The Therapeutic Effect and Clinical Outcome of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Bone Metastasis in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy in the Fight Against Bone Metastases: A Review of Recent Developments and Challenges

OPINION STATEMENT

Bone metastasis, a frequent and detrimental complication of advanced cancers, often triggers bone deterioration events that severely compromise patient quality of life and prognosis. The past few years have witnessed the emergence and continuous advancements in immunotherapy, ushering in innovative therapeutic prospects for bone metastasis. These advancements include not only the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as standalone and combined treatments, but also the investigation of novel targets within immune cells residing in bone metastases. These breakthroughs have instilled fresh optimism for effectively managing patients with bone metastasis. This article endeavors to present an exhaustive review of the recent progress made across a spectrum of immunotherapeutic strategies and targeted therapies specifically designed for individuals battling bone metastasis from malignant tumors. By doing so, it seeks to offer insights that can inform clinical practices and guide further medical research in this domain.

Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of patients with cancer, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and urothelial carcinoma. The extension of life expectancy has led to an increased incidence of bone metastases (BM) among patients with cancer. BM result in skeletal-related events, including severe pain, pathological fractures, and nerve palsy. Surgery is typically required for the treatment of BM in patients with an impending fracture; however, it may be avoided in those who respond to ICIs. We systematically reviewed studies analyzing BM responses to treatment with ICIs.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 statement and registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (ID: UMIN000053707). Studies reporting response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA) criteria specific for BM in patients treated with ICIs were included; reports of fewer than five cases and review articles were excluded. Studies involving humans, published in English and Japanese, were searched. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Ultimately, nine studies were analyzed. The Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to assess the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Based on the MDA criteria, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed in 44-78% and 62% patients treated with ICIs plus denosumab for NSCLC and melanoma, respectively. According to the RECIST, CR or PR was recorded in 5% and 7-28% of patients treated with ICIs for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although response rates to ICIs for BM are poor, patients treated with ICI plus denosumab for bone metastases with impending fractures from NSCLC and melanoma are likely to avoid surgery to prevent fractures.

Combining dynamics of serum inflammatory and nutritional indicators as novel biomarkers in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with bone metastases

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the association of the dynamics of serum inflammatory and nutritional indicators with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastases, and to develop a novel predictive scoring system based on these indicators.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC having bone metastases treated with ICIs were categorized as: the development cohort (January 2016 to March 2021, n = 60) and the validation cohort (April 2021 to June 2023, n = 40). Serum indicators of inflammation and nutrition such as C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were investigated before and six weeks after ICI initiation. The correlations of these dynamics with bone metastasis response rate (BoMRR) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. A scoring system consisting of independent predictors was developed (IMMUNO-SCORE) and correlations with clinical outcomes were validated using the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the development cohort, multivariable analysis showed that NLR and PNI dynamics and CRP, NLR, and PNI dynamics were independent predictors of BoMRR and OS, respectively. The IMMUNO-SCORE consisting of NLR and PNI dynamics, which were the common predictors of the clinical outcomes, was significantly correlated with BoMRR (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.001) in cross-validation. The area under the curve of the score (0.786) was higher than individual NLR and PNI dynamics (0.72 and 0.684).

CONCLUSION

Dynamics in NLR and PNI were demonstrated as biomarkers of treatment response and prognosis in ICI treatment of NSCLC with bone metastases, and the score combining these biomarkers was significantly correlated with clinical outcomes.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and denosumab improves clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer with bone metastases

BACKGROUND

The concomitant use of denosumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment may have synergistic effects and enhance antitumor activity; however, this has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastases receiving combination therapy and to identify the best combination regimen.

METHODS

Eighty-six NSCLC patients with bone metastases who received ICI treatment were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups; a denosumab combination group (D + ICI group; n = 47) and a non-combination group (non-D + ICI group; n = 39). The response rate (RR) for bone metastases, disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), real world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated. Additionally, the time when denosumab treatment should commence and concomitant treatment duration were evaluated.

