1
|
Pilla SJ, Maruthur NM. Crossing the deintensification chasm for older adults with diabetes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1952-1954. [PMID: 38738883 PMCID: PMC11226358 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
This editorial comments on the article by Haider et al.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott J. Pilla
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nisa M. Maruthur
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stuijt PJC, Heringa M, van Dijk L, Faber A, Burgers JS, Feenstra TL, Taxis K, Denig P. Effects of a multicomponent communication training to involve older people in decisions to DEPRESCRIBE cardiometabolic medication in primary care (CO-DEPRESCRIBE): protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded process and economic evaluation. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:210. [PMID: 38862899 PMCID: PMC11165805 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02465-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing of medication for cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes has been incorporated in clinical guidelines but proves to be difficult to implement in primary care. Training of healthcare providers is needed to enhance deprescribing in eligible patients. This study will examine the effects of a blended training program aimed at initiating and conducting constructive deprescribing consultations with patients. METHODS A cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in which local pharmacy-general practice teams in the Netherlands will be randomized to conducting clinical medication reviews with patients as usual (control) or after receiving the CO-DEPRESCRIBE training program (intervention). People of 75 years and older using specific cardiometabolic medication (diabetes drugs, antihypertensives, statins) and eligible for a medication review will be included. The CO-DEPRESCRIBE intervention is based on previous work and applies models for patient-centered communication and shared decision making. It consists of 5 training modules with supportive tools. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients with at least 1 cardiometabolic medication deintensified. Secondary outcomes include patient involvement in decision making, healthcare provider communication skills, health/medication-related outcomes, attitudes towards deprescribing, medication regimen complexity and health-related quality of life. Additional safety and cost parameters will be collected. It is estimated that 167 patients per study arm are needed in the final intention-to-treat analysis using a mixed effects model. Taking loss to follow-up into account, 40 teams are asked to recruit 10 patients each. A baseline and 6-months follow-up assessment, a process evaluation, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION The hypothesis is that the training program will lead to more proactive and patient-centered deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication. By a comprehensive evaluation, an increase in knowledge needed for sustainable implementation of deprescribing in primary care is expected. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT05507177).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J C Stuijt
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO-Box 30001, HPC AP50, UMCG, Groningen, 9700RB, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, - Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianne Faber
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jako S Burgers
- Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Talitha L Feenstra
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, - Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Dutch National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Taxis
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, - Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO-Box 30001, HPC AP50, UMCG, Groningen, 9700RB, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Denig P, Stuijt PJC. Barriers and Enablers for Deprescribing Diabetes Medication. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105075. [PMID: 38857686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter J C Stuijt
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schleiden LJ, Klima G, Rodriguez KL, Ersek M, Robinson JE, Hickson RP, Smith D, Cashy J, Sileanu FE, Thorpe CT. Clinician and Family Caregiver Perspectives on Deprescribing Chronic Disease Medications in Older Nursing Home Residents Near the End of Life. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:367-377. [PMID: 38575748 PMCID: PMC11021174 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01110-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nursing home (NH) residents with limited life expectancy (LLE) who are intensely treated for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes may benefit from deprescribing. OBJECTIVE This study sought to describe NH clinician and family caregiver perspectives on key influences on deprescribing decisions for chronic disease medications in NH residents near the end of life. METHODS We recruited family caregivers of veterans who recently died in a Veterans Affairs (VA) NH, known as community living centers (CLCs), and CLC healthcare clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, registered nurses). Respondents completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with deprescribing statin, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic medications for residents near end of life. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes regarding influences on deprescribing decisions. RESULTS Thirteen family caregivers and 13 clinicians completed interviews. Key themes included (1) clinicians and caregivers both prefer to minimize drug burden; (2) clinical factors strongly influence deprescribing of chronic disease medications, with differences in how clinicians and caregivers weigh specific factors; (3) caregivers trust and rely on clinicians to make deprescribing decisions; (4) clinicians perceive caregiver involvement and buy-in as essential to deprescribing decisions, which requires time and effort to obtain; and (5) clinicians perceive conflicting care from other clinicians as a barrier to deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest a need for efforts to encourage communication with and education for family caregivers of residents with LLE about deprescribing, and to foster better collaboration among clinicians in CLC and non-CLC settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren J Schleiden
