1
|
Aggarwal P, Satapathy S, Sood A, Singh H, Mittal BR, Lal S, Gupta R, Das CK, Yadav TD, Walia R. Safety and Efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in Children and Young Adult Population : A Single-Center Experience. Clin Nucl Med 2024; 49:e312-e318. [PMID: 38769655 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This single-center retrospective study explores the safety and efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in children and young adult population with metastatic/inoperable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of all children and young adult patients (≤29 years) with advanced inoperable/metastatic epithelial or nonepithelial NETs who were administered a median of 4 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy and low-dose oral capecitabine as a radiosensitizer every 8-12 weeks, except 2 patients who received CAPTEM chemotherapy. The radiological response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 on interim and end-of-treatment 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, whereas disease control rate, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Nineteen biopsy-proven NET patients (median age, 22 ± 10 years) with 8 of them adolescents (10-18 years) and the remaining young adults (19-29 years) were included. Fourteen patients had gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pancreas being most common primary site), whereas the rest had non-gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. A total of 65 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE (range, 1-6 cycles) were administered with a median cumulative activity of 600 mCi (range, 100-1000 mCi). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 41% and 94%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 adverse events were observed in 14 (74%) and 5 (26%) of 19 patients, respectively. In a total of 8 events (42%), 4 events each of disease progression and death occurred during a median follow-up of 80.1 months with an estimated 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival of 54% (95% confidence interval, 30-78) and 63% (95% confidence interval, 39-87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS 177 Lu-DOTATATE appears safe and effective in children and young adults with metastatic/inoperable NETs. Large prospective trials are required to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Sadhna Lal
- Gastroenterology (Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology)
| | | | | | | | - Rama Walia
- Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song H, Sgouros G. Alpha and Beta Radiation for Theragnostics. PET Clin 2024; 19:307-323. [PMID: 38688775 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has significantly evolved from its beginnings with iodine-131 to employing carrier molecules with beta emitting isotopes like lutetium-177. With the success of Lu-177-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors and Lu-177-PSMA-617 for prostate cancer, several other beta emitting radioisotopes, such as Cu-67 and Tb-161, are being explored for TRT. The field has also expanded into targeted alpha therapy (TAT) with agents like radium-223 for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and several other alpha emitter radioisotopes with carrier molecules, such as Ac-225, and Pb-212 under clinical trials. Despite these advancements, the scope of TRT in treating diverse solid tumors and integration with other therapies like immunotherapy remains under investigation. The success of antibody-drug conjugates further complements treatments with TRT, though challenges in treatment optimization continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Song
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - George Sgouros
- Division of Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berglund H, Salomonsson SL, Mohajershojai T, Gago FJF, Lane DP, Nestor M. p53 stabilisation potentiates [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment in neuroblastoma xenografts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:768-778. [PMID: 37823909 PMCID: PMC10796565 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06462-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular radiotherapy is a treatment modality that is highly suitable for targeting micrometastases and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is currently being explored as a potential novel treatment option for high-risk neuroblastoma. p53 is a key player in the proapoptotic signalling in response to radiation-induced DNA damage and is therefore a potential target for radiosensitisation. METHODS This study investigated the use of the p53 stabilising peptide VIP116 and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, either alone or in combination, for treatment of neuroblastoma tumour xenografts in mice. Initially, the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in the tumours was confirmed, and the efficacy of VIP116 as a monotherapy was evaluated. Subsequently, mice with neuroblastoma tumour xenografts were treated with placebo, VIP116, [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE or a combination of both agents. RESULTS The results demonstrated that monotherapy with either VIP116 or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE significantly prolonged median survival compared to the placebo group (90 and 96.5 days vs. 50.5 days, respectively). Notably, the combination treatment further improved median survival to over 120 days. Furthermore, the combination group exhibited the highest percentage of complete remission, corresponding to a twofold increase compared to the placebo group. Importantly, none of the treatments induced significant nephrotoxicity. Additionally, the therapies affected various molecular targets involved in critical processes such as apoptosis, hypoxia and angiogenesis. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the combination of VIP116 and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE presents a promising novel treatment approach for neuroblastoma. These findings hold potential to advance research efforts towards a potential cure for this vulnerable patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Berglund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sara Lundsten Salomonsson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
- Ridgeview Instruments AB, SE-752 38, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tabassom Mohajershojai
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - David P Lane
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
- p53Lab, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138648, Singapore
- Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 65, Solna, Sweden
| | - Marika Nestor
