Transition From Nasogastric Tube to Oral Feeding: The Role of Parental Guided Responsive Feeding

Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Preterm and low birth weight infants are at an early stage of development, and do not receive adequate maternal circadian signals. They are often cared for over prolonged periods of hospitalisation in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), where environmental circadian stimuli are lacking. Exposure to artificial light-dark cycles may stimulate the development of the circadian system and improve clinical outcomes. However, it remains uncertain whether cycled light (CL) is preferable to near darkness (ND) or continuous bright light (CBL) in fostering development and maturation, and reducing adverse neonatal health outcomes. This is an update of an earlier Cochrane review, last published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of CL in preterm and low birth weight infants compared to ND or CBL.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and two trial registries to September 2023. We also checked reference lists, and searched for retractions of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs in preterm infants (< 37 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA)), or those with a low birth weight (< 2500 g), admitted and cared for in an NICU or a step-down unit, comparing CL with ND or CBL.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard review methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to assess the methodological quality of studies. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data. Our primary outcomes were (1) growth at three and six months' corrected age, (2) major neurodevelopmental disability, and (3) adverse effects. Our secondary outcomes were (4) retinopathy of prematurity, (5) duration of initial hospitalisation, (6) duration of oxygen treatment, and (7) parent satisfaction. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 studies with 1633 infants. Data for meta-analysis were available for 11 studies (1126 infants). One study with multiple arms was included in both comparisons. We rated the overall risk of bias at the study level as high or unclear for all 20 studies that had one or several unclear or high risk of bias judgements across the domains. Cycled light versus dimmed light or near darkness (10 studies) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cycled light compared to dimmed light (reduction of illumination levels) or near darkness on weight at three months (MD 24.79, 95% CI -262.33 to 311.91; 2 studies, 187 infants; very low-certainty evidence), and weight at six months (MD 202, 95% CI -109.68 to 513.68; 1 study, 147 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The studies did not report any data for major neurodevelopmental disability. No data are available for adverse effects; it is uncertain if the absence of adverse effects is because none occurred, or because they were not identified and recorded. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cycled light compared to dimmed light or near darkness on the likelihood of developing retinopathy of prematurity of any stage (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.03; 3 studies, 307 infants; very low-certainty evidence), and severe retinopathy of prematurity of stage 3 or higher (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.61; 4 studies, 454 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Cycled light compared to dimmed light or near darkness may have little to no effect on the duration of initial hospitalisation (MD -3.04, 95% CI -7.86 to 1.78; 5 studies, 550 infants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. Cycled light versus continuous bright light (11 studies) No data are available on the following primary outcomes, as no studies reported them: growth at three and six months' corrected age, major neurodevelopmental disability, and adverse effects. It is uncertain if the absence of adverse effects is because none occurred or because they were not identified and recorded. No data are available on retinopathy of prematurity, as no studies reported it. Cycled light compared to continuous bright light may reduce the duration of initial hospitalisation, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -9.86, 95% CI -10.09 to -9.63; 5 studies, 499 infants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite identifying 20 studies, we remain uncertain about the effect of CL compared to ND or CBL on all outcomes of interest in this review. In addition, a few critical outcomes were not reported by any of the included studies. The evidence remains uncertain about whether CL is the right choice in the NICU. The physician should always weigh the benefits and risks, based on the effects of the different options in the specific setting.

Cue-based feeding in the NICU-a pathway to earlier oral feeding of preterm infants

Aim

To compare volume-driven and cue-based feeding of low birth weight preterm infants, regarding short-term outcomes, including transition to oral feeds, weight gain, and length of stay.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Feeding and weight gain outcomes were compared between infants fed by volume-driven and cue-based feeds. The groups were subdivided by birth weight categories.

Results

The study group included 240 low birth weight preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation, 120 infants fed by volume-driven feeding were compared to 120 infants fed by cue-based feeding. The groups were sub-analyzed by birth weight categories: <1,500 g and 1,500-2,500 g. Study groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics and neonatal morbidities. Infants fed by cue-based feeding were more likely to achieve full oral feeding faster and at an earlier gestational age. Infants with a birth weight <1,500 g were less likely to experience adverse respiratory episodes during cue-based feeding. Although the rate of weight gain was reduced in cue-based feeding in the heavier infant group, discharge weight, breastfeeding rates, and length of stay were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions

Cue-based feeding results in faster transition to full oral feeding in very low birth weight preterm infants and at an earlier gestational age.