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
| | - Gloria Klima
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Keri L Rodriguez
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacob E Robinson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ryan P Hickson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Cashy
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Florentina E Sileanu
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Carolyn T Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brunner L, Mooser B, Spinewine A, Rodondi N, Aubert CE. Older Adult Perspectives on Statin Continuation and Discontinuation in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Mixed-Methods Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:15-27. [PMID: 38196947 PMCID: PMC10773265 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s432448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Evidence for statin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention in older adults is limited. When evidence on risk-benefit profile of a medication is uncertain, using it or not becomes a preference-sensitive decision. We aimed to assess and explore patient perspectives on continuation and discontinuation of statins used for primary cardiovascular prevention in older adults. Patients and Methods We used a convergent mixed-methods design, conducting in parallel a survey among 47 patients and three focus groups (FGs) with 14 patients total. We recruited patients aged ≥65 years and taking a statin for primary cardiovascular prevention. The survey and FGs aimed to assess and explore patient experiences of statin use, and views on statin continuation and discontinuation, including patient decision-making. Quantitative and qualitative data were first analyzed separately - descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data - and then integrated to create metainferences, using joint displays. Results Forty-one percent of patients (N=19) were reluctant to discontinue the statin, whereas 22% (N=10) were willing to try discontinuing it. A reason to continue the statin was its perceived necessity, while self-estimated low cardiovascular risk and wish to reduce medication burden were given as reasons to discontinue it. Lack of expertise assumed by the patients to decide about statin continuation or discontinuation, uncertainty about statin indication, and fear of having a cardiovascular event after discontinuation made many patients uncertain about deciding to continue or discontinue the statin. In this context, 70% (N=33) would rather have their physician choose for them, and 94% (N=44) would continue taking the statin for as long as their physician told them to do so. Conclusion This study highlights factors that influence patient willingness to continue or discontinue statins, patient uncertainty about statin continuation or discontinuation, and the important role physicians play in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureline Brunner
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Blandine Mooser
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carole Elodie Aubert
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weir KR, Scherer AM, Vordenberg SE, Streit S, Jansen J, Jungo KT. The Patient Typology about deprescribing and medication-related decisions: A quantitative exploration. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:39-50. [PMID: 37300477 PMCID: PMC11187678 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to test the adequacy of a quantitative measure of our qualitatively developed Patient Typology-categories of older adults' attitudes towards medicines and medicine decision-making-and identify characteristics associated with each Typology. We conducted secondary data analyses of a subset of survey item measures of adults (≥65 years) who were members of online survey panels in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands (n = 4688). Multinomial logistic regression analyses assessed associations between demographic, psychosocial and medication-related measures. Mean age was 71.5 (5), and 47.5% of participants were female. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of identifying with Typology 1 'Attached to medicines' over Typology 2 'Open to deprescribing' were higher positive attitude towards polypharmacy (RRR = 1.12, p = <0.001) and higher need for certainty (RRR = 1.11, p = 0.039). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of identifying with Typology 3 'Defers (medication decision-making) to others' over Typology 2 were older age (RRR = 1.47 per 10-year age increase, p = <0.001) and a decreased likelihood of prior deprescribing experience (RRR = 0.73, p = 0.033). This study provides validation of the Typology with large samples from four countries, with the quantitatively-measured typologies generally aligning with the qualitatively derived categories. Our Patient Typology measure provides a succinct way researchers can assess attitudes towards deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aaron M. Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Sarah E. Vordenberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baas G, Crutzen S, Smits S, Denig P, Taxis K, Heringa M. Process evaluation of a pharmacist-led intervention aimed at deprescribing and appropriate use of cardiometabolic medication among adult people with type 2 diabetes. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:83-96. [PMID: 37563775 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A quasi-experimental study investigated a pharmacist-led intervention aimed at deprescribing and medication management among adult patients with type 2 diabetes at risk of hypoglycaemia. