Deep learning magnetic resonance imaging predicts platinum sensitivity in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Habitat Radiomics Based on MRI for Predicting Platinum Resistance in Patients with High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the feasibility of MRI-based habitat radiomics for predicting response of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and compared to conventional radiomics and deep learning models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on HGSOC patients from three hospitals. K-means algorithm was used to perform clustering on T2-weighted images (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. After feature extraction and selection, the radiomics model, habitat model, and deep learning model were constructed respectively to identify platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive patients. A nomogram was developed by integrating the optimal model and clinical independent predictors. The model performance and benefit was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

RESULTS

A total of 394 eligible patients were incorporated. Three habitats were clustered, a significant difference in habitat 2 (weak enhancement, high ADC values, and moderate T2WI signal) was found between the platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive groups (P < 0.05). Compared to the radiomics model (0.640) and deep learning model (0.603), the habitat model had a higher AUC (0.710). The nomogram, combining habitat signatures with a clinical independent predictor (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), yielded a highest AUC (0.721) among four models, with positive NRI and IDI.

CONCLUSION

MRI-based habitat radiomics had the potential to predict response of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with HGSOC. The nomogram combining with habitat signature had a best performance and good model gains for identifying platinum-resistant patients.

Advances in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer (Review)

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a crucial technique for extracting high‑throughput information from various sources, including medical images, pathological images, and genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics data. AI has been widely used in the field of diagnosis, for the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian cancer (OC), and for prognostic assessment, with favorable results. Notably, AI‑based radiomics has proven to be a non‑invasive, convenient and economical approach, making it an essential asset in a gynecological setting. The present study reviews the application of AI in the diagnosis, differentiation and prognostic assessment of OC. It is suggested that AI‑based multi‑omics studies have the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic predictive ability in patients with OC, thereby facilitating the realization of precision medicine.

Combined radiomics-clinical model to predict platinum-sensitivity in advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma using multimodal MRI

Introduction

We aimed to predict platinum sensitivity using routine baseline multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and established clinical data in a radiomics framework.

Methods

We evaluated 96 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent multimodal MRI and routine laboratory tests between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients underwent diffusion-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, and T2-weighted MRI. Subsequently, 293 radiomic features were extracted by manually identifying tumor regions of interest. The features were subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operators, leaving only a few selected features. We built the first prediction model with a tree-based classifier using selected radiomics features. A second prediction model was built by combining the selected radiomic features with four established clinical factors: age, disease stage, initial tumor marker level, and treatment course. Both models were built and tested using a five-fold cross-validation.

Results

Our radiomics model predicted platinum sensitivity with an AUC of 0.65 using a few radiomics features related to heterogeneity. The second combined model had an AUC of 0.77, confirming the incremental benefits of the radiomics model in addition to models using established clinical factors.

Conclusion

Our combined radiomics-clinical data model was effective in predicting platinum sensitivity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Platinum Chemotherapy Responses in Ovarian Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Machine learning is a potentially effective method for predicting the response to platinum-based treatment for ovarian cancer. However, the predictive performance of various machine learning methods and variables is still a matter of controversy and debate.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to systematically review relevant literature on the predictive value of machine learning for platinum-based chemotherapy responses in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies on predictive models for platinum-based therapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer published before April 26, 2023. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included articles. Concordance index (C-index), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction models to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for platinum chemotherapy responses in patients with ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 1749 articles were examined, and 19 of them involving 39 models were eligible for this study. The most commonly used modeling methods were logistic regression (16/39, 41%), Extreme Gradient Boosting (4/39, 10%), and support vector machine (4/39, 10%). The training cohort reported C-index in 39 predictive models, with a pooled value of 0.806; the validation cohort reported C-index in 12 predictive models, with a pooled value of 0.831. Support vector machine performed well in both the training and validation cohorts, with a C-index of 0.942 and 0.879, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 0.890, and the pooled specificity was 0.790 in the training cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can effectively predict how patients with ovarian cancer respond to platinum-based chemotherapy and may provide a reference for the development or updating of subsequent scoring systems.