Molecular subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer: a nationwide retrospective study

BECN1 mRNA expression in breast cancer tissue; significant correlation to tumor grade

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogenous disease with multiple pathways implicated in its development, progression, and drug resistance. Autophagy, a cellular process responsible for self-digestion of damaged organelles, had been recognized as eminent player in cancer progression and chemotherapeutic resistance. The haploinsufficiency of Beclin 1 (BECN1), autophagy protein, is believed to contribute to cancer pathogenesis and progression. In our study, we investigated the expression of BECN1 in a BC female Egyptian patient cohort, as well as its prognostic role through evaluating its association with disease free survival (DFS) after 2 years follow up and association of tumor clinicopathological features. Twenty frozen female BC tissue samples and 17 adjacent normal tissue were included and examined for the expression levels of BECN1. Although the tumor tissues showed lower expression 0.73 (0-8.95) than their corresponding normal tissues 1.02 (0.04-19.59), it was not statistically significant, p: 0.463. BECN1 expression was not associated with stage, nodal metastasis or tumor size, p:0.435, 0.541, 0.296, respectively. However, statistically significant negative correlation was found between grade and BECN1 mRNA expression in the studied cases, p:0.028. BECN1 expression had no statistically significant association with DFS, P = 0.944. However, we observed that triple negative (TNBC) cases had significantly lower DFS rate than luminal BC patients, p: 0.022, with mean DFS 19.0 months, while luminal BC patients had mean DFS of 23.41 months. Our study highlights the potential role of BECN1 in BC pathogenesis, showing that BECN1 expression correlates with poorer differentiation of BC, indicating its probable link with disease aggressiveness. DFS two years follow up showed that TNBC subtype remains associated with less favorable prognosis.

Validation of CTS5 Model in Large-scale Breast Cancer Population and Combination of CTS5 and Ki-67 Status to Develop a Novel Nomogram for Prognosis Prediction

BACKGROUND

More than half of patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer relapse after completing 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, so it is important to determine which patients are candidates for extended endocrine therapy. The clinical treatment score after 5 years (CTS5) is a prognostic tool developed based on postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer to assess the risk of late distant recurrence (LDR) after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. We aimed to externally validate the prognostic value of CTS5 in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients and combined with Ki-67 to develop a new model to improve the ability of prognosis prediction.

METHODS

We included a total of 516 patients with early-stage ER+ breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy and were recurrence-free for 5 years after surgery. According to menopausal status, we divided the study population into 2 groups: premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The CTS5 of each patient was calculated using a previously published formula, and the patients were divided into low, intermediate, and high CTS5 risk groups according to their CTS5 values. Based on the results of the univariate analysis ( P <0.01), a multivariate COX proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to establish a nomogram with significant variables ( P <0.05). The discriminative power and accuracy of the nomograms were assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated by bootstrapping 1000 times. Finally, we utilized decision curve analysis to assess the performance of our novel predictive model in comparison to the CTS5 scoring system with regard to their respective benefits and advantages.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 7 years (6 to 9 years). The 516 women were categorized by CTS5 as follows: 246(47.7%) low risk, 179(34.7%) intermediate risk, and 91(17.6%) high risk. Using the CTS5 score as a continuous variable, patients' risk score was significantly positively associated with recurrence risk in both premenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups. For HER2- premenopausal patients and HER2+ postmenopausal patients, the CTS5 score was positively correlated with LDR risk. Patients with a Ki-67≥20% had a higher risk of LDR regardless of menopausal status. Using the CTS5 score as a categorical variable, the high-risk group of HER2- premenopausal patients had a higher risk of LDR. However, the CTS5 model could not distinguish the risk of LDR in different risk groups for HER2+ postmenopausal patients. In the high-risk group, patients with Ki-67≥20% had a higher risk of LDR, regardless of menopausal status. We developed a new nomogram model by combining the CTS5 model with Ki-67 levels. The C-indexes premenopausal and postmenopausal cohorts were 0.731 and 0.713, respectively. The nomogram model was well calibrated, and the time-dependent ROC curves indicated good specificity and sensitivity. Furthermore, decision curve analysis demonstrated that the new model had a wider and practical range of threshold probabilities, resulting in an increased net benefit compared with the CTS5 model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the CTS5 model can effectively predict the risk of LDR in early-stage ER+ breast cancer patients in both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Extended endocrine therapy is recommended for patients with Ki-67≥20% in the CTS5 high-risk group, as well as premenopausal patients with HER2-. Compared with CTS5, the new nomogram model has better identification and calibration capabilities, and further research is required to validate its efficacy in large-scale, multicenter, and prospective studies.

