Molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of ERBB2 gene fusions in 32,131 Chinese patients with solid tumors

FusionNW, a potential clinical impact assessment of kinases in pan-cancer fusion gene network

Kinase fusion genes are the most active fusion gene group in human cancer fusion genes. To help choose the clinically significant kinase so that the cancer patients that have fusion genes can be better diagnosed, we need a metric to infer the assessment of kinases in pan-cancer fusion genes rather than relying on the sample frequency expressed fusion genes. Most of all, multiple studies assessed human kinases as the drug targets using multiple types of genomic and clinical information, but none used the kinase fusion genes in their study. The assessment studies of kinase without kinase fusion gene events can miss the effect of one of the mechanisms that enhance the kinase function in cancer. To fill this gap, in this study, we suggest a novel way of assessing genes using a network propagation approach to infer how likely individual kinases influence the kinase fusion gene network composed of ~5K kinase fusion gene pairs. To select a better seed of propagation, we chose the top genes via dimensionality reduction like a principal component or latent layer information of six features of individual genes in pan-cancer fusion genes. Our approach may provide a novel way to assess of human kinases in cancer.

Negative Hyperselection of Patients with HER2+ and RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Dual HER2 Blockade: the PRESSING-HER2 Study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the negative prognostic impact of a panel of genomic alterations (PRESSING-HER2 panel) and lack of HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with HER2+, RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving dual HER2 blockade.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The PRESSING-HER2 panel of HER2 mutations/rearrangements and RTK/MAPK mutations/amplifications was assessed by NGS. HER2 amplification was confirmed by NGS if copy-number variation (CNV) was ≥ 6. With a case-control design, hypothesizing 30% and 5% PRESSING-HER2 positivity in resistant [progression-free survival (PFS) <4 months and no RECIST response] versus sensitive cohorts, respectively, 35 patients were needed per group.

RESULTS

PRESSING-HER2 alterations included HER2 mutations/rearrangements, EGFR amplification, and BRAF mutations and had a prevalence of 27% (9/33) and 3% (1/35) in resistant versus sensitive patients (P = 0.005) and 63% predictive accuracy. Overall, HER2 nonamplified status by NGS had 10% prevalence. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were worse in PRESSING-HER2+ versus negative (2.2 vs. 5.3 months, P < 0.001; 5.4 vs. 14.9 months, P = 0.001) and in HER2 nonamplified versus amplified (1.6 vs. 5.2 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 vs. 12.4 months, P = 0.157). These results were confirmed in multivariable analyses [PRESSING-HER2 positivity: PFS HR = 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-6.69, P = 0.005; OS HR = 2.93, 95% CI, 1.32-6.48, P = 0.007]. Combining PRESSING-HER2 and HER2 CNV increased the predictive accuracy to 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

PRESSING-HER2 panel and HER2 nonamplified status by NGS warrant validation as potential predictive markers in this setting. See related commentary by Raghav et al., p. 260.

PRESSING Need of Precision Care in HER2-Positive Colorectal Cancer: The ELEPHANT in the Room

Although dual HER2 inhibition has shown promising clinical activity in patients with RAS wild-type HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, predictive biomarkers of response/resistance are less well characterized. Activating HER2/RTK/MAPK genomic alterations appears to blunt the clinical benefit of dual anti-HER2 therapy and may hold a potential albeit partial role in patient selection. See related article by Randon et al., p. 436.

Clinical Implication of HER2 Aberration in Patients With Metastatic Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing: A Pan-Tumor Analysis

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression or gene amplification is a significant predictive biomarker for identifying patients with cancer, who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to survey the proportion of patients who had HER2 aberration and to investigate the correlation between HER2 amplification and HER2 overexpression in immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a real-world data.

METHODS

We surveyed the incidence of HER2 aberration including mutation (single-nucleotide variant [SNV]), amplification (copy-number variation), and fusion by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 2,119 patients with cancer from Samsung Medical Center in South Korea.

RESULTS

Of 2,119 patients with cancer, 189 patients (8.9%) had HER2 aberration in their tumor specimen. Of 189 patients, 113 (5.3%) patients had HER2 amplification, 82 (3.9%) patients had HER2 mutations, and 11 (0.5%) patients had HER2 fusion. Of note, 10 patients (0.5%) had concurrent HER2 amplification and HER2 fusion. In addition, we identified that HER2 protein overexpression was strongly related to HER2 amplification by NGS. Of 74 patients with HER2 amplification only by NGS test, 64 patients (86.5%) had HER2 overexpression by IHC. Of 10 patients with concurrent HER2 amplification and fusion, 80% patients were HER2 overexpression. Among 51 patients with only HER2 mutation (SNV), 9 patients (17.6%) were HER2 (+). Interestingly, almost all patients with colorectal cancer (11 of 12) with HER2 amplification had very strong HER2 overexpression (3+) in their tumor specimen.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we showed that when patients with metastatic cancer receive NGS test, approximately 8.9% have HER2 aberrations in their tumor specimen. Most patients have HER2 amplification, and a small percentage of patients have HER2 fusion. A great majority of patients with HER2 amplification and/or HER2 fusion had HER2 (+) tumor by IHC.

Clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific prognosis of primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese hospital

Introduction

Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PPLELC) is a rare histological type of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for less than 1% of NSCLC. Currently, there is no well-recognized treatment guideline for PPLELC.

Methods

We identified PPLELC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset between 2000 and 2015 (n = 72) as well as from our medical center between 2014 and 2020 (n = 16). All diagnoses were confirmed by pathological testing, and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients were retrieved and summarized. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Multivariate survival analysis was performed with the Cox regression hazards model.

Results

The median age at diagnosis of the PPLELC cohort was 64 years, ranging from 15 to 86 years. The percentages of patients with TNM stages I, II, III, and IV were 52.3%, 10.2%, 20.5%, and 17.0%, respectively. Among the 88 cases, lesion resection was performed in 69 cases (78.4%), 16 cases (18.1%) received beam radiation, and 40 cases (45.5%) underwent chemotherapy. In the SEER dataset of lung cancer, the percentage of PPLELC in the Asian race (0.528‰) was almost 10 times higher than that in the white (0.065‰) and black (0.056‰) races. Patients with TNM stage III-IV exhibited a worse prognosis than those with TNM stage I-II (p = 0.008), with a 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of 81.8% for TNM stage I-II and 56.2% for TNM stage III-IV. Specifically, the N stage and M stage were the leading prognostic factors, not the T stage and tumor size. Moreover, patients who underwent surgery had significantly better outcomes than those who did not (p = 0.014). Additional multivariate analysis indicated that the TNM stage was an independent prognosis factor for CSS (HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.08-10.14).

Conclusion

PPLELC is a rare tumor with Asian susceptibility. Although the prognosis of PPLELC is better than that of other subtypes of NSCLC, it remains unsatisfactory for advanced-stage disease. The current treatment options for PPLELC include surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immune therapy. Among these options, patients with surgical resection have better survival rates in this study. However, large-scale clinical research trials will be necessary to develop effective treatment guidelines for PPLELC.