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the process of implementing the intervention consisting of a tailored clinical medication review (CMR) supported by a training and a toolbox. METHODS Mixed-methods study based on the Grant framework, including the domains "recruitment," "delivery of intervention" and "response" of pharmacists and patients. Data collected were administrative logs, semi-structured observations of patient consultations (n = 8), interviews with pharmacists (n = 16) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) questionnaires (n = 66). RESULTS Tailored CMRs were conducted largely as intended for 90 patients from 14 pharmacies. Although patient selection based on a medication-derived hypoglycaemia risk score was considered useful, pharmacists experienced barriers to proposing deprescribing in patients with recent medication changes, without current hypoglycaemic events, or treated by medical specialists. The training and toolbox were evaluated positively by the pharmacists. Overall, patients were satisfied with the CMR. CONCLUSION Pharmacists and patients valued the CMR focusing on deprescribing and medication management. To optimize implementation and effectiveness of the intervention, improvements can be made to the patient selection, pharmacist training and the collaboration between healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gert Baas
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Crutzen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Smits
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology, and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Taxis
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology, and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bolt J, Abdoulrezzak R, Inglis C. Barriers and enablers to deprescribing of older adults and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Eur Geriatr Med 2023; 14:1211-1222. [PMID: 37874489 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00879-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary objective of this study was to identify the barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the viewpoint of community-dwelling older adults and their caregivers. METHODS This meta-synthesis included a systematic review of the literature and an inductive thematic synthesis. Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies that qualitatively explored the perspectives of older adults or their caregivers on deprescribing. Studies had to use qualitative methodologies and include community-dwelling adults (or their caregivers) aged 60 years or older who were taking one or more chronic medications. The quality of studies was assessed using the CASP tool. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the meta-synthesis. All studies included older adults, and 3 included caregivers or companions. Four barriers were identified: favorable perceptions of medications, fear of medication discontinuation, the complexity of the healthcare system and discouragement from healthcare professionals; and seven enablers were identified: medication safety concerns, patient autonomy and confidence, education, follow-up, deprescribing strategies, relationships with physicians, and patient-perceived benefits of deprescribing. CONCLUSION Multiple barriers and enablers to deprescribing exist within the older adult population. Health system complexity and direct discouragement from healthcare providers were barriers uniquely identified in the older adult population. This population would benefit from interventions to increase their medication literacy, confidence, and autonomy in the deprescribing journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Bolt
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Interior Health Authority, Pharmacy Services, 505 Doyle Ave, Kelowna, BC, V1Y 6V8, Canada.
| | - Reema Abdoulrezzak
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Colleen Inglis
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Island Health Authority, Pharmacy Services, Courtenay, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelley CJ, Niznik JD, Ferreri SP, Schlusser C, Armistead LT, Hughes TD, Henage CB, Busby-Whitehead J, Roberts E. Patient Perceptions of Opioids and Benzodiazepines and Attitudes Toward Deprescribing. Drugs Aging 2023; 40:1113-1122. [PMID: 37792262 PMCID: PMC10768261 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01071-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs) pose a public health problem. Older adults are especially susceptible to adverse events from opioids and BZDs owing to an increased usage of opioids and BZDs, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy. Deprescribing is a possible, yet challenging, solution to reducing opioid and BZD use. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore older adult patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived facilitators and barriers to deprescribing opioids and BZDs, and attitudes toward alternative treatments for opioids and BZDs. METHODS We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with patients aged 65+ years with long-term opioid and/or BZD prescriptions. The interview guide was developed by an interprofessional team and focused on patients' knowledge of opioids and BZDs, perceived ability to reduce opioid or BZD use, and attitudes towards alternative treatments. RESULTS Three patients had taken opioids, either currently or in the past, three had taken BZDs, and five had taken both opioids and BZDs. Generally, knowledge of opioids and BZDs was variable among patients; yet facilitators and barriers to deprescribing both opioids and BZDs were consistent. Facilitators of deprescribing included patient-provider trust and slow tapering of medications, while barriers included concerns about re-emergence of symptoms and a lack of motivation, particularly if medications and symptoms were stable. Patients were generally unenthusiastic about pursuing alternative pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic alternatives to opioids and BZDs for symptom management. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that patients are open to deprescribing opioids and BZDs under certain circumstances, but overall remain hesitant with a lack of enthusiasm for alternative treatments. Future studies should focus on supportive approaches to alleviate older adults' deprescribing concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey J Kelley