Breast Tumor Metastasis and Its Microenvironment: It Takes Both Seed and Soil to Grow a Tumor and Target It for Treatment

Metastasis remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Breast tumors metastasize to organ-specific locations such as the brain, lungs, and bone, but why some organs are favored over others remains unclear. Breast tumors also show heterogeneity, plasticity, and distinct microenvironments. This contributes to treatment failure and relapse. The interaction of breast cancer cells with their metastatic microenvironment has led to the concept that primary breast cancer cells act as seeds, whereas the metastatic tissue microenvironment (TME) is the soil. Improving our understanding of this interaction could lead to better treatment strategies for metastatic breast cancer. Targeted treatments for different subtypes of breast cancers have improved overall patient survival, even with metastasis. However, these targeted treatments are based upon the biology of the primary tumor and often these patients' relapse, after therapy, with metastatic tumors. The advent of immunotherapy allowed the immune system to target metastatic tumors. Unfortunately, immunotherapy has not been as effective in metastatic breast cancer relative to other cancers with metastases, such as melanoma. This review will describe the heterogeneic nature of breast cancer cells and their microenvironments. The distinct properties of metastatic breast cancer cells and their microenvironments that allow interactions, especially in bone and brain metastasis, will also be described. Finally, we will review immunotherapy approaches to treat metastatic breast tumors and discuss future therapeutic approaches to improve treatments for metastatic breast cancer.

The relationship of changes in molecular subtypes with metastases and progression-free survival in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Molecular subtyping of breast cancer cells is increasingly being developed as an initial step in selecting therapy and predicting the prognosis of breast cancer patients. During breast cancer, the molecular subtype of cancer cells can change. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between changes in the intrinsic subtype of breast cancer with metastasis and progression-free survival in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2016 to 2021. The molecular subtypes from the immunohistochemical examination results were recorded twice, and metastasis and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test and SPSS 26.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients, 19 (43.2%) experienced a change in molecular subtype, and 25 (56.8%) did not. No significant relationship existed between changes in molecular subtype and metastasis (p = 0.405). No significant relationship existed between changes in molecular subtype and PFS (p = 0.900). A significant relationship was found between changes in the molecular subtype and PFS in the patients with changes in the molecular subtype (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the intrinsic subtype were associated with PFS in breast cancer patients. Patients with an intrinsic subtype that changed to triple-negative showed worse PFS.

High PGAP3 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and low CD8+T cell in patients with HER2+ breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) stands as the most prevalent malignancy among women and ranks as the second most frequently diagnosed cancer globally among newly identified cases. Post-GPI attachment to proteins factor 3（PGAP3）was reported to involve in lipid remodeling. However, its specific role in breast cancer remains inadequately elucidated. Consequently, the principal objective of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of PGAP3 in breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive analysis using both public databases and our own sample cohort to assess the role of PGAP3 in breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry was employed to assess PGAP3 expression, immune markers, and the co-expression of PGAP3 with key susceptibility genes. Data analysis was performed using the R programming language.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that PGAP3 is significantly overexpressed in breast cancer, particularly in human epidermal growth factor 2 positive (HER2 +) breast cancer cases (p < 0.001). Co-expression analyses demonstrated a significant correlation between PGAP3 and susceptibility genes associated with breast cancer, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, RAD51C, and RAD51D (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified PGAP3 as a significant predictor of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and lymph node metastasis status (p < 0.01). Furthermore, higher PGAP3 expression was associated with decreased infiltration of CD8 + T cells in breast cancer samples.

CONCLUSION

Our study sheds light on the clinical significance of PGAP3 in breast cancer. PGAP3 is not only overexpressed in breast cancer but also correlates with key susceptibility genes, lymph node metastasis, and CD8 + T cell infiltration. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential role of PGAP3 as a biomarker in breast cancer and may contribute to our understanding of the disease's pathogenesis.

Breast Cancer with Brain Metastasis: Molecular Insights and Clinical Management

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women. Brain metastases are a primary contributor to mortality, as they often go undetected until late stages due to their dormant nature. Moreover, the clinical management of brain metastases is complicated by the relevant issue of blood-brain barrier penetration. The molecular pathways involved in the formation, progression, and colonization of primary breast tumors and subsequent brain metastases are diverse, posing significant hurdles due to the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer subtypes. Despite advancements in primary breast cancer treatments, the prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor. In this review, we aim to highlight the biological mechanisms of breast cancer brain metastases by evaluating multi-step genetic pathways and to discuss currently available and emerging treatment strategies to propose a prospective overview of the management of this complex disease.