Minimally Invasive Management of Bladder Stones in Children

Ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones using Holmium: YAG laser devices: 15 W versus 30 W

Introduction We aimed to compare the effectiveness of 15Watt (W) and 30 W Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser devices used in the treatment of pediatric kidney stones. Methods: Eighty-six consecutive pediatric patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery between February 2010 and August 2020 were enrolled in the study. After exclusion criteria, the data of 79 children were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to the laser device power 15W (Group 15: N=30) and 30W (Group 30: N=49). The groups were compared according to demographic, stone feature, and clinical efficacy. Results The age, gender, height, weight, stone characteristics were similar between the groups. The mean operation time was shorter in Group 30. The stone-free rate after the first RIRS session (SF1) was 66.7% in Group 15 and 83.3% in Group 30. SF1 rate after the first RIRS procedure for 20 mm or larger kidney stones was found 0% in Group 15 and 62.5% in Group 30. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of stone-free rate. Conclusion: In pediatric kidney stone treatment, 30 W Ho:YAG laser devices should be preferred as they shorten the operation time compared to 15 W devices and provide final stone-free with fewer procedures, especially in large kidney stones.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Versus Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy for Treatment of Bladder Stones in Children

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy, the two most commonly used transurethral lithotripsy methods for treating bladder stones in children in Iraq. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 64 children with bladder stones were included in this prospective randomized study, after ethical committee approval and written consent from the children’s parents or caregivers were obtained. Patients were assigned randomly by computer software to two groups treated with either pneumatic cystolithotripsy or laser lithotripsy. A 9 Fr. semirigid ureteroscope was used to pass the lithotripter through and fragment the stone. A catheter of 8–12 Fr. was then introduced and kept in place for 24 h. All children were hospitalized for 24 h, and the catheter was removed the next morning. Outpatient follow-up was maintained for 6–12 months. In terms of operation outcomes and complications, the laser lithotripsy group had a significantly longer duration of operation (74.5 ± 26.6 min vs. 51.5 ± 17.2 min, p = 0.001), whereas the number of patients requiring an extended hospital stay was significantly higher in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (48.5% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.006). Moreover, pneumatic lithotripsy was associated with a significantly greater risk of having at least one adverse effect (64% greater than that in the laser group). Stone clearance rates did not significantly differ between treatment groups. In conclusion, both pneumatic and laser lithotripters can be used to treat children with bladder stones with high efficacy and safety.

Which Endoscopic Methods in Prepubertal Patients with 10-20 mm Bladder Stones: Transurethral Cystolithotripsy or Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral cystolithotripsy(TUC) and percutaneous cystolithotripsy(PCC) in prepubertal patients with 10-20 mm bladder stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of patients the age of 12 and under who were admitted our clinic for bladder stones from January 2007 to January 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were patients who were 12 years of age and under with 10-20 mm bladder stones, and who underwent endoscopic surgery(TUC or PCC). None of the patients had prior bladder or stone surgery. The patients were divided into two groups(Group 1:PCC group, and Group 2:TUC group) and collected data(preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics) were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

This present study was enrolled 51 patients(21 patients in Group 1 and 30 patients in Group 2).The mean ages of the groups were similar (Group 1:4.7±3.6; Group 2:4.6±3.2; p:0.936). The mean stone size was 15.8±3.5 in Group 1, and 12.1±2.4 mm in Group 2. It was higher in the PCC group than TUC group(p<0.001). The operative time was lower in Group 1 than Group 2(36.4±12.9 min vs. 42.7±16.3 min, respectively), but there was no statistically significance difference between the groups (p:0.117).We achieved SFR for all the patients in both groups. Complications were observed in four (7.7%) cases. One female patient was in Group 1 and three male patients were in Group 2. There was no difference for complication rates between the groups(p:0.634).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic surgeries have almost become a routine method in the treatment of bladder stones. Despite larger stone size, PCC provides similar SFR compared with TUC along with a tendency of shorter operative time. However, the use of the TUC method in toddler males could increase the risk of postoperative urinary retention. Hence, stone size and patient age should be considered in the selection of a surgical approach.