Reduced tumor stiffness quantified by tomoelastography as a predicative marker for glypican-3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

The expression of Ki-67 and Glypican -3 in hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated by comparing DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT

Objective

The value of DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the expression of Ki-67 and GPC-3 in HCC was compared.

Materials and methods

Ninety-four patients with primary HCC confirmed by pathology were retrospectively divided into high- and low-Ki-67-expression groups and positive- and negative- GPC-3 groups. The ADC and SUVmax values of the lesions in both groups were measured. ROC curves were used to evaluate the identification efficiency of parameters with significant differences for each group of lesions, and AUCwas calculated. The combined ADC and SUVmax values were analyzed by binary logistic regression. The Delong test was used to compare the AUC values of the combined and single parameters. Pearson (in line with normal distribution) or Spearman (in line with abnormal distribution) correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation.

Results

The ADC value of the high-Ki-67-expression group was lower than that of the low-Ki-67-expression group (P<0.05), and the SUVmax value of the high-expression group was higher than that of the low-expression group (P<0.05). The ADC value of the positive-GPC-3 group was lower than that of the negative group (P<0.0.tive group (P<0.05). The combined ADC and SUVmax values in the GPC-3 group were better than those of a single parameter (P<0.05). There was a strong negative correlation between the SUVmax value and ADC value in the Ki-67 group (R=-0.578, P<0.001) and a weak negative correlation between the SUVmax value and ADC value in the GPC-3 group (R=-0.279, P=0.006). The SUVmax value was strongly positively correlated with the Ki-67 expression index (R=0.733, P<0.001), while the ADC value was strongly negatively correlated with the Ki-67 expression index (R=-0.687, P<0.001).

Conclusion

DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to evaluate the expression of Ki-67 and GPC-3 in HCC, and there is a certain correlation between the ADC value and SUVmax. Combined DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT is superior to a single technique in evaluating the expression of GPC-3 in HCC patients. However, the combined model did not benefit the Ki-67 group.

Changes in Tissue Fluidity Predict Tumor Aggressiveness In Vivo

Cancer progression is caused by genetic changes and associated with various alterations in cell properties, which also affect a tumor's mechanical state. While an increased stiffness has been well known for long for solid tumors, it has limited prognostic power. It is hypothesized that cancer progression is accompanied by tissue fluidization, where portions of the tissue can change position across different length scales. Supported by tabletop magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) on stroma mimicking collagen gels and microscopic analysis of live cells inside patient derived tumor explants, an overview is provided of how cancer associated mechanisms, including cellular unjamming, proliferation, microenvironment composition, and remodeling can alter a tissue's fluidity and stiffness. In vivo, state-of-the-art multifrequency MRE can distinguish tumors from their surrounding host tissue by their rheological fingerprints. Most importantly, a meta-analysis on the currently available clinical studies is conducted and universal trends are identified. The results and conclusions are condensed into a gedankenexperiment about how a tumor can grow and eventually metastasize into its environment from a physics perspective to deduce corresponding mechanical properties. Based on stiffness, fluidity, spatial heterogeneity, and texture of the tumor front a roadmap for a prognosis of a tumor's aggressiveness and metastatic potential is presented.

MR Elastography in Cancer

ABSTRACT

The mechanical traits of cancer include abnormally high solid stress as well as drastic and spatially heterogeneous changes in intrinsic mechanical tissue properties. Whereas solid stress elicits mechanosensory signals promoting tumor progression, mechanical heterogeneity is conducive to cell unjamming and metastatic spread. This reductionist view of tumorigenesis and malignant transformation provides a generalized framework for understanding the physical principles of tumor aggressiveness and harnessing them as novel in vivo imaging markers. Magnetic resonance elastography is an emerging imaging technology for depicting the viscoelastic properties of biological soft tissues and clinically characterizing tumors in terms of their biomechanical properties. This review article presents recent technical developments, basic results, and clinical applications of magnetic resonance elastography in patients with malignant tumors.