Real-life monocentric experience of venetoclax-based regimens for acute myeloid leukemia

Panobinostat sensitizes AraC-resistant AML cells to the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax

The majority of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients respond to intensive induction therapy, consisting of cytarabine (AraC) and an anthracycline, though more than half experience relapse. Relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients are difficult to treat, and their clinical outcomes remain dismal. Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with azacitidine (AZA) has provided a promising treatment option for R/R AML, though the overall survival (OS) could be improved (OS ranges from 4.3 to 9.1 months). Overexpression of c-Myc is associated with chemoresistance in AML. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have been shown to suppress c-Myc and enhance the antileukemic activity of VEN, as well as AZA, though combination of all three has not been fully explored. In this study, we investigated the HDAC inhibitor, panobinostat, in combination with VEN + AZA against AraC-resistant AML cells. Panobinostat treatment downregulated c-Myc and Bcl-xL and upregulated Bim, which enhanced the antileukemic activity of VEN + AZA against AraC-resistant AML cells. In addition, panobinostat alone and in combination with VEN + AZA suppressed oxidative phosphorylation and/or glycolysis in AraC-resistant AML cells. These findings support further development of panobinostat in combination with VEN + AZA for the treatment of AraC-resistant AML.

A systematic review of venetoclax for the treatment of unfit AML patients in real-world: is all that glitters gold?

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological disease that mainly affects elderly patients. Following the randomized VIALE-A trial, current standard treatment in patients who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy consists of the combination of venetoclax (VEN), a selective inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2, with azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC). We performed a systematic review to critically assess the growing existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of the VEN-based combinations in unfit adult patients with newly diagnosed AML in the real-world setting. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of published manuscripts and conference abstracts (European Hematology Association and American Society of Hematology) was conducted (updated March 2024). Primary outcomes were composite complete remission (CRc) and median overall survival (mOS). A total of 73 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria, with a median age of 73 years old. The weighted mean mOS was 10.3 months among 7 138 patients, significantly lower than expected according to the VIALE-A trial (14.7 months), while the weighted mean CRc rate was 58.2% among 5 831 patients, slightly lower to that reported in the VIALE-A (66.4%). Early death rates at 30 and 60 days were 5% and 13%, respectively. The weighted mean percentage of subsequent allogeneic transplant was 15.4%. In conclusion, breakthrough mOS reported in the VIALE-A trial using VEN-AZA was not well reproduced in real world for unfit newly diagnosed AML patients, while CRc rates were more consistent. Strategies to optimize patient selection, dosing regimens, and supportive care are crucial to improve outcomes in real-world.

Fungal infection frequency in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia patients treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine with or without antifungal prophylaxis

Our observational study analysed fungal infection frequency within cohorts with versus without antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) among newly diagnosed first-line venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN + AZA)-treated acute myeloid leukaemias in Czech, Austrian and Slovak haematology centres. Among 186 patients, 85 (46%) received antifungal prophylaxis, while 101 (54%) received no prophylaxis. Fungal infections occurred in 1/85 patients with prophylaxis (1%) and 5/101 patients without prophylaxis (5%) (p = 0.222). No significant difference was recorded between cohorts with and without AFP in terms of death rate (p = 0.296) and overall survival (p = 0.844). In conclusion, most infections were not severe, developing during the first treatment-cycle and did not affect patients' overall outcome.

Venetoclax-based treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: an unexpected bonus on the path to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant?

Despite the approval of new drugs, the inclusion of -omics-derived data and the integration of machine learning in both the diagnostic and therapeutic process, the prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal. The curative path is still aimed at achieving a successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in most patients. Nevertheless, access to this procedure is limited to eligible patients. Moreover, post-HSCT outcomes are influenced by AML heterogeneity and patient-related factors. The rise of venetoclax (VEN)-based combinations as standard of care in the treatment of older or unfit AML patients, together with their peculiar management profile, has led researchers to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in patients proceeding toward HSCT. We reviewed the available evidence to weigh up the advantages and pitfalls of this new therapeutic strategy.

Real-Life Multicenter Experience of Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents in Previously Untreated Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Greece

BACKGROUND

The landscape of first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy has changed remarkably after venetoclax approval. Accumulating real-world data further apprises us with more knowledgeable use. To assess the efficacy and safety challenges in the real-life setting of the combination of hypomethylated agent (HMA) and venetoclax, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study.

METHODS

Forty adult AML patients treated with the combination of HMA and venetoclax as a first-line treatment after full approval (2020) were included. To confirm VIALE-A results, this group was compared to a historical cohort of 17 chemotherapy-ineligible AML patients treated with HMA monotherapy before 2020.

RESULTS

The combination of HMA-venetoclax achieved a composite complete response rate of 86.8% (p < 0.001), median overall survival, and event-free survival of 33.8 and 19.7 months, respectively, in a median follow-up of 17.8 months (pos < 0.001, HR = 0.276, CI: 0.132-0.575, pEFS = 0.004, HR = 0.367, CI: 0.174-0.773). High rates of neutropenia (90%) and consequent infection rates (57.5%) were noted. Only 55% of our patients received antifungal prophylaxis, as its use remains controversial, and invasive fungal infections were presented in 7.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidently, venetoclax-HMA yields high response rates and profound survival benefits in real life and has changed our approach to alternative chemotherapy options.