Thoracoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: Should it be the first choice?

Thoracoscopic Patch Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Can Smaller Incisions Treat Larger Defects?

INTRODUCTION

Thoracoscopic CDH repair is increasingly performed for Type A and small Type B defects that are amenable to primary repair. However, the thoracoscopic approach is controversial for larger defects necessitating a patch due to technical complexity, intraoperative acidosis, and recurrence risk. We aim to compare clinical outcomes between thoracoscopic and open patch repair of Type B/C defects, using a standardized technique.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of thoracoscopic and open CDH patch repairs January 2017-December 2021. We excluded primary repairs, Type D hernias, repairs on ECMO, recurrent repairs. Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared. Primary outcome was recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative pH and pCO2, operative time, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (open = 13, thoracoscopic = 16). The open cohort had lower o/e total fetal lung volume (29 vs 41.2%, p = 0.042), higher preoperative peak inspiratory pressures (24 vs 20 cm H2O, p = 0.007), were more frequently Type C defects (92.3 vs 31%, p = 0.002) and had liver "up" in left-sided hernias (46 vs 0%, p < 0.0001). Intraoperatively, median lowest pH and highest pCO2 did not differ; neither did overall median pH or pCO2. Operative times were similar (153 vs 194 min, p = 0.113). No difference in recurrence rates was identified, however postoperative complications were higher in the open group. There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we demonstrate higher disease severity of patients undergoing open repair, thoracoscopic patch repair for Type B/C defects is safe and effective in patients with favorable physiologic status, alleviating concerns for intraoperative acidosis, operative length, and risk of recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Reasons for conversions in thoracoscopic repairs of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review focused on reasons for conversions in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair.

METHODS

Systematic search of Medline/Pubmed and Embase was performed for English, Spanish and Portuguese reports, according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 153 articles identified (2003-2023), 28 met the inclusion criteria and offered 698 neonates for analysis. Mean birth weight and gestational age were 3109 g and 38.3 weeks, respectively, and neonates were operated at a mean age of 6.12 days. There were 278 males (61.50%; 278/452) and 174 females (38.50%; 174/452). The reasons for the 137 conversions (19.63%) were: (a) defect size (n = 22), (b) need for patch (n = 21); (c) difficulty in reducing organs (n = 14), (d) ventilation issues (n = 10), (e) bleeding, organ injury, cardiovascular instability (n = 3 each), (f) bowel ischemia and defect position (n = 2 each), hepatopulmonary fusion (n = 1), and (g) reason was not specified for n = 56 neonates (40.8%). The repair was primary in 322 neonates (63.1%; 322/510) and patch was used in 188 neonates (36.86%; 188/510). There were 80 recurrences (12.16%; 80/658) and 14 deaths (2.48%; 14/565). Mean LOS and follow-up were 20.17 days and 19.28 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal thoracoscopic repair for CDH is associated with conversion in 20% of cases. Based on available data, defect size and patch repairs have been identified as the predominant reasons, followed by technical difficulties to reduce the herniated organs and ventilation related issues. However, data specifically relating to conversion is poorly documented in a high number of reports (40%). Accurate data reporting in future will be important to better estimate and quantify reasons for conversions in neonatal thoracoscopy for CDH.

Use of Barbed Sutures for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair can be challenging, particularly when a larger defect is present. Barbed sutures prevent the suture from slipping back after approximation of the tissues. Although introduced almost 2 decades ago, barbed sutures have not been widely used for CDH repair. We report our initial experience and pitfalls.

METHODS

All patients presenting with CDH from 2021 onward underwent repair using barbed sutures. Demographics, operative parameters, complications, and outcomes were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients underwent CDH repair during the study interval (median age 6 days, range 3 days to 5.75 years). Median operative time was 89 min (range 46 to 288 min). Five thoracoscopic and eight open procedures were performed. Severe pulmonary hypertension and ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) were considered contraindications for thoracoscopic repair. The included patients were compared to a historic controlled group performed without barbed sutures. The barbed suture facilitated easy and quick closure of the defects in most cases and obviated the need for knot tying. One patient in the thoracoscopic group had a patch placed due to high tension after the barbed sutures tore the diaphragm. At a median follow-up time of 15 months (range 2 to 34 months), one patient had died, and one patient with complete diaphragmatic agenesis was home-ventilated. There were no recurrences. Median operative time trended lower (89 min) than in the historic control group repaired without barbed sutures (119 min, p < 0.06) after eliminating outliers with large, complex patch repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Barbed sutures simplify congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair regardless of whether a minimal-invasive or open approach is performed. Patch repair is not a contraindication for using barbed sutures. The resulting potential time savings make them particularly useful in patients with cardiac or other severe co-morbidities in which shorter operative times are essential. In cases with high tension, though, the barbs may tear through and produce a "saw" effect on the tissue with subsequent damage.