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5003 Old Clinic, CB# 7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Joshua D Niznik
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5003 Old Clinic, CB# 7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Stefanie P Ferreri
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Courtney Schlusser
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lori T Armistead
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tamera D Hughes
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cristine B Henage
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5003 Old Clinic, CB# 7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Jan Busby-Whitehead
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5003 Old Clinic, CB# 7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Ellen Roberts
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 5003 Old Clinic, CB# 7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patterson T, Beckenkamp PR, Turner J, Gnjidic D, Mintzes B, Bennett C, Bywaters L, Clavisi O, Baysari M, Ferreira M, Ferreira P. Barriers and facilitators to reducing paracetamol use in low back pain: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 67:102856. [PMID: 37696066 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paracetamol is widely used for low back pain (LBP), but research questions its efficacy and safety. Patient education booklets have been explored for promoting deprescribing, but barriers and facilitators specific to LBP deprescribing remain unexamined. OBJECTIVE To identify contextual factors facilitating and obstructing successful deprescribing of paracetamol for LBP after receiving an educational booklet. STUDY DESIGN This study is part of an uncontrolled cohort feasibility study (CEASE NOW) in the community, recruiting from Musculoskeletal Australia and painaustralia. PATIENT SAMPLE Twenty-four participants with acute, sub-acute, or chronic LBP, self-reporting paracetamol consumption, were included. METHODS Thematic content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data on barriers and facilitators. Data were categorized by deprescribing outcomes: i) successful deprescribing, ii) attempted but failed, or iii) no attempt. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted within one week after each participant completed the one-month follow-up. RESULTS Successful deprescribing was facilitated by supportive healthcare professionals, willingness, high self-efficacy, fear of future illness, and diverse strategies for deprescribing plans. Barriers included unsupportive healthcare professionals and fear of flare-ups. Participants not attempting deprescribing believed it unnecessary, perceived it as effortful, unquestioningly trusted healthcare professionals, and lacked risk awareness. CONCLUSIONS Support from healthcare professionals, patient willingness, perceived necessity, risk awareness, effort, and varied strategies influence deprescribing outcomes for LBP patients using paracetamol. Addressing these factors is crucial when designing interventions to promote safe and effective deprescribing in LBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Patterson
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Susan Wakil Health Building D18, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Paula R Beckenkamp
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Susan Wakil Health Building D18, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Justin Turner
- University of Montreal, Faculty of Pharmacy, Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- The University of Sydney, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Barbara Mintzes
- The University of Sydney, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Carol Bennett
- Painaustralia, Unit 6/42 Geils Ct, Deakin ACT, 2600, Australia
| | - Lisa Bywaters
- Consumer Services for Musculoskeletal Australia, 263-265 Kooyong Rd, Elsternwick, VIC, 3185, Australia
| | - Ornella Clavisi
- Consumer Services for Musculoskeletal Australia, 263-265 Kooyong Rd, Elsternwick, VIC, 3185, Australia
| | - Melissa Baysari
- The University of Sydney, Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Manuela Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and the Kolling Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, St Leonards, NSW 2064, Australia
| | - Paulo Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Susan Wakil Health Building D18, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stuijt PJC, Taxis K, Denig P. Letter to the Editor: a Qualitative Study of Perspectives of Older Adults on Deintensifying Diabetes Medications. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1316. [PMID: 36650324 PMCID: PMC10110832 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-08022-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J C Stuijt
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Katja Taxis
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise the current knowledge on barriers and facilitators to deprescribing cardiovascular medications (CVMs) at the levels of patients, informal caregivers and healthcare providers (HCPs). DESIGN/SETTING We conducted a systematic review of studies exploring/assessing patient, informal caregiver and/or HCP barriers and/or facilitators to deprescribing CVMs. DATA SOURCES Ovid/MEDLINE and Embase from January 2003 to November 2021. