Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?

Application of different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure in laparoscopic pyeloplasty for infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Background

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a minimally invasive approach for the therapy of infant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), reliant on CO2 pneumoperitoneum insufflation. While the impact of CO2 insufflation on adult and older pediatric populations has been studied, its effects on infants remain less explored.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled trial included infants with UPJO undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Patients were allocated to low pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP, 5 mmHg) or high pneumoperitoneum pressure (HPP, 8 mmHg) groups. Surgical parameters, postoperative complications, acid-base balance, stress markers, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress markers were evaluated and compared.

Results

A total of 116 infants were analyzed. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between LPP and HPP groups. No significant differences in blood loss, operation time, or hospitalization time were observed. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Acid-base balance analysis revealed a decrease in pH after pneumoperitoneum in both groups, with greater reductions in actual base excess and standard base excess in the HPP group. Stress markers, cytokines, and oxidative stress markers increased postoperatively in both groups, with higher levels in the HPP group.

Conclusion

HPP leads to more pronounced physiological responses, including acid-base alterations, stress reactions, and inflammatory cytokine elevations.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in neonates and infants is safe and efficient

Introduction

Dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is a well-accepted treatment modality for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. However, its efficacy and safety in infants, particularly neonates, remain uncertain. To address this significant knowledge gap, we aimed to compare outcomes between a cohort of neonates and infants undergoing LP vs. open pyeloplasty (OP) at less than 6 months and 6 weeks of age.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent primary pyeloplasty at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Only patients aged 6 months or less at the time of surgery were included, excluding redo-procedures or conversions. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were assessed for redo-pyeloplasty and postoperative complications, classified according to the Clavien-Madadi classification. A standard postoperative assessment was performed 6 weeks postoperatively. This included an isotope scan and a routine ultrasound up to the year 2020.

Results

A total of 91 eligible patients were identified, of which 49 underwent LP and 42 underwent OP. Patients receiving LP had a median age of 11.4 (1-25.4) weeks, compared to 13.8 (0.5-25.9) weeks for those receiving OP (p > 0.31). Both groups in our main cohort had an age range of 0-6 months at the time of surgery. Nineteen patients were younger than 6 weeks at the time of surgery. The mean operating time was longer for LP (161 ± 43 min) than that for OP (109 ± 32 min, p < 0.001). However, the mean operating time was not longer in the patient group receiving LP at ≤6 weeks (145 ± 21.6) compared to that in our main cohort receiving LP. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the groups. Four patients after LP required emergency nephrostomy compared to one patient after OP. The rate of revision pyeloplasty in our main cohort aged 0-6 months at surgery was 8% in the patient group receiving LP and 14% in the patient group receiving OP (not significant). Three revisions after LP were due to persistent UPJO, and one was due to stent migration. Only one patient requiring revision pyeloplasty was less than 6 weeks old.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is one of the largest collectives of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed in infants, and it is the youngest cohort published to date. Based on our experience, LP in neonates and infants under 6 months appears to be as effective as open surgery.

Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To compare the perioperative outcomes and success rates of minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP), including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, with open pyeloplasty (OP) in infants.

Materials and Methods

In September 2022, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was undertaken. The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with the study registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022359475).

Results

Eleven studies were included. Dichotomous and continuous variables were presented as odds ratios (OR) and standard mean differences (SMD), respectively, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Compared to OP, a longer operation time and shorter length of stay were associated with MIP (SMD: 0.96,95% CI: 0.30 to 1.62, p = 0.004, and SMD: -1.12, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.43, p = 0.002, respectively). No significant differences were found between the MIP and OP in terms of overall postoperative complications (OR:0.84, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.35, p = 0.47), minor complications (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.42, p = 0.39), or major complications (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.49 to 2.50, p = 0.81). In addition, a lower stent placement rate was related to MIP (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.47, p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference for success rate between the MIP and OP (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.59 to 3.07, p = 0.47). Finally, the results of subgroup analysis were consistent with the above.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MIP is a feasible and safe alternative to OP for infants, presenting comparable perioperative outcomes and similar success rates, albeit requiring longer operation times. However, it is essential to consider the limitations of our study, including the inclusion of studies with small sample sizes and the combination of both prospective and retrospective research designs.