Effects of implementing non-nutritive sucking on oral feeding progression and outcomes in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preterm infants have imperfect neurological development, uncoordinated sucking-swallowing-breathing, which makes it difficult to realize effective oral feeding after birth. How to help preterm infants achieve complete oral feeding as soon as possible has become an important issue in the management of preterm infants. Non-nutritive sucking (NNS), as a useful oral stimulation, can improve the effect of oral feeding in preterm infants. This review aimed to explore the effect of NNS on oral feeding progression through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, CINHAL, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane databases, China's National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and VIP database from inception to January 20, 2024. Search terms included 'non-nutritive sucking' 'oral feeding' and 'premature.' Eligibility criteria involved randomized controlled studies in English or Chinese. Studies were excluded if they were reviews, case reports, or observational studies from which valid data could not be extracted or outcome indicators were poorly defined. The meta-analysis will utilize Review Manager 5.3 software, employing either random-effects or fixed-effects models based on observed heterogeneity. We calculated the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data, and estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted to ensure robust and reliable findings. We evaluated the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing the assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

A total of 23 randomized controlled trials with 1461 preterm infants were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that NNS significantly shortened time taken to achieve exclusive oral feeding (MD = -5.37,95%CI = -7.48 to-3.26, p<0.001), length of hospital stay(MD = -4.92, 95% CI = -6.76 to -3.09, p<0.001), time to start oral feeding(MD = -1.41, 95% CI = -2.36 to -0.45, p = 0.004), time to return to birth weight(MD = -1.72, 95% CI = -2.54 to -0.91, p<0.001). Compared to the NNS group, the control group had significant weight gain in preterm infants, including weight of discharge (MD = -61.10, 95% CI = -94.97 to -27.23, p = 0.0004), weight at full oral feeding (MD = -86.21, 95% CI = -134.37 to -38.05, p = 0.0005). In addition, NNS reduced the incidence of feeding intolerance (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.35, p<0.001) in preterm infants.

CONCLUSION

NNS improves oral feeding outcomes in preterm infants and reduces the time to reach full oral feeding and hospitalization length. However, this study was limited by the relatively small sample size of included studies and did not account for potential confounding factors. There was some heterogeneity and bias between studies. More studies are needed in the future to validate the effects on weight gain and growth in preterm infants. Nevertheless, our meta-analysis provides valuable insights, updating existing evidence on NNS for improving oral feeding in preterm infants and promoting evidence-based feeding practices in this population.

Responsive Feeding for Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Responsive feeding may improve health outcomes in preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants. Our objective was to assess effects of responsive compared with scheduled feeding in preterm and LBW infants.

METHODS

Data sources include PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, and MEDICUS. Randomized trials were screened. Primary outcomes were mortality, morbidity, growth, neurodevelopment. Secondary outcomes were feed intolerance and duration of hospitalization. Data were extracted and pooled with random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible studies were identified, and data from 8 randomized control trials with 455 participants were pooled in the meta-analyses. At discharge, the mean difference in body weight between the intervention (responsive feeding) and comparison (scheduled feeding) was -2.80 g per day (95% CI -3.39 to -2.22, I2 = 0%, low certainty evidence, 4 trials, 213 participants); -0.99 g/kg per day (95% CI -2.45 to 0.46, I2 = 74%, very low certainty evidence, 5 trials, 372 participants); -22.21 g (95% CI -130.63 to 86.21, I2 = 41%, low certainty evidence, 3 trials, 183 participants). The mean difference in duration of hospitalization was -1.42 days (95% CI -5.43 to 2.59, I2 = 88%, very low certainty evidence, 5 trials, 342 participants). There were no trials assessing other growth outcomes (eg, length and head circumference) mortality, morbidity or neurodevelopment. Limitations include a high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and small sample size in included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, responsive feeding may decrease in-hospital weight gain. Although the evidence is very uncertain, responsive feeding may slightly decrease the duration of hospitalization. Evidence was insufficient to understand the effects of responsive compared with scheduled feeding on mortality, morbidity, linear growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm and LBW infants.

