1
|
Scaglione G, Arciuolo D, Travaglino A, Santoro A, Angelico G, Spadola S, Inzani F, D’Alessandris N, Raffone A, Fulgione C, Padial Urtueta B, Sfregola S, Valente M, Addante F, d’Amati A, Cianfrini F, Piermattei A, Pedone Anchora L, Scambia G, Ferrandina G, Zannoni GF. Prognostic Value of Mandard's Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) in Post Chemo-Radiotherapy Cervical Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3228. [PMID: 37892049 PMCID: PMC10605878 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), definitive chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment, but chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery could be an alternative choice in selected patients. We enrolled 244 patients affected by LACC and treated with CT-RT followed by surgery in order to assess the prognostic role of the histological response using the Mandard scoring system. Results: A complete pathological response (TRG 0) was observed in 118 patients (48.4%), rare residual cancer cells (TRG2) were found in 49 cases (20.1%), increased number of cancer cells but fibrosis still predominating (TRG3) in 35 cases (14.3%), and 42 (17.2%) were classified as non-responders (TRG4-5). TRG was significantly associated with both OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001). The survival curves highlighted two main prognostic groups: TRG1-TRG2 and TRG3-TRG4-5. Main responders (TRG1-2) showed a 92% 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) and a 75% 5-year disease free survival (5y-DFS). Minor or no responders showed a 48% 5y-OS and a 39% 5y-DFS. The two-tiered TRG was independently associated with both DFS and OS in Cox regression analysis. Conclusion. We showed that Mandard TRG is an independent prognostic factor in post-CT/RT LACC, with potential benefits in defining post-treatment adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Scaglione
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Damiano Arciuolo
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Angela Santoro
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Angelico
- Pathology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95126 Catania, Italy; (G.A.); (S.S.)
| | - Saveria Spadola
- Pathology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95126 Catania, Italy; (G.A.); (S.S.)
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Nicoletta D’Alessandris
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Caterina Fulgione
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Belen Padial Urtueta
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Stefania Sfregola
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Michele Valente
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesca Addante
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Antonio d’Amati
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70100 Bari, Italy;
| | - Federica Cianfrini
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Alessia Piermattei
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.P.A.); (G.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.P.A.); (G.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.P.A.); (G.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (D.A.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (N.D.); (B.P.U.); (S.S.); (M.V.); (F.A.); (F.C.); (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer Patients Effectively Improves Immune Function. DISEASE MARKERS 2022; 2022:3611174. [PMID: 36157208 PMCID: PMC9492327 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3611174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer and the effect on the immune function of patients. Methods Between January 2021 and December 2021, 42 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed and treated at our hospital were recruited and randomly assigned at a 1 : 1 ratio to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus open radical hysterectomy (control group) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (treatment group) (study group). Outcome measures included surgical indices, clinical outcomes, and immunological function. Results There were no significant differences in the operative time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients receiving laparoscopic surgery had significantly less intraoperative bleeding and shorter time lapse before postoperative anal exhaustion, time lapse before out-of-bed activities, and hospital stay versus patients receiving open surgery (P < 0.05). Laparoscopic surgery resulted in a significantly higher efficacy (90.48%) versus open surgery (57.14%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, patients in the study group showed lower levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and cancer antigen (CA125) than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, patients given laparoscopic surgery showed significantly lower CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ levels and higher CD4+/CD8+ levels versus those with open surgery (P < 0.05). The postoperative conditions of the two groups, including recatheterization, postoperative blood transfusion, and secondary anti-inflammation were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The study group showed a significantly lower incidence of complications (19.05%) than the control group (71.43%) (P < 0.05). Patients in the study group had a lower reoperation rate and a higher survival rate (0.00%, 95.24%) than those in the control group (19.05%, 66.67%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy effectively improves clinical efficacy, lowers cancer marker levels, improves patients' immune function, reduces the risk of adverse events, and improves patients' prognosis with less intraoperative bleeding, less trauma, faster postoperative recovery, and shorter hospital stay for cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
|