"Percorso Giacomo": An Italian Innovative Service of Perinatal Palliative Care

Evaluation of a perinatal palliative care program by SWOT analysis

BACKGROUND

Perinatal Palliative Care (PPC) is individualized medical-nursing care aimed at improving the quality of life of newborns with life-limiting conditions and to support their families. This study draws on the analysis of the experience gained over ten years by a service of PPC called the "Percorso Giacomo" (PG).

METHODS

We employed a SWOT analysis to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the PG through a systematic retrospective review of 48 cases followed by the program over the course of 10 years, 21 unsolicited parents' narrative and 27 experts' point of view.

RESULTS

Main strengths of the program were communication and parents' involvement in shared decision-making. Main weaknesses included lack of knowledge of the presence and the role of the PG and lack of resources. For opportunities, the PG proved to be an innovative choice for pregnancies with a fetal life-limiting diagnosis, however threats were identified such as lack of knowledge of PPC and delayed referrals.

CONCLUSION

The analysis by SWOT method of the 10-year experience of the PG allowed the identification of limitations and areas of improvement, however demonstrated that the PG provided beneficial services to women faced with fetal life-limiting diagnoses.

IMPACT

Perinatal Palliative Care (PPC) practice and literature on this subject is still limited. This study offers features of the 10-year experience of the Percorso Giacomo (PG), a service of PPC, through a SWOT analysis. By identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the PG, the study shows limitations and areas of improvement but also benefits of a PPC service to women with fetal diagnosis of life-limiting condition and may allow replication in other institutions.

Perinatal palliative care: focus on comfort

Providing comfort while a patient is living with a life-limiting condition or at end of life is the hallmark of palliative care regardless of the patient's age. In perinatal palliative care, the patient is unable to speak for themselves. In this manuscript we will present guidelines garnered from the 15-year experience of the Neonatal Comfort Care Program at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and how they provide care for families along the perinatal journey. We will describe essential tools and strategies necessary to consider in assessing and providing comfort to infants facing a life-limiting diagnosis in utero, born at the cusp of viability or critically ill where the burden of care may outweigh the benefit.

Components of Perinatal Palliative Care: An Integrative Review

When a severe diagnosis is made before or after birth, perinatal palliative care (PPC) can be provided to support the infant, parents and involved healthcare providers. An integrative and systematic overview of effectiveness and working components of existing PPC programs was needed. An integrative search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Web of Science. Study designs examining the effect of PPC compared to regular care, and (empirical) articles describing the components of care included in existing PPC initiatives were included. Three independent authors reviewed titles, abstracts and full texts against eligibility criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed; 21.893 records were identified; 69 publications met inclusion criteria. Twelve publications (17.4%) discussed the effect of a PPC program. Other publications concerned the description of PPC programs, most often by means of a program description (22/69; 31.9%), guidelines (14/769; 20.3%) or case study (10/69; 14.5%). Outcome measures envisioned four main target categories: care coordination, parents and family members, care for the fetus/neonate and healthcare providers. No trials exist to date. Analysis of working components revealed components related to changes directed to the policy of the hospital wards and components involving actual care being provided within the PPC program, directed to the fetus or infant, the family, involved healthcare providers or external actors. PPC is a growing research field where evidence consists mainly of descriptive studies and guidelines. The extensive list of possible PPC components can serve as a checklist for developing future initiatives worldwide. PPC includes several important actors: the fetus/infant and their family and included healthcare providers on both maternity and neonatal wards. This leads to a large variety of possible care components. However, while some studies show proof of concept, an evidence base to determine which components are actually effective is lacking.

Implementation of Quality Indicators of Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care One-Year Following Formal Training

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure implementation of quality indicators (QIs) of Perinatal/Neonatal Palliative Care (PNPC) as reported by participants following a one-year training course. Study Design: A cross-sectional survey mixed-method design was used to obtain data from an interdisciplinary team of professionals one year after attending a PNPC training course. A questionnaire with 32 QIs queried participants about self-reported implementation of PNPC and that of their colleagues. Descriptive and frequency data were analyzed to measure the implementation of PNPC QIs. Qualitative data were examined using content analysis. Results: Response rate was 34 of 76 (44.7%). Half of the QIs are implemented in clinical settings by course attendees more than 90% of the time, and 15 QIs are implemented between 70 and 89.9%. Colleagues within the same healthcare system applied palliative care practices less frequently than those who attended the training course. When asked if quality indicators were "always" implemented by colleagues, the average difference in scores was 36% lower. Qualitative analyses resulted in three themes that addressed changes in clinical practice, and four themes that summarized barriers in practice. Conclusion: There is high frequency of implementation of QIs by professionals who attended an evidence based PNPC training course. PNPC is implemented by the colleagues of attendees, but with less frequency. Attending evidence-based education increases clinicians' opportunities to translate quality PNPC care into clinical settings.