Azithromycin Prescribing by Respiratory Pediatricians in Australia and New Zealand for Chronic Wet Cough: A Questionnaire-Based Survey

Safety profiles and adverse reactions of azithromycin in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Azithromycin (AZM) is an antimicrobial agent and frequently used in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases due to its well-recognized clinical efficacy. Despite some favorable findings from many studies, there is a lack of research reports focusing on the safety profiles and adverse reactions.

METHODS

The randomized controlled trials of AZM in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases on internet databases were searched. The search databases included Chinese CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers of this study independently assessed the eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted the data. The included literature was meta-analyzed and subgroup analyzed by revman 5.1 software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 eligible studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of adverse reactions after AZM treatment was 24.20%, which was lower than 48.05% in the control group (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.12-0.72, P < .001). In the subgroup of sequential therapy, AZM had a lower incidence of adverse reactions in sequential therapy (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.60, P < .001). In the subgroup of intravenous administration, AZM had a lower the incidence of adverse reactions (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.12-0.84, P = .003). In the subgroup of oral administration, AZM had a lower the incidence of adverse reactions (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.13-0.69 P < .001). Overall, it was also found that the incidence of adverse reactions in the AZM subgroup was significantly lower than that in other treatment subgroup.

CONCLUSION

AZM has fewer adverse reactions and better safety profiles, which make AZM a more attractive option in the treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases.

Long-term Azithromycin in Children With Bronchiectasis Unrelated to Cystic Fibrosis: Treatment Effects Over Time

BACKGROUND

Following evidence from randomized controlled trials, patients with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis receive long-term azithromycin to reduce acute respiratory exacerbations. However, the period when azithromycin is effective and which patients are likely to most benefit remain unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

(i) What is the period after its commencement when azithromycin is most effective? and (ii) Which factors may modify azithromycin effects?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted of our previous randomized controlled trial involving 89 indigenous children with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis. Semi-parametric Poisson regression identified the azithromycin efficacy period. Multivariable Poisson regression identified factors that modify azithromycin effect.

RESULTS

Azithromycin was associated with fewer exacerbations per child-week during weeks 4 through 96, with the most effective period observed between weeks 17 and 62. Eleven factors were associated with different azithromycin effects; four were significant at the P < .05 level. Compared with their counterparts, higher reduction in exacerbations was observed in children with nasopharyngeal carriage of bacterial pathogens (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.57-1.14] vs 0.29 [0.20-0.44]; P < .001); New Zealand children (IRR = 0.73 [0.51-1.03] vs 0.39 [0.28-0.55]; P = .012); and those with higher weight-for-height z scores (interaction IRR = 0.82 [0.67-0.99]; P = .044). Compared with their counterparts, lower reduction was observed in those born preterm (IRR = 0.41 [0.30-0.55] vs 0.74 [0.49-1.10]; P = .012).

INTERPRETATION

Regular azithromycin is best used for at least 17 weeks and up to 62 weeks, as these periods provide maximum benefit for indigenous children with bronchiectasis unrelated to cystic fibrosis. Several factors modified azithromycin benefits; however, these traits need confirmation in larger studies before being adopted into clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12610000383066.

Reducing exacerbations in children and adults with primary ciliary dyskinesia using erdosteine and/or azithromycin therapy (REPEAT trial): study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, 2×2 partial factorial, randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, progressive, inherited ciliopathic disorder, which is incurable and frequently complicated by the development of bronchiectasis. There are few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adults with PCD and thus evidence of efficacy for interventions are usually extrapolated from people with cystic fibrosis. Our planned RCT seeks to address some of these unmet needs by employing a currently prescribed (but unapproved for long-term use in PCD) macrolide antibiotic (azithromycin) and a novel mucolytic agent (erdosteine). The primary aim of our RCT is to determine whether regular oral azithromycin and erdosteine over a 12-month period reduces acute respiratory exacerbations among children and adults with PCD. Our primary hypothesis is that: people with PCD who regularly use oral azithromycin and/or erdosteine will have fewer exacerbations than those receiving the corresponding placebo medications. Our secondary aims are to determine the effect of the trial medications on PCD-specific quality-of-life (QoL) and other clinical outcomes (lung function, time-to-next exacerbation, hospitalisations) and nasopharyngeal bacterial carriage and antimicrobial resistance.

Methods and analysis

We are currently undertaking a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy RCT to evaluate whether 12 months of azithromycin and/or erdosteine is beneficial for children and adults with PCD. We plan to recruit 104 children and adults with PCD to a parallel, 2×2 partial factorial superiority RCT at five sites across Australia. Our primary endpoint is the rate of exacerbations over 12 months. Our main secondary outcomes are QoL, lung function and nasopharyngeal carriage by respiratory bacterial pathogens and their associated azithromycin resistance.

