The diagnostic yield of CGH and WES in neurodevelopmental disorders

Breaking new ground: Exploring de novo chromosomal rearrangements in 1p36 microdeletion

Chromosomal structural variations (SVs) are linked to a wide range of phenotypes and arise due to disruptions during DNA replication, which can affect gene function within the SV regions. This case report details a patient diagnosed with neurodevelopmental delay. Detailed investigation through array comparative genomic hybridization revealed two pathogenic SVs on chromosome 1, which align with a 1p36 microdeletion, and a microduplication at 2p35.3, the latter being classified as a variant of unknown significance. The patient's clinical presentation is consistent with the 1p36 deletion syndrome, characterized by specific developmental delays and physical anomalies. Further genetic analysis suggests that these terminal rearrangements might stem from an unbalanced translocation between the short arms of chromosomes 1 and 2. This case underscores the complexity of interpreting multiple concurrent SVs and their cumulative effect on phenotype. Ongoing research into such chromosomal abnormalities will enhance our understanding of their clinical manifestations and guide more targeted therapeutic strategies.

Genetic Alterations in a Large Population of Italian Patients Affected by Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders are a group of complex multifactorial disorders characterized by cognitive impairment, communication deficits, abnormal behaviour, and/or motor skills resulting from abnormal neural development. Copy number variants (CNVs) are genetic alterations often associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of the array-comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) method and its relevance as a routine diagnostic test in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders for the identification of the molecular alterations underlying or contributing to the clinical manifestations. In the present study, we analysed 1800 subjects with neurodevelopmental disorders using a CGH microarray. We identified 208 (7%) pathogenetic CNVs, 2202 (78%) variants of uncertain significance (VOUS), and 504 (18%) benign CNVs in the 1800 patients analysed. Some alterations contain genes potentially related to neurodevelopmental disorders including CHRNA7, ANKS1B, ANKRD11, RBFOX1, ASTN2, GABRG3, SHANK2, KIF1A SETBP1, SNTG2, CTNNA2, TOP3B, CNTN4, CNTN5, and CNTN6. The identification of interesting significant genes related to neurological disorders with a-CGH is therefore an essential step in the diagnostic procedure, allowing a better understanding of both the pathophysiology of these disorders and the mechanisms underlying their clinical manifestations.

Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with ultrasound anomalies by whole-exome sequencing in Luoyang city, China

Background: There is a great obstacle in prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies due to their considerable genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been confirmed as a successful option for genetic diagnosis in pediatrics, but its clinical utility for prenatal diagnosis remains to be limited. Methods: A total of 60 fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings underwent karyotyping or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and those with negative results were further subjected to WES. The identified variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) and the variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Pregnancy outcomes were obtained through a telephone follow-up. Results: Twelve (20%, 12/60) fetuses were diagnosed to have chromosomal abnormalities using karyotyping or CMA. Of the remaining 48 cases that underwent WES, P/LP variants were identified in 14 cases (29.2%), giving an additional diagnostic yield of 23.3% (14/60). The most frequently affected organ referred for prenatal WES was the head or neck system (40%), followed by the skeletal system (39.1%). In terms of pathogenic genes, FGFR3 was the most common diagnostic gene in this cohort. For the first time, we discovered five P/LP variants involved in SEC24D, FIG4, CTNNA3, EPG5, and PKD2. In addition, we identified three VUSes that had been reported previously. Outcomes of pregnancy were available for 54 cases, of which 24 cases were terminated. Conclusion: The results confirmed that WES is a powerful tool in prenatal diagnosis, especially for fetuses with ultrasonographic anomalies that cannot be diagnosed using conventional prenatal methods. Additionally, newly identified variants will expand the phenotypic spectrum of monogenic disorders and greatly enrich the prenatal diagnostic database.

Reclassifying variations of unknown significance in diseases affecting Saudi Arabia's population reveal new associations

Introduction: Physicians face diagnostic dilemmas upon reports indicating disease variants of unknown significance (VUS). The most puzzling cases are patients with rare diseases, where finding another matched genotype and phenotype to associate their results is challenging. This study aims to prove the value of updating patient files with new classifications, potentially leading to better assessment and prevention. Methodology: We recruited retrospective phenotypic and genotypic data from King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Between September 2020 and December 2021, 1,080 patients' genetic profiles were tested in a College of American Pathologists accredited laboratory. We excluded all confirmed pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic variants and copy number variations. Finally, we further reclassified 194 VUS using different local and global databases, employing in silico prediction to justify the phenotype-genotype association. Results: Of the 194 VUS, 90 remained VUS, and the other 104 were reclassified as follows: 16 pathogenic, 49 likely pathogenic, nine benign, and 30 likely benign. Moreover, most of these variants had never been observed in other local or international databases. Conclusion: Reclassifying the VUS adds value to understanding the causality of the phenotype if it has been reported in another family or population. The healthcare system should establish guidelines for re-evaluating VUS, and upgrading VUS should reflect on individual/family risks and management strategies.