Feeding outcomes in post-discharge feeding clinic for infants following cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to describe the development and assess the usefulness of a feeding clinic to help infants with CHD tolerate the highest level of oral feeding while achieving growth velocity and supporting neurodevelopment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, cohort study assessed feeding outcomes for infants who underwent cardiac surgery at <30 days of age with cardiopulmonary bypass between February 2016 and April 2020. Diagnoses, age at surgery, hospitalisation variables, and feeding outcomes were compared between two cohorts, pre- and post-implementation of a specialised feeding clinic using Exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact test. The association between time to full oral feed and risk factors was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Post-clinic infants (n = 116) surgery was performed at a median of 6 days of life (interquartile range: 4, 8) with median hospital length of stay of 19 days (interquartile range: 16, 26). Infants' median age at first clinic visit was at 30 days old (interquartile range: 24, 40) and took median 10 days (interquartile range: 7, 12) after hospital discharge to first clinic visit. In the post-clinic cohort, the median time to 100% oral feeding was 47 days (interquartile range: 27, 96) compared to the 60 days (interquartile range: 20, 84) in the pre-clinic cohort (n = 22), but the difference was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

The cardiac feeding clinic was utilised by our neonatal surgery population and feasible in coordination with cardiology follow-up visits. Future assessment of cardiac feeding clinic impact should include additional measures of feeding and neurodevelopmental success.

Influence of Full Oral Feeding Acquisition on Growth of Premature Infants

OBJECTIVE

The main objective was to describe the impact of full oral feeding achievement in very low birth weight infants on weight, length, and head circumference, measured as the change in z-score from 32 weeks to discharge, the time at which full oral feeding occurs.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal retrospective observational study on infants younger than 30 weeks of gestational age, admitted to the Neonatology Unit of La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain), from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The infant's anthropometric characteristics (weight, height, and head circumference) were compared at birth, at 32, 34, and 36 weeks of gestational age, at the time of full oral feeding, and at discharge from the unit.

RESULTS

A total of 66 infants were included, gestational age at birth range from 24 to 30. Full oral intake occurred at 37.1 ± 2.1 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). We found an inverse correlation between gestational age at birth and birth weight with PMA at which full oral feeding (FOF) is achieved. PMA at discharge was 38.6 ± 2.5 weeks. Age of full oral intake and discharge occurred later in infants who had patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, and sepsis or received a blood transfusion. A positive correlation was found between days of oxygen and both parameters. However, we found no relationship between necrotizing enterocolitis or intraventricular hemorrhage with age at full oral feeding or age at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The transition from gastric tube to oral intake did not affect growth. We found a close relationship between preterm infants birth, earlier younger than 30 weeks of gestational age, and low birth weight, with a delay in full oral feeding achievement that correlated with age at discharge.

Improve the clinical effective decision of the oral feeding readiness in preterm infants: Revise and validate the TC-POFRAS

BACKGROUND

Currently there is limited information to guide health professionals regarding the optimal time frame to initiate safe and effective oral feedings to preterm infants. The study aims to revise and validate a streamlined version of the Traditional Chinese-Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale, the TC-POFRAS®, and evaluate its construct validity in the clinical decisions regarding feeding readiness of preterm infants.

METHODS

Eighty-one clinically stable preterm infants were assessed using the TC-POFRAS for oral feeding readiness. Item-total correlation analysis was used to check if any item was inconsistent with the averaged TC-POFRAS scores. Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the inter-item consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the coherence of variables to reorganize assessment domains. The revised version of TC-POFRAS (TC-POFRAS®) was developed and a new cut-off score based on discriminant accuracy was established.

RESULTS

Based on the results from statistical analysis, five items ("lips posture," "tongue posture," "biting reflex," "gag reflex," and "tongue cupping") were deleted from the original TC-POFRAS to form the TC-POFRAS®. The TC-POFRAS®'s global accuracy was 92.1%. The cut-off value of 19 was the one that presented the most optimization of sensitivity based on specificity. The TC-POFRAS® was reconstructed into corrected gestational age and five behavioral domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The TC-POFRAS® is considered a valid, safe, and accurate objective instrument to assist health professionals to initiate oral feeding of preterm infants.

