease Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China,*Correspondence: Zhenggui Du, ; Xiaodong Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
In Reply to Ward et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:256-259. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
7
|
Vaidya JS, Bulsara M, Wenz F, Sperk E, Massarut S, Alvarado M, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Bernstein M, Holmes D, Vinante L, Pigorsch S, Lundgren S, Uhl V, Joseph D, Tobias JS. The TARGIT-A Randomized Trial: TARGIT-IORT Versus Whole Breast Radiation Therapy: Long-Term Local Control and Survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:77-82. [PMID: 35998867 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jayant S Vaidya
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Max Bulsara
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Biostatistics, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Frederik Wenz
- University Medical Centre Freiburg, University of Frieberg, Frieberg, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Samuele Massarut
- Department of Surgery, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Michael Alvarado
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | - Dennis Holmes
- University of Southern California, John Wayne Cancer Institute & Helen Rey Breast Cancer Foundation, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lorenzo Vinante
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- Department of RadioOncology and Radiotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steinar Lundgren
- Department of Oncology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Valery Uhl
- Radiation Oncology, Summit Medical Center, Oakland, California
| | - David Joseph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jeffrey S Tobias
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Refaat T, Gros SE, Small W. The case for risk-stratified IORT for early breast cancer. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:719-722. [PMID: 36167653 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Refaat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Sebastien E Gros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.
| |
Collapse
|