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We performed a deductive thematic analysis based on the framework of specific barriers and facilitators to deprescribing CVMs created by Goyal et al. We added a quantification of the occurrence of categories and themes in the selected articles to identify the resounding themes that indicate the greater impetus to address in future research. RESULTS Most frequent deprescribing barriers for patients, informal caregivers and HCPs included uncertainty due to lack of evidence regarding CVM deprescribing (in n=10 studies), fear of negative consequences following deprescribing (n=13) and social influences (n=14). A frequently reported facilitator to deprescribing, especially for patients and informal caregivers, was the occurrence of adverse drug events (n=7). Another frequently reported facilitator for patients were dislike of CVMs (n=9). Necessity and benefit of CVMs were seen as barriers or facilitators similarly by patients and HCPs. CONCLUSION The differences in patient, informal caregiver and HCP regarding barriers and facilitators to deprescribing CVMs stress the need for ground discussions about beliefs and preferences of each stakeholder implicated in deprescribing decisions. Furthermore, HCP uncertainty regarding CVM deprescribing highlights the need to provide HCPs with tools that enable sharing the risks and benefits of deprescribing with patients and ensure a safe deprescribing process. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020221973.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureline Brunner
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carole Elodie Aubert
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hassan D, Versmissen J, Hek K, van Dijk L, van den Bemt PMLA. Feasibility of a protocol for deprescribing antihypertensive medication in older patients in Dutch general practices. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:280. [PMID: 36352363 PMCID: PMC9644553 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01894-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients using antihypertensive medication may experience Adverse Drug Events (ADEs), and thus benefit from deprescribing. The lack of a practical protocol may hamper deprescribing. Therefore, we aimed to develop a deprescribing protocol, based on a review of literature, combined with a feasibility test in a small number of patients. METHODS A deprescribing protocol for general practitioners was drafted and tested in older patients using multiple antihypertensive medication in a single arm intervention. Patients were included if they were 75 years or older, were using two or more antihypertensives, had at least one ADE linked to antihypertensive medication and deprescribing was considered to be safe by their general practitioner. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients for whom one or more antihypertensive drugs were stopped or reduced in dose after 12 months of follow up while maintaining safe blood pressures. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients reporting no ADEs after 12 months and the number of deprescribed antihypertensives. Patient's opinions on deprescribing and enablers and barriers for study participation were also collected. RESULTS Nine general practitioners included 14 patients to deprescribe antihypertensive medication using the deprescribing protocol. After 12 months antihypertensive drug use was lowered in 11 patients (79%). These patients had a mean systolic blood pressure increase of 16 mmHg and a mean diastolic blood pressure increase of 8 mmHg. Nine patients (64%) reported experiencing no ADEs anymore after twelve months. The mean number of deprescribed antihypertensives was 1.1 in all patients and 1.4 (range: 0.5 to 3.5) in patients who successfully lowered their medication. At baseline, being able to use less medication was the most frequently mentioned enabler to participate in this study. The most frequently mentioned positive experience at the end of the study was using less medication, which was in line with the most mentioned enabler to participate in this study. CONCLUSION A protocol for deprescribing antihypertensives in older patients was considered feasible, as it resulted in a substantial degree of safe deprescribing in this pilot study. Larger studies are needed to demonstrate the effect and safety of deprescribing antihypertensives in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimokrat Hassan
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorie Versmissen
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Hek
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia M L A van den Bemt
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seewoodharry M, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Gillies C, Seidu S. Attitudes of older adults and their carers towards de-prescribing: A systematic review. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14801. [PMID: 35118700 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this systematic review is to explore the attitudes of older adults (≥65 years old) and their carers towards de-prescribing. METHODS We identified relevant studies from three databases; MEDLINE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers (MS, SS) independently extracted data from each selected study using a standardised self-developed data extraction form. Main findings of the studies were summarised descriptively. RESULTS A total of 35 studies were included in the review. Of them, 19 were questionnaire studies, 11 semi-structured interviews, 4 focus groups and 1 study used the nominal group technique approach. Most older adults and their carers were willing to have medication de-prescribed if told to do so by a healthcare professional (HCP). Other factors that increased willingness to de-prescribing included; trust in the HCP, side effects and inconvenience from medications as well as the prospect of follow-up and monitoring during de-prescribing. In contrast, perceived effectiveness, unawareness of lack of benefit, negative expectations of ageing and fear were factors preventing de-prescribing. CONCLUSION De-prescribing is an important concept in older people given the harm associated with polypharmacy in this age group. Overall, older adults and their carers are willing to have medication de-prescribed if facilitated by their HCP. However, there remain a few barriers to de-prescribing which may need to be addressed in certain patients, through discussions between older adults/their carers and a HCP, to allow de-prescribing to be more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansha Seewoodharry
