Occurrence of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula in Siblings From Three-Generation Family Affected by Variable Expressivity MYCN Mutation: A Case Report

Epigenetic Findings in Twins with Esophageal Atresia

Esophageal atresia (EA) is the most common malformation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The estimated incidence of EA is 1 in 3500 births. EA is more frequently observed in boys and in twins. The exact cause of isolated EA remains unknown; a multifactorial etiology, including epigenetic gene expression modifications, is considered. The study included six pairs of twins (three pairs of monozygotic twins and three pairs of dizygotic twins) in which one child was born with EA as an isolated defect, while the other twin was healthy. DNA samples were obtained from the blood and esophageal tissue of the child with EA as well as from the blood of the healthy twin. The reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) technique was employed for a whole-genome methylation analysis. The analyses focused on comparing the CpG island methylation profiles between patients with EA and their healthy siblings. Hypermethylation in the promoters of 219 genes and hypomethylation in the promoters of 78 genes were observed. A pathway enrichment analysis revealed the statistically significant differences in methylation profile of 10 hypermethylated genes in the Rho GTPase pathway, previously undescribed in the field of EA (ARHGAP36, ARHGAP4, ARHGAP6, ARHGEF6, ARHGEF9, FGD1, GDI1, MCF2, OCRL, and STARD8).

Esophageal Atresia With or Without Tracheoesophageal Fistula: Comorbidities, Genetic Evaluations, and Neonatal Outcomes

Objective Esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) has a reported incidence of 1 in 3500 live births and requires intensive care and surgery. To evaluate the prevalence of a molecularly confirmed genetic etiology of EA/TEF in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), focusing on genetic evaluation, diagnostic yield, and clinical outcomes of these neonates. Study design A retrospective cohort study over a period of seven years was performed for all patients admitted with a diagnosis of EA/TEF. Automated data was extracted for demographic information and manual extraction was done to evaluate the frequency of associated anomalies, type of genetic evaluations and diagnoses, and outcomes at NICU discharge. Results Sixty-eight infants met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (n=42; 62%), born at >37 weeks' gestation (n=36; 53%), and had EA with distal TEF (n=54; 79%). Most (n=53; 78%) had additional associated congenital anomalies, but only 47 (69%) patients had a genetics evaluation performed and genetic testing was sent for 44 (65%) of those patients. The most common genetic testing performed was chromosomal microarray analysis (n=40; 59%), followed by chromosome analysis (n=11; 16%), and whole exome/genome sequencing (n=7; 10%). Five unique genetic diagnoses including CHARGE Syndrome, Fanconi Syndrome, EFTUD2-related mandibulofacial dysostosis, and two different chromosomal deletion syndromes were made for a total of nine (13%) patients in our cohort. The cohort suffered a high rate of morbidity and mortality during their NICU stay with important differences noted in isolated vs non-isolated EA/TEF. Twelve infants (18%) died prior to NICU discharge. Of those surviving, 40 (71%) infants had a primary repair, 37 (66%) infants required G or GJ feedings at NICU discharge, and eight (14%) patients were discharged on some type of respiratory support. Conclusion In this high-risk cohort of EA/TEF patients cared for at a quaternary NICU, a majority were non-isolated and had some form of a genetic evaluation, but a minority underwent exome or genome sequencing. Given the high prevalence of associated anomalies, high mortality, and genetic disease prevalence in this cohort, we recommend standardization of phenotyping and genetic evaluation to allow for precision care and appropriate risk stratification.

Endoscopic interventional therapies for tracheoesophageal fistulas in children: A systematic review

Methods

An electronic literature search was performed using the keywords "tracheoesophageal fistula," "endoscopic," and "children" in the four major medical databases (Ovid, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) right from inception to September 2022. All English language articles describing the endoscopic interventional therapies of TEF in children were reviewed. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at the title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again, and reference lists were screened manually to identify additional studies. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. A synthesis of the relevant data was presented in descriptive form because of the heterogeneity of the included articles. The Chi-Squared test was used with a significance level of 5% (P < 0.05).

Results

Among the 1,167 retrieved papers, a total of 46 studies describing 170 TEF patients with an age range of 0.3-175 months were included, including 11 cases of acquired tracheoesophageal fistula, 144 cases of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula, and 15 cases of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula (H-type TEF). A total of 119 out of 170 fistulas were successfully blocked via endoscopic techniques with an overall success rate of 70.0%, while 48 fistulas failed to close by endoscopic interventions, following which the procedure was converted to open surgery. No obviously severe intraoperative/postoperative complications occurred during the follow-up period, but only a mild esophageal stricture was noticed in six patients and grade II tracheal stenosis in one patient. Two patients died from causes unrelated to endoscopic procedures, with a mortality rate of approximately 1.2%. A comparative assessment of different endoscopic interventional techniques for TEF that detected endotracheal stenting was performed in six patients and one fistula was successfully blocked (16.7%). De-epithelialization alone was performed in 65 patients and the fistula healed in 47 of them (72.3%), with the mean number of successful treatments required being 2.3 times. Chemical sealant injection was administered in 33 patients and success was achieved in 21 (63.6%). The average requirement for endoscopic procedures was 1.5 times. De-epithelialization, in combination with chemical sealant injection, was performed in 62 patients, achieving the highest success rate of 77.4% (48 patients). Other treatment methods were performed in four patients and successfully treatment outcomes were reported in two of them (50.0%). The mean number of successful treatments required was four times, and a treatment was converted to surgery in one patient (25.0%). An assessment of different TEF types showed that 9 out of 15 congenital TEFs, 7 out of 11 acquired TEFs, and 103 out of 144 recurrent TEFs were successfully occluded. A comparison of the success rate across multiple groups showed a significant difference with a score of P < 0.05, while there was no significant difference in the success rate of different TEF-type groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Endoscopic intervention is currently a preferred treatment modality for children with TEF because of its less-invasive nature, less complications, and high success rate. Among all interventional techniques, de-epithelialization, in combination with chemical sealant, has a higher success rate than other techniques. However, due to the limited number of cases reported for implementing many kinds of techniques, an ideal endoscopic interventional technique has yet to be devised, often necessitating more treatment applications and close follow-up.