A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of antibiotic use on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Charting cancer's course: revealing the role of diet, exercise, and the microbiome in cancer evolution and immunotherapy response

A variety of pathophysiological mechanisms exist by which physical exercise, nutrition, and the microbiome can impact the development of cancer and the response of tumor cells to systemic anti-cancer therapy. Physical exercise positively impacts the different stages of oncological disease and may improve overall survival and quality of life, reduce treatment-associated toxicity, and improve response to immunotherapy. Nutrition impacts quality of life, and novel nutritional regimens and their role in cancer treatment and outcomes are under active investigation. Finally, the microbiome may act as a predictor of response and resistance to immunotherapy. This comprehensive review delves into the interplay between these elements and their impact on oncological outcomes, emphasizing their role in modulating the immune system and enhancing the response to immunotherapy.The data that support the findings of this study are openly available and referenced in the bibliography section.

Antibiotics are associated with worse outcomes in lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy

Anti-PD(L)-1 inhibition combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) has become the most frequently used standard of care regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The negative impact of antibiotics on clinical outcomes prior to anti-PD(L)-1 inhibition monotherapy (IO) has been demonstrated in multiple studies, but the impact of antibiotic exposure prior to initiation of Chemo-IO is controversial. We assessed antibiotic exposures at two time windows: within 60 days prior to therapy (-60 d window) and within 60 days prior to therapy and 42 days after therapy (-60 + 42d window) in 2028 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with Chemo-IO and IO monotherapy focusing on objective response rate (ORR: rate of partial response and complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We also assessed impact of antibiotic exposure in an independent cohort of 53 patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted along with a meta-analysis from similar studies. For the -60 d window, in the Chemo-IO group (N = 769), 183 (24%) patients received antibiotics. Antibiotic exposure was associated with worse ORR (27% vs 40%, p = 0.001), shorter PFS (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95%CI 1.1,1.6, p = 0.0012), as well as shorter OS (10 months vs. 15 months, HR 1.50, 95%CI 1.2,1.8, p = 0.00014). After adjusting for known prognostic factors in NSCLC, antibiotic exposure was independently associated with worse PFS (HR 1.39, 95%CI 1.35,1.7, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.28,2.03, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the -60 + 42d window, and also in an independent cohort. In a meta-analysis of patients with NSCLC treated with Chemo-IO (N = 4) or IO monotherapy (N = 13 studies) antibiotic exposure before treatment was associated with worse OS among all patients (n = 11,351) (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.52, 2.45) and Chemo-IO-treated patients (n = 1201) (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.28, 1.84). Thus, antibiotics exposure prior to Chemo-IO is common and associated with worse outcomes, even after adjusting for other factors. These results highlight the need to implement antibiotic stewardship in routine oncology practice.

Why does circadian timing of administration matter for immune checkpoint inhibitors' efficacy?

BACKGROUND

Tolerability and antitumour efficacy of chemotherapy and radiation therapy can vary largely according to their time of administration along the 24-h time scale, due to the moderation of their molecular and cellular mechanisms by circadian rhythms. Recent clinical data have highlighted a striking role of dosing time for cancer immunotherapy, thus calling for a critical evaluation.

METHODS

Here, we review the clinical data and we analyse the mechanisms through which circadian rhythms can influence outcomes on ICI therapies. We examine how circadian rhythm disorders can affect tumour immune microenvironment, as a main mechanism linking the circadian clock to the 24-h cycles in ICIs antitumour efficacy.

RESULTS

Real-life data from 18 retrospective studies have revealed that early time-of-day (ToD) infusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) could enhance progression-free and/or overall survival up to fourfold compared to late ToD dosing. The studies involved a total of 3250 patients with metastatic melanoma, lung, kidney, bladder, oesophageal, stomach or liver cancer from 9 countries. Such large and consistent differences in ToD effects on outcomes could only result from a previously ignored robust chronobiological mechanism. The circadian timing system coordinates cellular, tissue and whole-body physiology along the 24-h timescale. Circadian rhythms are generated at the cellular level by a molecular clock system that involves 15 specific clock genes. The disruption of circadian rhythms can trigger or accelerate carcinogenesis, and contribute to cancer treatment failure, possibly through tumour immune evasion resulting from immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVE

Such emerging understanding of circadian rhythms regulation of antitumour immunity now calls for randomised clinical trials of ICIs timing to establish recommendations for personalised chrono-immunotherapies with current and forthcoming drugs.

The impact of antibiotic use in gastrointestinal tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved overall survival in patients with different cancer types. However, treatment efficacy varies between patients depending on several factors. Recent research suggested that antibiotic-induced dysbiosis can impair ICI efficacy. Here we review the impact of antibiotic use in clinical outcome of patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI.

Methods

This is a systematic review and utilized a thorough search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, EB-SCO, Web of Science of studies published till September 2023. The aim of the study is to determine the association between antibiotic use and ICI treatment efficacy in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI). We utilized a meta-analysis of the association between the use of antibiotics and overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2,214 patients. The most common type of cancers was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The majority of the studies were retrospective, and one was collective of clinical trials. The use of antibiotics was associated with decreased both overall survival [haz-ard ratio (HR) 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 2.63] and progression-free survival [HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.29, 2.54].

