Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value and immune infiltration of FGFR family members in gastric cancer

Comprehensive in silico analysis of prognostic and immune infiltrates for FGFs in human ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are cell signaling proteins that perform multiple biological processes in many biological processes (cell development, repair, and metabolism). The dynamics of tumor cells, such as angiogenesis, transformation, and proliferation, have a significant impact on neoplasia and are modulated by FGFs. FGFs' expression and prognostic significance in ovarian cancer (OC), however, remain unclear.

METHODS

Through a series of in silico analysis, we investigated the transcriptional, survival data, genetic variation, gene-gene interaction network, ferroptosis-related genes, and DNA methylation of FGFs in OC patients.

RESULTS

We discovered that while FGF18 expression levels were higher in OC tissues than in normal OC tissues, FGF2/7/10/17/22 expression levels were lower in the former, and that FGF1/19 expression was related to the tumor stage in OC patients. According to the survival analysis, the clinical prognosis of individuals with OC was associated with the aberrant expression of FGFs. The function of FGFs and their neighboring genes was mainly connected to the cellular response to FGF stimulus. There was a negative correlation between FGF expression and various immune cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clarifies the relationship between FGFs and OC, which might provide new insights into the choice of prognostic biomarkers of OC patients.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Acting as Tormentors of Advanced Tumors by Unleashing Immune Cells and Associated Collateral Damage

Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), holds substantial promise in revolutionizing cancer treatment. This review explores the transformative impact of these combinations, emphasizing their potential for enhancing therapeutic outcomes across various cancers. Immune checkpoint proteins, such as PD1 and CTLA4, play a pivotal role in modulating immune responses. Blocking these checkpoints unleashes anticancer activity, and the synergy observed when combining multiple checkpoint inhibitors underscores their potential for enhanced efficacy. Nivolumab and ipilimumab harness the host's immune system to target cancer cells, presenting a powerful approach to prevent tumor development. Despite their efficacy, immune checkpoint inhibitors are accompanied by a distinct set of adverse effects, particularly immune-related adverse effects affecting various organs. Understanding these challenges is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and ensuring patient well-being. Ongoing clinical trials are actively exploring the combination of checkpoint inhibitory therapies, aiming to decipher their synergistic effects and efficacy against diverse cancer types. This review discusses the mechanisms, adverse effects, and various clinical trials involving nivolumab and ipilimumab across different cancers, emphasizing their transformative impact on cancer treatment.

Investigating FGFR2 gene as a blood-based epigenetic biomarker in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenocarcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer that often remains undetected in its early stages due to the lack of specific symptoms. This delayed diagnosis leads to poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for an effective and non-invasive method for early detection. Recent advances in cancer epigenetics have led to the identification of biomarkers that have the potential to revolutionize the early detection and monitoring of this disease. One such promising biomarker is the methylation of the FGFR2 promoter. This study aims to measure the methylation levels of a specific CpG site in the FGFR2 promoter gene in DNA extracted from blood leukocytes from patients with intestinal metaplasia, gastric cancer, and healthy control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The CpG site of the FGFR2 gene promoter was identified in its control region. Methylation alteration of the selected FGFR2 CpG site was determined through the (methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme) MSRE-qPCR. Genomic DNA was extracted from one hundred twenty-five participants.

RESULTS

The normal group had mean methylation levels of 93.23 ± 4.929%, while the IM group had a level of 69.85 ± 27.15%. In GC patients, the levels varied, with 25.96 ± 18.98% in the intestinal type and 28.30 ± 16.07% in the diffuse type. The methylation levels in the IM and GC patients were significantly lower than those in the normal control group. However, no significant difference was observed between the methylation status of the intestinal type of GC and the diffuse type. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that FGFR2 CpG methylation levels in GC patients compared to normal controls had a high sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%, with a cut-off of < 74.25%; when GC patients were compared to IM patients, the sensitivity was 85%, and the specificity was 80%, with a cut-off < 44.45%.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential of the FGFR2 methylation status as a non-invasive biomarker lies in its ability to be detected in blood leukocytes, which makes it a promising tool for the early detection of intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer. This could significantly improve the detection and management of these gastric conditions.

Molecular Targeting of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Pathway across Various Cancers

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are a family of receptor tyrosine kinases that are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, and development. FGFR alterations including amplifications, fusions, rearrangements, and mutations can result in the downstream activation of tyrosine kinases, leading to tumor development. Targeting these FGFR alterations has shown to be effective in treating cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms, and there are currently four FGFR inhibitors approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There have been developments in multiple agents targeting the FGFR pathway, including selective FGFR inhibitors, ligand traps, monoclonal antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates. However, most of these agents have variable and low responses, with some intolerable toxicities and acquired resistances. This review will summarize previous clinical experiences and current developments in agents targeting the FGFR pathway, and will also discuss future directions for FGFR-targeting agents.

Unleashing the potential of combining FGFR inhibitor and immune checkpoint blockade for FGF/FGFR signaling in tumor microenvironment

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) play a crucial role in cell fate and angiogenesis, with dysregulation of the signaling axis driving tumorigenesis. Therefore, many studies have targeted FGF/FGFR signaling for cancer therapy and several FGFR inhibitors have promising results in different tumors but treatment efficiency may still be improved. The clinical use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has resulted in sustained remission for patients. MAIN: Although there is limited data linking FGFR inhibitors and immunotherapy, preclinical research suggest that FGF/FGFR signaling is involved in regulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) including immune cells, vasculogenesis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This raises the possibility that ICB in combination with FGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (FGFR-TKIs) may be feasible for treatment option for patients with dysregulated FGF/FGFR signaling.

CONCLUSION

Here, we review the role of FGF/FGFR signaling in TME regulation and the potential mechanisms of FGFR-TKI in combination with ICB. In addition, we review clinical data surrounding ICB alone or in combination with FGFR-TKI for the treatment of FGFR-dysregulated tumors, highlighting that FGFR inhibitors may sensitize the response to ICB by impacting various stages of the "cancer-immune cycle".