Prognostic Nomograms Combined Adjuvant Lenvatinib for Hepatitis B Virus–related Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion After Radical Resection

Insights in Molecular Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active recruiting clinical trials on targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Combinations of different agents and medical therapy along with radiological interventions were analyzed for the setting of advanced HCC. Those settings were also analyzed in combination with adjuvant situations after resection or radiological treatments. We summarized the current knowledge for each therapeutic setting and combination that currently is or has been under clinical evaluation. We further discuss the results in the background of current treatment guidelines. In addition, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways for each of these investigated targets and drugs to further elucidate the molecular background and underlying mechanisms of action. Established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for patients are considered for systemic treatment: atezolizumab/bevacizumab, durvalumab/tremelimumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Combination treatment for systemic treatment and local ablative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies are under clinical investigation.

Role of microvascular invasion in early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection: A literature review

Hepatectomy is widely considered a potential treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, one-third of HCC patients have tumor recurrence within 2 years after surgery (early recurrence), accounting for more than 60% of all recurrence patients. Early recurrence is associated with a worse prognosis. Previous studies have shown that microvascular invasion (MVI) is one of the key factors for early recurrence and poor prognosis in patients with HCC after surgery. This paper reviews the latest literature and summarizes the predictors of MVI, the correlation between MVI and early recurrence, the identification of suspicious nodules or subclinical lesions, and the treatment strategies for MVI-positive HCC. The aim is to explore the management of patients with MVI-positive HCC.

The Current and Prospective Adjuvant Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stands as the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer and is highly invasive and easily recurs. For HCC, chemotherapy shows limited effect. The gold standard for HCC treatment includes curative surgical resection or liver transplantation. However, the recurrence rate at 5 years after liver resection is estimated at approximately 70% and even at 5 years after liver transplantation, it is 20%. Therefore, improving survival outcomes after curative surgical resection of liver cancer is crucial. This review highlights the importance of identifying risk factors for HCC recurrence following radical surgical resection and adjuvant therapy options that may reduce the recurrence risk and improve overall survival, including local adjuvant therapy (e.g., transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiotherapy), adjuvant systemic therapy (e.g., small molecule targeted therapy and immunotherapy), and other adjuvant therapies (e.g., chemotherapy). However, further research is needed to refine the use of these therapies and optimize their effectiveness in preventing HCC recurrence.

Comparative effectiveness of several adjuvant therapies after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion

BACKGROUND

For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), radical hepatectomy is commonly used as a curative treatment. However, postoperative recurrence significantly diminishes the overall survival (OS) of HCC patients, especially with microvascular invasion (MVI) as an independent high-risk factor for recurrence. While some studies suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy may decrease the risk of recurrence following liver resection in HCC patients, the specific role of adjuvant therapies in those with MVI remains unclear.

AIM

To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of various adjuvant therapies and determine the optimal adjuvant regimen.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science until April 6, 2023. Studies comparing different adjuvant therapies or comparing adjuvant therapy with hepatectomy alone were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were used to combine data on recurrence free survival and OS in both pairwise meta-analyses and NMA.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible trials (2268 patients) reporting five different therapies were included. In terms of reducing the risk of recurrence, radiotherapy (RT) [HR = 0.34 (0.23, 0.5); surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 97.7%] was found to be the most effective adjuvant therapy, followed by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy [HR = 0.52 (0.35, 0.76); SUCRA = 65.1%]. Regarding OS improvement, RT [HR: 0.35 (0.2, 0.61); SUCRA = 93.1%] demonstrated the highest effectiveness, followed by sorafenib [HR = 0.48 (0.32, 0.69); SUCRA = 70.9%].

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant therapy following hepatectomy may reduce the risk of recurrence and provide a survival benefit for HCC patients with MVI. RT appears to be the most effective adjuvant regimen.

Evaluation of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation followed by adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) adjuvant to lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 67 patients with HCC treated at our hospital between October 2018 and May 2022 was conducted. All patients underwent a combination of TACE and MWA. Among them, 29 received postoperative treatment with molecular-targeted agents, like lenvatinib, along with anti-PD-1 antibodies such as sindilizumab, karelizumab, or tirilizumab. The remaining 38 patients did not receive postoperative systemic therapies, like targeted or immunotherapy. The survival and prognosis of all patients were analyzed.