Conclusion

The use of antibiotics may affect clinical outcomes in patients with GI cancers treated with ICI. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the understanding of this phenomenon.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023462172.

Antibiotic use reduces the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Antibiotics have been suggested to diminish the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) by alterations of the gut microbiota.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis summarizing the effect of antibiotics on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of urothelial cancer (UC) patients receiving ICI.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies published up to July 14, 2023. Studies reporting the associations between antibiotics use and OS and PFS in UC patients treated with ICI were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The random-effect model was used to pool the Hazard Ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The ROBINS-I was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies, while the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used to inform the quality of evidence.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirteen nonrandomized studies involving a total of 5,095 ICI-treated UC patients were included in this review, of which 1434 (28%) received antibiotics. Overall, compared to patients who did not receive antibiotics, the pooled HRs for OS and PFS in those who received antibiotics were 1.45 [95% CI 1.25-1.68] and 1.40 [95% CI 1.05-1.87], respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the types of ICI and timing of antibiotic initiation did not influence the effect of antibiotics on OS and PFS in UC patients (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic use significantly reduced OS and PFS in UC patients receiving ICI. While antibiotics remain crucial for the treatment of infections in UC patients, antibiotics should be prescribed cautiously in UC patients receiving ICI.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Antibiotic use is associated with worsened survival in UC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Antibiotic treatment and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an effective mode of treatment. Despite their efficacy, responses to ICIs have been shown to differ based on several factors; for example, antibiotic use prior to and/or during immunotherapy has been associated with lower survival in NSCLC patients. The objective of this study is to provide an updated review of the literature and to fill in important knowledge gaps by accounting for potential confounding in the relationship between ICIs and survival.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on peer-reviewed studies that examined the effects of antibiotic use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. We searched MEDLINE for studies published up to June 30th, 2023 that included NSCLC patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents, who received antibiotics before and/or during immunotherapy, and included a control group who did not receive antibiotics and had available data on the associations between antibiotics and OS and PFS. We calculated aggregated crude OS and PFS for all studies, and only for studies that reported multivariable hazard ratios (HRs). Risk of bias was assessed using a funnel plot. All results were synthesized and displayed using the metaphor statistical package in R, version 4.2.1.

Results

Nineteen studies, conducted between 2017 and 2022, met the inclusion criteria, and included 2,932 patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC. Compared to those who did not receive antibiotics, immunotherapy patients who did had a significantly reduced PFS (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44) and OS (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.23-1.99). Adjusted HRs were even more pronounced (OS HRadj: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.23-2.27, PFS HRadj: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.16-2.32).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients treated with antibiotics have significantly lowered survival compared with patients not treated with antibiotics. These results support the hypothesis that antibiotic use in conjunction with ICI among NSCLC patients lowers survival. Limitations of this analysis include the use of studies available only on a single database, limiting the literature search to NSCLC patients, which may impact the generalizability of results to other cancer patient populations, and the inability to account for and adjust the estimates for the same variables (e.g., age, sex) across all studies. Nevertheless, our findings underscore the importance of taking antibiotic use into consideration when using ICIs to treat NSCLC and suggest that confounders should be taken into account when designing future similar studies.

Two Cases of Durable and Deep Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-Refractory Metastatic Melanoma after Addition of Camu Camu Prebiotic

Camu camu (CC) is a prebiotic that selectively stimulates growth and activity of beneficial gut microbiota. Work in murine models demonstrated that castalagin, the active compound in CC, preferentially binds to beneficial gut microbiome bacteria, promoting a stronger CD8+T cell anti-cancer response. We present two patients with metastatic melanoma whose cancer progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and developed clinically significant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). They were rechallenged with ICIs in combination with CC. The first patient is a 71-year-old woman with metastatic melanoma, whose ICI treatment was complicated by immune-related pneumonitis and colitis. Upon progression on maintenance nivolumab, CC was added to nivolumab, leading to a near complete response (CR). The second patient is a 90-year-old man with recurrent unresectable melanoma, treated with nivolumab, complicated by immune-related rash and diabetes. He developed new subcutaneous calf lesions and a metastatic popliteal lymph node. CC was added to nivolumab. One month later, the patient experienced a CR. Both patients have been on nivolumab and CC with durable responses for more than a year, with minimal irAEs. These two cases suggest that CC may modulate the microbiome, synergizing with ICIs to produce deep, durable responses with minimal irAEs.

Potential role of gut microbes in the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoints inhibitors

In recent years, Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively used in the treatment of a variety of cancers. However, the response rates ranging from 13% to 69% depending on the tumor type and the emergence of immune-related adverse events have posed significant challenges for clinical treatment. As a key environmental factor, gut microbes have a variety of important physiological functions such as regulating intestinal nutrient metabolism, promoting intestinal mucosal renewal, and maintaining intestinal mucosal immune activity. A growing number of studies have revealed that gut microbes further influence the anticancer effects of tumor patients through modulation of the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Currently, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been developed relatively mature and suggested as an important regulator in order to enhance the efficacy of treatment. This review is dedicated to exploring the impact of differences in flora composition on the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as to summarizing the current progress of FMT.