Genetic determinants for methotrexate response in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

The epigenetic determinants for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis phenotyping and treatment response

BACKGROUND

Determining the role of epigenetics in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) provides an opportunity to explore previously unrecognized disease pathways and new therapeutic targets.

AIM

We aimed to identify the clinical significance of microRNAs (miRNA-26a, miRNA-223) in SJIA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of children with SJIA attending to pediatric rheumatology clinic, at Mansoura University Children's Hospital (MUCH) from December 2021 to November 2022. Patient demographics, and clinical, and laboratory data were collected with the measurement of microRNAs by quantitative real-time PCR. The Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests were used for variable comparison and correlations, besides the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for microRNAs disease activity and treatment non-response discrimination.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included in the study. On comparison of miRNA-26a, and miRNA-223 levels to the clinical, assessment measures, and laboratory features, miRNA-26a was statistically higher in cases with systemic manifestations versus those without. Similarly, it was higher in children who did not fulfill the Wallace criteria for inactive disease and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 criteria for treatment response. Meanwhile, miRNA-223 was not statistically different between cases regarding the studied parameters. The best cut-off value for systemic juvenile arthritis disease activity score-10 (sJADAS-10) and the ability of miRNA-26a, and miRNA-223 to discriminate disease activity and treatment non-response were determined by the (ROC) curve.

CONCLUSION

The significant association of miRNA-26a with SJIA features points out that this molecule may be preferentially assessed in SJIA disease activity and treatment non-response discrimination.

Precision Medicine: Towards Individualized Dosing in Pediatric Rheumatology

Despite an increase in the number of available therapeutics, many children with rheumatic disease continue to experience active inflammatory disease and treatment failure. One reason for treatment failure is the lack of dosing paradigms to account for the wide between-patient variability in drug pharmacokinetics because of developmental changes or genetic polymorphisms that effect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. This review highlights several strategies to optimize dosing for biologic and nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacogenomics, and the use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.

Responses of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis to methotrexate: a genomic outlook

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic disease characterized by persistent joint inflammation. JIA is the most common pediatric chronic rheumatic disease and no curative therapy is currently available. Methotrexate (MTX) is an important treatment for JIA even though a high inter-individual variability in response is observed in patients. Among the factors of this variability, genetics and epigenetics might play an important role.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the results of pharmacogenetic and pharmacoepigenetic studies regarding MTX response in JIA. Studies considering epigenetic factors in JIA patients are still very limited, therefore this review includes also studies performed in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, the relevance of biomarkers measured in blood or urine of JIA patients in relation to MTX treatment is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Nowadays, even though many pharmacogenomics studies have been published, a specific genetic marker predictor of MTX efficacy or adverse events has not yet been identified. Encouraging results are available and great expectations rely on the study of epigenetics. Future studies are needed in order to identify genetic and epigenetic biomarkers that can be implemented in the clinical practice.

Toward pharmacogenetic SLCO1B1-guided dosing of methotrexate in arthritis using a murine Slco1b2 knockout model

Low‐dose methotrexate (MTX) is a first‐line therapy for the treatment of arthritis. However, there is considerable interindividual variability in MTX exposure following standard dosing. Polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 significantly effect MTX clearance, altering therapeutic response. One decreased function variant, rs4149056 (c.521T>C, Val174Ala), slows MTX clearance and in vitro uptake of MTX. This phenotype was recapitulated in a mouse model using a knockout (KO) of the murine orthologue, Slco1b2. Our objective was to investigate the impact of this phenotype on the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic outcomes of low‐dose MTX in a murine model of collagen‐induced arthritis (CIA). We evaluated response to MTX in mice with CIA using wildtype (WT), heterozygous, and KO Slco1b2 mice on a DBA1/J background. Arthritis was macroscopically evaluated daily to quantify disease progression. Mice received 2 mg/kg or a pharmacogenetically guided MTX dose subcutaneously 3 times a week for 2 weeks. MTX concentrations were collected at the end of the study and exposure (day*µM) was estimated using a two‐compartment model. Mice displayed a seven‐fold range in MTX exposure and revealed a significant exposure‐response relationship (p = 0.0027). KO mice receiving the 2 mg/kg dosing regimen had 2.3‐fold greater exposure to MTX (p < 0.0001) and a 66% reduction in overall disease progression (p = 0.011) compared to WT mice. However, exposure and response were equivalent when pharmacogenetically guided dosing was used. These studies demonstrate that an exposure‐response relationship exists for MTX and that Slco1b2 genotype affects MTX exposure and therapeutic response. Such evidence supports the use of SLCO1B1‐pharmacogenetic dosing of low‐dose MTX for patients with arthritis.

