1
|
Wang J, Wu Z, de Groot EM, Challine A, Mohammad NH, Mook S, Goense L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Discontinuation of neoadjuvant therapy does not influence postoperative short-term outcomes in elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with resectable gastric cancer: a population-based study from the dutch upper gastrointestinal cancer audit (DUCA) data. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:1114-1123. [PMID: 38918269 PMCID: PMC11335952 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01522-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the elderly patients with gastric cancer, it may be more challenging to tolerate complete neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The impact of discontinued NAT on the surgical safety and pathological outcomes of elderly patients with poor tolerance remains poorly understood. METHODS Gastric cancer patients received gastrectomy with curative intent from the Dutch upper GI cancer audit (DUCA) database were included in this study. The independent association of age with not initiating and discontinuation of NAT was assessed with restricted cubic splines (RCS). According to the RCS results, age ≥ 70 years was defined as elderly. Short-term postoperative outcomes and pathological results were compared between elderly patients who completed and discontinued NAT. RESULTS Between 2011- 2021, total of 3049 patients were included. The risk of not initiating NAT increased from 70 years. In 1954 (64%) patients receiving NAT, the risk of discontinuation increased from 55 years, reaching the peak around 74 years. In the elderly, discontinued NAT was not independently associated with worse 30-day mortality, overall complications, anastomotic leakage, re-intervention, and pathologic complete response, but was associated with a higher risk of R1/2 resection (p-value = 0.001), higher ypT stage (p-value = 0.004), ypN + (p-value = 0.008), and non-response ( p-value = 0.012). CONCLUSION A decreased utilization of NAT has been observed in Dutch gastric cancer patients from 70 years due to old age considerations, possibly because of their high risk of discontinuation. Increasing the utilization of NAT may not adversely impact the surgical safety of gastric cancer population ≥ 70 years and may contribute to better pathological results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingpu Wang
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Zhouqiao Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Eline M de Groot
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre Challine
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Imaging and Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Goense
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan M, Tang J, Du W, Du YF, Liu HJ. Systemic immunoinflammatory index and prognostic nutrition index for predicting pathologic responses of patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2024; 14:3922-3934. [PMID: 39267676 PMCID: PMC11387872 DOI: 10.62347/paym2267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
To investigate the value of prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and systemic immunoinflammatory index (SII) for predicting pathological responses of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The clinicopathological data of 326 patients with advanced GC who received NACT in Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. The SII and PNI of patients were calculated. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was leveraged for getting the optimal cutoff values of SII and PNI. The pathological response of patients after NACT, as obtained from their postoperative pathological examinations, was evaluated based on the tumor regression grade (TRG) criteria. Multivariate regression analysis was employed for identifying factors that led to various pathological responses after NACT in advanced GC patients. The log-rank test was utilized for between-group comparison of patients' survival curves. The SII and PNI were 507.45 and 48.48 respectively, and their levels were divided into high and low groups. Pathological response (TRG 0-1) was observed in 66 cases (20.25%), while non-pathological response (TRG 2-3) was observed in 260 cases (79.75%). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, chemotherapy regimen XELOX (capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin), SII < 507.45 (P=0.002), PNI > 48.48 were all independent factors affecting the pathological responses of advanced GC patients after NACT (all P < 0.05). With SII and PNI being included, the AUC was 0.821 (95% CI: 0.765-0.876), and the specificity was 87.90% and the sensitivity was 64.20%. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that NACT patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, XELOX chemotherapy regimen, SII < 507.45 and SII ≥ 507.45 had a higher survival rate. (P < 0.001). Before treatment, tumor diameter < 5 cm, ypT T0-T2, ypN N0, chemotherapy regimen XELOX, SII < 507.45, PNI > 48.48 were all independent factors affecting the pathological response of advanced GC patients after NACT. Moreover, the inclusion of SII and PNI increased the accuracy of predicting the pathological response of patients after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Fan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) Changde 415000, Hunan, China
| | - Jin Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) Changde 415000, Hunan, China
| | - Wei Du
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) Changde 415000, Hunan, China
| | - Yang-Feng Du
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) Changde 415000, Hunan, China
| | - Hai-Jun Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde City) Changde 415000, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shi JM, Li N, Jiang LM, Yang L, Wang SL, Song YW, Liu YP, Fang H, Lu NN, Qi SN, Chen B, Li YX, Zhao DB, Tang Y, Jin J. A prospective phase II clinical trial of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7522. [PMID: 38553594 PMCID: PMC10980744 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58177-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
To investigate the safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy (NCCT) and surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients diagnosed as locally advanced GC or Siewert II/III GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage T3-4 and/or N positive were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent NCRT (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent S-1, followed by NCCT (4 to 6 cycles of the SOX regimen) 2 to 4 weeks after NCRT. Gastric cancer radical resection with D2 lymph node dissection was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the total neoadjuvant therapy. The study was conducted from November 2019 to January 2023, enrolling a total of 46 patients. During the NCRT, all patients completed the treatment without dose reduction or delay. During the NCCT, 32 patients (69.6%) completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events in NCRT (5 cases) were non-hematological. During the course of NCCT, a notable occurrence of hematological toxicities was observed, with grade 3 or higher leukopenia (9.7%) and thrombocytopenia (12.2%) being experienced. A total of 28 patients (60.9%) underwent surgery, achieving R0 resection in all cases. A significant proportion of cases (71.4%) exhibited pathological downstaging to ypT0-2, while 10 patients (35.7%) demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR). The total neoadjuvant therapy comprising NCRT followed by NCCT and surgery demonstrates a low severe adverse reactions and promising efficacy, which could be considered as a viable treatment for locally advanced GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT04062058); the full date of first trial registration was 20/08/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Ming Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Li-Ming Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dong-Bing Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuang ZY, Sun QH, Cao LC, Ma XY, Wang JX, Liu KX, Li J. Efficacy and safety of perioperative therapy for locally resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1046-1058. [PMID: 38577462 PMCID: PMC10989386 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, with over 1 million new cases per year, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. AIM To determine the optimal perioperative treatment regimen for patients with locally resectable GC. