Comparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants Aged 12 Months or Less

Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RP) compared with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have not been clearly established in ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) children and require review. We searched in the Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI database on 30 June 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in RevMan 5.4 based on studies comparing RP versus LP in children with UPJO and subgroup analysis in children < 2 years of age has been performed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the studies. We included one RCT, and eighteen cohort studies, a total involving 3370 children. Compared with LP, RP showed higher surgical success rates (OR 2.57, 95%CI (1.24, 5.32), P < 0.05), lower postoperative complication rates (OR 0.61, 95%CI (0.38, 0.99), P < 0.05), shorter hospital stay (MD - 1.04, 95% CI (- 1.6, - 0.47), P < 0.05) as well as operative time (MD - 22.11, 95%CI (- 35.91, - 8.31), P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected for intraoperative complication rates or conversion to open surgery rates. RP is an alternative to UPJO with higher success rates, and less postoperative complications. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of RP compared with LP for UPJO children is of low certainty. More quality evidence in the form of randomized controlled trials is needed to obtain more reliable analysis results.

The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for treating pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction through an extensive comparison of RALP, open pyeloplasty (OP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP). We conducted a comprehensive search of the following databases: PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, Web of Science database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and China Biology Medical Disc. Baseline data were compared, the sources of heterogeneity were assessed, and publication biases were detected. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023415667). 26 studies with 6074 cases performing pyeloplasty were included, and the overall data are comparable. Our analysis showed no significant difference in success rate and postoperative complications between RALP and OP, and RALP is associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS) (MD - 1.00 95%CI - 1.45 to - 0.55, p < 0.0001). In addition, compared to LP, RALP was associated with a shorter anastomosis time (MD - 18.35 95%CI - 29.88 to - 6.82, p = 0.002) and fewer postoperative analgesics (MD - 0.09 95% CI - 0.18 to - 0.01, p = 0.03); however, RALP has a longer operative time (OT) (MD 52.39, 95% CI 39.75-65.03, p < 0.00001) and higher cost. The heterogeneity of OT may be influenced by factors, such as age and region, while the heterogeneity of LOS primarily stems from regional differences. No significant publication bias was detected. Our meta-analysis shows that RALP can be an alternative to OP and LP with a high success rate, minimal postoperative complications, and shorter LOS. In addition, RALP contributes to reduce anastomosis time and postoperative analgesic drugs. However, further well-designed, large-scale, randomized controlled trials with additional parameters are needed to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of heterogeneity.

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the characteristics of conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in infants and young children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients (age: 0-36 months) who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) with the fourth-generation RALP or traditional LP between April 2020 and December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients with UPJO were enrolled: 12 underwent RALP (9 left side; 3 right side) and 21 underwent LP (18 left side; 3 right side). In the RALP group, the median patient age was 17 months (range: 5-36 months). In the LP group, the median patient age was 9 months (range: 2-36 months) (P = 0.182). The mean operation times were 120.25 ± 37.54 min (RALP) and 156.10 ± 51.11 min (LP) (P = 0.042), and the mean lengths of hospital stay were 6.42 ± 1.62 days (RALP) and 8.19 ± 2.25 days (LP) (P = 0.023). Removal of the drainage tube was performed after 3.08 ± 0.69 days (RALP) and after 4.76 ± 1.81 days (LP) (P = 0.001). The postoperative pain showed no significant difference. The mean hospitalization costs were 61464.75 ± 2800.53 yuan (RALP) and 22169.52 ± 3442.15 yuan (LP) (P < 0.001). The mean follow-up time was 10-18 months. Significant improvements in the anteroposterior diameter and parenchymal thickness were observed after surgery. Conversion to laparotomy was not performed. No short-term complications occurred during postoperative hospitalization and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RALP has the advantages of less trauma and faster recovery. It can be safely and effectively performed in infants and young children, and its effectiveness is similar to that of traditional LP.

Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: Robot-assisted surgery demands a specific skillset of surgical knowledge, skills, and attitudes from the robotic surgeon to function as part of the robotic team and for maximal utility of the assistive surgical robot. Subsequently, the learning process of robot-assisted surgery entails new modes of learning. We sought to systematically summarize the published data on pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty (pRALP) to decipher the learning process by analyzing learning curves. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for ‘learning curve’ AND ‘pediatric pyeloplasty’. All studies presenting outcomes of learning curves (LC) in the context of pRALP in patients < 18 years of age were included. Studies comparing LC in pRALP versus open and/or laparoscopic pyeloplasty were also included; however, those solely focusing on LC in non-robotic approaches were excluded. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle and Ottawa scale. Results: Competency was non-uniformly defined in all fifteen studies addressing learning curves in pRALP. pRALP was considered safe at all stages. Proficiency in pRALP was reached after 18 cases, while competency was estimated to demand 31 operated cases with operative duration as outcome variable. Conclusions: Pediatric RALP is safe during the learning process and ‘learning by doing’ improves efficiency. Competencies with broader implications than time must be defined for future studies.

