Prospective Cohort Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Ambulatory Treatment With Oral Cefuroxime-Axetil in Febrile Children With Urinary Tract Infection

Children with acute pyelonephritis need medical re-evaluation when home-treated with oral antibiotics

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of home-treatment with oral piv-mecillinam or amoxicillin-clavulanate in children with acute pyelonephritis.

METHODS

Children aged over 6 months diagnosed with culture confirmed pyelonephritis at Danish Paediatric Departments were home-treated with piv-mecillinam (tablets) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (liquid or tablets). Follow-up was performed by phone (second treatment day) and clinical review of the patients in the hospital (day three).

RESULTS

Four hundred eighteen children were included. In total, 333/418 (80%) responded well to the initial oral antibiotic treatment. 85/418 (20%) were changed to another treatment of these 47/418 (11%) to a second-line oral antibiotic and 38/418 (9%) to intravenous antibiotics due to insufficient clinical improvement or bacterial resistance. Bacterial resistance was similar for piv-mecillinam and amoxicillin-clavulanate: 4/74 (5%) versus 33/333 (10%) (p = 0.22). Insufficient clinical improvement, despite no resistance, primarily occurred in children treated with piv-mecillinam: 16/74 (22%) versus 28/344 (8%) (p < 0.001), and predominantly occurred in piv-mecillinam treated children <5 years: 7/20 (35%) versus 9/54 (17%) (p < 0.05), potentially because of problems with piv-mecillinam tablets. In the study population no cases of death or septicemia developed after start of initial oral treatment.

CONCLUSION

A home-treatment regime for pyelonephritis in children >6 months is safe; however, during treatment, clinical re-evaluation is required as in 20% of cases a change in treatment was necessary.

Towards standardisation of evidence-based clinical care process specifications

There is a strong push towards standardisation of treatment approaches, care processes and documentation of clinical practice. However, confusion persists regarding terminology and description of many clinical care process specifications which this research seeks to resolve by developing a taxonomic characterisation of clinical care process specifications. Literature on clinical care process specifications was analysed, creating the starting point for identifying common characteristics and how each is constructed and used in the clinical setting. A taxonomy for clinical care process specifications is presented. The De Bleser approach to limited clinical care process specifications characterisation was extended and each clinical care process specification is successfully characterised in terms of purpose, core elements and relationship to the other clinical care process specification types. A case study on the diagnosis and treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom was used to evaluate the taxonomy and demonstrate how the characterisation framework applies. Standardising clinical care process specifications ensures that the format and content are consistent with expectations, can be read more quickly and high-quality information can be recorded about the patient. Standardisation also enables computer interpretability, which is important in integrating Learning Health Systems into the modern clinical environment. The approach presented allows terminologies for clinical care process specifications that were widely used interchangeably to be easily distinguished, thus, eliminating the existing confusion.