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Gillies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Seidu
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Niznik JD, Collins BJ, Armistead LT, Larson CK, Kelley CJ, Hughes TD, Sanders KA, Carlson R, Ferreri SP. Pharmacist interventions to deprescribe opioids and benzodiazepines in older adults: A rapid review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022; 18:2913-2921. [PMID: 34281786 PMCID: PMC8836277 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many older adults are prescribed opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs), despite increased susceptibility to adverse events. Challenges of deprescribing include fragmented care and lack of knowledge or time. Pharmacists are well-positioned to overcome these challenges and facilitate deprescribing of these medications. OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate interventions utilizing pharmacists to deprescribe opioids and BZDs in older adults. METHODS We conducted a rapid review following a comprehensive literature search to identify interventions with pharmacist involvement for deprescribing opioids and BZDs in older adults. Studies were included based on: (1) inclusion of patients ≥ 65 years old receiving BZDs and/or opioids, (2) evaluation of feasibility or outcomes following deprescribing (3) pharmacists as part of the intervention. We included randomized, observational, cohort, and pilot studies. Studies that did not report specific results for BZD or opioids were excluded. RESULTS We screened 687 abstracts and included 17 studies. Most (n = 13) focused on BZD deprescribing. Few studies focused on opioids (n = 2) or co-prescribing of opioids and BZDs (n = 2). The most common intervention was educational brochures (n = 8), majority being the EMPOWER brochure for deprescribing BZDs. Other interventions included chart review with electronic notes (n = 4), pharmacist-led programs/services (n = 2), and multifactorial interventions (n = 3). Many studies were underpowered or lacked suitable control groups. Generally speaking, interventions utilizing educational materials and those in which pharmacists engaged with patients and providers were more effective. Interventions relying on electronic communication by pharmacists were less successful, due to low acceptance or acknowledgement. CONCLUSIONS We identified a number of feasible interventions to reduce BZD use, but fewer interventions to reduce opioid use in older adults. An optimal approach for deprescribing likely requires pharmacists to engage directly with patients and providers. Larger well-designed studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions beyond feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Niznik
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Brendan J Collins
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lori T Armistead
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Claire K Larson
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Casey J Kelley
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tamera D Hughes
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly A Sanders
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca Carlson
- University of North Carolina, Health Sciences Library, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stefanie P Ferreri
- University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barriers and Enablers of Healthcare Providers to Deprescribe Cardiometabolic Medication in Older Patients: A Focus Group Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:209-221. [PMID: 35187614 PMCID: PMC8934783 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00918-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Benefits and risks of preventive medication change over time for ageing patients and deprescribing of medication may be needed. Deprescribing of cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs can be challenging and is not widely implemented in daily practice. Objective The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers of deprescribing cardiometabolic medication as seen by healthcare providers (HCPs) of different disciplines, and to explore their views on their specific roles in the process of deprescribing. Methods Three focus groups with five general practitioners, eight pharmacists, three nurse practitioners, two geriatricians, and two elder care physicians were conducted in three cities in The Netherlands. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Directed content analysis was performed on the basis of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Two researchers independently coded the data. Results Most HCPs agreed that deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication is relevant but that barriers include lack of evidence and expertise, negative beliefs and fears, poor communication and collaboration between HCPs, and lack of resources. Having a guideline was considered an enabler for the process of deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication. Some HCPs feared the consequences of discontinuing cardiovascular or antidiabetic medication, while others were not motivated to deprescribe when the patients experienced no problems with their medication. HCPs of all disciplines stated that adequate patient communication and involving the patients and relatives in the decision making enables deprescribing. Barriers to deprescribing included the use of medication initiated by specialists, the poor exchange of information, and the amount of time it takes to deprescribe cardiometabolic medication. The HCPs were uncertain about each other’s roles and responsibilities. A multidisciplinary approach including the pharmacist and nurse practitioner was seen as the best way to support the process of deprescribing and address barriers related to resources. Conclusion HCPs recognized the importance of deprescribing cardiometabolic medication as a medical decision that can only be made in close cooperation with the patient. To successfully accomplish the process of deprescribing they strongly recommended a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
