1
|
Zakeri A, Hokmabadi A, Nix MG, Gooya A, Wijesinghe I, Taylor ZA. 4D-Precise: Learning-based 3D motion estimation and high temporal resolution 4DCT reconstruction from treatment 2D+t X-ray projections. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 250:108158. [PMID: 38604010 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In radiotherapy treatment planning, respiration-induced motion introduces uncertainty that, if not appropriately considered, could result in dose delivery problems. 4D cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) has been developed to provide imaging guidance by reconstructing a pseudo-motion sequence of CBCT volumes through binning projection data into breathing phases. However, it suffers from artefacts and erroneously characterizes the averaged breathing motion. Furthermore, conventional 4D-CBCT can only be generated post-hoc using the full sequence of kV projections after the treatment is complete, limiting its utility. Hence, our purpose is to develop a deep-learning motion model for estimating 3D+t CT images from treatment kV projection series. METHODS We propose an end-to-end learning-based 3D motion modelling and 4DCT reconstruction model named 4D-Precise, abbreviated from Probabilistic reconstruction of image sequences from CBCT kV projections. The model estimates voxel-wise motion fields and simultaneously reconstructs a 3DCT volume at any arbitrary time point of the input projections by transforming a reference CT volume. Developing a Torch-DRR module, it enables end-to-end training by computing Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) in PyTorch. During training, DRRs with matching projection angles to the input kVs are automatically extracted from reconstructed volumes and their structural dissimilarity to inputs is penalised. We introduced a novel loss function to regulate spatio-temporal motion field variations across the CT scan, leveraging planning 4DCT for prior motion distribution estimation. RESULTS The model is trained patient-specifically using three kV scan series, each including over 1200 angular/temporal projections, and tested on three other scan series. Imaging data from five patients are analysed here. Also, the model is validated on a simulated paired 4DCT-DRR dataset created using the Surrogate Parametrised Respiratory Motion Modelling (SuPReMo). The results demonstrate that the reconstructed volumes by 4D-Precise closely resemble the ground-truth volumes in terms of Dice, volume similarity, mean contour distance, and Hausdorff distance, whereas 4D-Precise achieves smoother deformations and fewer negative Jacobian determinants compared to SuPReMo. CONCLUSIONS Unlike conventional 4DCT reconstruction techniques that ignore breath inter-cycle motion variations, the proposed model computes both intra-cycle and inter-cycle motions. It represents motion over an extended timeframe, covering several minutes of kV scan series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezoo Zakeri
- Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Alireza Hokmabadi
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardio Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael G Nix
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Ali Gooya
- School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Isuru Wijesinghe
- Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Zeike A Taylor
- Centre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poiset SJ, Shah S, Cappelli L, Anné P, Mooney KE, Werner-Wasik M, Laufer TS, Posey JA, Lin D, Basu Mallick A, Lavu H, Bashir B, Yeo CJ, Mueller AC. Early outcomes of MR-guided SBRT for patients with recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:65. [PMID: 38812040 PMCID: PMC11138072 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02457-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local treatment options for locally recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LR-PAC) are limited, with median survival time (MST) of 9-13 months (mos) following recurrence. MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) provides the ability to dose escalate while sparing normal tissue. Here we report on the early outcomes of MRgSBRT for LR-PAC. METHODS Patients with prior resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with local recurrence treated with MRgSBRT at a single tertiary referral center from 5-2021 to 2-2023 were identified from our prospective database. MRgSBRT was delivered to 40-50 Gy in 4-5 fractions with target and OAR delineation per institutional standards. Endpoints included local control per RECIST v1.1, distant failure, overall survival (OS), and acute and chronic toxicities per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v5. RESULTS Fifteen patients with LR-PAC were identified with median follow-up of 10.6 mos (2.8-26.5 mos) from MRgSBRT. There were 8 females and 7 males, with a median age of 69 years (50-83). One patient underwent neoadjuvant radiation for 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions followed by resection, and one underwent adjuvant radiation for 45 Gy in 25 fractions prior to recurrence. MRgSBRT was delivered a median of 18.8 mos (3.5-52.8 mos) following resection. OS following recurrence at 6 and 12 mos were 87% and 51%, respectively, with a median survival time of 14.1 mos (3.2-27.4 mos). Three patients experienced local failure at 5.9, 7.8, and 16.6 months from MgSBRT with local control of 92.3% and 83.9% at 6 and 12 months. 10 patients experienced distant failure at a median of 2.9 mos (0.3-6.7 mos). Grade 1-2 acute GI toxicity was noted in 47% of patients, and chronic GI toxicity in 31% of patients. No grade > 3 toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report on toxicity and outcomes of MRgSBRT for LR-PAC in the literature. MRgSBRT is a safe, feasible treatment modality with the potential for improved local control in this vulnerable population. Future research is necessary to better identify which patients yield the most benefit from MRgSBRT, which should continue to be used with systemic therapy as tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION Jefferson IRB#20976, approved 2/17/21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer J Poiset