Results

Nine patients in the observation group and 29 patients in the control group experienced recurrence, and the median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) was not reached 'Not Applicable'(NA) and 17.05 months (P=0.035), respectively. Failure to combine adjuvant therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence, and the observation group had a 0.245 times lower risk of recurrence compared to that in the control group (P=0.005). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that the maximum tumor size, and tumor number were risk factors for tumor recurrence. Patients with a large maximum tumor size had a 1.519 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small maximum tumor size (P=0.006), and patients with a large number of tumors had a 5.978 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small number of tumors (P=0.02). The median PFS2 of the two groups was 11.795 and 21.257 months, respectively, though not statistically significant (P=0.955). However, there was a disparity in the percentage of BCLC stages associated with recurrence between the two groups. In the observation group approximately 22.22% of patients progressed to stage C, while in the control group, this proportion was 34.48%. The observation group exhibited a lower risk of distant metastasis compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Adjuvant treatment of HCC following TACE combined with MWA improved PFS and achieved better clinical outcomes compared to that with TACE combined with MWA alone.

ACTB may serve as a predictive marker for the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with HBV-related early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma following partial hepatectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The lack of effective biomarkers for the treatment of postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists despite lenvatinib therapy. This study aims to identify beta-actin (ACTB) as a predictive biomarker for lenvatinib that can facilitate individualized treatment for HCC.

Methods

This retrospective study included a subset of patients with HCC who underwent partial hepatectomy, with some receiving postoperative lenvatinib treatment and others not receiving lenvatinib treatment. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis of patients who underwent treatment with or without lenvatinib following HCC partial hepatectomy was performed. Immunohistochemistry was employed to determine the levels of ACTB expression in HCC samples obtained from matched patients (n=225) enrolled in this study. The X-Tile was employed to determine the optimal cut-off point of ACTB levels for predicting time to recurrence (TTR). To assess the correlation between ACTB levels and lenvatinib efficacy, a subgroup analysis of TTR was conducted. A Cox regression model with an interaction term was utilized to assess the predictive significance of the model. Subsequently, a nomogram was developed and its discriminative ability and predictive accuracy were assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. For the investigation of the ACTB expression, HCC and para-tumoral normal tissues were employed. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was utilized to validate the correlation between ACTB levels and lenvatinib responsiveness.

Results

After PSM, a total of 76 patients who underwent postoperative lenvatinib treatment were included in the analysis, with a median TTR of 24.35 months. Early-stage HCC patients with lower levels of ACTB exhibited a more favorable response to lenvatinib therapy compared to those with higher levels. The reduced expression of ACTB was indicative of the benefits of lenvatinib, as opposed to higher levels {hazard ratio (HR) =0.243 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.096-0.619], P<0.001, P value for interaction =0.014}. In approximately 81.8% of cases involving HCC patients, there was an observed increase in the expression of ACTB. Multivariate analysis of the lenvatinib cohort revealed Child-Pugh [HR =5.416 (95% CI: 1.390-21.104), P=0.015], Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage [HR =2.508 (95% CI: 1.116-5.639), P=0.026], and ACTB [HR =5.879 (95% CI: 2.424-14.259), P<0.001] score as independent factors for TTR, and all were included in the nomogram. The survival probability based on the calibration curve showed that the prediction of the nomogram was in good agreement with the actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84). Moreover, the PDXs derived from tumors exhibiting low levels of ACTB expression demonstrated a heightened sensitivity to lenvatinib treatment.

Conclusions

In patients with tumors treated with lenvatinib, low ACTB expression can predict a lower risk of recurrence. The validation of this potential biomarker in independent cohorts is necessary prior to its implementation for precision treatment stratification in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for early-stage HCC.

Network meta-analysis of adjuvant treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection

PURPOSE

The prevention of recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection is still a great challenge in clinical practice. There are numerous studies that trying to search for favorable strategies to decrease the recurrence and prolong life span for these patients, whereas no consensus is reached till now. Herein, we aim to compare the efficacy between different reported treatments by network meta-analysis(NMA).

