Xerna™ TME Panel is a machine learning-based transcriptomic biomarker designed to predict therapeutic response in multiple cancers

Phosphatidylserine externalization as immune checkpoint in cancer

Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Despite recent advances in cancer treatment including immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, new unconventional biomarkers and targets for the detection, prognosis, and treatment of cancer are still in high demand. Tumor cells are characterized by mutations that allow their unlimited growth, program their local microenvironment to support tumor growth, and spread towards distant sites. While a major focus has been on altered tumor genomes and proteomes, crucial signaling molecules such as lipids have been underappreciated. One of these molecules is the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) that is usually found at cytosolic surfaces of cellular membranes but can be rapidly and massively shuttled to the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane during apoptosis to serve as a limiting factor for immune responses. These immunosuppressive interactions are exploited by tumor cells to evade the immune system. In this review, we describe mechanisms of immune regulation in tumors, discuss if PS may constitute an inhibitory immune checkpoint, and describe current and future strategies for targeting PS to reactivate the tumor-associated immune system.

Maintenance durvalumab after first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma: results from the randomised PLATFORM study

BACKGROUND

PLAnning Treatment For Oesophago-gastric Cancer: a Randomised Maintenance Therapy Trial (PLATFORM) is an adaptive phase II study assessing the role of maintenance therapies in advanced oesophago-gastric (OG) adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the role of the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative locally advanced or metastatic OG adenocarcinoma with disease control or response to 18 weeks of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy were randomised to active surveillance or maintenance durvalumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Safety was assessed in all patients who had commenced surveillance visits or received at least one dose of durvalumab. Exploratory survival analyses according to PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) and immune (biomarker-positive) or angiogenesis dominant (biomarker-negative) tumour microenvironment (TME) phenotypes were conducted.

RESULTS

Between March 2015 and April 2020, 205 patients were randomised to surveillance (n = 100) and durvalumab (n = 105). No significant differences were seen in PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, P = 0.13] and overall survival (OS; HR 0.98, P = 0.45) between surveillance and durvalumab. Five patients randomised to durvalumab demonstrated incremental radiological responses compared with none with surveillance. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 77 (76.2%) durvalumab-assigned patients. A favourable effect in OS with durvalumab over surveillance in CPS ≥5 and immune biomarker-positive patients was observed compared with CPS <5 and biomarker-negative subgroups, respectively: CPS ≥5 versus <5: HR 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-1.22 versus HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44-1.96; biomarker-positive versus negative: HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.29-1.23 versus HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.42-1.65.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance durvalumab does not improve PFS in patients with OG adenocarcinoma who respond to first-line chemotherapy but induced incremental radiological responses in a subset of patients. TME characterisation could refine patient selection for anti-PD-L1 therapy above PD-L1 CPS alone.

The phosphatidylserine targeting antibody bavituximab plus pembrolizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/L1 have modest efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma as single agents. Targeting membranous phosphatidylserine may induce pro-inflammatory and -immune stimulating effects that enhance immunotherapy activity. This hypothesis was tested in a single-arm phase 2 trial evaluating frontline bavituximab, a phosphatidylserine targeting antibody, plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (NCT03519997). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate among evaluable patients, and secondary end points included progression-free survival, incidence of adverse events, overall survival, and duration of response. Among 28 evaluable patients, the confirmed response rate was 32.1%, which met the pre-specified endpoint, and the median progression-free survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 1.3-11.3 months). Treatment related-adverse events of any grade occurred in 45.7% of patients, with grade 3 or greater adverse events in 14.3% of patients. Adverse events of any cause were observed in 33 patients (94.3%), with grade 3 or greater adverse events in 11 patients (31.4%). Prespecified exploratory analyses of baseline tumor specimens showed that a depletion of B cells, and the presence of fibrotic tissue and expression of immune checkpoints in stroma was associated with tumor response. These results suggest that targeting phosphatidylserine may lead to synergistic effects with PD-1 blockade without increasing toxicity rates, and future studies on this therapeutic strategy may be guided by biomarkers characterizing the pre-treatment tumor microenvironment.

RNA Expression-Based Analysis to Predict Response in Patients with Metastatic Mismatch Repair Proficient Colorectal Cancer Treated with Regorafenib and Nivolumab

INTRODUCTION

We previously conducted a phase I/Ib study (NCT03712943) with regorafenib and nivolumab in patients with refractory metastatic mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to investigate the role of Xerna™ TME Panel in predicting the treatment response.

METHODS

Twenty-two archival pretreatment tumor samples were subjected to the Xerna™ TME Panel, a machine learning-based RNA-sequencing biomarker assay. The Xerna tumor microenvironment (TME) subtypes were evaluated for correlation with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and other biomarkers including KRAS, PD-L1, CD8 expression, and Treg cells in TME.

RESULTS

Based on Xerna™ TME Panel, 4 patients with immune-active (IA) subtype and 6 patients with immune-suppressed subtype were classified as biomarker-positive, and five with angiogenic (A) subtype and seven with immune desert subtype were biomarker-negative. While not reaching statistical significance, Xerna TME biomarker-positive patients seemed to have longer median PFS (7.9 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.254), median OS (15.75 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.378), and higher DCR (70% vs. 58%, p = 0.675). The IA subtype in our cohort had higher levels of CD4+ FOXP3+ Treg cells, whereas the A subtype showed lower levels of Treg cells.

CONCLUSION

Xerna™ TME Panel analysis in patients with refractory metastatic pMMR CRC who were treated with regorafenib plus nivolumab might be of value for predictive clinical benefit. Further studies are needed to evaluate the predictive role of Xerna™ TME Panel analysis in patients with refractory metastatic pMMR CRC.