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Sophia Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Louis Cappelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Pramila Anné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Karen E Mooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Talya S Laufer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - James A Posey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Atrayee Basu Mallick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Babar Bashir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, 111 S 11th St. Suite G301, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huma C, Hawon L, Sarisha J, Erdal T, Kevin C, Valentina KA. Advances in the field of developing biomarkers for re-irradiation: a how-to guide to small, powerful data sets and artificial intelligence. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2024; 9:3-16. [PMID: 38550554 PMCID: PMC10972602 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2024.2325936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Patient selection remains challenging as the clinical use of re-irradiation (re-RT) increases. Re-RT data is limited to retrospective studies and small prospective single-institution reports, resulting in small, heterogenous data sets. Validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers are derived from large-volume studies with long-term follow-up. This review aims to examine existing re-RT publications and available data sets and discuss strategies using artificial intelligence (AI) to approach small data sets to optimize the use of re-RT data. Methods Re-RT publications were identified where associated public data was present. The existing literature on small data sets to identify biomarkers was also explored. Results Publications with associated public data were identified, with glioma and nasopharyngeal cancers emerging as the most common tumor sites where the use of re-RT was the primary management approach. Existing and emerging AI strategies have been used to approach small data sets including data generation, augmentation, discovery, and transfer learning. Conclusions Further data is needed to generate adaptive frameworks, improve the collection of specimens for molecular analysis, and improve the interpretability of results in re-RT data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaudhry Huma
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Lee Hawon
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Jagasia Sarisha
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Tasci Erdal
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Camphausen Kevin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| | - Krauze Andra Valentina
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ocanto A, Torres L, Montijano M, Rincón D, Fernández C, Sevilla B, Gonsalves D, Teja M, Guijarro M, Glaría L, Hernánz R, Zafra-Martin J, Sanmamed N, Kishan A, Alongi F, Moghanaki D, Nagar H, Couñago F. MR-LINAC, a New Partner in Radiation Oncology: Current Landscape. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:270. [PMID: 38254760 PMCID: PMC10813892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in radiation oncology are oriented towards improving treatment precision and tumor control. Among these advances, magnetic-resonance-image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) stands out, with technological advances to deliver targeted treatments adapted to a tumor's anatomy on the day while minimizing incidental exposure to organs at risk, offering an unprecedented therapeutic advantage compared to X-ray-based IGRT delivery systems. This new technology changes the traditional workflow in radiation oncology and requires an evolution in team coordination to administer more precise treatments. Once implemented, it paves the way for newer indication for radiation therapy to safely deliver higher doses than ever before, with better preservation of healthy tissues to optimize patient outcomes. In this narrative review, we assess the technical aspects of the novel linear accelerators that can deliver MRgRT and summarize the available published experience to date, focusing on oncological results and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisselott Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Montijano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Rincón
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Castalia Fernández
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Sevilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniela Gonsalves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Macarena Teja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marcos Guijarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Glaría
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
| | - Raúl Hernánz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
| | - Juan Zafra-Martin
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias (CIMES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga (UMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Noelia Sanmamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Amar Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA;
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar, Italy;
- University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- UCLA Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA;
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Francisco de Asís, GenesisCare, 28002 Madrid, Spain; (L.T.); (M.M.); (D.R.); (C.F.); (B.S.); (D.G.); (M.T.); (M.G.); (L.G.); (R.H.); (F.C.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vithas La Milagrosa, GenesisCare, 28010 Madrid, Spain
