War and oncology: cancer care in five Iraqi provinces impacted by the ISIL conflict

Assessment of psycho-oncology in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is expected to witness a significant increase in the burden of cancer. Contrary to Western literature, the burden of psycho-oncology is yet to be established within the MENA region. This study reviews all available evidence characterizing the psychological burden among patients with cancer across the MENA region.

METHODS

We systematically explored the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane/CENTRAL, and Web of Science (WoS) databases for reports on the psychiatric burden among patients with cancer residing within the MENA region from January 2000 until January 2023. Raw proportion were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model.

FINDINGS

Eighty-three studies comprised of 16 810 participants, representing 14 countries, met our inclusion criteria. Across the MENA region, the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and distress were 44% (95% CI, 39%-50%), 47% (95% CI, 40%-54%), and 43% (95% CI, 30%-56%), respectively. Prevalence of depression was significantly different across countries, with Palestine (73%; 95% CI, 42%-91%) reporting the highest rate while Morocco (23%; 95% CI, 7%-56%) reported the lowest. Similarly, anxiety significantly differed across MENA nations ranging from 64% (95% CI, 3%-99%) in Morocco to 28% (95% CI, 18%-42%) in Tunisia. Rates of depression and anxiety were significantly different across measurement tools but not between Arabic-speaking versus Persian/Farsi-speaking countries. Meta-regression models showed that neither publication year nor age affected the prevalence of both anxiety and depression (P = .374 and .091 for depression and P = .627, and .546 for anxiety, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

We report an abnormally high rate of psychiatric burden among patients with cancer in the MENA region. Thus, establishing appropriate psycho-oncologic interventions within the MENA region is of utmost importance.

First Global Summit on War and Cancer: The Hidden Impact of War on Cancer-Urging Global Action for Change

The 1st Global Summit on War and Cancer (GSWC) united leaders, medical professionals, policymakers, and advocates to address cancer issues in conflict zones featuring speakers from around 50 countries.

Enhancing Cancer Care Amid Conflict: A Proposal for Optimizing Oncology Services During Wartime

The landscape of cancer care within armed conflict zones is characterized by intricate challenges arising from disrupted health care systems, scarcity of resources, and population displacement. During times of war, the provision of cancer services is often disrupted, leading to significant challenges for oncologists and other health care providers. To optimize cancer services during wartime, several key priorities must be addressed. Focusing on needs assessment, treatment prioritization, drug supply chain, telemedicine, mobile clinics, cross-border collaborations, health care staff support, and continuity of care will enable health care systems to provide essential cancer services and mitigate the adverse impact of conflict on patients with cancer. This article delineates the pivotal key priorities for optimizing cancer services during wartime. It calls for collaborative action, the integration of technology, and holistic care approaches to safeguard the rights, well-being, and dignity of individuals confronting the dual challenges of cancer and conflict. By addressing these priorities, health care providers, policymakers, and stakeholders can collectively ensure that cancer services remain steadfast and compassionate even amid the turmoil of war. Thus, it may be possible to optimize cancer services during wartime, ensuring that patients with cancer continue to receive the care they need.

Cancer Research in Vulnerable Populations: A Call for Collaboration and Sustainability From MENAT Countries

PURPOSE

Cancer is a major burden across Middle East, North Africa, Türkiye (MENAT). Many MENAT countries experience multiple conflicts that compound vulnerabilities, but little research investigates the linkages between vulnerability and cancer research. This study examines the current level and the potential for cancer research among vulnerable populations in the MENAT region, aiming to provide direction toward developing a research agenda on the region's vulnerable populations.

METHODS

Expert-driven meetings were arranged among the 10 authors. After obtaining institutional review board approval, a self-administered online survey questionnaire was circulated to more than 500 cancer practitioners working in 22 MENAT countries.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixteen cancer practitioners across the MENAT region responded. Fifty percent of the respondents identified clinical research in vulnerable patients with cancer as a significant issue; 21.8% reported previous research experience that included vulnerable populations, and 60% reported encountering vulnerable populations in their daily clinical practice. The main barriers to conducting research were lack of funding (60%), protected time (42%), and research training (35%). More than half of the respondents believed that wars/conflicts constituted an important source of vulnerability. The most vulnerable cancer populations were the elderly, palliative/terminally ill, those with concomitant mental health-related issues, those with other chronic illnesses, and socioeconomically deprived patients.

CONCLUSION

Results support that a major effort is needed to improve cancer research among vulnerable cancer populations in the MENAT region. We call for interdisciplinary research that accounts for the region's unique, compounding, and cumulative forms of vulnerability. This cancer research agenda on different vulnerable populations must balance sociobehavioral studies that explore sociopolitical barriers to quality care and clinical studies that gauge and refine treatment protocols. Building a research agenda through collaboration and solidarity with international partners is prime time.