Corona enhancement combined with microvascular invasion for prognosis prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype

MRI imaging features for predicting macrotrabecular-massive subtype hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To identify significant MRI features associated with macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC), and to assess the distribution of Liver Imaging Radiology and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category assignments.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to March 28, 2023. Random-effects model was constructed to calculate pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each MRI feature for differentiating MTM-HCC from NMTM-HCC. The pooled proportions of LI-RADS category assignments in MTM-HCC and NMTM-HCC were compared using z-test.

RESULTS

Ten studies included 1978 patients with 2031 HCCs (426 (20.9%) MTM-HCC and 1605 (79.1%) NMTM-HCC). Six MRI features showed significant association with MTM-HCC: tumor in vein (TIV) (DOR = 2.4 [95% CI, 1.6-3.5]), rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (DOR =2.6 [95% CI, 1.4-5.0]), corona enhancement (DOR = 2.6 [95% CI, 1.4-4.5]), intratumoral arteries (DOR = 2.6 [95% CI, 1.1-6.3]), peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (DOR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.5-3.3]), and necrosis (DOR = 4.2 [95% CI, 2.0-8.5]). The pooled proportions of LI-RADS categories in MTM-HCC were LR-3, 0% [95% CI, 0-2%]; LR-4, 11% [95% CI, 6-16%]; LR-5, 63% [95% CI, 55-71%]; LR-M, 12% [95% CI, 6-19%]; and LR-TIV, 13% [95% CI, 6-22%]. In NMTM-HCC, the pooled proportions of LI-RADS categories were LR-3, 1% [95% CI, 0-2%]; LR-4, 8% [95% CI, 3-15%]; LR-5, 77% [95% CI, 71-82%]; LR-M, 5% [95% CI, 3-7%]; and LR-TIV, 6% [95% CI, 2-11%]. MTM-HCC had significantly lower proportion of LR-5 and higher proportion of LR-M and LR-TIV categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Six MRI features showed significant association with MTM-HCC. Additionally, compared to NMTM-HCC, MTM-HCC are more likely to be categorized LR-M and LR-TIV and less likely to be categorized LR-5.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Several MR imaging features can suggest macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype, which can assist in guiding treatment plans and identifying potential candidates for clinical trials of new treatment strategies.

KEY POINTS

• Macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma is a subtype of HCC characterized by its aggressive nature and unfavorable prognosis. • Tumor in vein, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, corona enhancement, intratumoral arteries, peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase, and necrosis on MRI are indicative of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma. • Various MRI characteristics can be utilized for the diagnosis of the macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype. This can prove beneficial in guiding treatment decisions and identifying potential candidates for clinical trials involving novel treatment approaches.

Clinical-Radiologic Morphology-Radiomics Model on Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI for Identification of Highly Aggressive Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Temporal Validation and Multiscanner Validation

BACKGROUND

Highly aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by high tumor recurrence and poor outcomes, but its definition and imaging characteristics have not been clearly described.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a fusion model on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for identifying highly aggressive HCC.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

341 patients (M/F = 294/47) with surgically resected HCC, divided into a training cohort (n = 177), temporal validation cohort (n = 77), and multiscanner validation cohort (n = 87).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination gradient-echo sequences, especially arterial phase (AP) and hepatobiliary phase (HBP, 80-100 min).

ASSESSMENT

Clinical factors and diagnosis assessment based on radiologic morphology characteristics associated with highly aggressive HCCs were evaluated. The radiomics signatures were extracted from AP and HBP. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to construct clinical-radiologic morphology (CR) model and clinical-radiologic morphology-radiomics (CRR) model. A nomogram based on the optimal model was established. Early recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in actual groups and risk groups calculated by the nomogram.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, calibration curves analysis, and decision curves. Early RFS was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The CRR model incorporating corona enhancement, cloud-like hyperintensity on HBP, and radiomics signatures showed the highest diagnostic performance. The area under the curves (AUCs) of CRR were significantly higher than those of the CR model (AUC = 0.883 vs. 0.815, respectively, for the training cohort), 0.874 vs. 0.769 for temporal validation, and 0.892 vs. 0.792 for multiscanner validation. In both actual and risk groups, highly and low aggressive HCCs showed statistically significant differences in early recurrence.

DATA CONCLUSION

The clinical-radiologic morphology-radiomics model on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI has potential to identify highly aggressive HCCs and non-invasively obtain prognostic information.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR-based models and their prognostic implications

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based radiomics and clinical models in predicting MTM-HCC. Additionally, to investigate the ability of the radiomics model designed for MTM-HCC identification in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with HCC.

METHODS

A total of 336 patients who underwent oncological resection for HCC between June 2007 and March 2021 were included. 127 patients in Cohort1 were used for MTM-HCC identification, and 209 patients in Cohort2 for prognostic analyses. Radiomics analysis was performed using volumes of interest of HCC delineated on pre-operative MRI images. Radiomics and clinical models were developed using Random Forest algorithm in Cohort1 and a radiomics probability (RP) of MTM-HCC was obtained from the radiomics model. Based on the RP, patients in Cohort2 were divided into a RAD-MTM-HCC (RAD-M) group and a RAD-non-MTM-HCC (RAD-nM) group. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to identify the independent predictors for DFS of patients in Cohort2. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the DFS between different groups pf patients based on the predictors.

RESULTS

The radiomics model for identifying MTM-HCC showed AUCs of 0.916 (95% CI: 0.858-0.960) and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.675-0.935), and the clinical model showed AUCs of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.669-0.836) and 0.704 (95% CI: 0.532-0.843) in the respective training and validation sets. Furthermore, the radiomics biomarker RP, portal or hepatic vein tumor thrombus, irregular rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (IRE) and AFP were independent predictors of DFS in patients with HCC. The DFS of RAD-nM group was significantly higher than that of the RAD-M group (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

MR-based clinical and radiomic models have the potential to accurately diagnose MTM-HCC. Moreover, the radiomics signature designed to identify MTM-HCC also can be used to predict prognosis in patients with HCC, realizing the diagnostic and prognostic aims at the same time.