Association of Molecular Biomarker Heterogeneity With Treatment Pattern and Disease Outcomes in Multifocal or Multicentric Breast Cancer

Intertumoral heterogeneity of bifocal breast cancer: a morphological and molecular study

PURPOSE

To analyze concordance rates between individual foci of bifocal BC for histological grade, type and intrinsic subtype based on immunohistochemical (IHC) and mRNA-testing using MammaTyper.

METHODS

We evaluated histological grade and type as well as intrinsic subtype based on IHC status for estrogen and progesterone receptors, HER2 and the mitotic activity index in 158 individual foci of 79 bifocal BC. A subgroup of 31 cases additionally underwent mRNA-based subtyping using the MammaTyper (MT) test. We calculated concordance rates between individual foci, as well as Cohen's Kappa (K).

RESULTS

For 79 bifocal BC, concordance rates between individual foci for grade, histological type, and IHC-based subtype were 69.6% (K=0.53), 92.4% (K=0.81), and 74.7% (K=0.62), respectively. In the MT subgroup of 31 bifocal BC, concordance rates between individual foci for grade, histological type, IHC-based and mRNA-based intrinsic subtype were 87.1% (K=0.78), 90.3% (K=0.73), 87.1% (K=0.82), and 87.1% (K=0.7), respectively. Overall concordance between IHC- and mRNA-based subtype in the MT subgroup was 79% (K=0.7). In 6/79 cases (7.6%), testing of the smaller focus added clinically relevant information either on IHC- or mRNA-level: four cases showed high hormonal receptor expression while the expression in the larger focus was negative or low, warranting additional endocrine treatment; two cases presented with higher proliferative activity in the smaller focus, warranting additional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In bifocal BC, intertumoral heterogeneity on the morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular level is common, with discordant intrinsic subtype in up to 25% between individual foci, with about 8% clinically relevant discordances.

Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer

Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

Correlation analysis of MR elastography and Ki-67 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive primary liver cancer with dismal outcome, high Ki-67 expression is associated with active progression and poor prognosis of iCCA, the application of MRE in the prediction of iCCA Ki-67 expression has not yet been investigated until now. We aimed to evaluate the value of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in assessing Ki-67 expression for iCCA.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, 97 patients (57 high Ki-67 and 40 low Ki-67; 58 males, 39 females; mean age, 58.89 years, ranges 36-70 years) were included. At the multivariate analysis, tumor stiffness (odds ratio (OR) = 1.669 [95% CI: 1.307-2.131], p < 0.001) and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (OR = 0.030 [95% CI: 0.002, 0.476], p = 0.013) were independent significant variables associated with Ki-67. Areas under the curve of tumor stiffness for the identification of high Ki-67 were 0.796 (95% CI 0.702, 0.871). Tumor stiffness was moderately correlated with Ki-67 level (r = 0.593, p < 0.001). When both predictive variables of tumor stiffness and ADC were integrated, the best performance was achieved with area under the curve values of 0.864 (95% CI 0.780-0.926).

CONCLUSION

MRE-based tumor stiffness correlated with Ki-67 in iCCA and could be investigated as a potential prognostic biomarker. The combined model incorporating both tumor stiffness and ADC increased the predictive performance.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MRE-based tumor stiffness might be a surrogate imaging biomarker to predict Ki-67 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients, reflecting tumor cellular proliferation. The combined model incorporating both tumor stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient increased the predictive performance.

KEY POINTS

• MRE-based tumor stiffness shows a significant correlation with Ki-67. • The combined model incorporating tumor stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient demonstrated an optimized predictive performance for Ki-67 expression. • MRE-based tumor stiffness could be investigated as a potential prognostic biomarker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Clinical evaluation of molecular surrogate subtypes in patients with ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

When ipsilateral multifocal primary breast cancer (IMBC) is detected, standard routine is to evaluate the largest tumor with immunohistochemistry (IHC). As all foci are not routinely characterized, many patients may not receive optimal adjuvant treatment. Here, we assess the clinical relevance of examining at least two foci present in patients with IMBC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed and treated for IMBC at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden) between 2012 and 2017 were screened. In total, 180 patients with ≥ 2 invasive foci (183 specimens) were assessed with IHC and included in this study. Expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, Ki67, HER2, and tumor grade were used to determine the molecular surrogate subtypes and discordance among the foci was recorded. An additional multidisciplinary team board was then held to re-assess whether treatment recommendations changed due to discordances in molecular surrogate subtype between the different foci.

RESULTS

Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 was found in 2.7%, 19.1%, 7.7%, and 16.9% of invasive foci, respectively. Discordance in the molecular surrogate subtypes was found in 48 of 180 (26.7%) patients, which resulted in therapy changes for 11 patients (6.1%). These patients received additional endocrine therapy (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 3), and combined chemotherapy and trastuzumab (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, when assessing at least two tumor foci with IHC, regardless of shared morphology or tumor grade between the different foci, 6.1% of patients with IMBC were recommended additional adjuvant treatment. A pathologic assessment using IHC of all foci is therefore recommended to assist in individualized treatment decision making.