Piglets' acute responses to procaine-based local anesthetic injection and surgical castration: Effects of two volumes of anesthetic

The Influence of the Nature of the Polymer Incorporating the Same A3B Multifunctional Porphyrin on the Optical or Electrical Capacity to Recognize Procaine

The multifunctionality of an A3B mixed-substituted porphyrin, namely 5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris(4-methylphenyl)porphyrin (5-COOH-3MPP), was proven due to its capacity to detect procaine by different methods, depending on the polymer matrix in which it is incorporated. The hybrid nanomaterial containing k-carrageenan and AuNPs (5-COOH-3MPP-k-carrageenan-AuNPs) was able to optically detect procaine in the concentration range from 5.76 × 10-6 M to 2.75 × 10-7 M, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.33 × 10-7 M. This method for the detection of procaine gave complementary results to the potentiometric one, which uses 5-COOH-3MPP as an electroactive material incorporated in a polyvinylchloride (PVC) membrane plasticized with o-NPOE. The detected concentration range by this ion-selective membrane electrode is wider (enlarged in the field of higher concentrations from 10-2 to 10-6 M), linearly dependent with a 53.88 mV/decade slope, possesses a detection limit of 7 × 10-7 M, a response time of 60 s, and has a certified stability for a working period of six weeks.

Comparative Study of Pain-Related Responses of Male Piglets up to Seven Days of Age to the Application of Different Local Anaesthetics and Subsequent Castration

Simple Summary

Since 2021, surgical piglet castration must be performed with complete pain elimination according to the Animal Protection Law in Germany. General anaesthesia by isoflurane inhalation, which can be performed by the farmer, or by injection of ketamine and azaperone, which must be performed by a veterinarian, are the options available. At present, local anaesthesia is still under debate because of the lack of proof of complete pain elimination and the pain on injection. We tested three local anaesthetics (procaine, lidocaine, and mepivacaine) at two different doses each. Because pain responses can be masked by reactions caused by handling, the piglets were given superficial isoflurane anaesthesia. The pain on injection to the testes was compared with intramuscular injection, and the effectiveness during castration was compared among the local anaesthetics. Nocifensive movements, respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate and its variability as well as electroencephalography (EEG) changes were studied in relation to the painful interventions. Most indicators of nociception point to testicular injection pain being beyond intramuscular injection pain when an effective amount of local anaesthetic was used. However, complete pain elimination could not be achieved during castration under local anaesthesia.

Abstract

To evaluate pain responses to intratesticular and subscrotal injection of three local anaesthetics and their efficacy during castration a randomized controlled study was conducted. In groups of 20 piglets, procaine (2%), lidocaine (2%), or mepivacaine (2%) were administered subscrotal and intratesticularly in two different dosages: 0.5 mL of the original substances or the maximum recommended dosage according to body weight diluted with isotonic saline to a volume of 0.3 mL per each injection site. Two placebo groups received the equivalent volume of isotonic saline. A control group was injected intramuscularly with 0.5 mL isotonic saline for injection pain comparison. Electroencephalographic changes, respiratory rate, heart rate and its variability, blood pressure, and nocifensive movements were assessed in superficial isoflurane anaesthesia. While EEG-changes and linear measures of heart rate variability did not appear conclusive, the low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio corresponded best with the other pain indicators recorded. The injection of 0.3 mL diluted local anaesthetic per injection site elicited significant fewer signs of pain compared to intramuscular injection of saline. However, pain reduction, but not complete pain elimination, during castration could only be achieved with 0.5 mL of the 2% local anaesthetics per injection site, whereby lidocaine and mepivacaine were the most effective.

Piglets' acute responses to local anesthetic injection and surgical castration: Effects of the injection method and interval between injection and castration

Although applied in some countries, efficacy of local anesthetics based on procaine to mitigate acute responses to piglet castration remains questioned. This paper presents results from a factorial study examining the effects of two methods of injection of a procaine-based drug (intra-funicular, IF, vs. intra-testicular, IT), and four intervals between drug injection and castration (2.5, 5, 10, and 30 min) on acute responses of 3–4 day old piglets. The study involved 597 male piglets, and 13 treatments: surgical castration without anesthesia (CC), local anesthesia followed by castration involving all combinations of injection method and interval, and sham handling separated by the same four intervals (SH). Responses of piglets to drug injection, castration and sham handling were evaluated based on quantification of intra-procedural vocalizations and leg movements, as well as saliva cortisol concentration in samples taken before and after castration. No differences were found between IF and the simpler IT injection method. Intervals of 2.5 or 30 min led to stronger piglet responses than the other intervals. Overall, treatments involving anesthesia led to significantly stronger responses than sham handling, during both injection and castration. All treatments, even sham handling, led to a significant increase in saliva cortisol, with no differences between anesthesia treatments and controls. Based on these results, castration 5–10 min after intra-testicular injection of procaine seems to be preferable as compared to the other treatments tested. However, piglets still showed measurable signs of pain and stress during both injection and castration, while handling alone (including the use of a castration bench) triggered a noticeable stress response. In light of these findings, the overall benefit of the procedure in terms of piglet welfare remains arguable.