RESULTS

The D + ICI group showed significantly better RR (40.4 % vs. 20.5 %, p = 0.01), DCR (67.3 % vs. 38.7 %, p = 0.02), OS (14.2 vs. 8.6 months, p = 0.02), and rwPFS (7.4 vs. 3.6 months, p < 0.01) than the non-D + ICI group; however, incidence of irAEs showed no difference (29.7 % vs. 12.8 %, p = 0.07). Although clinical outcomes did not differ regardless of whether denosumab was initiated before or after ICI treatment, the group that received concomitant denosumab for more than four months had significantly better RR (46.2 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.03), OS (20.3 vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.01), and rwPFS (10.9 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.01) than the group that received concomitant denosumab for less than four months. However, the landmark analysis showed no significant differences in OS (20.4 vs. 12.7 months, p = 0.11) and rwPFS (22.8 vs. 11.2 months, p = 0.21), and the results of denosumab duration were influenced by long-term survivors.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab showed favorable synergistic effects with ICI treatment and may significantly improve the response to bone metastasis and prognosis without increasing the incidence of irAEs.

Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy on bone metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Bone metastases (BoMs) are prevalent in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) however, there are limited data detailing how BoMs respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging response to ICIs of BoMs against visceral metastases and to evaluate the effect of BoMs on survival.

Materials and methods

A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab in Alberta, Canada from 2015 to 2020. The primary endpoint was the real-world organ specific progression free survival (osPFS) of bone versus visceral metastases. Visceral metastases were categorized as adrenal, brain, liver, lung, lymph node, or other intra-abdominal lesions. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS) amongst patients with and without BoMs.

Results

A total of 573 patients were included of which all patients had visceral metastases and 243 patients (42.4%) had BoMs. High PD-L1 expression was identified in 268 patients (46.8%). No significant difference in osPFS was observed between bone, liver, and intra-abdominal metastases (p=0.20 and p=0.76, respectively), with all showing shorter osPFS than other disease sites. There was no difference in the osPFS of extra-thoracic sites of disease in patients with high PD-L1 expression. There was significant discordance between visceral disease response and bone disease response to ICI (p=0.047). The presence of BoMs was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.26, 95%CI: 1.05-1.53, p=0.01).

Conclusion

Metastatic bone, liver, and intra-abdominal lesions demonstrated inferior clinical responses to ICI relative to other sites of disease. Additionally, the presence of bone and liver metastases were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival. This real-world data suggests that BoMs respond poorly to ICI and may require treatment adjuncts for disease control.

High bone tumor burden to identify advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with survival benefit upon bone targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Bone-targeted agents (BTA), such as denosumab (DN) and zoledronic acid (ZA), have historically reduced the risk of skeletal related events in cancer patients with bone metastases (BM), with no improvement in survival outcomes. In the immunotherapy era, BM have been associated with poor prognosis upon immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Currently, the impact of bone tumor burden on survival upon BTAs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with ICI remains unknown.

METHODS

Data from ICI-treated aNSCLC patients with BM (4/2013-5/2022) in one institution were retrospectively collected. BTA-ICI concurrent treatment was defined as BTA administration at any time before or within 90 days from ICI start. High bone tumor burden (HBTB) was defined as ≥ 3 sites of BM. Median OS (mOS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Aikaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model for data analysis adjusted for clinical variables.

RESULTS

Of 134 patients included, 51 (38 %) received BTA. At a mFU of 39.6 months (m), BTA-ICIs concurrent treatment did not significantly impact on mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 3.9-12.8) versus (vs) 6.8 m (95% CI 4.0-9.6) p = 0.36]; these results were confirmed after adjustment for clinical variables selected by AIC. A multivariate model showed a significant interaction between BTA use and HBTB or radiation therapy to BM. In subgroup analyses, only HBTB confirmed to be associated with significantly longer mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 2.4-14.2) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1), p = 0.003] and mPFS [3.0 m (95% CI 1.6-4.4) vs 1.8 m (95% CI 1.6-2.0) p = 0.001] upon BTA-ICI concurrent treatment, with the most pronounced OS benefit observed for DN-ICI concurrent regimen [15.2 m (95% CI 0.1-30.7) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1) p = 0.002].

CONCLUSIONS

In the immunotherapy era, HBTB can identify patients experiencing survival benefit with BTA, especially with DN-ICI combination. HBTB should be included as a stratification factor in the upcoming trials assessing BTA and ICI combinations in patients with aNSCLC and BM.