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through February 2023. All of the random controlled trials(RCTs) were evaluated and collected as eligible studies. The primary outcome was the prevention of recurrence between different procedures. The second outcomes were one-year survival, three-year survival and five-year survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-two RCTs including 5783 patients were selected, and 12 treatments were classified. Most of the studies were high quality with low bias. Thirty-one studies including 5629 patients were recruited for recurrence analysis. The network meta-analysis showed benefits from transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) + portal vein chemotherapy(PVC)[OR, 2.84 (1.15,6.99)] and internal radiotherapy(IRT) [OR, 2.63 (1.41,4.91)] compared to non-adjuvant(NA) treatment when considering prevention of recurrence. Seventeen studies including 2047 patients were collected for one-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis showed benefit from TACE[OR, 0.33 (0.14,0.75)] when considering one-year survival. Twenty-one studies including 2463 patients were collected for three-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis showed TACE [OR, 0.51 (0.30,0.86)], IRT[OR, 0.41 (0.20,0.83)] and dendritic cell(DC) [OR, 0.09 (0.01,0.98)] were better than NA when considering three-year survival. Sixteen studies including 1915 patients were collected for five-year survival analysis. The network meta-analysis didn't show any benefit from different treatments when considering five-year survival. Other strategies including external radiotherapy(ERT), branched-chain amino acids(BCAA), hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC), cytokine-induced killer(CIK), adoptive immunotherapy(AIT), Huaier, interferon(IFN), oral chemotherapy(OCT) and sorafenib(SOR) didn't show significant benefit regardless of prevention of recurrence or short-, long- time survival.

CONCLUSION

This NMA found that TACE + PVC and IRT were considered as the procedures to decrease HCC recurrence rate. TACE, IRT and DC were preferred when considering the extending of life span for post-operative patients with HCC. Large scale of RCTs are needed to verify it.

Management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and strategies for optimal outcomes

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis, management of early-stage HCC is often successful with highly efficacious treatment modalities such as liver transplantation, surgical resection, and radiofrequency ablation. However, unfavorable clinical outcomes have been observed under certain circumstances, even after efficient treatment. Factors that predict unsuitable results after treatment include tumor markers, inflammatory markers, imaging findings reflecting tumor biology, specific outcome indicators for each treatment modality, liver functional reserve, and the technical feasibility of the treatment modalities. Various strategies may overcome these challenges, including the application of reinforced treatment indication criteria with predictive markers reflecting tumor biology, compensation for technical issues with up-to-date technologies, modification of treatment modalities, downstaging with locoregional therapies (such as transarterial chemotherapy or radiotherapy), and recently introduced combination immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in the management of early-stage HCC and suggest strategies to overcome these obstacles.

Postoperative adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies improves surgical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk recurrent factors

Background

The clinical value of postoperative adjuvant therapy (PAT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of PAT with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies on the surgical outcomes of HCC patients with high-risk recurrent factors (HRRFs).

Methods

HCC patients who underwent radical hepatectomy at Tongji Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and those with HRRFs were divided into PAT group and non-PAT group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors associated with RFS and OS were determined by Cox regression analysis, and subgroup analysis was also conducted.

Results

A total of 250 HCC patients were enrolled, and 47 pairs of patients with HRRFs in the PAT and non-PAT groups were matched through PSM. After PSM, the 1- and 2-year RFS rates in the two groups were 82.1% vs. 40.0% (P < 0.001) and 54.2% vs. 25.1% (P = 0.012), respectively. The corresponding 1- and 2-year OS rates were 95.4% vs. 69.8% (P = 0.001) and 84.3% vs. 55.5% (P = 0.014), respectively. Multivariable analyses indicated that PAT was an independent factor related to improving RFS and OS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that HCC patients with tumor diameter > 5 cm, satellite nodules, or vascular invasion could significantly benefit from PAT in RFS and OS. Common grade 1-3 toxicities, such as pruritus (44.7%), hypertension (42.6%), dermatitis (34.0%), and proteinuria (31.9%) were observed, and no grade 4/5 toxicities or serious adverse events occurred in patients receiving PAT.

Conclusions

PAT with TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies could improve surgical outcomes for HCC patients with HRRFs.

Adjuvant therapy following curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: current dilemmas and prospects

Curative surgical treatments, mainly liver resection, are still one of the optimal options for patients with early-, mid-, and even progression-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the recurrence rate within 5 years after surgery is as high as 70%, especially in patients with high risk factors for recurrence, most of whom experience early recurrence within 2 years. Effective adjuvant therapy may improve prognosis, previous studies found that adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization, antiviral, and traditional Chinese medicine et al. were helpful in preventing HCC recurrence. Nevertheless, due to controversial results or lack of high-level evidence, there is no standardized postoperative management protocol worldwide at present. Continued exploration of effective postoperative adjuvant treatments to improve surgical prognosis is necessary.