1
|
Yang Q, Chen Z, Qiu Y, Huang W, Wang T, Song L, Sun X, Li C, Xu X, Kang L. Theranostic role of 89Zr- and 177Lu-labeled aflibercept in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1246-1260. [PMID: 38135849 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06575-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis due to the absence of effective therapeutic targets. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family are expressed in 30-60% of TNBC, therefore providing potential therapeutic targets for TNBC. Aflibercept (Abe), a humanized recombinant fusion protein specifically bound to VEGF-A, B and placental growth factor (PIGF), has proven to be effective in the treatment in some cancers. Therefore, 89Zr/177Lu-labeled Abe was investigated for its theranostic role in TNBC. METHODS Abe was radiolabeled with 89Zr and 177Lu via the conjugation of chelators. Flow cytometry and cell immunofluorescent staining were performed to evaluate the binding affinity of Abe. Sequential PET imaging and fluorescent imaging were conducted in TNBC tumor bearing mice following the injection of 89Zr-labeled Abe and Cy5.5-labeled Abe. Treatment study was performed after the administration of 177Lu-labeled Abe. Tumor volume and survival were monitored and SPECT imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted. Safety evaluation was performed including body weight, blood cell measurement, and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining of major organs. Expression of VEGF and CD31 was tested by immunohistochemical staining. Dosimetry was estimated using the OLINDA software. RESULTS FITC-labeled Abe showed a strong binding affinity to VEGF in TNBC 4T1 cells and HUVECs by flow cytometry and cell immunofluorescence. Tumor uptake of 89Zr-labeled Abe peaked at 120 h (SUVmax = 3.2 ± 0.64) and persisted before 168 h (SUVmax = 2.54 ± 0.42). The fluorescence intensity of the Cy5.5-labeled Abe group surpassed that of the Cy5.5-labeled IgG group, implying that Cy5.5-labeled Abe is a viable candidate monitoring in vivo tumor targeting and localization. 177Lu-labeled Abe (11.1 MBq) served well as the therapeutic component to suppress tumor growth with standardized tumor volume at 16 days, significantly smaller than PBS group (about 815.66 ± 3.58% vs 3646.52 ± 11.10%, n = 5, P < 0.01). Moreover, SPECT images confirmed high contrast between tumors and normal organs, indicating selective tumor uptake of 177Lu-labeled Abe. No discernible abnormalities in blood cells, and no evident histopathological abnormality observed in liver, spleen, and kidney. Immunohistochemical staining showed that 177Lu-labeled Abe effectively inhibited the expression of VEGF and CD31 of tumor, suggesting that angiogenesis may be suppressed by 177Lu-labeled Abe. The whole-body effective dose for an adult human was estimated to be 0.16 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSION 89Zr/177Lu-labeled Abe could be a TNBC-specific marker with diagnostic value and provide insights into targeted therapy in the treatment of TNBC. Further clinical evaluation and translation may be of high significance for TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zhao Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yongkang Qiu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Wenpeng Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Tianyao Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lele Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xinyao Sun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Cuicui Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Rd., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Xiaojie Xu
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lei Kang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Str., Xicheng Dist., Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitani K, Tsuboi I, Tanaka G, Yosioka S, Yokoyama S, Kobayashi Y, Nakajima H, Nagami T, Ogawa K, Wada K. Metastatic small cell bladder cancer treated with sequential systemic therapy including pembrolizumab and amrubicin: A case report. IJU Case Rep 2024; 7:127-130. [PMID: 38440697 PMCID: PMC10909136 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Small cell bladder cancer is a relatively rare tumor, representing <1% of all bladder tumors. Amrubicin monotherapy is used as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer in Japan. Case presentation A 79-year-old woman presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with small cell bladder cancer (T2 or higher). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin resulted in a partial response. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was performed, and radical resection was achieved. As we identified metastasis in the pleura 1 year later, we administered carboplatin and etoposide, which resulted in a partial response. Although pembrolizumab was initiated as maintenance therapy, it was not effective. Amrubicin was given as third-line therapy, and stable disease was achieved without serious adverse effect for 6 months. Conclusion Although there is no established treatment for metastatic small cell bladder cancer, the current case report suggests the effectiveness of amrubicin in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazutaka Mitani
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Gen Tanaka
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Saori Yosioka
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Shuhei Yokoyama
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Yusuke Kobayashi
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Hirochika Nakajima
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Taichi Nagami
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Kohei Ogawa
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of UrologyShimane University Faculty of MedicineIzumoShimaneJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Imai H, Saijo K, Kawamura Y, Kodera S, Komine K, Iwasaki T, Takenaga N, Kasahara Y, Ouchi K, Shirota H, Takahashi M, Ishioka C. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Carboplatin-Etoposide and Cisplatin-Etoposide Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. Oncology 2023; 102:359-367. [PMID: 37903486 PMCID: PMC11251665 DOI: 10.1159/000534747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and is generally treated with platinum and etoposide combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether carboplatin and etoposide combination therapy (CE) and cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy (PE) have comparable treatment efficacy. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of CE and PE in patients with NEC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the patient's clinical record from 2005 to 2022 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital. Patients who received either CE or PE were included in the study. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 16.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 73 patients assigned to the CE group and 31 patients assigned to the PE group. Statistically, the response rate, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were 42.6%, 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-6.3) and 13.6 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.4), respectively, in the CE groups and 44.4%, 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.1-7.0) and 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-14.6), respectively, in the PE groups. There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the CE and the PE groups. However, the number of patients with elevated creatinine (3.35 mg/dL and 3.88 mg/dL in 2 patients, respectively) was significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group. CONCLUSION The efficacy of CE and PE in patients with NEC is comparable. However, the incidence of renal dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroo Imai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan,
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan,
| | - Ken Saijo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Kawamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shuto Kodera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keigo Komine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Iwasaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriko Takenaga
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yuki Kasahara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kota Ouchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Shirota
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masanobu Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Chikashi Ishioka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|