Are weight or age limits for pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Results of a multicentric study

INTRODUCTION

Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty is the technique of choice for the treatment of pyeloureteral junction obstruction (PUJO) with an excellent success rate. Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care for the management of PUJO in children. Although it has been comparable to the open approach at all levels, its diffusion or employment in younger children has not been widely adopted. Our aim is to evaluate laparoscopic pyeloplasty outcomes from international academic centers in children under 1 year of age, focusing on feasibility and outcomes including possible complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is review of consecutive infants under 1 year of age who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty between 2009 and 2018 with more than 12 months of follow-up. Seven different training centers with different backgrounds participated in this study. Evaluation was carried out with ultrasound and renogram before and after surgery. Demographic data, perioperative characteristics, complications, and results are described and analyzed.

RESULTS

Over 9 years, 124 transperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties were performed on 123 children under 1 year of age; 88 males and 35 females, with 1 case of bilateral PUJO. Of the 124 renal units, 86 were left-sided. Mean age at surgery was 6.6 months (1 week-12 months), with 56% (n = 70) done before 6 months of age. Mean weight at surgery was 6.8 kg (3-12 kg), with 59% (n = 73) weighing less than 8 kg. Mean operative time (skin-to-skin) was 150 min (75-330 min). After a mean follow-up of 46 months (12-84 months), 12 (9%) patients developed complications, with only 1 needing a redo pyeloplasty also done laparoscopically. One child, with deterioration in renal function, underwent nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty under 1 year of age and/or less than 12 kilos is feasible with lower complication rate. Furthermore, age younger than 6 months and weight less than 8 kg are no longer limiting factors for a successful pyeloplasty as shown by this multicentre study.

Use of Temporary Double-J Stent Placement for Children With Congenital Hydronephrosis: A Long-Term Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utilization of double-J stents in children with congenital hydronephrosis in order to avoid or postpone more invasive surgical intervention. Numerous studies have demonstrated that congenital hydronephrosis caused by ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) or primary obstructive megaureter (POM) may require a surgical correction in up to 20% of cases.

METHODS

All infants with severe hydronephrosis and/or an obstructive pattern on renal scintigraphy that received double-J stent placement between 2010 to 2015 in our center were analyzed. Children were followed regularly with ultrasound and received antibiotic metaphylaxis. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and double-J dislocation were defined as complications. Treatment success was defined as avoidance of surgery and reduction of hydronephrosis to grade 1 or 0 during the observation period.

RESULTS

29 children were included, in these, 34 (23 UPJO, 7 POM, 4 UPJO and POM) treatment attempts were performed. Stent implantation failed in six cases, resulting in 28 double-J stent treatments, of which 19 (69%) were successful within the follow-up period of 20 to 104 months. The most common complications were febrile UTI in 6 of29 cases and double-J dislocation in 3 of 29 cases.

CONCLUSION

During the observation period, the success rate of temporary double-J in urodynamically relevant obstruction was relatively high. However, urinary tract infections and a complex disease course due to renal stent dislocation, as well as the need for repeated anesthesia and radiation exposure, should be taken into account. Hence, we do not recommend double-J stents placement in all children with congenital hydronephrosis; it may be useful in selected cases.

Latitudes and attitudes: A multinational study of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children

PURPOSE

The Anderson-Hynes technique has been the treatment of choice for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Laparoscopic approach has shown similar outcomes to open, with advantages of shorter hospital stay and less pain. We reviewed the experience of 11 geographically diverse, tertiary pediatric urology institutions focusing on the outcomes and complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted evaluating patients undergoing Anderson-Hynes dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Centers from four different continents participated. Demographic data, perioperative management, results, and complications are described.

RESULTS

Over a 9-year period, 744 laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed in 743 patients. Mean follow-up was 31 months (6-120m). Mean age at surgery was 82 months (1 w-19 y). Median operative time was 177 min. An internal stent was placed in 648 patients (87%). A catheter was placed for bladder drainage in 702 patients (94%). Conversion to open pyeloplasty was necessary in seven patients. Average length of hospital stay was 2.8 days. Mean time of analgesic requirement was 3.2 days. Complications, according to Clavien-Dindo classification, were observed in 56 patients (7.5%); 10 (1%) were Clavien-Dindo IIIb. Treatment failure occurred in 35 cases with 30 requiring redo pyeloplasty (4%) and 5 cases requiring nephrectomy (0.6%).

CONCLUSION

We have described the laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience of institutions with diverse cultural and economic backgrounds. They had very similar outcomes, in agreement with previously published data. Based on these findings, we conclude that laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and successful in diverse geographics areas of the world.

