1
|
Wells L, Qin A. Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Atypical EGFR Mutations. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1802-1814. [PMID: 38095779 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01159-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) should always be considered when treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atypical EGFR mutations. The first choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation(s) present and its effect on structure and function of the EGFR protein. Afatinib is the only EGFR TKI currently FDA approved for atypical EGFR mutations and has the strongest data to support its use in PACC mutations, a subgroup of atypical EGFR mutations which includes G719X and S7681. Dacomitinib may also be an option for these mutations given similar efficacy to afatinib. In contrast, for classical-like mutations such as L861Q, osimertinib should be considered the first choice given that their behavior mimics that of the classical mutations exon 19 deletion and L858R. Osimertinib should also be utilized in the setting of a concurrent T790M mutation. Superior CNS penetrance and well managed toxicity profile may also be reasons to consider osimertinib. Given that the choice of TKI may depend on the specific mutation, it is crucial that every patient diagnosed with NSCLC undergo comprehensive sequencing to identify these mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Wells
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5848, Med Inn C349, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA
| | - Angel Qin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5848, Med Inn C349, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hung JSE, Su YH, Chen CJ, Chiang CL, Shen CI, Yang HC, Shiau CY, Luo YH, Wu HM, Hu YS, Lin CJ, Liu KD, Chung WY, Guo WY, Lee CC. Is it advisable to perform radiosurgery for EGFR-TKI-controlled brain metastases? A retrospective study of the role of radiosurgery in lung cancer treatment. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:413-422. [PMID: 37656378 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04425-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the availability of TKIs with high central nervous system efficacy, the question arises as to whether upfront SRS provides additional clinical benefits. The goal of this study was to characterize the clinical outcomes of SRS as salvage therapy for TKI-uncontrolled BMs. METHODS This retrospective study included EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients presenting BMs at the time of primary tumor diagnosis. BMs were categorized into three subgroups, referred to as "Nature of TKI-treated BMs", "TKI-controlled brain metastases ± SRS", and "SRS salvage therapy". The first subgroup analysis characterized the effects of TKIs on tumor behavior. In the second subgroup, we compared outcomes of TKI-controlled BMs treated with TKI alone versus those treated with combined TKI-SRS therapy. The third subgroup characterized the outcomes of TKI-uncontrolled BMs treated with SRS as salvage therapy Clinical outcomes include local and distant tumor control. RESULTS This study included 106 patients with a total of 683 BMs. TKI treatment achieved control in 63% of local tumors at 24 months. Among the TKI-controlled BMs, local tumor control was significantly higher in the combined TKI-SRS group (93%) than in the TKI-alone group (65%) at 24 months (p < 0.001). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of distant tumor control (p = 0.832). In dealing with TKI-uncontrolled BMs, salvage SRS achieved local tumor control in 58% of BMs at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS While upfront TKI alone proved highly effective in BM control, this study also demonstrated the outcomes of SRS when implemented concurrently with TKI or as salvage therapy for TKI-uncontrolled BMs. This study also presents a strategy of the precise timing and targeting of SRS to lesions in progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Shang-En Hung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Hua Su
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chi-Lu Chiang
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-I Shen
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Hung Luo
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yong-Sin Hu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Jung Lin
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Du Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yuh Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Yuo Guo
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|