Case Report: A Case of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Which Achieved Progression Free for Over 12 Months by Subsequent Therapy with Anlotinib Hydrochloride Plus Tegafur-Gimeracil-Oteracil Potassium (TS-1)

Recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with N-803 and PD-L1 t-haNK followed by an EGFR-targeted nanocell drug conjugate

Multimodal temporal therapy orchestrated to leverage immunotherapy, tumor-targeted chemotherapy, and natural killer (NK) cell therapy may provide an opportunity to induce immunogenic cell death for tumor response and increased survival in patients with recurrent cancer. The interleukin-15 (IL-15) superagonist N-803, an enhancer of NK cells, CD4 + T cells, cytotoxic CD8 + T cells, and memory T-cell activity, combined with off-the-shelf PD-L1-targeted high-affinity NK (PD-L1 t-haNK) cells represent novel immunotherapies designed to overcome an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). The epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibody-nanocell conjugate E-EDV-D682 provides tumor-targeted chemotherapy in the form of its anthracycline metabolite PNU159682 (nemorubicin) cargo and is currently being studied in combination with immunomodulatory EDVs delivering the adjuvant α-galactosyl ceramide (GC). Here, we report the compassionate use treatment of this combination in a patient with recurrent, metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after 3 lines of therapy. Under the initial single-patient Investigational New Drug (spIND) protocol, the patient received N-803, PD-L1 t-haNK cells, and the albumin doxorubicin conjugate aldoxorubicin for ~27 months. The patient's disease became stable on this regimen, and a transient complete response was observed by ~14 months of therapy. Due to progression, a second spIND protocol was designed whereby the patient received E-EDV-D682 plus EDV-GC for more than 24 months, which resulted in stable disease and the patient's continued survival at the time this report was written. The patient's extended survival despite the dire prognosis associated with recurrent mPC points to the merits of this temporal combination regimen in overcoming immuno-chemo resistance with enhanced immune activity required for tumor response and extended survival.

Synergistic effect of additional anlotinib and immunotherapy as second-line or later-line treatment in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is in urgent need of a second-line or later-line treatment strategy. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib, specifically anlotinib in combination with immunotherapy, in patients with PDAC who have failed first-line therapy.

Methods

Patients with pathological diagnosis of PDAC were additionally treated with anlotinib, and some patients were treated with anti-PD-1 agents at the same time, which could be retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib were evaluated.

Results

A total of 23 patients were included. In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, regardless of anti-PD-1 agents. Among patients receiving additional anlotinib in combination with anti-PD-1 agents, median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 6.5 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 16 patients (69.6%). In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the majority of AEs were grade 1-3. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) <14% treated with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents had significantly longer OS than patients with baseline RDW ≥14% (p = 0.025). Patients with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents as second-line therapy had a longer OS than those treated as later-line therapy (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that baseline RDW was the only independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.042).

Conclusion

The combination of anlotinib and immunotherapy represents an effective add-on therapy with tolerable AEs as second- or later-line therapy in patients with PDAC, particularly in patients with baseline RDW <14%.

Thyroid collision tumour with pulmonary metastases treated effectively with nedaplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy: A case report

Collision tumour of the thyroid is a rare entity for which surgical resection is the primary treatment. We present here a case of a collision thyroid tumour of oncocytic and papillary carcinoma with lung metastases occurring in a 62-year-old woman who initially presented with a rapidly enlarging cervical mass and dyspnoea. The patient had extensive venous tumour thrombosis in the internal jugular and subclavian veins. The patient received six cycles of combined chemotherapy with nedaplatin and paclitaxel which significantly reduced the size of the metastases in the lungs. Following discharge from the hospital, the patient was treated with oral anlotinib and at 14 months follow up she had not experienced any serious side effects and the metastases in her lung and thyroid surgery areas were well controlled.

A real-world study of anlotinib combined with GS regimen as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib may boost the efficacy of pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment if timely added to the GS regimen (Gemcitabine, Tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium); however, no data has been published. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in combination with the GS regimen(hereafter referred to as the A+GS regimen) in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic PC.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable or metastatic PC treated at Yueyang Central Hospital and Yueyang People's Hospital between October 2018 and June 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective real-world investigation. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR), while the treatment safety was assessed by the frequency of major adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were included in this study, 41 in the GS group and 30 in the A+GS group. The A+GS group had a longer mPFS than the GS group (12.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-18.0) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.1)), respectively (P = 0.005). mOS was longer in the GS+A group) when compared with the GS group (17.0 months (95%CI, 14.0-20.0) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.5)), respectively (P = 0.018). The GS+A group had higher ORR (50.0% vs 26.8%, P = 0.045) and DCR (83.3% vs 58.5%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, there were no grade 4-5 AEs and no treatment-related deaths, and no discernible increase in AEs in the GS+A group when compared with the GS group.

CONCLUSION

The A+GS regimen therapy holds great promise in managing treatment-naive advanced PC, except that future prospective studies with larger sample sizes and multiple centers are required to determine its efficacy and safety.