Exploration of a novel prognostic model based on nomogram in non-small cell lung cancer patients with distant organ metastasis: implications for immunotherapy

Background

Evidence for the effects of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with distant organ metastasis is insufficient, and the predictive efficacy of established markers in tissue and blood is elusive. Our study aimed to determine the prognostic factors and develop a survival prognosis model for these patients.

Methods

A total of 100 advanced NSCLC patients with distant organ metastases, who received single or combination immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in Xijing Hospital between June 2018 and June 2021, were enrolled for retrospective analysis. The major clinicopathological parameters were collected, and associated survival outcomes were followed up by telephone or inpatient follow-up for nearly 3 years to assess prognoses. The survival prognosis model was established based on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine the candidate prognostic factors.

Results

From the start of immunotherapy to the last follow-up, 77 patients progressed and 42 patients died, with a median follow-up of 18 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 15-19.9]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8 months (95% CI: 5.6-10.4) and 21 months (95% CI: 8.9-33.1), respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), body mass index (BMI), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were correlated significantly with OS. Based on these five predictive factors, a nomogram and corresponding dynamic web page were constructed with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.81 and a 95% CI of 0.778-0.842. Additionally, the calibration plot and time-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve validated the precision of the model at 6-, 12-, and 18-month area under the curves (AUCs) reached 0.934, 0.829, and 0.846, respectively. According to the critical point of the model, patients were further divided into a high-risk total point score (TPS) >258, middle-risk (204< TPS ≤258), and low-risk group (TPS ≤204), and significant OS differences were observed among the three subgroups (median OS: 4.8 vs. 13.0 vs. 32.9 months).

Conclusions

A feasible and practical model based on clinical characteristics has been developed to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients with distant organ metastasis undergoing immunotherapy.

Bone-modifying agents for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases during the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A narrative review

During the course of lung cancer progression, bone metastases occur in about 40% of patients. Common complications associated with bone metastases in lung cancer patients include musculoskeletal pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia. We discuss the efficacy of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in reducing skeletal-related events (SREs) and improving cancer-related outcomes, particularly in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with bone metastases. In addition, the combined effects of BMAs with radiotherapy or immunotherapy in reducing SREs in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases are explored.

How has the field of metastatic breast cancer in bones evolved over the past 22 years?

Background

Although knowledge on metastatic breast cancer in bones (MBCB) has increased rapidly over the past 22 years, a comprehensive and objective bibliometric analysis is still lacking.

Materials and methods

We used R, VOSviewer, and Citespace software to conduct a bibliometric analysis of 5,497 papers on MBCB from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) using author, institution, country/region, citation, and keyword indicators.

Results

A general strong sense of scholarly collaboration was noted in the MBCB field at the author, research institution, and country/region levels. We discovered some outstanding authors and highly productive institutions, but with less collaboration with other academic groups. Unbalanced and uncoordinated developments were observed among countries/regions in the field of MBCB research. We also found that by using various indicators and applying different analysis methods to them, we were able to broadly identify primary clinical practices, relevant clinical experiments, and directions for bioinformatics regarding MBCB, changes over the past 22 years, and current challenges in the field. The development of knowledge on MBCB is progressing greatly; however, MBCB is still incurable.

Conclusion

This study is the first to use bibliometrics to provide an overall analysis of the scientific output of MBCB studies. Palliative therapies for MBCB are mostly in a mature state. However, research on the molecular mechanisms and immune response to tumors related to the development of treatments to cure MBCB remains relatively immature. Therefore, further research should be undertaken in this area.

Factors affecting local control of bone metastases from radioresistant tumors treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas (renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and colorectal carcinoma [CRC]) treated with palliative external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2010 and December 2020, 211 bone metastases in 134 patients were treated with EBRT in two hospitals (a cancer center and university hospital). Based on follow-up CT, these cases were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate LC at the EBRT site.

RESULTS

The median EBRT dose (BED10) was 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-66.3 Gy). The median follow-up time of the imaging studies was 6 months (range, 1-107 months). The 0.5-year overall survival and LC rates of the EBRT sites were 73% and 73%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the primary sites (HCC/CRC), low EBRT dose (BED10) (≤ 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of post-EBRT bone modifying agents (BMAs) and/or antineoplastic agents (ATs) were statistically significant factors that negatively affected the LC of EBRT sites. In the absence of BMAs or ATs, the EBRT dose (BED10) escalation from 39.0 Gy improved the LC of EBRT sites. Based on ATs administration, the LC of EBRT sites was significantly affected by tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation improves LC in bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas. Higher EBRT doses are needed to treat patients for whom few effective systemic therapies remain available.