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davis L, Elmaraghi C, Buscombe JR, Gaze MN. Clinical perspectives on dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy. Phys Med 2023; 114:103154. [PMID: 37805342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular radiotherapy is the use of systemically administered unsealed radioactive sources to treat cancer. Theragnostics is the term used to describe paired radiopharmaceuticals localising to a specific target, one optimised for imaging, the other for therapy. For many decades, molecular radiotherapy has developed empirically. Standard administered activity schedules have been used without the prior estimation of the resulting tumour radiation absorbed dose by theragnostic imaging, or its subsequent measurement by serial scanning. This pragmatic approach has benefited many patients, however others who should have benefited have failed to do so as the radiation absorbed dose in the tumour was suboptimal. The accurate prediction and measurement of tumour and organ at risk radiation absorbed doses allows treatment to be personalised, and offers the prospect of improved clinical outcomes. To deliver this for all molecular radiotherapy patients would require not only a significant financial investment in equipment and skilled personnel, but also a change in attitude of those who believe that simple - or simplistic - schedules are easier to deliver, and that accurate dosimetry is too much trouble. Further clinical studies are required to demonstrate beyond doubt that the advantages of individualised treatment planning outweigh the inconvenience, and that the expense is justified by enhanced results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LauraMay Davis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline Elmaraghi
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - John R Buscombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urso L, Nieri A, Uccelli L, Castello A, Artioli P, Cittanti C, Marzola MC, Florimonte L, Castellani M, Bissoli S, Porto F, Boschi A, Evangelista L, Bartolomei M. Lutathera® Orphans: State of the Art and Future Application of Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041110. [PMID: 37111596 PMCID: PMC10142322 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lutathera® is the first EMA- and FDA-approved radiopharmaceutical for radioligand therapy (RLT). Currently, on the legacy of the NETTER1 trial, only adult patients with progressive unresectable somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NET) can be treated with Lutathera®. Conversely, patients with SSTR-positive disease arising from outside the gastroenteric region do not currently have access to Lutathera® treatment despite several papers in the literature reporting the effectiveness and safety of RLT in these settings. Moreover, patients with well-differentiated G3 GEP-NET are also still “Lutathera orphans”, and retreatment with RLT in patients with disease relapse is currently not approved. The aim of this critical review is to summarize current literature evidence assessing the role of Lutathera® outside the approved indications. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluating new possible applications of Lutathera® will be considered and discussed to provide an updated picture of future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Urso
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Alberto Nieri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Licia Uccelli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-053-232-6387
| | - Angelo Castello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Paolo Artioli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| | - Maria Cristina Marzola
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy;
| | - Luigia Florimonte
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimo Castellani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (L.F.); (M.C.)
| | - Sergio Bissoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, AULSS1 Dolomiti, San Martino Hospital, 32100 Belluno, Italy; (P.A.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesca Porto
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; (L.U.); (C.C.); (F.P.)
| | - Alessandra Boschi
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialist Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Cona, Italy; (A.N.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brink A, Hlongwa KN, More S. The Impact of PET/CT on Paediatric Oncology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020192. [PMID: 36673002 PMCID: PMC9857884 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This review paper will discuss the use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in paediatric oncology. Functional imaging with PET/CT has proven useful to guide treatment by accurately staging disease and limiting unnecessary treatments by determining the metabolic response to treatment. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (2-[18F]FDG) PET/CT is routinely used in patients with lymphoma. We highlight specific considerations in the paediatric population with lymphoma. The strengths and weaknesses for PET/CT tracers that compliment Meta-[123I]iodobenzylguanidine ([123I]mIBG) for the imaging of neuroblastoma are summarized. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT has increasingly been used in the staging and evaluation of disease response in sarcomas. The current recommendations for the use of PET/CT in sarcomas are given and potential future developments and highlighted. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in combination with conventional imaging is currently the standard for disease evaluation in children with Langerhans-cell Histiocytosis (LCH) and the non-LCH disease spectrum. The common pitfalls of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in this setting are discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Castle JT, Levy BE, Chauhan A. Pediatric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Rare Malignancies with Incredible Variability. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205049. [PMID: 36291833 PMCID: PMC9599522 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass a variety of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) which can arise anywhere in the body. While relatively rare in the pediatric population, the incidence of NENs has increased in the past few decades. These neoplasms can be devastating if not diagnosed and treated early, however, symptoms are variable and can be indolent for many years. There is a reported median of 10 years from the appearance of the first symptoms to time of diagnosis. Considering some of these neoplasms have a mortality rate as high as 90%, it is crucial healthcare providers are aware of NENs and remain vigilant. With better provider education and easily accessible resources for information about these neoplasms, awareness can be improved leading to earlier disease recognition and diagnosis. This manuscript aims to provide an overview of both the most common NENs as well as the rarer NENs with high lethality in the pediatric population. This review provides up to date evidence and recommendations, encompassing recent changes in classification and advances in treatment modalities, including recently completed and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer T. Castle
- Department of Surgery, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Brittany E. Levy
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Aman Chauhan
- Department of Internal Medicine-Medical Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Correspondence: or
| |
Collapse
|