Oro-Motor Intervention Protocol to Improve Sucking Behavior among Neonates with Immature Sucking: An Experimental Protocol

Background:

Oro-motor intervention methods were previously adopted to improve the sucking pattern but there is still a lag in the structured protocol for improving sucking behavior in infants with immature sucking. Thus, this study is aimed to develop a structured protocol for the Oro-motor intervention to improve sucking behavior.

Method:

Using the prospective observational study design, neonates with poor suck (producing less than 10 sucks per minute), under NG tube feeding, and maintaining oxygen saturation at room air were included. A total of 6 subjects were enrolled in this study and they were treated with Oro-motor intervention protocol. The Sucking rate and LATCH score were taken as the outcome measures and measured at beginning of intervention and after 2 weeks of intervention.

Result:

The mean pre-test and post-test values for sucking rate were is (8.66), (32.5) and LATCH were (4.66), (8.16) respectively. The data collected showed that the protocol framed for Oro-motor intervention was significantly effective in improving quality of feeding among infants with immature sucking behavior.

Conclusion:

The structured Oro-motor intervention protocol improves the feeding performance in infants with poor sucking behavior and improves the LATCH score. All the infants included in this study where under nasogastric tube feeding, thus the structured protocol can be considered to be helpful in weaning from NG tube feeding.

Effect of SINC Feeding Protocol on Weight Gain, Transition to Oral Feeding, and the Length of Hospitalization in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to test the effect of the Safe Individualized Nipple-Feeding Competence (SINC) protocol on the preterm infants' weight gain, transition to oral feeding, and duration of hospitalization.

METHODS

The procedure was designed as a single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. The trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Konya, Turkey. Data were collected from 80 preterm infants between February 2018 and March 2019. Infants (gestational weeks 28-33) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 39) and control groups (n = 41). The intervention group received the SINC feeding protocol, whereas the control group received the standard feeding. Data were collected using the Family Information Form, the Preterm Infant Follow-Up Form, and the SINC Protocol Evaluation Checklist. Infants were followed from hospitalization to discharge. The outcomes were weight gain, transition to oral feeding, and the length of hospitalization from birth to discharge. Pearson χ² test, Fisher exact test, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and general linear model test were used in analyzing the data.

RESULTS

The main effects of groups on weight measurements were found to be statistically significant (P < .001). There were no significant differences in terms of the transition from gavage to full oral feeding and the length of hospitalization (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

SINC protocol positively influences weight gain in preterm infants. It is important to evaluate different evidence-based feeding methods both as they apply to the NICU stay and how they may affect long-term outcomes of preterm infant.

Behavioral changes in preterm children during nasogastric tube feeding. Comparative study of manual administration by parents versus mechanical administration via electric syringe pump

INTRODUCTION

Manual feeding by parents using a syringe, a widespread practice in Sweden since the 1980s, favors parents' involvement in childcare tasks. This approach is used in our neonatal unity since 2007.

OBJECTIVE

To study the behavioral changes of preterm children during nasogastric tube feeding: manual milk administration by parents (MAP) versus electric syringe administration (ESA) over a 30-minute period.

METHOD

This is a randomized, crossover study conducted in the neonatology unit of Toulouse. Preterm children under 33 weeks of age and over 7 days of life were included. A video recording was performed to assess the children's behavioral response, using the Dsilna score. The reviewer was blinded.

RESULTS

15 preterm children with a median gestational age of 30.1 weeks and a median birth weight of 1.210 g were included from March to October 2012. The facility, environment, and state of alertness of children were similar in both groups. Signs of well-being were significantly more prevalent in the MAP group versus the ESA group (36.2 (±8.0) versus 30.7 (±9.5)), (p = 0.04), particularly "hand-to-mouth, mouth gestures, seeking suction and sucking". Although not significant, motor withdrawal signs were more apparent and fluctuating in the ESA group. Qualitative analysis of NIDCAP observations confirms this data.

CONCLUSION

There are behavior changes of preterm children during nasogastric tube feeding. This pilot study showed previously undescribed results: MAP is associated with more common well-being signs and could be more widely used in neonatal units.