Case report: Complete remission of bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma in histopathological examination after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Recently, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved owing to the development of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there have been few studies on the therapeutic effect of ICIs in bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We report a case in which pulmonary and humeral metastases from RCC were significantly ameliorated using ICIs, while surgery for a pathological fracture of the humerus significantly improved the patient’s quality of life (QoL). A 70-year-old man who underwent a left nephrectomy for RCC developed multiple pulmonary metastases and humeral metastasis with a pathological fracture one year after surgery, and combined treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab was initiated. After four courses of ICI treatment, multiple pulmonary metastases had almost disappeared, and the tumor at the fracture site had shrunk remarkably. However, the shoulder joint function had decreased due to the fracture, worsening his QoL. Therefore, he underwent surgery and returned to normal daily life one month after. Postoperative histopathological examination of bone and soft tissue at the fracture site revealed no malignancy. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of complete remission of bone metastasis of RCC based on histopathological examination with ICI treatment.

Efficacy and safety of concomitant immunotherapy and denosumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer carrying bone metastases: A retrospective chart review

Background

Synergistic anti-tumor effects were observed in vivo and in vitro when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were combined with denosumab. However, the clinical benefit and safety of this synergy have not been adequately evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Consecutive charts of NSCLC patients with bone metastases between December 2020 and December 2021 in the Chinese National Cancer Center were reviewed. The entire cohort was divided into one experimental group (denosumab + ICIs [DI]) and three control groups (denosumab + non-ICIs [DnI], phosphates + ICIs [PI], phosphates + non-ICIs [PnI]). Real-world objective response rates (ORRs), median progression-free survival (mPFS), skeletal-related events (SREs), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 171/410 (41.7%) patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC carrying bone metastases who received bone-targeted therapy were eligible for analysis. Although the DI group showed a better benefit trend, differences were not statistically significant concerning the therapeutic efficacy among the DI group (n = 40), PI group (n = 74), DnI group (n = 15), and PnI group (n = 42) (ORRs: 47.5%, 43.2%, 33.3%, and 40.5%, respectively, p = 0.799; and mPFS: 378, 190, 170, and 172 days, respectively, p = 0.115; SREs: 5%, 10.8%, 13.3%, and 11.9%, respectively, p = 0.733). Nevertheless, further analysis in the NON-DRIVER cohort revealed a greater benefit for the DI group (p = 0.045). Additionally, the AEs of the DI group were not significantly different from those of the PI, DnI, and PnI groups (AEs: 27.5%, 39.2%, 26.7%, and 28.6%, respectively, p = 0.742). Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed the independent prognostic role of DI treatment for PFS in the overall cohort. Within the DI group, we did not observe differences in benefit among different mutational subgroups (p = 0.814), but patients with single-site bone metastasis (p = 0.319) and high PD-L1 expression (p = 0.100) appeared to benefit more, though no significant differences were observed.

Conclusions

Denosumab exhibited synergistic antitumor efficacy without increasing toxicity when used concomitantly with ICIs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer carrying bone metastases.

Bone Metastasis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Microenvironment and Possible Clinical Implications

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop bone metastasis (BoM) in more than 50% of cases during the course of the disease. This metastatic site can lead to the development of skeletal related events (SREs), such as severe pain, pathological fractures, spinal compression, and hypercalcemia, which reduce the patient’s quality of life. Recently, the treatment of advanced NSCLC has radically changed due to the advent of immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) alone or in combination with chemotherapy have become the main therapeutic strategy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC without driver gene mutations. Since survival has increased, it has become even more important to treat bone metastasis to prevent SRE. We know that the presence of bone metastasis is a negative prognostic factor. The lower efficacy of immunotherapy treatments in BoM+ patients could be induced by the presence of a particular immunosuppressive tumor and bone microenvironment. This article reviews the most important pre-clinical and clinical scientific evidence on the reasons for this lower sensitivity to immunotherapy and the need to combine bone target therapies (BTT) with immunotherapy to improve patient outcome.