- GenesisCare, 28043 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Courtney PT, Valle LF, Raldow AC, Steinberg ML. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy-An Emerging and Disruptive Process of Care: Healthcare Economic and Policy Considerations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:4-13. [PMID: 38105092 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is an emerging, innovative technology that provides opportunities to transform and improve the current clinical care process in radiation oncology. As with many new technologies in radiation oncology, careful evaluation from a healthcare economic and policy perspective is required for its successful implementation. In this review article, we describe the current evidence surrounding MRgRT, framing it within the context of value within the healthcare system. Additionally, we highlight areas in which MRgRT may disrupt the current process of care, and discuss the evidence thresholds and timeline required for the widespread adoption of this promising technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chourak H, Barateau A, Greer P, Lafond C, Nunes JC, de Crevoisier R, Dowling J, Acosta O. Determination of acceptable Hounsfield units uncertainties via a sensitivity analysis for an accurate dose calculation in the context of prostate MRI-only radiotherapy. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:1703-1711. [PMID: 37815702 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01333-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is moving from CT based to MRI guided planning, particularly for soft tissue anatomy. An important requirement of this new workflow is the generation of synthetic-CT (sCT) from MRI to enable treatment dose calculations. Automatic methods to determine the acceptable range of CT Hounsfield Unit (HU) uncertainties to avoid dose distribution errors is thus a key step toward safe MRI-only radiotherapy. This work has analysed the effects of controlled errors introduced in CT scans on the delivered radiation dose for prostate cancer patients. Spearman correlation coefficient has been computed, and a global sensitivity analysis performed following the Morris screening method. This allows the classification of different error factors according to their impact on the dose at the isocentre. sCT HU estimation errors in the bladder appeared to be the least influential factor, and sCT quality assessment should not only focus on organs surrounding the radiation target, as errors in other soft tissue may significantly impact the dose in the target volume. This methodology links dose and intensity-based metrics, and is the first step to define a threshold of acceptability of HU uncertainties for accurate dose planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda Chourak
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.
- CSIRO Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, QLD, Australia.
| | - Anaïs Barateau
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France
| | - Peter Greer
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Caroline Lafond
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Claude Nunes
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France
| | | | - Jason Dowling
- CSIRO Australian e-Health Research Centre, Herston, QLD, Australia.
| | - Oscar Acosta
- Univ Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anghel B, Serboiu C, Marinescu A, Taciuc IA, Bobirca F, Stanescu AD. Recent Advances and Adaptive Strategies in Image Guidance for Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1735. [PMID: 37893453 PMCID: PMC10608436 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
The standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with simultaneous chemotherapy followed by an internal radiation boost. New imaging methods such as positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been implemented into daily practice for better tumor delineation in radiotherapy planning. The method of delivering radiation has changed with technical advances in qualitative imaging and treatment delivery. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plays an important role in minimizing treatment toxicity of pelvic radiation and provides a superior conformality for sparing the organs at risk (OARs) such as bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder. Similarly, three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (3D-IGABT) with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to improve target coverage and reduce the dose to normal tissues. Brachytherapy is a complementary part of radiotherapy treatment for cervical cancer and, over the past 20 years, 3D-image-based brachytherapy has rapidly evolved and established itself as the gold standard. With new techniques and adaptive treatment in cervical cancer, the concept of personalized medicine is introduced with an enhanced comprehension of the therapeutic index not only in terms of volume (three-dimensional) but during treatment too (four-dimensional). Current data show promising results with integrated IGRT and IGABT in clinical practice and, therefore, better local control and overall survival while reducing treatment-related morbidity. This review gives an overview of the substantial impact that occurred in the progress of image-guided adaptive external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Anghel
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (B.A.); (I.-A.T.); (F.B.); (A.D.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanador Oncology Centre, 010991 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Crenguta Serboiu
- Department of Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea Marinescu
- Radiology and Imaging Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Iulian-Alexandru Taciuc
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (B.A.); (I.-A.T.); (F.B.); (A.D.S.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Oncological Institute “Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florin Bobirca
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (B.A.); (I.-A.T.); (F.B.); (A.D.S.)
- General Surgery Department, Cantacuzino Clinical Hospital, 73206 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Daniela Stanescu
- Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (B.A.); (I.-A.T.); (F.B.); (A.D.S.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. John Emergency Hospital, Bucur Maternity, 040292 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|