|
17
|
Oktora MP, Edwina AE, Denig P. Differences in Older Patients' Attitudes Toward Deprescribing at Contextual and Individual Level. Front Public Health 2022; 10:795043. [PMID: 35223732 PMCID: PMC8874144 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.795043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deprescribing requires patients' involvement and taking patients' attitudes toward deprescribing into account. To understand the observed variation in these attitudes, the influence of contextual-level factors, such as country or healthcare setting, should be taken into account. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies using the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire among older adults. We searched articles in Medline and Embase up to 30 June 2021. PRISMA guideline was used for the search process and reporting. We summarized the outcomes from the rPATD and compared attitudes at study population level between high or low-middle-income countries, global regions, and healthcare settings using ANOVA testing. Correlations of the rPATD outcomes with the mean age of the study populations were tested. Associations with the rPATD outcomes at individual patient level extracted from the included studies were summarized. Results Sixteen articles were included. Percentages of patients willing to stop medication were significantly lower in low-middle-income countries (<70% in Nepal and Malaysia) compared to high-income countries (>85% in USA, Australia, European countries). No significant differences were observed when results were compared by global region or by healthcare setting but a high willingness (>95%) was seen in the two studies conducted in an inpatient population. A higher mean age at study level was associated with a higher willingness to stop medication. At individual level, associations between patient characteristics, including demographics and education, and attitudes toward deprescribing showed inconsistent results. Conclusion Findings about attitudes toward deprescribing are influenced by contextual factors. Future research should pay more attention to the influence of the healthcare system and setting as well as the culture on patients' attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pury Oktora
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Monika Pury Oktora
| | - Angela Elma Edwina
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Medical Pharmaceutical Sciences Programme, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Unit of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pruskowski JA, Jeffery SM, Brandt N, Zarowitz BJ, Handler SM. How to implement deprescribing into clinical practice. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A. Pruskowski
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
| | - Sean M. Jeffery
- University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy Storrs Connecticut USA
| | - Nicole Brandt
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA
| | | | - Steven M. Handler
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Crutzen S, Abou J, Smits SE, Baas G, Hugtenburg JG, Heringa M, Denig P, Taxis K. Older people's attitudes towards deprescribing cardiometabolic medication. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:366. [PMID: 34134649 PMCID: PMC8207766 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02249-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overtreatment with cardiometabolic medication in older patients can lead to major adverse events. Timely deprescribing of these medications is therefore essential. Self-reported willingness to stop medication is usually high among older people, still overtreatment with cardiometabolic medication is common and deprescribing is rarely initiated. An important barrier for deprescribing reported by general practitioners is the patients' unwillingness to stop the medication. More insights are needed into the influence of patients' characteristics on their attitudes towards deprescribing and differences in these attitudes between cardiometabolic medication groups. METHODS A survey in older people using cardiometabolic medication using the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire was performed. Participants completed the general rPATD and an adapted version for four medication groups. Linear and ordinal logistic regression were used to assess the influence of age, sex, therapeutic area and number of medications used on the patients' general attitudes towards deprescribing. Univariate analysis was used to compare differences in deprescribing attitudes towards sulfonylureas, insulins, antihypertensive medication and statins. RESULTS Overall, 314 out of 1143 invited participants completed the survey (median age 76 years, 54% female). Most participants (80%) were satisfied with their medication and willing to stop medications if their doctor said it was possible (88%). Age, sex and therapeutic area had no influence on the general attitudes towards deprescribing. Taking more than ten medicines was significantly associated with a higher perceived medication burden. Antihypertensive medication and insulin were considered more appropriate than statins, and insulin was considered more appropriate than sulfonylureas not favouring deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS The majority of older people using cardiometabolic medication are willing to stop one of their medicines if their doctor said it was possible. Health care providers should take into account that patients perceive some of their medication as more appropriate than other medication when discussing deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Crutzen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Petra Denig Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, EB70, Postbus 30.001, Hanzeplein1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jamila Abou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Smits
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Gert Baas
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5B, 2331 JE, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Theda Mansholtstraat 5B, 2331 JE, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Katja Taxis
