Differentiation of Benign From Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors Using Conventional MRI Based on Radiomics Nomogram

Different MRI-based radiomics models for differentiating misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor of the parotid gland: a multicenter study

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of MRI-based radiomics models in distinguishing between Warthin tumors (WT) and misdiagnosed or ambiguous pleomorphic adenoma (PA).

Methods

Data of patients with PA and WT from two centers were collected. MR images were used to extract radiomic features. The optimal radiomics model was found by running nine machine learning algorithms after feature reduction and selection. To create a clinical model, univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis and multivariate LR were used. The independent clinical predictors and radiomics were combined to create a nomogram. Two integrated models were constructed by the ensemble and stacking algorithms respectively based on the clinical model and the optimal radiomics model. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

There were 149 patients included in all. Gender, age, and smoking of patients were independent clinical predictors. With the greatest average AUC (0.896) and accuracy (0.839) in validation groups, the LR model was the optimal radiomics model. In the average validation group, the radiomics model based on LR did not have a higher AUC (0.795) than the clinical model (AUC = 0.909). The nomogram (AUC = 0.953) outperformed the radiomics model in terms of discrimination performance. The nomogram in the average validation group had a highest AUC than the stacking model (0.914) or ensemble model (0.798).

Conclusion

Misdiagnosed or ambiguous PA and WT can be non-invasively distinguished using MRI-based radiomics models. The nomogram exhibited excellent and stable diagnostic performance. In daily work, it is necessary to combine with clinical parameters for distinguishing between PA and WT.

Discriminating atypical parotid carcinoma and pleomorphic adenoma utilizing extracellular volume fraction and arterial enhancement fraction derived from contrast-enhanced CT imaging: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the added value of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) derived from enhanced CT to conventional image and clinical features for differentiating between pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and atypical parotid adenocarcinoma (PCA) pre-operation.

METHODS

From January 2010 to October 2023, a total of 187 cases of parotid tumors were recruited, and divided into training cohort (102 PAs and 51 PCAs) and testing cohort (24 PAs and 10 atypical PCAs). Clinical and CT image features of tumor were assessed. Both enhanced CT-derived ECV and AEF were calculated. Univariate analysis identified variables with statistically significant differences between the two subgroups in the training cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with the forward variable selection method was used to build four models (clinical model, clinical model+ECV, clinical model+AEF, and combined model). Diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Delong's test compared model differences, and calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) assessed calibration and clinical application.

RESULTS

Age and boundary were chosen to build clinical model, and to construct its ROC curve. Amalgamating the clinical model, ECV, and AEF to establish a combined model demonstrated superior diagnostic effectiveness compared to the clinical model in both the training and test cohorts (AUC = 0.888, 0.867). There was a significant statistical difference between the combined model and the clinical model in the training cohort (p = 0.0145).

CONCLUSIONS

ECV and AEF are helpful in differentiating PA and atypical PCA, and integrating clinical and CT image features can further improve the diagnostic performance.

Differentiation of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors based on the fusion of radiomics and deep learning features on ultrasound images

Objective

The pathological classification and imaging manifestation of parotid gland tumors are complex, while accurate preoperative identification plays a crucial role in clinical management and prognosis assessment. This study aims to construct and compare the performance of clinical models, traditional radiomics models, deep learning (DL) models, and deep learning radiomics (DLR) models based on ultrasound (US) images in differentiating between benign parotid gland tumors (BPGTs) and malignant parotid gland tumors (MPGTs).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 526 patients with confirmed PGTs after surgery, who were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in the ratio of 7:3. Traditional radiomics and three DL models (DenseNet121, VGG19, ResNet50) were employed to extract handcrafted radiomics (HCR) features and DL features followed by feature fusion. Seven machine learning classifiers including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, LightGBM and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) were combined to construct predictive models. The most optimal model was integrated with clinical and US features to develop a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed for assessing performance of various models while the clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The DLR model based on ExtraTrees demonstrated superior performance with AUC values of 0.943 (95% CI: 0.918-0.969) and 0.916 (95% CI: 0.861-0.971) for the training and testing set, respectively. The combined model DLR nomogram (DLRN) further enhanced the performance, resulting in AUC values of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.940- 0.979) and 0.934 (95% CI: 0.876-0.991) for the training and testing sets, respectively. DCA analysis indicated that DLRN provided greater clinical benefits compared to other models.

Conclusion

DLRN based on US images shows exceptional performance in distinguishing BPGTs and MPGTs, providing more reliable information for personalized diagnosis and treatment plans in clinical practice.

Radiomics Analysis in Characterization of Salivary Gland Tumors on MRI: A Systematic Review

Radiomics analysis can potentially characterize salivary gland tumors (SGTs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The procedures for radiomics analysis were various, and no consistent performances were reported. This review evaluated the methodologies and performances of studies using radiomics analysis to characterize SGTs on MRI. We systematically reviewed studies published until July 2023, which employed radiomics analysis to characterize SGTs on MRI. In total, 14 of 98 studies were eligible. Each study examined 23-334 benign and 8-56 malignant SGTs. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was the most common feature selection method (in eight studies). Eleven studies confirmed the stability of selected features using cross-validation or bootstrap. Nine classifiers were used to build models that achieved area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.74 to 1.00 for characterizing benign and malignant SGTs and 0.80 to 0.96 for characterizing pleomorphic adenomas and Warthin's tumors. Performances were validated using cross-validation, internal, and external datasets in four, six, and two studies, respectively. No single feature consistently appeared in the final models across the studies. No standardized procedure was used for radiomics analysis in characterizing SGTs on MRIs, and various models were proposed. The need for a standard procedure for radiomics analysis is emphasized.