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The historical gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) was the open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (OP). Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures, including laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), have been reported to achieve better outcomes (i.e., decreased morbidity, reduced postoperative pain, superior esthetic results, and shortened length of hospital stay, LOS), with a success rate similar to OP. The main limitation of the MIS approach is the age and weight of patients, limiting these procedures to children >1 year. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of MIS pyeloplasty compared to OP to surgically treat UPJO in children <1 year of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was independently performed by two authors. Papers comparing both techniques (MIS pyeloplasty vs. OP) in infants were included in the meta-analysis. Data (mean ± DS or percentage) were analyzed using Rev.Man 5.4 A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Nine studies (eight retrospective and one prospective) meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 3,145 pyeloplasties have been included, with 2,859 (90.9%) OP and 286 (9.1%) MIS. Age at operation was 4.9 ± 1.4 months in OP vs. 5.8 ± 2.2 months in MIS, p = ns. Weight at surgery was 6.4 ± 1.4 kg in OP vs. 6.9 ± 1.4 kg in MIS, p = ns. Operative time was 129.4 ± 24.1 min for OP vs. 144.0 ± 32.3 min for MIS, p < 0.001. LOS was 3.2 ± 1.9 days for OP vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 days for MIS, p < 0.01. Postoperative complications were present in 10.0 ± 12.9% of OP vs. 10.9 ± 11.6% in MIS, p = ns. Failure of surgery was 5.2 ± 3.5% for OP vs. 4.2 ± 3.3% for MIS, p = ns.

CONCLUSION

The development of miniaturized instruments and technical modifications has made MIS feasible and safe in infants and small children. MIS presented a longer operative time than OP. However, MIS seemed effective for treating UPJO in infants, showing shortened LOS compared to OP. No differences have been reported with regard to the incidence of postoperative complications and failure of pyeloplasty. Given the low quality of evidence of the meta-analysis according to the GRADE methodology, we would suggest limiting MIS procedures in infants to only those high-volume centers with experienced surgeons.

A combined approach of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible endoscopy to treat concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction and calyceal stones in children: Technical considerations and review of the literature

The management of children with concomitant ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction and calyceal stones remains challenging. The various treatment options available for pediatric nephrolithiasis may require multiple sessions, and the techniques by themselves are not designed for simultaneous correction of UPJ obstruction. Recently, success in combining robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and flexible endoscopy has been reported by multi-institutional studies to treat children with concomitant UPJ obstruction and renal stones. Given the paucity of technical details of this novel approach in the existing literature, we herein report our techniques to treat two girls aged 6 and 10 years who had concomitant UPJ obstruction and multiple stones in mid- and lower poles calyces. Three robotic ports were used without any assistant ports. A flexible endoscope, either a cystoscope or a single-use ureteroscope, was introduced via the undocked epigastric port to perform nephroscopy and stones removal after the renal pelvis was opened. The rest of the RALP was completed in the usual manner. Technical modifications were employed to facilitate the flexible endoscope to examine the entire calyceal system. Both patients underwent successful surgical procedures by the combined approach without any intra- or post-operative complications. Three and 14 stones were removed from each of the patients respectively. Postoperative investigations demonstrated successful correction of UPJ obstruction and complete stone clearance in both patients. A combined approach of RALP and flexible endoscopy is a safe and effective technique to treat concurrent UPJ obstruction and calyceal stones in children.

Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

BACKGROUND

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a commonly observed abnormality in pediatric urology. Minimally invasive approaches have gained popularity in recent years. Studies have demonstrated excellent results with both laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LAP) and robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP). Few studies have compared the experience of both procedures performed in a single institution. Our objective is to compare laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in the Puerto Rican pediatric population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using our clinic's database on patients with UPJO that were operated by the same surgeon (MPB) from 2008 to 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted of demographics, preoperative studies, perioperative data and complications of both procedures. This study was approved by our local IRB committee.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients that underwent pyeloplasty with at least 3 years of follow up were recorded for this study. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted pyeloplasty were performed in 44 (51.1%) and 42 (48.8%) patients, respectively. Patient age ranged between 4 months and 17 years (LAP group - mean age of 6.19 years/RAP group - mean age of 7.07 years). Success rates was high in this series (LAP - 100% and RAP -95%). Using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann whitney sum test, significant differences between preoperative and postoperative hydronephrosis grading were observed in both LAP and RAP groups. However, no significant difference was seen regarding reduction of hydronephrosis grading when comparing both groups. No intraoperative complications were seen on either group.

CONCLUSION

Both LAP and RAP are safe and effective procedures that can properly manage UPJO. Our study shows that, under experienced hands, pure laparoscopic pyeloplasty achieves comparable results to robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Pediatric urologists should be comfortable offering either of these approaches as they demonstrate high success rates in our pediatric population. Selection of LAP vs. RAP approach depends on the Surgeon's preference or experience, and on institutional availability. Minimally invasive therapies will continue to gain popularity with future advances in laparoscopic and robotic technology.