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Community pharmacists' perceptions on providing fall prevention services: a mixed-methods study. Int J Clin Pharm 2021; 43:1533-1545. [PMID: 34121152 PMCID: PMC8642357 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01277-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Pharmacists may contribute to fall prevention particularly by identifying and deprescribing fall risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) in patients with high fall risk. Objective To assess community pharmacists’ perceptions on providing fall prevention services, and to identify their barriers and facilitators in offering these fall prevention services including deprescribing of FRIDs. Setting A mixed-methods study was conducted with Dutch pharmacists. Method Quantitative (ranking statements on a Likert scale, survey) and qualitative data (semi-structured interviews) were collected. Out of 466 pharmacists who were invited to participate, 313 Dutch pharmacists ranked statements, about providing fall prevention, that were presented during a lecture, and 205 completed a survey. To explore pharmacists’ perceptions in-depth, 16 were interviewed. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The capability opportunity motivation-behaviour model was applied to interpret and analyse the findings of qualitative data. Main outcome measure Community pharmacists’ views on providing fall prevention. Results Pharmacists stated that they were motivated to provide fall prevention. They believed they were capable of providing fall prevention by FRID deprescribing. They perceived limited opportunities to contribute. Major barriers included insufficient multidisciplinary collaboration, patient unwillingness to deprescribe FRIDs, and lack of time. Facilitators included goal-setting behaviour, financial compensation, and skilled communication. Conclusion Despite the complex decision-making process in medication-related fall prevention, community pharmacists are motivated and feel capable of providing fall prevention. Opportunities for pharmacists to provide fall prevention services should be enhanced, for example by implementing multidisciplinary agreements.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abebe E, Campbell NL, Clark DO, Tu W, Hill JR, Harrington AB, O'Neal G, Trowbridge KS, Vallejo C, Yang Z, Bo N, Knight A, Alamer KA, Carter A, Valenzuela R, Adeoye P, Boustani MA, Holden RJ. Reducing anticholinergic medication exposure among older adults using consumer technology: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 17:986-992. [PMID: 33773639 PMCID: PMC8007932 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A growing body of scientific evidence points to the potentially harmful cognitive effects of anticholinergic medications among older adults. Most interventions designed to promote deprescribing of anticholinergics have directly targeted healthcare professionals and have had mixed results. Consumer-facing technologies may provide a unique benefit by empowering patients and can complement existing healthcare professional-centric efforts. METHODS We initiated a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-facing mobile application (Brain Safe app) compared to an attention control medication list app in reducing anticholinergic exposure among community-dwelling older adults. Study participants are adults aged 60 years and above, currently using at least one prescribed strong anticholinergic, and receiving primary care. The trial plans to enroll a total of 700 participants, randomly allocated in 1:1 proportion to the two study arms. Participants will have the Brain Safe app (intervention arm) or attention control medication list app (control arm) loaded onto a smartphone (study provided or personal device). All participants will be followed for 12 months and will have data collected at baseline, at 6 months, and 12 months by blinded outcome assessors. The primary outcome of the study is anticholinergic exposure measured as total standard daily dose (TSDD) computed from medication prescription electronic records. Secondary outcomes of the study are cognitive function and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION A consumer-facing intervention to promote deprescribing of potentially high-risk medications can be part of a multi-pronged approach to reduce inappropriate medication use among older adult patients. Delivering a deprescribing intervention via a mobile app is a novel approach and may hold great promise to accelerate deployment of medication safety initiatives across diverse patient populations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 10, 2019. Identifier number: NCT04121858.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ephrem Abebe
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Noll L Campbell
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Daniel O Clark
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Wanzhu Tu
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jordan R Hill
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Addison B Harrington
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gracen O'Neal
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kimberly S Trowbridge
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Christian Vallejo
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ziyi Yang
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Na Bo
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alexxus Knight
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Khalid A Alamer
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Allie Carter
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Robin Valenzuela
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Philip Adeoye
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Malaz A Boustani
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Sandra Eskenazi Center for Brain Care Innovation, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard J Holden
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|