Attaining competency and proficiency in open pyeloplasty: a learning curve configuration using cumulative sum analysis

INTRODUCTION

The learning curves for minimally invasive pyeloplasty techniques have been described in the past. However, the learning curve in achieving competency in open pyeloplasty has not been described. Hence, we aim to evaluate a single surgeon series of open pyeloplasty technique using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all open pyeloplasties performed by a single surgeon (AJL) between January 2008 and March 2020. Collected variables included: sex, age at surgery, operative time, hospital stay, pre-operative ultrasound, pre-operative nuclear scans, pre-operative anteroposterior diameter, associated anomalies, laterality (left or right), type of stent, pre-operative split renal function, and duration of follow-up. A CUSUM analysis was used: the highest peak, plateau and downward trends for complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3b) were identified on the plot and set as the transition points between five phases (learning, competency, proficiency, case-mix, and mastery).

RESULTS

Based on the CUSUM analysis, the index surgeon reached the competency phase after performing their 13th open pyeloplasty and became proficient after the 70th case. In the case-mix phase (104th-126th cases), where the surgeon may be performing more complex cases while increasing trainee involvement, there was a slight increase in complication rates. After the 126th case, the surgeon entered the mastery phase, where there was consistent decreasing trend in complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons performing open pyeloplasty in children following completion of their surgical training will continue to learn through their early cases until achieving competency. Technical competency may be reached after the 13th case. In this report, we looked at the number of cases to become proficient in open pyeloplasty procedure in children. A surgeon may achieve technical proficiency in the procedure after their 13th case.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants

OBJECTIVE

While there are several reports confirming the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children there have been none comparing LP and RALP specifically in infants. In this meta-analysis, we have compared the outcomes of LP and RALP in infants.

METHODS

Pubmed (Medline), Publon, Index Medicus and Embase were searched using the search terms: pyeloplasty (laparoscopic OR robot-assisted) AND (infant), to identify all papers pertaining to LP and RALP. Systematic review was performed to identify information regarding number of patients/renal units, age, body weight, operating time, hospital stay, success and complications. Meta-analysis of heterogeneity was reported with I2statistics. Once heterogeneity was found low, the pooled outcomes were compared with student's t test and Fishers exact test, wherever appropriate.

RESULTS

After screening a total of 267 articles, 18 articles were included (10 articles on LP, 7 on RALP, 1 reporting both), comprising 323 renal units for LP and 173 renal units for RALP. With low heterogeneity (I2: 0%) both groups were considered to have been conducted under similar conditions for fixed effect model. There was no significant difference between the success rates of LP or RALP (97.5% vs 94.8%; p = 0.21). The mean age at operation was significantly lower for LP (5.6 ± 1.8 months) than RALP (7.2 ± 1.2 months, P = 0.0001). The duration of surgery was 137 ± 45 min for LP while significantly higher at 179 ± 49 min for RALP (p = 0.0001). The mean (s.d) time to discharge was 2.0 (1.9) days for LP while 1.3 (0.4) days for RALP. The overall complication rate was significantly higher (summary table) for RALP than LP (p = 0.03), mainly due to more port-site hernias in RALP.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we found that the success of LP and RALP in infants was similar. RALP in infants had longer duration of surgery, similar hospital stay and higher Clavien-3 complications than LP. While several studies have reported favorable outcomes for RALP over LP in children, this was not the case in infants. The smaller workspace, in an infant, can significantly limit the mobility of robotic instruments and increase the chance of port-site conflicts or trocar collisions. The use of larger robotic ports and instruments in the small space of infant abdomen might have been responsible for higher complications in RALP, including significantly larger number of port-site hernias. This meta-analysis represents the early experience of most RALP in infants, and it is possible that with experience RALP outcomes in infants also will catch up with LP. Miniaturization of robotic instruments might render RALP the future standard of care for pyeloplasty in infants.

Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success

BACKGROUND

Since its first description, multiple reports proved efficacy and safety of the robotic platform. Further progress has been made allowing for the application of robotic surgery to smaller patients, including infants. Despite the early favorable results, the use of robot surgery in infants is still controversial and more studies are needed to confirm its benefits.

OBJECTIVE

To our knowledge, we present the largest single-institution case series of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P) in infants, aiming to contribute to the current literature with a guide for key technical steps and safety tips for infant RAL-P.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Only infants (≤12 mo of age) with a diagnosis of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were included in the study.