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in treating locally resectable GC. The R0 resection rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and incidence of grade 3 or higher nonsurgical severe adverse events (SAEs) associated with various perioperative regimens were analyzed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment regimens and rank their efficacy. RESULTS Thirty RCTs involving 8346 patients were included in this study. Neoadjuvant XELOX plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant CF were found to significantly improve the R0 resection rate compared with surgery alone, and the former had the highest probability of being the most effective option in this context. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant FLOT was associated with the highest probability of being the best regimen for improving OS. Owing to limited data, no definitive ranking could be determined for DFS. Considering nonsurgical SAEs, FLO has emerged as the safest treatment regimen. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights for clinicians when selecting perioperative treatment regimens for patients with locally resectable GC. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Yu Kuang
- Graduate College, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Qian-Hui Sun
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Lu-Chang Cao
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Xin-Yi Ma
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jia-Xi Wang
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Ke-Xin Liu
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jie Li
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu Y, Chen J, Sun X, Lou Y, Fang M, Zhou F, Zhang L, Xin Y. Survival and complications after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1177557. [PMID: 37228495 PMCID: PMC10203550 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1177557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing evidence that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, a number of studies have come to the opposite conclusion. Therefore, our meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods We searched Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Network database, VIP database, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. The searched terms included'Stomach Neoplasms', 'Neoadjuvant Therapy' and 'Chemoradiotherapy'. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the corresponding database to September 2022, and our meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.3) and Stata (version 17) software. Results A total of 17 literatures were included, which involved 7 randomized controlled trials and 10 retrospective studies, with a total of 6831 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with NACT group, the complete response rate(RR=1.95, 95%CI 1.39-2.73, p=0.0001), the partial response rate(RR=1.44, 95%CI 1.22-1.71, p=0.0001), the objective response rate(RR=1.37, 95%CI 1.27-1.54, p=0.00001), the pathologic complete response rate(RR=3.39, 95%CI 2.17-5.30, p=0.00001), the R0 resection rate(RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.09-1.29, p=0.0001) and 3-year overall survival rate(HR=0.89, 95%CI 0.82-0.96, p=0.002) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group were significantly improved. The results of subgroup analyses of gastric cancer subgroup and gastroesophageal junction cancer subgroup were consistent with the overall results. Meanwhile, the stable disease(RR=0.59, 95%CI:0.44-0.81, P=0.0010) of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group was lower than that of neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, and there were no statistical significance in the progressive disease rate(RR=0.57, 95%CI:0.31-1.03, P=0.06), five-year overall survival rate(HR=1.03, 95%CI:0.99-1.07, P=0.839), postoperative complications and adverse reactions between the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. Conclusion Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might bring more survival benefits without significantly increasing adverse reactions. neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be a recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Systematic Review Registration https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-12-0068/, identifier INPLASY202212068.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youqi Zhu
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiuzhou Chen
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xueqing Sun
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yufei Lou
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Miao Fang
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fengjuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Suining County People’s Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yong Xin
- Department of Radiation, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a multicentered, prospective, cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04302-9. [PMID: 36042044 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04302-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and apatinib have been utilized in metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib (SOXPA) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. METHODS This two-centered, prospective, cohort study analyzed 30 resectable LAGC patients receiving SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS Two (6.7%), 18 (60.0%), and 10 (33.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD), separately. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 66.7% and 100.0%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 93.3%. Beyond that, 6 (20.0%), 18 (60.0%), and 6 (20.0%) patients achieved grade 1, 2, and 3 pathological responses. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20%. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.6% and 77.7% respectively; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.6% and 90.1%, separately. What's more, better clinical response (P = 0.046); achievement of ORR (P = 0.014), and better pathological response (P = 0.020) were correlated with longer DFS. Besides, ORR achievement was linked with longer OS (P = 0.040). Most adverse events were relatively mild and manageable. Grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting. No grade 4 adverse events were witnessed. CONCLUSION SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy achieves a satisfying clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and tolerable safety in LAGC patients.
Collapse
|