The Role of an MRI-Based Radiomic Signature in Predicting Malignancy of Parotid Gland Tumors

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of MRI radiomic features to differentiate between benign parotid gland tumors (BPGT) and malignant parotid gland tumors (MPGT). This retrospective study included 93 patients who underwent MRI examinations of the head and neck region (78 patients presenting unique PGT, while 15 patients presented double PGT). A total of 108 PGT with histological confirmation were eligible for the radiomic analysis and were assigned to a training group (n = 83; 58 BPGT; 25 MPGT) and a testing group (n = 25; 16 BPGT; 9 MPGT). The radiomic features were extracted from 3D segmentations of the PGT on the T2-weighted and fat-saturated, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Following feature reduction techniques, including LASSO regression analysis, a radiomic signature (RS) was built with five radiomic features. The RS presented a good diagnostic performance in differentiating between PGT, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.852 (p < 0.001) in the training set and 0.786 (p = 0.017) in the testing set. In both datasets, the RS proved to have lower values in the BPGT group as compared to MPGT group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively). The multivariate analysis revealed that RS was independently associated with PGT malignancy, together with the ill-defined margin pattern (p = 0.031, p = 0.001, respectively). The complex model, using clinical data, MRI features and the RS, presented a higher diagnostic performance (AUC of 0.976) in comparison to the RS alone. MRI-based radiomic features could be considered potential additional imaging biomarkers able to discriminate between benign and malignant parotid gland tumors.

CT-based radiomics with various classifiers for histological differentiation of parotid gland tumors

Objective

This study assessed whether radiomics features could stratify parotid gland tumours accurately based on only noncontrast CT images and validated the best classifier of different radiomics models.

Methods

In this single-centre study, we retrospectively recruited 249 patients with a diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (PA), Warthin tumour (WT), basal cell adenoma (BCA) or malignant parotid gland tumours (MPGTs) from June 2020 to August 2022. Each patient was randomly classified into training and testing cohorts at a ratio of 7:3, and then, pairwise comparisons in different parotid tumour groups were performed. CT images were transferred to 3D-Slicer software and the region of interest was manually drawn for feature extraction. Feature selection methods were performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient, t test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Five common classifiers, namely, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbours (KNN) and general Bayesian network (Gnb), were selected to build different radiomics models. The receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F-1 score were used to assess the prediction performances of these models. The calibration of the model was calculated by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. DeLong’s test was utilized for comparing the AUCs.

Results

The radiomics model based on the RF, SVM, Gnb, LR, LR and RF classifiers obtained the highest AUC in differentiating PA from MPGTs, WT from MPGTs, BCA from MPGTs, PA from WT, PA from BCA, and WT from BCA, respectively. Accordingly, the AUC and the accuracy of the model for each classifier were 0.834 and 0.71, 0.893 and 0.79, 0.844 and 0.79, 0.902 and 0.88, 0.602 and 0.68, and 0.861 and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that noncontrast CT-based radiomics could stratify refined pathological types of parotid tumours well but could not sufficiently differentiate PA from BCA. Different classifiers had the best diagnostic performance for different parotid tumours. Our study findings add to the current knowledge on the differential diagnosis of parotid tumours.

Histogram Analysis Based on Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density MR Imaging for Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Brain Metastasis and Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two ROI Placements

BACKGROUND

Preoperative differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (SBM) contributes to guide neurosurgical decision-making.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of histogram analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) in differentiating between GBM and SBM and comparison of the diagnostic performance of two region of interest (ROI) placements.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 109 patients with GBM (n = 57) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T scanners. T₂ -dark-fluid sequence, contrast-enhanced T₁ magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence, and NODDI.

ASSESSMENT

ROIs were placed on the peritumoral edema area (ROI1) and whole tumor area (ROI2, included the cystic, necrotic, and hemorrhagic areas). Histogram parameters of each isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI) from NODDI images for two ROIs were calculated, respectively.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Mann-Whitney U test, independent t-test, chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression analysis, DeLong's test.

RESULTS

For the ROI1 and ROI2, the ICVF_min and ODI_mean obtained the highest area under curve (AUC, AUC = 0.741 and 0.750, respectively) compared to other single parameters, and the AUC of the multivariate logistic regression model was 0.851 and 0.942, respectively. DeLong's test revealed significant difference in diagnostic performance between optimal single parameter and multivariate logistic regression model within the same ROI, and the multivariate logistic regression models between two different ROIs.

DATA CONCLUSION

The performance of multivariate logistic regression model is superior to optimal single parameter in both ROIs based on NODDI histogram analysis to distinguish SBM from GBM, and the ROI placed on the whole tumor area exhibited better diagnostic performance.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.