MEASUREMENTS

We critically reviewed the clinical outcomes, described the main steps of the operation, and shared tips for a safe approach.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

From January 2012 to August 2019, 44 infants underwent RAL-P for UPJO--33 (75%) males and 11 (25%) females. All robotic cases were completed successfully, with no laparotomic conversions. The median age and weight were 4 (1-12) mo and 6.8 (3.8-10.5) kg, respectively. The mean operative time was 142 (±25) min. The mean estimated blood loss was 7 (±3.6) ml, and no intraoperative complications occurred. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 1.4 (±0.7) d. Seven (15.6%) patients had postoperative complications-one (2%) ileus (Clavien-Dindo grade [CDG] I), four (9%) urinary tract infections (CDG II), and two (4.5%) port-site hernias (CDG III). At a median follow-up of 19 mo, the success rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the successful outcomes, benefits of decreased LOS, and improved cosmesis, RAL-P is an appealing management option for UPJO in infants. Market release of new systems, further miniaturization of instruments, and more affordable costs will hopefully be shedding light on more complex applications.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Infants (≤12 mo of age) diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were selected and included in this study. No intraoperative complications or conversion to an open approach occurred. Seven patients (16%) developed postoperative complications-one (2%) postoperative ileus, four (9%) urinary tract infections, and two (4.5%) port-site hernias. At a median follow-up of 19 (7-66) mo, the success rate was 100%.

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction via Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approaches

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches. Method: A systematic literature search on keywords was undertaken using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Nation Knowledge (CNKI), and Wanfang. The eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies were identified with a total of 777 patients. Four hundred eight patients were treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP), and 368 patients were treated with transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (TLP). The meta-analysis results showed that the two approaches were similar in terms of presence of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication, the rate of conversion, and recurrence (p > 0.05). The operative time in the TLP group was significantly shorter than the RLP group (MD = 16.6; 95% CI, 3.40-29.80; p = 0.01). The duration of drainage was significantly shorter (MD = -1.06; 95% CI, -1.92 to -0.19; p = 0.02), and the score of postoperative visual analog score (VAS) was significantly lower in the RLP group than in the TLP group (MD = -0.52; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.08; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Both approaches have good success rates and low postoperative complication rates. RLP provides a shorter duration of drainage and lower VAS score, but it takes more operative time than TLP.

Early Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Infants Under 3 Months With Severe Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Objective: To present our primary experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for severe ureteropelvis junction obstruction (UPJO) infants under 3 months. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 9 infants under 3 months who underwent RALP for severe UPJO between April 2017 and March 2019 in our center. The severe UPJO was defined as infants with severe hydronephrosis (Society of Fetal Urology grades III or IV, anteroposterior diameter >3 cm or split renal function <40% or T 1/2 >20 min) involving bilateral, solitary kidney, or contralateral renal hypoplasia UPJO at the same time. All clinical, perioperative, and postoperative information was collected. Results: There were four bilateral UPJO cases, two solitary kidney UPJO cases and three unilateral UPJO with contralateral renal hypoplasia cases included. One single surgeon performed RALP on all of the infants. The mean age of the infants was 1.62 ± 0.54 months. The mean operative time was 109.55 ± 10.47 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 19.29 ± 3.19 ml, and the mean length of hospital stay was 5.57 ± 0.73 days. According to the ultrasonography results, all patients had a significant recovery of renal function at 12 months after the operation. Conclusions: To maximize the protection of renal function, early RALP is a safe and feasible option for the treatment of severe UPJO in infants under 3 months.

Searching for the Least Invasive Management of Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction in Children: A Critical Literature Review of Comparative Outcomes

Introduction: To review the published evidence on the minimally invasive pyeloplasty techniques available currently with particular emphasis on the comparative data about the various minimally invasive alternatives to treat pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction and gauge if one should be favored under certain circumstances. Materials and Methods: Non-systematic review of literature on open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty including various kinds of laparoscopic procedures, the robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and endourological procedures. Results: Any particular minimally invasive pyeloplasty procedure seems feasible in experienced hands, irrespective of age including infants. Comparative data suggest that the robotic-assisted procedure has gained wider acceptance mainly because it is ergonomically more suited to surgeon well-being and facilitates advanced skills with dexterity thanks to 7 degrees of freedom. However, costs remain the major drawback of robotic surgery. In young children and infants, instead, open surgery can be performed via a relatively small incision and quicker time frame. Conclusions: The best approach for pyeloplasty is still a matter of debate. The robotic approach has gained increasing acceptance over the last years with major advantages of the surgeon well-being and ergonomics and the ease of suturing. Evidence, however, may favor the use of open surgery in infancy.