DANILKO K, A. MALIEVSKY V, O. KARIMOV D, B. BAKIROV A, V. VIKTOROVA T. The relationship of the immune response mediator genes’ polymorphic variants with the methotrexate efficacy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Background/aim

The aim of the study was to analyze the relationship of the immune response mediator genes’ polymorphic loci (TNFA rs1800629, LTA rs909253, IL1B rs16944, IL2-IL21 rs6822844, IL2RA rs2104286, IL6 rs1800795, IL10 rs1800872, MIF rs755622, CTLA4 rs3087243, NFKB1 rs28362491, PTPN22 rs2476601, PADI4 rs2240336) variants with the methotrexate efficacy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Materials and methods

The study included 274 JIA patients from the Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia. Achieving the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30 (ACR Pedi 30) response was regarded as the presence of the response to methotrexate (otherwise, as the absence), while achieving clinical remission on medication (Wallace et al., 2011) - as the sufficient response (otherwise, as the insufficient). Genotyping was conducted by the real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Associations with an altered risk of the nonresponse to methotrexate in JIA were observed for the alleles/genotypes of the lociIL10 rs1800872 (in girls) and NFKB1 rs28362491 (in girls); with an altered risk of the insufficient response to methotrexate in JIA – for the alleles/genotypes of the loci IL1B rs16944 (in boys), CTLA4 rs3087243 (in boys), NFKB1 rs28362491 (in girls) and the haplotype TNFA rs1800629*A - LTA rs909253*G (in girls).

Conclusion

As a result of the study, the relationship of the alleles/genotypes of the IL1B rs16944, IL10 rs1800872, CTLA4 rs3087243, NFKB1 rs28362491 polymorphic lociand the TNFA rs1800629*A - LTA rs909253*G haplotype with the methotrexate efficacy in JIA was established (taking into account the differences by sex).

Methotrexate an Old Drug with New Tricks

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first line drug for the treatment of a number of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. It is currently used as an anchor disease, modifying anti-rheumatic drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the development of numerous new targeted therapies, MTX remains the backbone of RA therapy due to its potent efficacy and tolerability. There has been also a growing interest in the use of MTX in the treatment of chronic viral mediated arthritis. Many viruses-including old world alphaviruses, Parvovirus B19, hepatitis B/C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus-have been associated with arthritogenic diseases and reminiscent of RA. MTX may provide benefits although with the potential risk of attenuating patients' immune surveillance capacities. In this review, we describe the emerging mechanisms of action of MTX as an anti-inflammatory drug and complementing its well-established immunomodulatory activity. The mechanisms involve adenosine signaling modulation, alteration of cytokine networks, generation of reactive oxygen species and HMGB1 alarmin suppression. We also provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of MTX toxic effects. Lastly, we discussed the efficacy, as well as the safety, of MTX used in the management of viral-related rheumatic syndromes.

Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting

BACKGROUND

Conventional pharmacological therapies for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) consist of non-biological, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, among which methotrexate (MTX) is the most commonly prescribed. However, there is a lack of consensus-based clinical and therapeutic recommendations for the use of MTX in the management of patients with JIA. Therefore, the Methotrexate Advice and RecommendAtions on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (MARAJIA) Expert Meeting was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of MTX in the treatment of JIA.

METHODS

The preliminary executive committee identified a total of 9 key clinical issues according to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) approach, and performed an evidence-based, systematic, literature review. During the subsequent Expert Meeting, the relevant evidence was assessed and graded, and 10 recommendations were made.

RESULTS

Recommendations relating to the efficacy, optimal dosing and route of administration and duration of treatment with MTX in JIA, and to the issue of folic acid supplementation to prevent MTX side effects, use of MTX in the treatment of chronic JIA-associated uveitis, combination treatment with biologic agents, and the use of vaccinations in patients with JIA were developed. The selected topics were considered to represent clinically important issues facing clinicians caring for patients with JIA. Evidence was insufficient to formulate recommendations for the use of biomarkers predictive of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus recommendations provide balanced and evidence-based recommendations designed to have broad value for physicians and healthcare clinicians involved in the clinical management of patients with JIA.