Ethics and dissemination

Our RCT is conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Australian legislation and National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines for ethical conduct of Research, including that for First Nations Australians.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12619000564156.

Effects of long-term azithromycin therapy on auditory functions in children with chronic respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In recent years, long-term azithromycin (AZT) use has been increased in pediatric patients with chronic respiratory tract problems. In this study, we aimed to assess auditory functions in children on long-term AZT therapy.

METHOD

The study included 43 patients who received long-term AZT treatment and 27 age-matched, healthy controls. In the study and control groups, ear-nose-throat examination, pure tone audiometry, speech recognition threshold (SRT), speech discrimination score (SDS), uncomfortable loudness level (UCL), acoustic reflex tests, and otoacoustic emission tests were performed. The test results were statistically compared between groups.

RESULTS

Mean age was 11.3 ± 0.56 years in the study group and 9.3 ± 3.07 years in the control group. The medain hearing examination was 8 months after end of AZT treatment (Ranged: 1-12 months). No significant difference was found in normal- and high-frequency audiogram tests at any frequency between study and control groups. Also, no significant difference was found in distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) tests between groups. Also, there was no significant difference in acoustic reflex, SRT, SDS, and UCL test results between study and control groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study assessing auditory functions comprehensively in pediatric patients who received long-term AZT therapy. In this study, it was shown that long-term AZT use had no deleterious effect on auditory function tests.

Duration of amoxicillin-clavulanate for protracted bacterial bronchitis in children (DACS): a multi-centre, double blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB) is a leading cause of chronic wet cough in children. The current standard treatment in European and American guidelines is 2 weeks of antibiotics, but the optimal duration of therapy is unknown. We describe the first randomised controlled trial to assess the duration of antibiotic treatment in children with chronic wet cough and suspected PBB. We hypothesise that 4 weeks of amoxicillin-clavulanate is superior to 2 weeks for improving clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Our parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial was completed in four Australian hospitals. Children aged 2 months to 19 years with chronic (>4 weeks duration) wet cough, and suspected PBB were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted block randomisation (stratified by age and site) to 4 weeks of amoxicillin-clavulanate (25-35 mg/kg twice daily oral suspension; 4-week group) or 2 weeks of amoxicillin-clavulanate followed by 2 weeks of placebo (2-week group). The children, caregivers, all the study coordinators, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment until data analysis was completed. The primary outcome was clinical cure (cough resolution) by day 28. Secondary outcomes were recurrence of PBB at 6 months, time to next exacerbation, change in Parent-proxy Cough-Specific Quality-of-Life (PC-QoL) score from baseline to day 28 and from day 28 to 7 months, adverse events, nasal swab bacteriology, and antimicrobial resistance. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is complete and registered with Australian/New Zealand Registry, ACTRN12616001725459.

FINDINGS

Between March 8, 2017, and Sept 30, 2019, 106 children were randomly assigned (52 in the 4-week group, median age 2·2 years [IQR 1·3-4·1]; 54 in the 2-week group, median age 1·7 years [1·2-3·8]) with 90 children completing the 4-week treatment. By day 28, the primary endpoint of clinical cure in the 4-week group (32 [62%] of 52 patients) was not significantly different to the 2-week group (38 [70%] of 54 patients; adjusted relative risk 0·87 [95% CI 0·60 to 1·28]; p=0·49). Time to next wet cough exacerbation was significantly longer in the 4-week group than the 2-week group (median 150 days [IQR 38-181] vs 36 days [15-181]; adjusted hazard ratio 0·47 [0·25 to 0·90]; p=0·02). The rate of recurrence of PBB at 6 months was 17 (53%) of 32 patients in the 4-week group vs 28 (74%) of 38 patients in the 2-week group, but the difference between the groups was not significant (adjusted odds ratio 0·39 [0·14 to 1·04]; p=0·07). PC-QoL significantly improved from baseline to day 28 in both groups, but there was no significant difference between them (mean difference in change -0·2 [95% CI -1·0 to 0·6]; p=0·64). From day 28 to 7 months, median PC-QoL remained stable in both groups with no difference in change between them. Data on respiratory pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (paired swabs available for 48 children) were similar between groups. Adverse events occurred in 13 (25%) children in the 2-week group and ten (19%) in the 4-week group (p=0·57).

INTERPRETATION

A 4-week course of amoxicillin-clavulanate for treating children with chronic wet cough and suspected PBB confers little advantage compared with a 2-week course in achieving clinical cure by 28 days. However, as a 4-week duration led to a longer cough-free period, identifying children who would benefit from a longer antibiotic course is a priority.

FUNDING

Queensland Children's Hospital Foundation.