In the Pursuit of Methotrexate Treatment Response Biomarker in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Are We Getting Closer to Personalised Medicine?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in paediatric rheumatology and the mainstay in the therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Despite its common use, about 30% of children fail to respond to this medicine that results in potentially irreversible joint damage.

RECENT FINDINGS

No clinical biomarker that would predict the outcome of MTX therapy exists. Results of several studies focused on gene polymorphisms and outcome of this DMARD therapy have been published, but no reliable genetic marker useful to tailor the therapy has been discovered so far. The results of the first genome-wide association study in this field have recently revealed new genetic candidates from outside the metabolic pathway of MTX that may be associated with the efficacy of treatment. However promising, those outcomes need validation in independent prospective cohorts before we can claim that clinically useful biomarker predicting MTX treatment response is discovered.

Tumor necrosis factor-α -308 A/G gene polymorphism in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: relation to disease activity, damage, and functional status

The study aims to evaluate the clinical significance of serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and -308 A/G promoter polymorphism in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and find any association to the subsets, clinical and laboratory features, disease activity, and damage as well as functional disability. Forty-eight JIA children and 30 controls were included in the present study. Juvenile arthritis disease activity score in 27 joints (JADAS-27) was calculated, juvenile arthritis damage index (JADI) was assessed, and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) measured the functional status. Serum TNF-α was assayed by ELISA and gene (-308) promoter polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction. The 48 JIA children (mean age 11.5 ± 2.8 years) were 13 systemic, 17 oligoarticular, and 18 polyarticular onset. The serum TNF-α was significantly higher in patients (90.4 ± 6.3 ng/ml) compared to control (3.5 ± 2.6 ng/ml) (p < 0.0001) with a tendency to be higher in the polyarticular subtype. All controls had TNF-α -308 GG alleles. The frequency of GG genotype tended to be higher in systemic onset compared to oligoarticular and polyarticular subtypes. The serum TNF-α significantly correlated with JADAS-27 (r = 0.32, p = 0.03) and CHAQ (r = 0.37, p = 0.01) and negatively with the presence of GG alleles (r = -0.48, p = 0.001). The GG alleles were significantly negatively associated with C-reactive protein (r = -0.32, p = 0.03) with a tendency to negatively correlate with JADAS-27, CHAQ, and JADI-extrarticular (r = -0.28, p = 0.06; r = -0.25, p = 0.09 and r = -0.25, p = 0.09, respectively). There is evidence of a possible influence of the -308 SNP promoter position on the production of TNF-α, the severity of JIA which may consequently influence the response to anti-TNF-α treatment.

Methotrexate efficacy, but not its intolerance, is associated with the dose and route of administration

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of published evidence on the importance of methotrexate (MTX) dose and route of administration on both its efficacy and adverse events in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). We aimed to document our clinical practice based on the treat-to-target approach in order to support the concept that better therapeutic effect achieved with an optimal dose of parenteral MTX is associated with clinically acceptable adverse effects comparable to those reported for oral treatment.

METHODS

Study inclusion criteria were indication of new MTX therapy for active arthritis in confirmed JIA patients younger than 18 years. Eligible patients were evaluated prospectively every 3 months for 1 year using standardized instruments for treatment response (American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACRPedi) response, Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) 71, Clinically Inactive Disease (CID)) and adverse events (laboratory monitoring, Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS)). MTX responders had to achieve at least ACRPedi 70 response. MTX intolerance was defined by MISS ≥ 6.

RESULTS

In 45/55 patients (81.8 %) MTX was started as subcutaneous injection. The initial median weekly dose was 14.4 mg/m(2) in parenteral and 11.7 mg/m(2) in oral administration. MTX therapy was effective in the level of ACRpedi70 and CID in 50.9 % and 30.9 % of patients at month 6 and in 70.9 % and 56.4 % after 12 months of the treatment, respectively. MTX intolerance at 6 and 12 months was noted in 25.5 % and 30.6 %, respectively. Management of intolerance included change in the dose and/or route of administration, education and councelling. Adverse events led to MTX withdrawal in 5 patients (9 %) due to toxicity (n = 3) and intolerance (n = 2). We did not find any significant predictive factors for either MTX therapeutic response or intolerance.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous MTX weekly dose around 15 mg/m(2) is associated not only with a high response rate within the first 12 months of treatment, but also with a relatively low rate of significant adverse effects that would lead to the treatment termination. It allows early recognition of MTX non-responders and addition of biologic therapy. Sustainability of therapeutic effect and longer-term evolution of adverse events will be addressed by an ongoing extension of the study.